Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter clinical isolates and emerging antibiogram trends for nosocomial infection management

Abstract:

Introduction:

The drug resistant Acinetobacter strains are important causes of nosocomial infections that are difficult to control and treat. This study aimed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Acinetobacter strains isolated from different clinical specimens obtained from patients belonging to different age groups.

METHODS:

In total, 716 non-duplicate Acinetobacter isolates were collected from the infected patients admitted to tertiary-care hospitals at Lahore, Pakistan, over a period of 28 months. The Acinetobacter isolates were identified using API 20E, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed and interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.

RESULTS:

The isolation rate of Acinetobacter was high from the respiratory specimens, followed by wound samples. Antibiotic susceptibility analyses of the isolates revealed that the resistance to cefotaxime and ceftazidime was the most common, in 710 (99.2%) specimens each, followed by the resistance to gentamicin in 670 (93.6%) isolates, and to imipenem in 651 (90.9%) isolates. However, almost all isolates were susceptible to tigecycline, colistin, and polymyxin B.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study showed the alarming trends of resistance of Acinetobacter strains isolated from clinical specimens to the various classes of antimicrobials. The improvement of microbiological techniques for earlier and more accurate identification of bacteria is necessary for the selection of appropriate treatments.

Keywords:
Acinetobacter; Antibiotic resistance; Prevalence; Nosocomial infections; Carbapenems

INTRODUCTION

Acinetobacter is a genus of Gram-negative coccobacilli, which are non-motile, oxidase-negative, and catalase-positive, and occur in pairs under magnification¹. Acinetobacter species are opportunistic pathogens predominantly found in immunocompromised patients. They are widespread in nature, and regarded as commensal microbes of human skin and respiratory tract, however, they may cause serious infections, such as endocarditis, urinary tract infections, pneumonia, wound infections, meningitis, and septicemia, especially in individuals with impaired host defenses². Infections caused by Acinetobacter species are acquired due to hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, respiratory failure, inadequate treatment, previous infection, or antibiotic therapy and catheterization³. Higher colonization rates of the throat, and respiratory and digestive tracts are well documented in several previous outbreaks^{4) (5}.

Acinetobacter species are becoming increasingly resistant to nearly all routinely prescribed antimicrobial agents, including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and broad-spectrum β-lactams. The majority of strains are resistant to cephalosporin class of antimicrobials, whereas the resistance to carbapenems is increasingly reported⁶. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed differences between Acinetobacter species, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most resistant strains^{7) (8}.

The aim of the study was to compare the isolation frequency of Acinetobacter species form different clinical specimens and the frequency of antibiotic resistance in different age groups. Antimicrobial susceptibility assays were performed using different antibiotics that are frequently recommended by the clinicians.

METHODS

Hospital and clinical isolates

This study was conducted at the Microbiology Section, Chughtai Lab, Lahore, Pakistan, between January 2012 and April 2014. Various clinical samples were collected, including urine, pus, blood, fluid (pleural, pericardial, synovial and peritoneal), wound swab, cerebro spinal fluid (CSF), sputum, central venous pressure (CVP) catheter tip, stool, throat swab, ear swab, tracheal secret, nasal swab, from the tip of Foley catheter, tissue (wound and soft tissues), bronchial washing sample, and samples from endotracheal tube (ETT), and PVC tip.

Isolation and identification of bacteria

The preliminary identification of bacteria was done by standard microbiological procedures⁹. The obtained Acinetobacter isolates were further sub-cultured on MacConkey agar and confirmed by API 20NE (Biomerieux, France), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Antimicrobial susceptibility analyses

Acinetobacter isolates were tested for the susceptibility to ampicillin/sulbactam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, doxycycline, tigecycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, piperacillin/tazobactam, colistin, and polymyxin B (300U each). These analyses were performed by standard disc diffusion technique and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines⁵. The bacterial suspension of each sample was made and compared with 0.5McFarland turbidity standard. The cartridges containing antimicrobial susceptibility discs (Oxoid, UK) were stored at between 4°C and -20°C, and used after the incubation at room temperature. Mueller-Hinton agar plates were inoculated and incubated at 35°C for 18h, and the zones of inhibition were measured. Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were used as reference strains, according to the CLSI protocol.

Broth dilution method was used to determine the susceptibilities of the isolated strains to tigecycline and colistin. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA, approved breakpoints for the agents against Enterobacteriaceae were used to determine tigecycline susceptibility in Acinetobacter isolates (resistance, ≥8mg/L; susceptibility, ≤2mg/L). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for colistin were used according to the CLSI guidelines (resistance, ≥4mg/L; susceptibility, ≤2mg/L)^{10) (11}.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft, USA). The descriptive analysis was performed by calculating frequencies of isolation of Acinetobacter and percentage resistance among isolates to various antimicrobial agents.

RESULTS

In total, 716 Acinetobacter isolates were obtained (Table 1), with the majority from the respiratory samples, followed by the isolates from surgical or burn wounds.

Table 1
Distribution of Acinetobacter isolates obtained from different clinical specimens.

• CSF: cerebro spinal fluid; CVP: central venous pressure; ETT: endotracheal tube.

Prevalence of Acinetobacter resistance according to the age group

The prevalence of Acinetobacter strain resistance was shown to be higher in individuals aged between 21 and 50 (Figure 1).The frequency of Acinetobacter strains isolated alone or in the combination with other bacterial strains isolated from the clinical specimens are different, with 72% of Acinetobacter strains isolated alone (519 isolates), as presented in Table 2.

Figure 1
Resistance patterns of Acinetobacter isolates to various classes of antimicrobial agents according to the different age groups.

Table 2
Percentage of Acinetobacter isolated alone, or in combination with other isolates from clinical specimens.

• MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile

Antibiotic resistance profile of Acinetobacter isolates was determined using 18 antibiotics, and this revealed that the isolated strains were most commonly resistant to cefotaxime and ceftazidime [for both of them, 710 (99.2%) isolates were shown to be resistant], followed by the strains resistant to gentamicin [670 (93.6%)], and imipenem [651(90.9%)] (Table 3). However, most of the tested isolates were susceptible to tigecycline, colistin, and polymyxin B.

Table 3
Resistance pattern of Acinetobacter isolates to various antimicrobial agents.

DISCUSSION

The aim of this study was to characterize Acinetobacter samples obtained from the infected patients and the antimicrobial susceptibility of these isolates to various antibiotics commonly used in clinical practice. In total, 716 Acinetobacter strains were isolated. The higher isolation rates of Acinetobacter from the respiratory samples are in agreement with the results reported previously in other countries¹².

The resistance rates of Acinetobacter isolates were 10-51% against amikacin, 0-81% against gentamicin, 0-81% against ceftazidime, 19-81% against ciprofloxacin, 36-75% against piperacillin/tazobactam, and 5-19% against imipenem, as reported in a surveillance study from the intensive care units (ICU) of five European countries¹³. A. baumannii strains collected from 11 European countries between 1997 and 2000 were reported to be susceptible to imipenem and meropenem, with resistance rates of 16% and 18%, respectively¹⁴. However the subsequent data from 12 countries revealed a significant increase in the resistance rates against imipenem (42.5%) and meropenem (43.4%)¹⁵.

The antibiotic resistance data collected around the world demonstrated that the resistance rates of Acinetobacter species to imipenem ranged from 0-40% between 2000 and 2004¹⁶. The prevalence of imipenem resistance in Acinetobacter species increased from zero in 1991 to 50% in 2001, as shown in a study conducted in a Spanish hospital¹⁷. The resistant rates to ampicillin/sulbactam, imipenem, and meropenem were 51.6%, 26.3%, and 29.6%, respectively, of Acinetobacter isolates from 30 European centers¹⁸.

Colistin or tigecycline remain the treatment options for the management of most of the cases of infections caused by multi-drug resistant A. baumannii strains. We showed that, among the strains we isolated, only 0.7% and 0.1% were resistant to tigecycline and colistin, respectively. This is in accordance with the previous studies^{16) (18}. However, the emergence of Acinetobacter resistance against tigecycline and colistin is reported with an increasing frequency ^{18) (19}. In a surveillance study in Europe, the resistance of A. baumannii against polymyxin B was shown to be 2.7%¹⁸. A surveillance study in Greece showed that 3% of Acinetobacter strains isolated from ICU patients were resistant to colistin²⁰. Furthermore, tigecycline and colistin resistance rates of A. baumannii strains isolated in Germany were 6% and 2.8%, respectively²¹. A study in Turkey reported considerably higher tigecycline resistance rates (25%) of Acinetobacter strains²².

Acinetobacter infections are sometimes accompanied by the infections caused by other microorganisms, and here, we showed that these species are mainly Candida, Escherichia coli, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Proteus, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas species (Table 2). These co-infections may increase patient mortality, highlighting the importance of choosing the appropriate antimicrobial therapy²³. The analyses of antibiotic resistance patterns according to the age groups showed that the number of the strains resistant to most of the antimicrobial agents increased with age, except the strains resistant to co-trimoxazole and piperacillin/tazobactam (Figure 1). Some differences in the antibiotic resistance patterns between the urinary tract pathogens isolated from different age groups were observed, however, the rate of resistance to different antibiotics was higher in pediatrics patients compared with that in the middle aged and elderly patients²⁴. Another study demonstrated the differences between the age groups in susceptibility patterns among E. coli urinary tract isolates for all tested antibiotics except co-trimoxazole²⁵. A microarray-based study showed that the antibiotic resistance gene diversity is age-related and that these genes accumulate in the members of human gut microflora starting from infancy, and their interactions become gradually more complex with age²⁶. To the best of our knowledge, the differences in the Acinetobacter susceptibility to different antimicrobial agents between different age groups have not been reported before.

Taken together, this study identified the differences in the antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in Pakistan. Acinetobacter strains have the capacity to acquire antimicrobial resistance rapidly, and therefore, the resistance to even newer antimicrobials is reported worldwide. This allows them to cause nosocomial outbreaks in hospitals. Therefore, decreasing the pace of the emergence of antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter species is crucial, through the restricted use of antimicrobials, and the enforcement and surveillance of antibiotic Stewardship Programs in health care settings.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. Omar Chughtai for the support and permission to conduct this study in Microbiology Section of his laboratory.

• ¹
  Allen S, Procop G, Schreckenberger P. Guidelines for the collection, transport, processing, analysis, and reporting of cultures from specific specimen sources. Winn WC, Koneman EE, editors. Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 68-105.
• ²
  Bergogne-Berezin E, Towner KJ. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996; 9:148-165.
• ³
  Husni RN, Goldstein LS, Arroliga AC, Hall GS, Fatica C, Stoller JK, et al. Risk factors for an outbreak of multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter nosocomial pneumonia among intubated patients. Chest 1999; 115:1378-1382.
• ⁴
  Van Looveren M, Goossens H, Group AS. Antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter spp in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004; 10:684-704.
• ⁵
  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 20^th informational supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2010, CLSI document M100-S120. 2010.
• ⁶
  Lyytikainen O, Koljalg S, Harma M, Vuopio-Varkila J. Outbreak caused by two multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clones in a burns unit: emergence of resistance to imipenem. J Hosp Infect 1995; 31:41-54.
• ⁷
  Seifert H, Baginski R, Schulze A, Pulverer G. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37:750-753.
• ⁸
  Vila J, Marcos A, Marco F, Abdalla S, Vergara Y, Reig R, et al. In vitro antimicrobial production of beta-lactamases, aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase by and susceptibility of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37:138-141.
• ⁹
  Cowan. Cowan and Steel's Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. 2nd edition ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1974.
• ¹⁰
  Chang KC, Lin MF, Lin NT, Wu WJ, Kuo HY, Lin TY, et al. Clonal spread of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in eastern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2012; 45:37-42.
• ¹¹
  Gales AC, Reis AO, Jones RN. Contemporary assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin B and colistin: review of available interpretative criteria and quality control guidelines. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:183-190.
• ¹²
  Suri A, Mahapatra AK, Kapil A. Acinetobacter infection in neurosurgical intensive care patients. Natl Med J India 2000; 13:296-300.
• ¹³
  Hanberger H, Garcia-Rodriguez JA, Gobernado M, Goossens H, Nilsson LE, Struelens MJ. Antibiotic susceptibility among aerobic gram-negative bacilli in intensive care units in 5 European countries. French and Portuguese ICU Study Groups. JAMA 1999; 281:67-71.
• ¹⁴
  Turner PJ, Greenhalgh JM, Group MS. The activity of meropenem and comparators against Acinetobacter strains isolated from European hospitals, 1997-2000. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9:563-567.
• ¹⁵
  Turner PJ. Meropenem activity against European isolates: report on the MYSTIC (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection) 2006 results. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 60:185-192.
• ¹⁶
  Perez F, Hujer AM, Hujer KM, Decker BK, Rather PN, Bonomo RA. Global challenge of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51:3471-3484.
• ¹⁷
  Cisneros JM, Rodriguez-Bano J. Nosocomial bacteremia due to Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, clinical features and treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002; 8:687-693.
• ¹⁸
  Gales AC, Jones RN, Sader HS. Global assessment of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against 54 731 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme (2001-2004). Clin Microbiol Infect 2006; 12:315-321.
• ¹⁹
  Rodloff AC, Leclercq R, Debbia EA, Canton R, Oppenheim BA, Dowzicky MJ. Comparative analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility among organisms from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK as part of the tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14:307-314.
• ²⁰
  Souli M, Kontopidou FV, Koratzanis E, Antoniadou A, Giannitsioti E, Evangelopoulou P, et al. In vitro activity of tigecycline against multiple-drug-resistant, including pan-resistant, gram-negative and gram-positive clinical isolates from Greek hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50:3166-3169.
• ²¹
  Seifert H, Stefanik D, Wisplinghoff H. Comparative in vitro activities of tigecycline and 11 other antimicrobial agents against 215 epidemiologically defined multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58:1099-1100.
• ²²
  Dizbay M, Altuncekic A, Sezer BE, Ozdemir K, Arman D. Colistin and tigecycline susceptibility among multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from ventilator-associated pneumonia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 32:29-32.
• ²³
  Dent LL, Marshall DR, Pratap S, Hulette RB. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a descriptive study in a city hospital. BMC Infect Dis 2010; 10:196.
• ²⁴
  Akram M, Shahid M, Khan AU. Etiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of community-acquired urinary tract infections in J N M C Hospital Aligarh, India. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2007; 6:4.
• ²⁵
  McGregor JC, Elman MR, Bearden DT, Smith DH. Sex- and age-specific trends in antibiotic resistance patterns of Escherichia coli urinary isolates from outpatients. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14:25.
• ²⁶
  Lu N, Hu Y, Zhu L, Yang X, Yin Y, Lei F, et al. DNA microarray analysis reveals that antibiotic resistance-gene diversity in human gut microbiota is age related. Sci Rep 2014; 4:4302.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  May-Jun 2016

History

• Received
  04 Apr 2016
• Accepted
  26 May 2016