Print version ISSN 0101-8175
Rev. Bras. Zool. vol.21 no.1 Curitiba Mar. 2004
Food categories reconstruction and feeding consumption estimates for the Sciaenid Macrodon ancylodon (Bloch & Schneider), and the congeneric fishes Stellifer rastrifer (Jordan) and Stellifer naso (Jordan) (Pisces, Perciformes) in the Caeté Estuary, Northern Coast of Brazil
Mauricio Camargo; Victoria Isaac
Laboratório de Biologia Pesqueira e Manejo de Recursos Aquáticos, Universidade Federal do Pará. Avenida Tancredo Neves 2651, 66077-530 Belém, Pará, Brasil. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
A quantitative method to estimate fish feeding consumption and energy intake from different food categories through the reconstruction of ingested preys based on hard not digestible body structures is presented. In order to establish the equations of the functional relationships between preys weight and body structures, stomachs of 1.086 specimens of Macrodon ancylodon (Bloch & Schneider, 1801), Stellifer rastrifer (Jordan, 1889), and Stellifer naso (Jordan, 1889) fish species were dissected. Consequently, preys reconstruction enabled a quantitative evaluation of food categories consumption. Results indicate a marked difference in diet composition and energy requirements according to fish species ontogenetic development.
Key words: Energetic values, feeding ingestion rates.
Um método quantitativo para se estimar o consumo alimentar e o aporte energético das diferentes categorias alimentares é apresentado através da reconstrução das presas ingeridas com base em estruturas corporais não digeríveis. Para tal, o presente estudo estabelece, através do exame dos conteúdos estomacais de 1.086 exemplares dissecados de Macrodon ancylodon (Bloch & Schneider, 1801), Stellifer rastrifer (Jordan, 1889) e Stellifer naso (Jordan, 1889), as equações das relações funcionais entre o peso das presas e estruturas corporais. Com as categorias reconstruídas foi possível quantificar o alimento ingerido pelos espécimes. Os resultados indicaram que existe uma marcada diferença, tanto na composição das categorias alimentares, bem como no aporte energético acompanhando o desenvolvimento ontogênico do predador.
Palavras chave: Valores energéticos, taxas de consumo alimentar.
Temporal variations in the availability of feeding resources are known to be responsible for diet plasticity of tropical fishes (KNÖPPEL 1970). The daily continuous food ingestion often characterizing tropical fishes, and reflected by relatively fast metabolic processes, hampered proper daily feeding rhythm definition (FONTELES FILHO 1989, PAULY 1994). As a result, difficulties are often encountered to estimate daily food consumption and energetic contribution of each food items for a given predator. In addition, a proper identification of the preys, specially of fish larvae or juveniles, is limited by their advanced digestion state (TORNO 1976).
Many studies on fishes trophic ecology include a qualitative approach of the diet through the identification of the most abundant preys present in the stomach. However, proper construction of trophic models also require data on preys abundance and biomass, as well as additional information on the way each of these food items contributes to the energetic flow within the aquatic ecosystem. Therefore, as already explained by WORTHMANN (1979) it appears as fundamental to first restore size and body weight of all ingested preys, to better understand their contribution in the food chain.
This study aims to first of all, estimate morphometrical relationships of Stellifer rastrifer (JORDAN, 1889), Stellifer naso (JORDAN, 1889) and Macrodon ancylodon (BLOCH & SCHNEIDER, 1801) preys, to subsequently calculate average biomass and energetic values of the ingested food groups, in accordance to the development stage of the predator.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
In order to define the food groups more frequently ingested by each predator, 1.086 stomachs (469 for Macrodon ancylodon, 459 for Stellifer rastrifer, and 158 for S. naso) from fishes of different sizes were dissected. Once all fed items identified and gathered into taxonomic groups, the indigestible body parts such as exoskeletons, otoliths and eyes, were picked up and identified to the highest taxonomic level possible.
In parallel, preys most commonly encountered in fish stomachs were collected in the wild within the same estuary, then weighted, measured and dissected in order to assess the size of all the indigestible parts already found in the stomachs of the three predators.
Zooplanktonic organisms were measured (mm), from the head up to the caudal thorns (Lct), using a micrometric magnifying glass. Length-weight relationships, were then established for five or six length classes (mm) including 100 to 200 individuals pending on the species and defined based on the fish size frequency data. Average individual body weight was estimated through the total weight (g) obtained for each length class divided by the number of weighed individuals. Results were plotted, and the regression between weight and length was estimated using the least squares method.
In the case of crustacean decapods, the indigestible structures included eyes and carapace. Relations between carapace length (Lcar) and ocular peduncle (Lpeye) of 48 individuals of Acetes americanus Ortmann, 1893, and between carapace length (Lcar) and eye diameter (Deye) of 128 individuals of Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (Heller, 1862) were established. In the case of the crustacean Uca sp., the relationship was established between body weight (g) and carapace width Wcar (mm) of the individuals. Obtention of these relationships enabled subsequent plotting of preys body structure size vs preys weight and definition of mathematical equations for the obtained regressions
Collection of otoliths from preyed fishes and subsequent study of their shape in relation to preys size enabled to define mathematical equations between these two parameters. Hence sagitta width Wotol (mm) was plotted vs preys standard length (mm) (Ls) or preys weight, and respective linear or exponential regressions were calculated.
Mathematical functions between preys body parts were given as linear regressions, obtained after logarithmic transformations in the case of exponential relationships. Once the mathematical relations established, body weights of various length classes of each food categories were reconstructed. Average consumption of all three studied predators was assessed through the sum of weights of all feeding categories per defined length class. Additionally, lengths at first maturation as defined by CAMARGO & ISAAC (IN press) enabled dividing the predators into three ontogenic groups, namely the younger, pre-adult and adult groups. Predators energetic intake (Kcal) for each food category, and expressed per gram of predator, was calculated based on the energetic contents of the preys (Kcal/gram of preys), as available in the literature.
Diet composition of the three predator species varies along the ontogeny. While young individuals feed more exclusively on zooplanktonic organisms such as Pseudodiaptomus marshi Wright, 1936 and Acartia lilljerborgii Giesbrecht, 1889 copepods, pre-adults also include in their diet invertebrates like Acetes americanus, Xiphopenaeus kroyeri, and Uca sp. Other hand, adults can also feed on young fishes like Cathorops arenatus (Valenciennes, 1840), Macrodon ancylodon, and Stellifer rastrifer, hence demonstrating a cannibalism behavior (Figs 1-3).
Fresh body weight of the preys, obtained through mathematical equations themselves issued from body structure relationships, is presented in table I.
For each of the three preyed species, namely: Stellifer rastrifer, Macrodon ancylodon and Cathorops arenatus, linear equations between otolith width and individual standard length, and exponential equations between body weight and otolith width or standard length were established. It is important to note that otoliths, known as body growth indicators, present an exponential relationship with fish body weight up to the juvenile stage, after which parameters of the equation change. Therefore, as in this case predators consume exclusively young organisms, equations were only defined for young preys.
Once preys weight reconstructed, food consumptions (per gram of body weight) were defined by predator group class of 1 cm. In the case of juveniles Macrodon ancylodon (Lt £ 21 cm) consumption rate ranged from 0.002g of prey/g of predator to 0.800g of prey/g of predator. For specimens of Lt ³ 21 cm, consumption rate was comprised between 0.001 g of prey/g of predator and 0.400 g of prey/g of predator. Results indicate that M. ancylodon of a total length comprised between 4 and 6 cm fed preferentially on juvenile decapods of Sergestidae (Acetes americanus) and Penaeidae (Xiphopenaeus kroyeri). Acartia lilljeborgii and Pseudodiaptomus marshi were the more common copepods consumed by the three predators; however due their small size they represented a relatively small proportion of the overall stomach contents. Above 6 cm standard length, diet of the younger specimens was complemented by fish juveniles, principally Stellifer rastrifer and Macrodon ancylodon and to a lower extends Cathorops arenatus (Fig. 1).
In the case of juveniles Stellifer rastrifer of length ranging between 1 and 10 cm, results indicate a consumption rate comprised between 0.001 g of prey/g of predator to 0.085 g of prey/g of predator. For bigger individuals up to 16 cm of length, the rate ranged between 0.007 g of prey/g of predator and 0.075 g of prey/g of predator. Juveniles of 1 to 3 cm of total length fed mainly on zooplankton, and especially on copepods such as Pseudodiaptomus marshi. At 4 cm of total length, this diet was complemented by juveniles of crustacean decapods like Acetes, Xiphopenaeus and Uca sp. At last, diet of bigger individuals (i.e. ³ 6 cm standard length) also included fish juveniles, mainly Stellifer rastrifer and Cathorops arenatus species (Fig. 2).
Rates of average consumption for Stellifer naso ranged from 0.001 g of prey/g of predator to 0.013 g of prey/g of predator for individuals measuring from 4 to 10 cm standard length, and from 0.003 g of prey/g of predator to 0.034 g of prey/g of predator for bigger individuals of 11 to 16 cm of standard length. Specimens of 4 cm fed mainly on copepods like Pseudodiaptomus marshii and Acartia lilljerborgi, while individuals of standard length ³ 5 cm also eat decapods and barnacles larvae. Larger individuals showed preferences for crustacean decapods of Uca sp. and Acetes americanus, and to a lower extend for juveniles of Cathorops arenatus (Fig. 3).
Based on the conversion factors mentioned in the literature for the most common fed items, the different categories were transformed into energy units (Kcal) (Tab. II).
The main energetic intake in the diet was due to fishes, whose size increases concomitantly with predators size.
The main energy flow in the Caeté Estuary was found to be of benthic origin (WOLFF et al. 2000). The present results indicate that demersal preys constitute the main feeding resources for the three fish species studied. However, it was showed clear difference in the qualitative composition of the diet between individuals of different sizes but belonging to a same species. This variation was related to predators digestive structures efficiency as a function of individual age, and to preys availability within the estuary. Based on the energetic input from planktonic preys, it can be hypothesized that juveniles have a higher feeding frequency in order to compensate for the relatively low supply in energy provided by their diet. On the other hand, the adults, who feed on bigger preys, would present a lower feeding frequency. The relatively high frequency of fishes and shrimps in predators stomachs, could be explained by the relatively high energetic value of these preys. The present results support WEATHERLEY (1972) finding, who reported higher metabolic rates for young fishes when compared to the adults, hence suggesting bigger feeding requirements of the formers.
The reconstruction of preys size and weight for several groups of vertebrate has already been applied to different aquatic environments as in Hansel et al. (1988), and PRENDA & GRANADO-LORENCIO (1992). This methodology, pursued in details, can provide accurate information on the energy requirements of an individual all along its ontogeny, but also on the relationships between preys and predators.
We are grateful to Dr Valérie Sarpédonti for her english corrections.
BUTLER, M. & H.G. DAM. 1994. Production rates and characteristics of fecal pellets of the copepod Acartia tonsa under simulated phytoplankton bloom conditions: implications for vertical fluxes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Oldendorf, 114: 81-91. [ Links ]
CAMARGO, M. & V. ISAAC. (in press). Reproductive biology in relation to the spatio-temporal distribution of Stellifer rastrifer, Stellifer naso and Macrodon ancylodon (perciformes- Sciaenidae) in the Caeté Estuary, Northern Coast of Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, São Paulo. [ Links ]
GOLLEY, F.B. 1961. Energy values of ecological materials. Ecology, New York, 42 (3): 581-584. [ Links ]
FONTELES FILHO, A.A. 1989. Recursos pesqueiros: Biologia e Dinâmica Populacional. Fortaleza, Imprensa Oficial do Ceará, 296p. [ Links ]
HANSEL, H.C.; S.D. DUKE; P.T. LOFY & G.A. GRAY. 1988. Use of diagnostic bones to identify and estimated original lengths of ingested prey fishes. Transactions of American Fish Society, Washington, 117: 55-62. [ Links ]
HONJO, S. & M.R. ROMAN. 1978. Marine copepod fecal pellets: production, preservation and sedimentation. Journal of Marine Research, New Haven, 36: 45-57. [ Links ]
KNÖPPEL, H.A. 1970. Food of Central Amazonian fishes. Contribution to the nutrient-ecology of Amazonian rain-forest streams. Amazoniana, Kiel, 2 (3): 257-352. [ Links ]
PAULY, D. 1994. On the sex of fish and the gender of scientists: essays in fisheries science. London, Chapman & Hall, 250p. [ Links ]
PRENDA, J. & C. GRANADO-LORENCIO. 1992. Claves de identificación de Barbus sclateri, Chondrostoma polylepis, Leucisus pyrenaius y Cyprinus carpio mediante algunas de sus estructuras óseas. Doñana Acta Vertebrata, Sevilla, 19 (1-2): 25-36. [ Links ]
THAYER, G.W.; W.E. SCHAAF; J.W. ANGELOVIC, & M.W. LACROIX, 1973. Caloric measurements of some estuarine organisms. Fishery Bulletin, Seattle, 71: 289-296. [ Links ]
TORNO, A 1976. Descripcion y comparação de los otólitos de algunas familias de peces de la plataforma Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia", Buenos Aires, 12 (4): 27-43. [ Links ]
UYE, S.I. & K. KANAME. 1994. Relations between fecal pellet volumeand body size for major zooplankters of the Inland Sea of Japan. Journal of Oceanography, Japan, 50: 43-49. [ Links ]
WEATHERLEY, A.H. 1972. Growth and ecology of fish populations. Londres, Academic Press, 293p. [ Links ]
WHITFIELD, A.K. & S.J.M. BLADER. 1980. The diet of Atilax paludinosus (water mongoose) at St. Lucia, South Africa. Mammalia, Paris, 44: 315-318. [ Links ]
WOLFF, M; V. KOCH, & V. ISAAC. 2000. A trophic flow model of the Caeté mangrove estuary (North Brazil) with considerations for the sustainable management of its resources. Estuarine Costal and Shelf Science, Amsterdam, 50 (6): 789-803. [ Links ]
WORTHMANN, H.A. 1979. A relação entre o desenvolvimento do otólito e o crescimento do peixe com auxílio da distinção das populações de pescada (Plagioscion squamosissimus). Acta Amazonica, Manaus, 9 (3): 573-586. [ Links ]
Received in 30.IX.2002
accepted in 26.I.2004