Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Spectrometric and electrochemical investigation of vanadium(V) and vanadium(IV) tartrate complexes in solution

Abstracts

Spectroscopic and electrochemical studies were carried out to characterize the vanadium(IV) and (V) complexes that form in solution and their interconversions. 51V NMR spectroscopy coupled with ¹H NMR, 13C NMR and EPR spectroscopy were used to characterize the vanadium(V)-tartrate complexes that form in the vanadium-tartrate system. The major complex that forms over most of the pH range is a 1:1 complex. In addition a minor 1:2 complex forms. The 1:2 complex formed from enantiomerically pure tartaric acid was less stable than complex formed from racemic tartaric acid. These complexes are different than the 2:2 complex that is the major contributor in the vanadium(IV)-tartrate system. The polarographic and cyclic voltammetic investigations of the electrochemical behavior of V(V) in the presence of tartrate demonstrated a complex formation. The diffusion coefficient values of free vanadium ions and vanadium-tartrate complexes were determined. The minimum average values for the diffusion coefficient for the vanadium(IV)-tartrate 2:2 complexes were determined to range from 3 <FONT FACE=Symbol>´</FONT> 10-6 cm² s-1 to 17 <FONT FACE=Symbol>´</FONT> 10-6 cm² s-1 depending on pH.

vanadium(V); vanadium(IV); tartrate complexes; NMR and EPR spectroscopy; electrochemistry


Os complexos de vanádio(IV) e (V) com tartarato formados em solução e as suas possíveis interconversões foram estudados utilizando-se técnicas espectroscópicas e eletroquímicas. A investigação foi feita através de espectroscopia de NMR de 51V combinada com ¹H, de NMR de 13C e espectroscopia de EPR. Como técnicas electroquímicas utilizaram-se a polagrografia e a voltametria cíclica. Verificou-se que complexo que se forma em maior extensão, em quase todo o intervalo de pH, é o de vanádio(V)-tartarato na proporção 1:1. O complexo 1:2 apresentou menor contribuição. Estes complexos foram formados a partir do complexo de vanádio(IV)-tartarato 2:2. A caracterização electroquímica de V(V) em solução na presença de tartarato por polarografia e por voltametria cíclica demonstrou a formação de complexos. Foram determinados os coeficientes de difusão dos íons livres de vanádio e dos complexos de vanádio-tartarato. Os valores dos coeficientes de difusão foram de 3 <FONT FACE=Symbol>´</FONT> 10-6 cm² s-1 a 17 <FONT FACE=Symbol>´</FONT> 10-6 cm² s-1, dependendo do pH.


ARTICLE

Spectrometric and electrochemical investigation of vanadium(V) and vanadium(IV) tartrate complexes in solution

Ahmad R. KhanI; Debbie C. CransI; Rasa Pauliukaite# # Current Address: Departamento de Química, Universidade de Coimbra, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal , II; Eugenijus Norkus* * e-mail: Norkus@ktl.mii.lt , II

IDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1872, USA

IIDepartment of Catalysis, Institute of Chemistry, A. Goštauto 9, LT-01108 Vilnius, Lithuania

ABSTRACT

Spectroscopic and electrochemical studies were carried out to characterize the vanadium(IV) and (V) complexes that form in solution and their interconversions. 51V NMR spectroscopy coupled with 1H NMR, 13C NMR and EPR spectroscopy were used to characterize the vanadium(V)-tartrate complexes that form in the vanadium-tartrate system. The major complex that forms over most of the pH range is a 1:1 complex. In addition a minor 1:2 complex forms. The 1:2 complex formed from enantiomerically pure tartaric acid was less stable than complex formed from racemic tartaric acid. These complexes are different than the 2:2 complex that is the major contributor in the vanadium(IV)-tartrate system. The polarographic and cyclic voltammetic investigations of the electrochemical behavior of V(V) in the presence of tartrate demonstrated a complex formation. The diffusion coefficient values of free vanadium ions and vanadium-tartrate complexes were determined. The minimum average values for the diffusion coefficient for the vanadium(IV)-tartrate 2:2 complexes were determined to range from 3 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1 to 17 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1 depending on pH.

Keywords: vanadium(V), vanadium(IV), tartrate complexes, NMR and EPR spectroscopy, electrochemistry

RESUMO

Os complexos de vanádio(IV) e (V) com tartarato formados em solução e as suas possíveis interconversões foram estudados utilizando-se técnicas espectroscópicas e eletroquímicas. A investigação foi feita através de espectroscopia de NMR de 51V combinada com 1H, de NMR de 13C e espectroscopia de EPR. Como técnicas electroquímicas utilizaram-se a polagrografia e a voltametria cíclica. Verificou-se que complexo que se forma em maior extensão, em quase todo o intervalo de pH, é o de vanádio(V)-tartarato na proporção 1:1. O complexo 1:2 apresentou menor contribuição. Estes complexos foram formados a partir do complexo de vanádio(IV)-tartarato 2:2. A caracterização electroquímica de V(V) em solução na presença de tartarato por polarografia e por voltametria cíclica demonstrou a formação de complexos. Foram determinados os coeficientes de difusão dos íons livres de vanádio e dos complexos de vanádio-tartarato. Os valores dos coeficientes de difusão foram de 3 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1 a 17 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1, dependendo do pH.

Introduction

Characterization of complexes that could potentially form and exist under biological conditions is of current interest given the anti-diabetic properties of vanadium compounds.1 Furthermore, the role of vanadium compounds as cofactor in haloperoxidases,2 nitrogenases3 and the analog between vanadate and phosphate4 has stimulated a surge in the interest in aqueous vanadium chemistry. Tartaric acid is produced by microorganisms in large quantities and is formed in the human metabolism In general, alpha-hydroxy carboxylates are strong metal chelators, and in the case of tartrate the three different stereoisomers (D(–)-tartrate, L(+)-tartrate and DL()-tartrate), further allow for geometrically intriguing coordination complexes.

The variety of oxidation states of the metal in vanadium complexes implies that the redox reactions under physiological conditions are important to the action of these complexes.1 The redox processes are more likely to take place in the presence of an organic ligand such as tartrate. Vanadium-tartrate systems reported in the literature include a crystallographic characterization and solution study.5-8 The chemistry of vanadium(IV)-tartrate complexes have been studied.8 The structurally characterized 2:2 vanadium(IV) tartaric acid complex contains two tartaric acid ligands (of DL() stereochemistry) coordinating to each vanadium atom in a bidentate manner.7 The V(IV) complexation with L(+)- and DL()-tartaric acid as monitored by spectrophotometry and EPR confirmed that 2:2 anionic complexes exist in solution. At neutral pH, spectral differences were observed between the L(+)-complex and the DL()-complex; the last one was found to be more stable.6 Recent comprehensive potentiometric and EPR spectroscopic investigations of the vanadium(IV) complexes with tartrate isomers confirmed the formation of the dinuclear complex from V(IV) and the D(–)-, L(+)- and DL()-tartrate systems. In contrast, a cyclic trinuclear species formed from V(IV) and meso-tartrate.9 One spectrophotometric study was carried out from vanadate and tartaric acid at pH 2.8-3.4, and a weak 2:1 complex (log b = 3.1) was observed.5

The current study was carried out to provide benchmark information on the properties of physiological relevant vanadium(IV) and (V) complexes. Specifically, we selected a system in which both oxidation states could be characterized and the conversion between oxidation states could be investigated. Multinuclear NMR and EPR spectroscopy, polarography and cyclic voltammetry were used to characterize the vanadium-tartrate system, beginning with the detailed characterization of the vanadium(V)-tartrate complexes.

Experimental

Materials

All chemicals were of the highest purity grade and were used as provided by Sigma-Aldrich chemical company. L(+)-, D(–)- and DL()-tartaric acid were all used for these studies even though most experiments were performed with L(+)-tartaric acid.

Polarography

The polarographic curves were recorded by a PU-1 polarograph (Belarus) using a dropping mercury electrode in a three-electrode cell, equipped with a thermostat.10 The reported experiments were carried out at 20 ± 0.1 °C (selected measurements were also carried out at 25 and 30 °C). The potential scanning rate was 100 mV min-1. The capillary characteristics at 20 °C were m = 2.95 mg s-1 and t = 3.73 s. The reference electrode was an Ag/AgCl electrode filled with saturated KCl. All potential values are referred to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE).

The polarograms were recorded in 1.0 mmol L-1 sodium metavanadate (NaVO3·2H2O) solutions and tartaric acid at a ratio 1:1 to 1:10 metal to ligand. Supporting electrolyte was 600 mmol L-1 of NaCl. Oxygen was removed from the solutions by purging Ar through the solution. The Ar flow was maintained on top of the solution during the course of experiment. Applied potential was swept from +0.1 to –1.6 V vs. SHE.

Cyclic voltammetry

The cyclic voltammograms11 were recorded by a PI-50 potentiostat (Russia) using three-electrode thermostated electrochemical cell. The working electrode was a smooth Pt foil of 1 cm2, the auxiliary electrode, a Pt foil of 3 cm2, and the reference electrode was an Ag/AgCl electrode filled with saturated KCl. Applied potential was cycled from –0.75 to +1.1 V at potential scan rate 50 mV s-1 for 3 times. Supporting electrolyte was 600 mmol L-1 NaCl solution. Sodium metavanadate concentration was 10 mmol L-1 and its concentration ratio with tartaric acid varied from 1:1 to 1:3. pH was adjusted either with HCl or with NaOH solutions.12 Oxygen was removed from the solutions by purging Ar through the solution. The Ar flow was maintained on top of the solution during the course of experiment. The experiments were carried out at 20 ± 0.1 °C.

NMR and EPR spectroscopy

The NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Inova-300 spectrometer (USA) at 78.9 MHz (7.0 T) for 51V, at 75.46 MHz 13C and at 300 MHz for 1H. The 51V is a quadrupolar nucleus and with high natural abundance and a frequency near that of 13C. The parameters used for recording the 51V NMR spectra were as follows; a sweep width of 33000 Hz, a pulse width of 90º and an acquisition time of 0.050 sec.13 The chemical shifts were recorded against an external standard of VOCl3 (0 ppm).13 The spectra were processed using no line-broadening or baseline correction. Spectra were integrated using the Varian software, and the concentrations calculated from the mole fraction of each signal. The 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts were referenced against an external sample of 3-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propanesulfonic acid sodium salt (DSS) at ambient temperature.13 The EPR spectra were recorded on a Bruker EMX spectrometer (USA). The X-band EPR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature in 1 mm quartz capillary tubes that were placed in 5 mm quartz EPR tubes. The spectra were recorded between 9.750 and 9.900 GHz (X-band) and at 40 mW microwave power and the quantitative parameters described previously:14 concentration of vanadium(IV) compounds were varied from 10 to 50 mmol L-1 and were recorded in the aqueous sodium chloride solutions. Quantification of EPR signals was performed by double integration of the first-derivate spectra to obtain the area under the absorption curve.

Sample preparation for 51V NMR (EPR) spectroscopic studies

Sample solutions were prepared from the stock solutions and were analyzed by 1H, 51V and 13C NMR spectroscopy. Concentrations of the stock solutions were 50 and 1000 mmol L-1 sodium metavanadate, 100, 500 and 2000 mmol L-1 tartaric acid and 2.00 mol L-1 NaCl. The pH of the tartaric acid solution was adjusted to the desired pH (2.45 and 6.50). The stock solutions were prepared either in H2O or D2O depending on the mode of analyses to be carried out.

The solutions prepared in the neutral and alkaline pH range were prepared by the addition of vanadate, tartaric acid followed by NaCl. In the near neutral pH range studies, the tartaric acid solution was adjusted because no acid can be added to the vanadate-tartaric acid solution due to formation of decavanadate at acidic pH. The samples at acidic pH values were prepared similarly. A wide range of concentration ranges were investigated; various combinations from 0.40 to 500 mmol L-1 vanadate and from 0.40 to 800 mmol L-1 tartaric acid. The NaCl concentration was maintained at 600 mmol L-1 to keep ionic strength constant, except for the structural studies using 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy where no salt was added.

Interpretation of NMR spectra

The concentrations of vanadium species were calculated from the mole fractions of each species signal and the known overall concentration of vanadium(V). This method assumes that no redox processes have taken place and thus most reliable for freshly prepared solutions in a system such as the vanadate-tatrate system. The vanadate oligomers observed in the 51V NMR spectra include monomer (V1; defined as the sum of H2VO4– or HVO4), dimer (V2) and tetramer (V4); these species are related as shown in equations (1) and (3).13 The concentration of VO2+ was obtained directly from the integration of the spectra at acidic pH. Since decavanadate gives three signals (-416, -499 and -515 ppm), the two signals can be used to calculate the component of the third signal that overlap with the V-tratrate complex. Thus, the difference is assigned to the V-tartrate complex. The formation constants and stoichiometries of the complexes were investigated both at low and high pH ranges using equations (4)-(7). By using H2VO4–, tar and H+ to carry out a study in which H+ is also varied, the charge of the complex can also be determined.

Structural studies were conducted using 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy at acidic pH using the samples described above at varies concentrations of ligand and vanadate. Selected 1H and 13C NMR spectra were investigated at both ambient and low temperature; however due to sample instability and multiple complexes the quality of the 13C NMR spectra were limited. Reducing the temperature slow down some of the exchange processes, and signals sharpen somewhat; since the samples are studied in aqueous solution these studies were only conducted from ~-5 to 25 °C. Accompanying 51V NMR spectra were recorded to verify the composition of the samples.

Calculation of diffusion coefficients

The values of the diffusion coefficient (D) were calculated using the Ilkovic equation,15

where is the limiting diffusion current (A), n is a number of electrons involved in the electrode reaction, c is the concentration (mmol L-1), m is the flow rate of Hg (mg s-1), and t is the time of the formation of the drop (s).

Results and Discussion

Spectroscopic investigations of the vanadium(V)-tartrate system

NMR studies at various pH. In a series of spectra of 10 vanadate and 100 mmol L-1 L-tartaric acid recorded from pH 6.5 to pH 10, two new complexes were observed at -495.7 and -516.1 ppm (Figure 1). A minor signal observed at -529 ppm at pH 6.7 may be a third complex; the possibility that this complex was the oxovanadate complex reported previously was considered and not ruled out.16 The complex at -495.7 ppm shift was found to shift at higher pH (Figure 2). Redox chemistry was found to take place in these samples, as evidenced by the appearance of decomposition products (NMR spectroscopy) as well as changes in solution color (visible spectroscopy). The rate of redox reaction was larger in solutions with high concentration of vanadate and tartrate at low pH. In all cases, the results described here are from freshly prepared solutions.



The initial studies were expanded to include pH range 2 to 9 by recording NMR spectra of solutions containing vanadate and tartaric acid (10 mmmol L-1 / 10 mmol L-1, 10 mmol L-1 / 30 mmol L-1 and 15 mmol L-1 / 200 mmol L-1). Complexes were observed in this entire pH range, and are shown in Figure 2. One complex is observed at alkaline pH (-495 ppm) and a second complex is observed at -515 ppm in addition to the complex at -495 ppm at neutral pH. From pH 3.5 to 4.5, four complexes are observed at -574 ppm, -539 ppm, -515 ppm and -485 ppm, however, only the three complexes at -570 ppm, -539 ppm and -515 ppm are observed below pH 3.5. As it is shown in Figure 2, the chemical shifts of two of the four complexes (-539 ppm and -515 ppm) are pH independent. However, the signal at -574 ppm at pH 4 decreases to -569 ppm at pH 2.5. The signal at -495 ppm decreases as the pH continues to decrease from pH 6. At pH of 3.7, the chemical shift is approximately -478 ppm and no signal is observed below this pH.

Stoichiometry studies at neutral pH. The stoichiometry of the complexes at -515 ppm and at -495 ppm was investigated using 1 to 10 mmol L-1 vanadate, from 10 to 50 mmol L-1 tartaric acid, and at pH values from 6.5 to 7.05 and 600 mmol L-1 NaCl. The data were analyzed using equations (4) to (7). Since a linear relationship is obtained when plotting complex as a function of [V1] vs. [tartrate] it has been concluded that the complex at -515 ppm is a 1:1 complex. The relationship furthermore shows that 2 protons are used upon complex formation. By corresponding analysis, the signal at -495 ppm is also found to be a 1:1 complex consuming no more than one proton upon complex formation.

Stoichiometry studies at acidic pH. A series of spectra of 10 mmol L-1 vanadate and 10, 20 and 30 mmol L-1 tartaric acid with 600 mmol L-1 NaCl were recorded from pH 2.30 to 2.50. Two new complexes were observed in these spectra in the presence of the major complex at -515 ppm and a minor complex at -539 ppm (Figure 1). The major species overlap one of the signals for decavanadate and the minor species overlap the signal for VO2+ at these low pH values. The signal at -515 ppm is even observed when little decavanadate is present (0 to 2%). The -539 ppm signal increases by the addition of increasing tartaric acid concentrations. In the neutral pH range, signals were observed for both the oxovanadate complex (at -529 ppm) and decavanadate (at -416, -499 and -515 ppm). At high tartaric acid concentrations in solutions from pH 2.5 to pH 4.5, a new species was observed at about -570 ppm.

The stoichiometry of the complexes at -515 ppm and at -539 ppm was investigated using several concentration ranges of vanadate and tartaric acid. The concentration range from 2 to 10 mmol L-1 vanadate was combined with 2 to 10 mmol L-1 tartaric acid, at pH ~2.5 with 600 mmol L-1 NaCl. In this series, the complex at -539 ppm (overlapping the VO2+ signal) was not observed. Any contribution of decavanadate to -515 ppm signal was taken into account by measuring the decavanadate signal at -499 ppm and subtracting this from the total observed signal at -515 ppm. The concentration range used for stoichiometric studies was 10 mmol L-1 vanadate and 15 to 35 mmol L-1 tartaric acid at pH ~2.5 with 600 mmol L-1 NaCl. Since the chemical shift of the complex was superimposed on the free VO2+, the concentration of the VO2+ was assumed to be the same as the oxovanadate complex at -529 ppm. At low concentrations of tartaric acid in the sample solutions, the concentration of the oxovanadate species was similar to that of the free VO2+ species. Results obtained from these series of spectra are interpreted below.

Spectra from solutions containing 1:1 metal to ligand ratio in the concentration range from 2 to 3.5 mmol L-1 vanadate and 0.5 to 3.0 mmol L-1 tartaric acid showed that the signal at -515 ppm is likely to be a 1:1 (metal:ligand) species. This conclusion is based on the linear relationship between the concentration of -515 ppm species and that of [VO2+] vs. [tar]. Plotting the concentration of complex (from the -539 ppm peak) from data of a series of concentrations of 10 mmol L-1 vanadate and varying concentration of tartaric acid above 10 mmol L-1, gave a linear relationship both as a function of [VO2+] vs. [H2tar]2 and [VO2+]2vs. [H2tar]2, respectively. Unfortunately, redox chemistry (see below) prevented from investigating solutions with increasing concentrations of vanadate, and prevented clear distinction between the 1:2 and 2:2 complexes by such plots. Solutions of 1:1 vanadate and tartaric acid below 10 mmol L-1 vanadate did not form a complex at -539 ppm as the stability of the 1:1 complex precluded formation of other complexes (Also, no decavanadate are observed in these solutions). However, the dramatic increase of the complex at -539 ppm in solutions containing 10-fold excess tartaric acid is consistent with this species being a 1:2 complex.

Solution structure. Solution structure can be investigated by measuring the change of signals in free ligand to complex (coordination induced shift abbreviated CIS). Using 13C NMR spectroscopy to determine the solution structure of the major 1:1 complex present at acidic pH. Two peaks at 72 ppm and 175 ppm were observed for tartaric acid (ligand) at pH 2.5 at ambient and at low temperature (5 ºC). In solutions containing one 51V NMR signal at -515 ppm with 600 mmol L-1 of vanadate and tartaric acid at pH 2.5 no 13C NMR signals were observed at ambient temperature but two peaks at 89 ppm and 184 ppm were observed at 5 °C. This corresponds to a CIS of 17 and 9 ppm. These signals were also observed at ambient temperature when solutions of 500 mmol L-1 vanadate and 500 mmol L-1 tartaric acid were prepared at pH 3.9 (by 51V NMR the complex at -515 ppm was the major species). The size of the carboxylate CIS shift (9 ppm) indicates that both the carboxylates are chelated to the vanadium. In addition, the large 20 ppm CIS of the carbon atoms adjacent to the hydroxyl groups suggests that these groups are deprotonated and chelated as alkoxide ligands to the vanadium. Studies by 1H NMR spectroscopy supported these conclusions, as the complex signal was observed at 5.2 ppm and the free ligand at 4.7 ppm, the protons adjacent to the hydroxyl group support coordination of the hydroxyl group to the vanadium. The 1H NMR spectra were more complex than the 13C NMR spectra in that more than the signals described above were present. Presumably these signals are due to decomposition products and the 1:2 complex. A structural proposal consistent with these data would have all four oxygen atoms coordinated to the vanadium atoms, however, the stoichiometry requires that two of the oxygen atoms are protonated. Three structural possibilities are given below (Scheme 1).


Attempts to characterize the solution structure of the 1:2 (metal: ligand) complex were unsuccessful (500 mmol L-1 vanadate and 800 mmol L-1 tartaric acid) at pH 2.50 and at pH 4.00 at both ambient and low temperature (5 ºC). Low concentration of each isomer and the rapid redox processes that take place in these solutions presumably is what limit these observations even in freshly prepared solutions.

Do vanadium(IV)-tartrate complexes form in solution of vanadate and tartrate?

The solution color changes indicate that redox chemistry of the vanadate-tartrate system is taking place in the acidic pH range. The rate of color change increased with the increasing concentration of tartaric acid. Three distinct color changes from orange were observed of sample solutions in the presence of 600 mmol L-1 NaCl at pH ~2.5: to green within 24 h (from 2.5 to 7.0 mmol L-1 vanadate and tartaric acid), to yellow within 12 h (from 7.5 to 10 mmol L-1 vanadate and tartaric acid) and to blue within 4 h (at 10 mmol L-1 vanadate and from 15 mmol L-1 to 35 mmol L-1 tartaric acid). The detailed characterization of the speciation in the vanadium(IV)-tartrate system show that both 1:1 and 2:2 complexes form. EPR spectroscopic studies were therefore conducted to confirm formation of the previously reported species.9

In freshly prepared sample solutions containing 600 mmol L-1 NaCl (7.0 mmol L-1 vanadate and 6.5 mmol L-1 tartrate acid/10 mmol L-1 vanadate and 35 mmol L-1 tartrate acid), the concentration of V(IV) species increases with increasing tartrate concentration (Figure 3). Initially, about 3-10% of total vanadate were immediately observed in the samples. Within 48 h, 90 to 95% of V(IV) species form. In a 6.5 mmol L-1 / 7.0 mmol L-1 sample, two species are observed; the spectra are shown in Figure 3. The first species had the parameters of A0 = 106 ´ 10-4 cm-1, g0 = 1.98 which corresponds to the VO2+ species (A0 = 106 ´ 10-4 cm-1, g0 = 1.964).17 The second species observed had parameters of A0 = 97 ´ 10-4 cm-1, g0 = 1.98 and corresponds with the species previously reported.4-8 In the 10 mmol L-1/35 mmol L-1 sample two species are observed, one which corresponds to the complex observed in dilute sample. The minor species had the parameters of A0 = 102 ´ 10-4 cm-1, g0 = 1.98. On spiking the 7.0 mmol L-1/6.5 mmol L-1 sample with an equivalent amount of tartrate, the VO2+ species disappeared and the second complex species was formed. These two species with parameters of A0 = 97 ´ 10-4 cm-1, g0 = 1.98 and A0 = 102 ´ 10-4 cm-1, g0 = 1.98 correspond to the 1:1 species and 2:2 species previously reported.6-9


In contrast, no observable color change was observed within 24 to 30 hours in sample solutions with pH above 6.50. Accordingly, no EPR detectable V(IV) species was observed in freshly prepared sample solutions with 5 and 10-fold excess tartrate and 600 mmol L-1 NaCl at pH 6.55. However, after 24 hours 8-10% and after 4 days 20% vanadium(IV) was observed with a major species at A0 = 81 ´ 10-4 cm-1, g0 = 1.98 and a minor species at A0 = 93 ´ 10-4 cm-1, g0 = 1.98 with a slight increase of pH to 6.90.

Complexes formed from enantiomerically pure and racemic tartaric acid

The stereoisomers of the tartaric acid can be used to further explore the properties of the complexes further. Complexes containing one ligand stereoisomer, be it the D(–)- or L(+)-tartaric acid isomer, will have identical stabilities. Complexes containing two ligand-stereoisomers may vary depending on whether the complex contains two D's (or two L's), or a DL()-tartaric acid. The spectra of 10 mmol L-1 vanadate and 100 mmol L-1 L-tartaric acid with 600 mmol L-1 NaCl were practically identical to spectra recorded of 10 mmol L-1 vanadate and 100 mmol L-1 D(–)-tartaric acid at pH 2.50 with 600 mmol L-1 NaCl (Figure 4). However, mixing these solutions in a 1:1 ratio gives rather different spectrum in which the intensity of the -539 ppm signal was significantly greater than the -515 ppm signal (Figure 4). Identical spectra were obtained by mixing DL()-tartaric acid with vanadate. The differences in the concentration of -539 ppm species depending on the enantiomeric purity of the ligand suggest that the vanadium(V)-complex contains more than one ligand. These spectra show that the 1:2 complex at -539 ppm generated from the DL()-tartraric acid is more stable than the 1:2 complexes formed from enantiomerically pure tartraric acid.


Electrochemical investigations of the vanadium-tartrate system

Polarography. The polarograms were measured in solutions of vanadate (1.0 mmol L-1) and tartaric acid at a ratio 1:1 to 1:10 metal to ligand. The V(V) reduction show two irreversible waves in the pH range from 3.5 to 9.5 (Figure 5) (based on the analysis of log(I/Ilim-I) dependence on E). Given the irreversibility of these waves polarography cannot be used to characterise the speciation. In this oxidation state, vanadium characteristically gives two cathodic waves as reported previously.18 Cathodic reduction of V(V) to V(IV) begins at +0.3 V and no charging current region is observed as commonly found at dropping mercury electrode. The first wave is the one electron reduction of V(V) to V(IV) in agreement with previous report,18 while the second wave describes the reduction of V(IV).18 The second reduction wave appears at a negative potential (-1.0 V to -1.2 V). Since the limiting current of that wave is approximately two-fold higher than that of the V(V) reduction to V(IV), the participation of two electrons in the reduction process is inferred. Therefore this wave is the V(IV) reduction to V(II).


At pH 2.5 (Figure 6), three cathodic waves were obtained and correspond to stepwise reduction to V(IV) (at ca. +0.3 V), V(III) (at ca. -0.95 – -1.0 V) and V(II) (at ca. -1.2 V), respectively. The decrease in limiting current of the second and the third wave with the increase in tartaric acid concentration confirms the participation of tartaric acid in complex formation.


In the polarograms of solutions at pH 3.5-9.5, the height of the waves of V(IV) reduction to V(II) decreases by approximately a factor of two in the presence of L-tartrate which is interpreted as the formation of a larger species with lower diffusion coefficient (Figure 5). Since the polarographic waves of V(IV) reduction are diffusion limited (the temperature coefficient of the limiting current is ca. 1.5-1.8% deg-1) the diffusion coefficient values could be calculated as described in the experimental section. Some change in the diffusion coefficients with varying of pH is anticipated and was observed. Solutions containing the simple vanadate salt gave diffusion coefficients at 10 ´ 10-6 and 15 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1 at pH 3.5 and 5.5 to 25 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1 at pH 7.5 to 9.5. It is possible that a further detailed study can provide additional information of ionic species in these solutions of V(IV) and various oligomeric and polymeric forms in the physiological pH range. Moreover, in the presence of excess ligand, the same pattern was observed. At pH 3.5 and 5.5, the diffusion coefficients were 3 ´ 10-6 and 6 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1. At pH 7.5 and 9.5, the diffusion coefficients were 12 ´ 10-6 and 17 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1 respectively. Given the fact that the pure salt resulted in a much lower current, the observed diffusion coefficient of the salt will be much larger. However, free ligand yields higher currents. Accordingly, if solutions of vanadium-tartaric acid complexes contained some free ligand this should result in underestimation of a diffusion coefficient for the complexes. Since complexes are in equilibrium with free ligand and vanadate as demonstrated by NMR spectroscopy it became important to determine whether there was free ligand under such electrochemical investigations. As shown below using cyclic voltammetry free ligand was observed in these solutions, and the diffusion coefficients above have minimum values. Furthermore, these measurements represents an average value of the vanadium(IV) complexes that exist in solution.

Cyclic voltammetry. The cyclic voltammograms were recorded in solutions of vanadate, L(+)- and DL()-tartrate and complexes at a potential scan rate 50 mV s-1 (Table 1). A representative scan is shown in Figure 7 at pH 2.5. The ratios of vanadate to tartaric acid vary from 1:1 to 1:3. The cyclic voltammogram of vanadate and tartaric acid alone is different than that observed from the complex as shown in Figure 7. For the complex, a well-defined V(V)-V(IV)-L(+)-tartaric acid redox couple was observed at peak potentials of +0.93 V and +0.37 V, which is a region where no electrochemical process was observed for either vanadate or tartrate ligand. As it is seen from voltammograms this process is irreversible. Thus, this fact suggests that the electron transfer process is accompanied by additional chemical reaction, as can be anticipated vanadium(V) forms 1:1 and 1:2 complexes with tartaric acid, and vanadium(IV) forms 2:2 complexes. In the potential region approximately from -0.1 V to -0.7 V the decrease in reduction current from the ligand compared to the complex is consistent with the complexation of tartaric acid with the V(V). Two peaks are observed in the complex cyclic voltammogram in this region, one of which is new and can be attributed to a reduction of V(V) to a lower oxidation state. This process is also irreversible. The other peak is at the same potential as a peak in the tartaric acid curve which is likely due to the small presence of uncomplexed tartaric acid.


A series of different pH values were investigated and different cyclic voltammograms were observed. The series of cyclic voltammograms of vanadate, tartrate and complex at pH 6.5 are shown in Figure 9. At pH 6.5, the V(V)-V(IV)-L(+)-tartrate was found to give a peak separation of 60 mV and a ratio of Ipc/Ipa ~1 (Figure 8), which corresponds to a reversible redox process. Increasing the pH to 9.5 completely eliminated the peaks at this potential (data not shown) suggesting that both the vanadium(IV) and (V) complexes which undergoes reversible redox chemistry no longer exist or dramatically changed structure at pH 9.5.



Interestingly, the cyclic voltammograms of vanadium(V) solutions containing DL(+–)-tartrate as ligand are significantly different from that of L(+)-tartrate. Although the cyclic voltammograms of tartrate have several identifiable features, the differences were observed in the shapes of the voltammograms and the position of the reduction and oxidation current peaks (Table 1) (Figure 8 and Figure 9). Possible sources of these changes include differential stability, ligand oxidation and differential adsorption at the electrode surface. Variability between the complexes stability seems less likely when considering that the stability constants of 1:1 complexes of other transition metal ions (Cu(II), Sb(III), Fe(II)) with L(+)- and DL()-tartaric acid are similar.19,20 However, differential stabilities were observed for the vanadium(V) L(+)- and DL()-tartaric acid 1:2 complex. Differential stabilities are particularly feasible when respective complexes contain more than one ligand (which found in the V(V)/V(IV)-tartrate system). Alternatively, the different electrochemical behavior of V(V)/V(IV) complexes with L(+)-tartaric and DL()-tartaric acids could be due to differential adsorption of the complexes on the electrode surface. Without further investigations it is hardly likely to distinguish these possibilities. Precedent for this effect has been reported for Cu(II) complexes with L(+)- and DL()-tartaric acid when the process of electroless copper plating was investigated using formaldehyde as a reducing agent.21,22 The rate of copper deposition and real surface area of the coatings are about 3 times higher in DL()-tartaric acid solutions compared with these parameters in L(+)-tartaric acid solutions.21 These differences are in contrast to the similar complexation by L(+)- and DL()-tartrate of Cu(II) ions in alkaline solutions.22

Conclusions

Characterization of vanadium(V) complexes with tartaric acid was undertaken using multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and supported by EPR spectroscopy. Two major species were observed, one with a stoichiometry of 1:2 and a second complex with a stoichiometry of 1:1. The 1:2 complex formed from enantiomerically pure L-tartrate ligand was less stable than that of the 1:2 complex formed from racemic DL(+–)-tartrate ligand. The stability of the 1:2 complex of the L(+)- or D(–)-tartrate ligand was found to be lower than that of the 1:2 complex with the DL()-tartrate ligand.

The redox chemistry of these complexes was characterized using the electrochemical methods, particularly polarography and cyclic voltammetry. Diffusion coefficients were calculated from the polarographic data and the minimum average values for the diffusion coefficient for the vanadium(IV)-tartrate 2:2 complexes were determined to range from 3 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1 to 17 ´ 10-6 cm2 s-1 depending on pH. Cyclic voltammetry confirmed results obtained using NMR and EPR that complex formation depends on pH and tartrate enantiomer.

Acknowledgments

EN thanks the Lithuanian State Science and Studies Foundation for financial support (Project T–17/06). DCC thank the National Institutes of Health, General Medical Sciences for partial funding. In addition, DDC and EN thank the American Chemical Society and COBASE for funding the visitor exchange program.

References

1. Thompson, K. H.; McNeil, J. H.; Orvig, C.; Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2561; Sakurai, H.; Sano, H.; Takino, T.; Yasui, H.; Chem. Lett. 1999, 913; Crans, D. C.; Smee, J. J.; Gaidamauskas, E.; Yang, L. Q.; Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 849; Yang, X. G.; Yang, X. D.; Yuan, L.; Wang, K.; Crans, D. C.; Pharm. Res. 2004, 21, 1026; Sakurai, H.; Funakoshi, S.; Adachi, Y.; Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77, 1629; Crans, D. C.; Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77, 1497; Buglyó, P.; Crans, D. C.; Nagy, E. M.; Lindo, R. L.; Yang, L.; Smee, J. J.; Chi, L.-H.; Godzala III, M. E.; Willsky, G. R. Inor. Chem. 2005, 44, 5416.

2. Clague, M. J.; Butler, A.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3475; Rehder, D. In Bioinorganic Chemistry. Transition Metals in Biology and Their Coordination Chemistry; Trautwein, A. X., ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997; Rehder, D.; Jantzen, S.; Vanadium in the Environment. Part 1: Chemistry and Biochemistry, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998.

3. Eady, R. R. In Metal Ions in Biological Systems; Sigel, H.; Sigel, A., eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1995, vol. 31.

4. Druekhammer, D. G.; Durrwachter, J. R.; Pederson, R. L.; Crans, D. C.; Daniels, L.; Wong C.-H.; J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 70; Nour-Eldeen, A. F.; Craig, M. M.; Gresser, M. J.; J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 6836.

5. Ghosh, B. N.; Moulik, S. P.; Sengupta, K. K.; Pal, P. K.; J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1963, 40, 509.

6. Tapscott, R. E.; Belford, R. L.; Inorg. Chem. 1967, 6, 735.

7. Tapscott, R. E.; Belford, R. L.; Paul, I. C.; Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 356.

8. Tapscott, R. E.; Belford, R. L.; Paul, I. C.; Coord. Chem. Rev. 1969, 4, 323.

9. Kiss, T.; Buglyo, P.; Sanna, D.; Micera, G.; Decock, P.; Dewaele, D.; Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 239, 145.

10. Norkus, E.; Vaškelis, A.; Polyhedron 1994, 13, 3041.

11. Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R.; Electrochemical Methods. Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1980.

12. Norkus, E.; Pauliukaite, R.; Vaškelis, A.; Polish J. Chem. 1999, 73, 1837.

13. Crans, D. C.; Shin, P. K.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1305.

14. Amin, S. S.; Cryer, K.; Zhang, B.; Dutta, S. K.; Eaton, S. S.; Anderson, O. P.; Miller, S. M.; Reul, B. A.; Brichard, S. M.; Crans, D. C.; Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 406.

15. Heyrovsky, J.; Kuta, J.; Principles of Polarography, Academic Press: New York, 1966.

16. Pettersson, L.; Andersson, I.; Howarth, O. W.; Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 4032.

17. Chasteen, N. D. In Biological Magnetic Resonance; Berliner, L.; Reuben, J., eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1981, vol. 3.

18. Bard, A. J., ed.; Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry of the Elements; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1978, vol. 7.

19. Sillen, L. G.; Martell, A. E., eds.; Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes. Special Publication No 17, Supplement No 1; Chemical Society: London, 1964.

20. Sillen, L. G.; Martell, A. E., eds.; Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes. Special Publication No 17, Supplement No 1; Chemical Society: London, 1971.

21. Norkus, E.; Vaškelis, A.; Stalnioniene, I.; J. Solid State Electrochem. 2000, 4, 337.

22. Norkus, E.; Vaškelis, A.; Zakaite, I.; Chemija (Vilnius) 1997, 2, 16.

Received: January 17, 2006

Published on the web: June 20, 2006

  • 1. Thompson, K. H.; McNeil, J. H.; Orvig, C.; Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2561;
  • Sakurai, H.; Sano, H.; Takino, T.; Yasui, H.; Chem. Lett. 1999, 913;
  • Crans, D. C.; Smee, J. J.; Gaidamauskas, E.; Yang, L. Q.; Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 849;
  • Yang, X. G.; Yang, X. D.; Yuan, L.; Wang, K.; Crans, D. C.; Pharm. Res. 2004, 21, 1026;
  • Sakurai, H.; Funakoshi, S.; Adachi, Y.; Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77, 1629;
  • Crans, D. C.; Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77, 1497;
  • Buglyó, P.; Crans, D. C.; Nagy, E. M.; Lindo, R. L.; Yang, L.; Smee, J. J.; Chi, L.-H.; Godzala III, M. E.; Willsky, G. R. Inor. Chem. 2005, 44, 5416.
  • 2. Clague, M. J.; Butler, A.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3475;
  • Rehder, D. In Bioinorganic Chemistry. Transition Metals in Biology and Their Coordination Chemistry; Trautwein, A. X., ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997;
  • Rehder, D.; Jantzen, S.; Vanadium in the Environment. Part 1: Chemistry and Biochemistry, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998.
  • 3. Eady, R. R. In Metal Ions in Biological Systems; Sigel, H.; Sigel, A., eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1995, vol. 31.
  • 4. Druekhammer, D. G.; Durrwachter, J. R.; Pederson, R. L.; Crans, D. C.; Daniels, L.; Wong C.-H.; J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 70;
  • Nour-Eldeen, A. F.; Craig, M. M.; Gresser, M. J.; J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 6836.
  • 5. Ghosh, B. N.; Moulik, S. P.; Sengupta, K. K.; Pal, P. K.; J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1963, 40, 509.
  • 6. Tapscott, R. E.; Belford, R. L.; Inorg. Chem. 1967, 6, 735.
  • 7. Tapscott, R. E.; Belford, R. L.; Paul, I. C.; Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 356.
  • 8. Tapscott, R. E.; Belford, R. L.; Paul, I. C.; Coord. Chem. Rev 1969, 4, 323.
  • 9. Kiss, T.; Buglyo, P.; Sanna, D.; Micera, G.; Decock, P.; Dewaele, D.; Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 239, 145.
  • 10. Norkus, E.; Vakelis, A.; Polyhedron 1994, 13, 3041.
  • 11. Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R.; Electrochemical Methods. Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1980.
  • 12. Norkus, E.; Pauliukaite, R.; Vakelis, A.; Polish J. Chem. 1999, 73, 1837.
  • 13. Crans, D. C.; Shin, P. K.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1305.
  • 14. Amin, S. S.; Cryer, K.; Zhang, B.; Dutta, S. K.; Eaton, S. S.; Anderson, O. P.; Miller, S. M.; Reul, B. A.; Brichard, S. M.; Crans, D. C.; Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 406.
  • 15. Heyrovsky, J.; Kuta, J.; Principles of Polarography, Academic Press: New York, 1966.
  • 16. Pettersson, L.; Andersson, I.; Howarth, O. W.; Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 4032.
  • 17. Chasteen, N. D. In Biological Magnetic Resonance; Berliner, L.; Reuben, J., eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1981, vol. 3.
  • 18. Bard, A. J., ed.; Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry of the Elements; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1978, vol. 7.
  • 19. Sillen, L. G.; Martell, A. E., eds.; Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes. Special Publication No 17, Supplement No 1; Chemical Society: London, 1964.
  • 20. Sillen, L. G.; Martell, A. E., eds.; Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes. Special Publication No 17, Supplement No 1; Chemical Society: London, 1971.
  • 21. Norkus, E.; Vakelis, A.; Stalnioniene, I.; J. Solid State Electrochem. 2000, 4, 337.
  • 22. Norkus, E.; Vakelis, A.; Zakaite, I.; Chemija (Vilnius) 1997, 2, 16.
  • *
    e-mail:
  • #
    Current Address: Departamento de Química, Universidade de Coimbra, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      01 Dec 2006
    • Date of issue
      Oct 2006
    Sociedade Brasileira de Química Instituto de Química - UNICAMP, Caixa Postal 6154, 13083-970 Campinas SP - Brazil, Tel./FAX.: +55 19 3521-3151 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: office@jbcs.sbq.org.br