SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.121 issue3Regulation of cell cycles is of key importance in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical carcinogenesisForensic autopsy costs in the city of São Paulo author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Sao Paulo Medical Journal

Print version ISSN 1516-3180On-line version ISSN 1806-9460

Sao Paulo Med. J. vol.121 no.3 São Paulo  2003

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802003000300010 

REVIEW ARTICLE

 

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and isolated hemihyperplasia

 

 

Marcus Vinícius de Matos Gomes; Ester Silveira Ramos

Department of Genetics, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Correspondence

 

 


CONTEXT: Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is a complex and heterogeneous overgrowth syndrome with genetic and epigenetic alterations, involving genomic imprinting and cancer predisposition. Isolated hemihyperplasia is of unknown cause, and it may represent a partial or incomplete expression of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.
OBJECTIVES: A clinical and molecular review and proposal of the use of an experimental protocol to provide a practical approach for the physician.
DATA SYNTHESIS: This review demonstrates the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms involved in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and isolated hemihyperplasia, and the candidate genes. To our knowledge, this is the first Brazilian protocol for research into these disorders. The results have been used at the Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, to elucidate the basis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and isolated hemihyperplasia, and have been applied at the Hospital Universitário of the Faculdade de Medicina.
CONCLUSIONS: Elucidation of the etiological mechanisms and use of a laboratory protocol to detect alterations in these disorders may be useful for guiding the management of such patients and genetic counseling of the families.

Keywords: Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Imprinting. Methylation. Isolated hemihyperplasia. Cancer.


RESUMO

CONTEXTO: A síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann é uma doença de hipercrescimento complexa e heterogênea com alterações genéticas e epigenéticas, envolvendo imprinting genômico e predisposição ao câncer. A causa da hemi-hiperplasia isolada ainda é desconhecida e pode representar uma expressão parcial ou incompleta da síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann.
OBJETIVOS: Revisão clínica e molecular e proposta de um protocolo experimental para utilização na prática médica.
SÍNTESE DOS DADOS: Esta revisão apresenta os mecanismos genéticos e epigenéticos envolvidos na síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann e na hemi-hiperplasia isolada, os genes candidatos e o primeiro protocolo brasileiro, de que temos conhecimento, para a pesquisa dessas doenças. Os resultados têm sido utilizados na Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo para elucidar as bases da síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann/hemi-hiperplasia isolada e aplicados no Hospital das Clínicas desta Faculdade.
CONCLUSÕES: A elucidação dos mecanismos etiológicos e o uso de um protocolo laboratorial para se detectar as alterações nessas doenças pode ser proveitoso no acompanhamento clínico dos pacientes e no aconselhamento genético das famílias.

Palavras-chave: Síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann. Imprinting. Metilação. Hemi-hiperplasia isolada. Câncer.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is a congenital disorder first recognized in 1964 by Dr. H.R. Wiedemann,1 a geneticist, and then in 1969 by Dr. J. Bruce Beckwith,2 a pediatric pathologist. The syndrome is usually sporadic, but may be inherited.3 The incidence has been report to be approximately 1:13,700 births.4 The most common phenotypes associated are:

a) Macroglossia: larger than usual for an infant, may disturb the child's ability to eat, breathe or speak. In severe cases, corrective surgery may be necessary. The enlargement is no longer apparent by 6-8 years of age.

b) Abdominal wall defects (omphalocele, umbilical hernia, diastasis recti).

c) Increased growth: birth weight and length (usually above the mean), visceromegaly (particularly kidneys, liver, and pancreas) and hemihyperplasia (usually all or part of one side of the body).

d) Ear lobe creases, first described by Irving (1967) and then used as one of the criteria for diagnosis of the illness, and/or pit indentations on the posterior helix.5-8

Macroglossia, together with omphalocele or other umbilical abnormalities, allows recognition of the disorder at birth. Sometimes hemihyperplasia is not present at birth but becomes apparent later in childhood. It can be noted in approximately 12.5% of the cases and is present in 40% of the children who develop tumors (Figure 1).9

 

 

The risk situations are:

a) Hypoglycemia, which occurs shortly after birth. Although it is usually temporary, if untreated, it can cause seizures and hypoxia, leading to severe complications, including mental deficiency.10

b) Premature birth and its complications.

c) Development of tumors: children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome have a 7-21% risk for the development of embryonic malignancies, most notably Wilms' tumor of the kidney,11-13 although a wide variety of benign and malignant tumors have been reported, including hepatoblastoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and neuroblastoma.8,13

Isolated hemihyperplasia

Hemihyperplasia is clinically defined as asymmetric overgrowth of one or more body parts. The overgrowth may involve an entire half of the body, a single limb, and/or one side of the face or combinations thereof. There may be accompanying asymmetric visceromegaly.14

It may be an isolated finding, or it may be associated with a variety of multiple malformation syndromes. Rowe et al (1962)15 proposed a classification system for hemihyperplasia, based on anatomic site of involvement: a) complex hemihyperplasia – involvement of half of the body (at least one arm and one leg), in which the affected parts may be contra or ipsilateral; b) simple hemihyperplasia – involvement of a single limb; c) hemifacial hyperplasia – involvement of one side of the face. The incidence of isolated hemihyperplasia has been report to be approximately 1:86,000 live births16,17 and increased birth weight has been observed (mean of 3.8 kg).18 Hoyme et al (1998)17 reported an increase in the incidence of certain abdominal tumors in children with isolated hemihyperplasia (5.9%), in comparison with the general population.

Genetic and epigenetic aspects

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is a disorder with complex genetic and epigenetic alterations that occur in the chromosomal region 11p15.5. Genomic imprinting is a phenomenon that causes genes to be expressed according to their parental origin. Approximately 40 imprinted genes have now been identified in the human genome, with roles in prenatal growth, development of particular cell lineages, and in human diseases.19 The imprinting mechanism is still unclear, but probably involves differential methylation of specific sites in or near imprinted genes. It is characterized by a methylation pattern specific for the parental allele. Uniparental disomy is another phenomenon that involves and displays imprinting effects. It occurs when a pair of homologous chromosomes is inherited from the same parent. There are several mechanisms that could give rise to uniparental disomy, but the most common is "trisomic rescue", involving the loss of a supernumerary chromosome from a trisomic conceptus, leaving two homologues from the same gamete.20

The chromosomal region 11p15.5 is divided into two imprinted gene clusters: IGF2 and H19 are mapped in the telomeric domain; and CDKN1C (also know as p57kip2), KVLQT1 and LIT1 (also know as KvLQT1AS) in the centromeric domain (Figure 2) (Table 1).21-32 Genes IGF2 and H19 are coordinately regulated in normal tissues through an expression competition model.33,34 On the expressed maternal H19 allele, the differential methylated region (H19DMR), mapped 2 kb upstream from this gene, is nonmethylated and is able to bind to an insulator protein CCCTC-binding factor termed CTCF. This insulates the maternal IGF2 promoter from enhancers located 3' from the H19 gene, and prevents expression of IGF2. On the paternal allele, the H19DMR is methylated. This blocks the binding of the CTCF protein and prevents expression of the imprinted paternal H19 alleles.35 The IGF2 promoter now has access to the 3' enhancers and the paternal allele is expressed via enhancers and boundary elements.36 This suggests that H19DMR may function as a regional imprinting center that regulates the telomeric 11p15 imprinted domain. Deletion of the entire DMR results in loss of imprinting, with activation of H19 expression and reduction of IGF2 paternal expression when paternally inherited. The IGF2 maternal allele is activated and the maternal H19 expression is reducted when the deletion is maternally inherited.37,38 In the centromeric domain, the KvDMR1, a maternally methylated CpG island at the 5' end of the LIT1 transcript, may function as a regional imprinting center. Loss of methylation of KvDMR1 has been associated with biallelic expression of LIT1 in some Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome cases.31

 

 

Etiology of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and isolated hemihyperplasia

The etiology of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is complex and genetic and/or epigenetic alterations have been described. In approximately 15% of patients, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is inherited as an autosomal dominant pattern with variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance; 2% of patients have cytogenetics abnormalities and the remainder are sporadic. Imprinted genes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of both familial and sporadic Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (Table 2).39-47 Isolated hemihyperplasia and other mild manifestations of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome may represent patchy overexpression of the IGF2 gene following defective imprinting.17 The frequency of hemihyperplasia among Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome patients with uniparental disomy or aberrant methylation of both H19 and LIT1 has been found to be significantly higher than that in patients without such defects.48 Defects in imprinting are also related to the development of a number of cancers, including Wilms' tumor, neuroblastoma, acute myeloblastic leukemia, and rhabdomyosarcoma.49,50 Many authors have hypothesized that there may be a relationship between cancer risk and loss of imprinting of IGF2 and/or aberrant methylation of the H19DMR, because both defects have been described in cancers detected in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, especially Wilms' tumor.39,51-53 Imprinting defects in the centromeric domain (KvDMR) of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome patients have been observed in rhabdomyosarcoma, hepatoblastoma and gonadoblastoma, but not in Wilms' tumor. This suggests that distinct tumor predisposition profiles result from deregulation of the telomeric domain versus the centromeric domain and that these imprinting defects activate distinct genetic pathways for embryonic tumorigenesis.13

 

METHODS

After analyzing the papers in the literature, we created an experimental protocol for the identification of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and isolated hemihyperplasia, and to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the condition. This protocol has been used at the Department of Genetics of the Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, and for the management of the patients and genetic family counseling in the Genetic Outpatient Service of the Hospital Universitário of the Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo.

 

PATIENTS

For those families who have agreed to participate in the protocol, an informed consent and medical-information release document has been obtained, as approved by the respective institutional review boards. For the purpose of such studies, we define patients as having Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome if a clinical diagnosis has been made by a physician. The following specific criteria also need to be fulfilled: presence of 3 major findings (macroglossia, pre or postnatal growth > 90th percentile, and abdominal wall defects) or 2 major features plus 3 or more minor features such as ear signs (ear lobe creases or posterior helical ear pits), facial nevus flammeus, hypoglycemia, nephromegaly and hemihyperplasia.6,56,55 Patients with isolated hemihyperplasia or asymmetric overgrowth have also been analyzed, because they share a predisposition with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome patients for the same neoplasia, especially Wilms' tumor. The mechanism involved in isolated hemihyperplasia may have links with the mechanism for Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.

 

CLINICAL MANAGEMENT

Prenatal ultrasound has occasionally been helpful when certain characteristics (omphalocele, enlarged abdominal circumference, enlarged kidneys, protruding tongue) are present. Monitoring the glycemia in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome newborns every 6 hours during the first 3 days, in order to correct blood glucose levels, can prevent complications in the central nervous system.10 Everman et al (2000)56 conducted a study of serial alpha-fetoprotein concentration in 22 Beckwith-Wiedemann patients. The concentration was greater in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome patients and declined during the postnatal period at a significantly slower rate than in healthy children. Tongue correction surgery may be necessary in some severe cases. Follow-up by ultrasound is warranted in all patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, especially in cases associated with hemihyperplasia and/or nephromegaly, and in patients with isolated hemihyperplasia due to predisposition to embryonic tumors, including Wilms' tumor. The screened patients should be submitted to at least 2 ultrasounds per year up to the age of 5-7 years, and then annually until puberty. Some screening sonogram programs use intervals of 4 months or less.57-59

Cytogenetic analysis

Conventional cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes is performed60 and the slides are subjected to standard Giemsa staining.61 High resolution banding and in-situ fluorescence hybridization may be used in specific cases. The karyotype description should follow the nomenclature recommended by the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (1995).

Molecular analysis

Genomic DNA is isolated from peripheral-blood lymphocytes. In the analysis of uniparental disomy, patient, paternal and maternal samples are genotyped by ApaI/IGF2 and RsaI/H19 restriction fragment length polymorphism. Non-informative cases are genotyped with at least two microsatellite markers. IGF2 gene expression analysis (skin fibroblast RNA extraction) allows the detection of loss of imprinting. This is a highly invasive methodology that requires biopsy. For this reason we use it only in specific cases. As an alternative to this, we can use less invasive methodology based on the relationship between IGF2 and H19 correlated expression. Digestion using methylation-sensitive and nonsensitive enzymes and bisulfite DNA treatment allows the analysis of H19DMR and KvDMR methylation, and gene sequencing allows the analysis of CDKN1C mutations (Figure 3).

 

 

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is an overgrowth syndrome with tumor predisposition in childhood. It can be inherited but most cases are sporadic. The etiology is not totally clear, but some genetic and epigenetic aspects may be involved, like chromosomal rearrangements in the 11p15.5 region (2%), mutations and imprinting defects of genes, most probably involving methylation of the differential methylated region and uniparental disomy. Isolated hemihyperplasia is of unknown cause, and it may represent a partial or incomplete expression of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. The heterogeneous genetic and epigenetic basis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and isolated hemihyperplasia hampers understanding of the mechanisms involved in these disorders. Knowledge of the clinical and molecular basis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and isolated hemihyperplasia, establishment of a relationship between the causes of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and etiology of isolated hemihyperplasia, with an experimental protocol for their study, may be useful for patient management and better genetic counseling of their families.

 

REFERENCES

1. Wiedemann HR. Complexe malformatif familial avec hernie ombilicale et macroglossie - un 'syndrome nouveau'? J Genet Hum 1964;13:223-32.        [ Links ]

2. Beckwith JB. Macroglossia, omphalocele, adrenal cytomegaly, gigantism and hyperplastic visceromegaly. Birth Defects Orig Art Ser 1969;2:188-96.        [ Links ]

3. Li M, Squire JA, Weksberg R. Overgrowth syndromes and genomic imprinting: from mouse to man. Clin Genet 1998;53(3):165-70.        [ Links ]

4. Mannens M, Alders M, Redeker B, et al. Positional cloning of genes involved in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, hemihypertrophy, and associated childhood tumors. Med Pediatr Oncol 1996;27(5):490-4.        [ Links ]

5. Elliot M, Bayly R, Cole T, Temple IK, Maher ER. Clinical features and natural history of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: presentation of 74 new cases. Clin Genet 1994; 46 (2): 168-74.        [ Links ]

6. Martínez y Martínez R. Clinical features in the Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome. Clin Genet 1996;50(4):272-4.        [ Links ]

7. Sippell WG, Partsch CJ, Wiedemann HR. Growth, bone maturation and pubertal development in children with the EMG-syndrome. Clin Genet 1989;35(1):20-8.        [ Links ]

8. Irving IM. Exomphalos with macroglossia: a study of eleven cases. J Pediat Surg 1967;2(6):499-507.        [ Links ]

9. Wiedemann HR. Tumours and hemihypertrophy associated with Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome. Euro J Pediat 1983;141:129.        [ Links ]

10. Martínez y Martínez R, Martínez-Carboney R, Ocampo-Campos R, et al. Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome: clinical, cytogenetical and radiological observations in 39 new cases. Genet Couns 1992;3(2):67-76.        [ Links ]

11. Sotelo-Avila C, Gonzalez-Crussi F, Fowler JW. Complete and incomplete forms of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: their oncogenic potential. J Pediat 1980;96(1):47-50.        [ Links ]

12. Schneid H, Vazquez MP, Vacher C, Gourmelen M, Cabrol S, Le Bouc Y. The Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome phenotype and the risk of cancer. Med Pediat Oncol 1997;28(6):411-5.        [ Links ]

13. Weksberg R, Nishikawa J, Caluseriu O, et al. Tumor development in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is associated with a variety of constitutional molecular 11p15 alterations including imprinting defects of KCNQ1OT1. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10(26)2989-3000.        [ Links ]

14. Cohen MM. A comprehensive and critical assessment of overgrowth and overgrowth syndromes. Adv Hum Genet 1989;18:181-303,373-6.        [ Links ]

15. Rowe NH. Hemifacial hypertrophy: review of the literature and addition of four cases. Oral Surg 1962;15:572-6.        [ Links ]

16. Tomooka Y, Onitsuka H, Goya T, et al. Congenital hemihypertrophy with adrenal adenoma and medullary sponge kidney. Br J Radiol 1988;61(729):851-3.        [ Links ]

17. Hoyme HE, Seaver LH, Jones KL, et al. Isolated hemihyperplasia (hemihypertrophy): Report of a prospective multicenter study of the incidence of neoplasia and review. Am J Med Genet 1998;79(4):274-8.        [ Links ]

18. Leisenring WM, Breslow NE, Evans IE, et al. Increased birth weights of National Wilms' Tumor Study patients suggest a growth factor excess. Cancer Res 1994;54(17):4680-3.        [ Links ]

19. Reik W, Davies K, Dean W, Kelsey G, Constância M. Imprinted genes and the coordination of fetal and postnatal growth in mammals. Novartis Found Symp 2001;237:19-31; discussion 31-42.        [ Links ]

20. Engel E, DeLozier-Blanchet CD. Uniparental disomy, isodisomy, and imprinting: probable effects in man and strategies for their detection. Am J Med Genet 1991;40(4):432-9.        [ Links ]

21. Reik W, Maher ER. Imprinting in clusters: lessons from Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Trends Genet 1997;13(8):330-4.        [ Links ]

22. Maher ER, Reik W. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: imprinting in cluster revisited. J Clin Invest 2000;105(3):247-52.        [ Links ]

23. Engel JR, Smallwood A, Harper A, et al. Epigenotype-phenotype correlations in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Med Genet 2000;37(12):921-6.        [ Links ]

24. Brown KW, Villar AJ, Bickmore W, et al. Imprinting mutation in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome leads to biallelic IGF2 expression through an H19-independent pathway. Hum Mol Genet 1996;5(12):2027-32.        [ Links ]

25. Weksberg R, Teshima I, Williams BR, et al. Molecular characterization of cytogenetic alterations associated with the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) phenotype refines the localization and suggests the gene for BWS is imprinted. Hum Mol Genet 1993;2(5):549-56.        [ Links ]

26. Li M, Squire JA, Weksberg R. Molecular genetics of Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1998;79(4):253-9.        [ Links ]

27. Hashimoto K, Azuma C, Koyama M, et al. Loss of imprinting in choriocarcinoma. Nat Genet 1995;9(2):109-10.        [ Links ]

28. Ogawa O, Becroft DM, Morison IM, et al. Constitutional relaxation of insulin-like growth factor II gene imprinting associated with Wilms' tumour and gigantism. Nat Genet 1993;5(4):408-12.        [ Links ]

29. Hao Y, Crenshaw T, Moulton T, Newcomb E, Tycko B. Tumour suppressor activity of H19 RNA. Nature 1993;365(6448):764-7.        [ Links ]

30. Matsuoka S, Edwards MC, Bai C, et al. p57 KIP2 , a structurally distinct member of the p21CIP1 Cdk inhibitor family, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Genes Dev 1995;9(6):650-62.        [ Links ]

31. Lee MP, DeBaun MR, Mitsuya K, et al. Loss of imprinting of a paternally expressed transcript, with antisense orientation to KvLQT1, occurs frequently in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and is independent of insulin like growth factor II imprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96(9):5203-8.        [ Links ]

32. Smilinich NJ, Day CD, Fitzpatrick GV, et al. A maternally methylated CpG island in KvLQT1 is associated with an antisense paternal transcript and loss of imprinting in Beckwith- Wiedemann syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96(14):8064-9.        [ Links ]

33. Barlow DP. Competition - a common motif for the imprinting mechanism? EMBO J 1997;16(23):6899-905.        [ Links ]

34. Webber AL, Ingram RS, Levorse JM, Tilghman SM. Location of enhancers is essential for the imprinting of H19 and Igf2 genes. Nature 1998;391(6668):711-5.        [ Links ]

35. Hark AT, Schoenherr CJ, Katz DJ, Ingram RS, Levorse JM, Tilghman SM. CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus. Nature 2000;405(6785):486-9.        [ Links ]

36. Kanduri C, Pant V, Loukinov D, et al. Functional association of CTCF with the insulator upstream of the H19 gene is parent of origin-specific and methylation-sensitive. Curr Biol 2000;10(14):853-6.        [ Links ]

37. Thorvaldsen JL, Duran KL, Bartolomei MS. Deletion of the H19 differentially methylated domain results in loss of imprinted expression of H19 and Igf2. Genes Dev 1998;12(23):3693-702.        [ Links ]

38. Srivastava M, Hsieh S, Grinberg A, Williams-Simons L, Huang SP, Pfeifer K. H19 and Igf2 monoallelic expression is regulated in two distinct ways by a shared cis acting regulatory region upstream of H19. Genes Dev 2000;14(10):1186-95.        [ Links ]

39. Steenman MJ, Rainier S, Dobry CJ, Grundy P, Horon IL, Feinberg AP. Loss of imprinting of IGF2 is linked to reduced expression and abnormal methylation of H19 in Wilms' tumour. Nat Genet 1994;7(3):433-9.        [ Links ]

40. Reik W, Brown KW, Schneid H, Le Bouc Y, Bickmore W, Maher ER. Imprinting mutations in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome suggested by altered imprinting pattern in the IGF2-H19 domain. Hum Mol Genet 1995;4(12):2379-85.        [ Links ]

41. Feinberg AP. Cancer epigenetics takes center stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98(2):392-4.        [ Links ]

42. Bell AC, Felsenfeld G. Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature 2000;405(6785):482-5.        [ Links ]

43. Sun FL, Dean WL, Kelsey G, Allen NA, Reik W. Transactivation of Igf2 in a mouse model of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Nature 1997;389(6653):809-15.        [ Links ]

44. Lee MP, Hu RJ, Johnson LA, Feinberg AP. Human KVLQT1 gene shows tissue-specific imprinting and encompasses Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome chromosomal rearrangements. Nat Genet 1997;15(2):181-5.        [ Links ]

45. Lee MP, DeBaun M, Randhawa G, et al. Low frequency of p57 KIP2 mutation in Beckwith-Wiedemann. Am J Hum Genet 1997;61(2):304-9.        [ Links ]

46. Lam WW, Hatada I, Ohishi S, et al. Analysis of germline CDKN1C (p57KIP2) mutations in familial and sporadic Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) provides a novel genotype-phenotype correlation. J Med Genet 1999;36(7)518-23.        [ Links ]

47. Henry I, Bonaiti-Pellié C, Chehensse V, et al. Uniparental paternal disomy in a genetic cancer-predisposing syndrome. Nature 1991;351(6328):665-7.        [ Links ]

48. DeBaun MR, Niemitz EL, McNeil DE, et al. Epigenetic alterations of H19 and LIT1 distinguish patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome with cancer and birth defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70(3):604-11.        [ Links ]

49. Falls JG, Pulford DJ, Wylie AA, Jirtle RL. Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease. Am J Pathol 1999;154(3)635-47.        [ Links ]

50. Moulton T, Chung WY, Yuan L, et al. Genomic imprinting and Wilms' tumor. Med Pediatr Oncol 1996;27(5):476-83.        [ Links ]

51. Ogawa O, Eccles MR, Szeto J, et al. Relaxation of insulin-like growth factor II gene imprinting in Wilms' tumour. Nature 1993;362(6422):749-51.        [ Links ]

52. Rainier S, Johnson LA, Dobry CJ, Ping AJ, Grundy PE, Feinberg AP. Relaxation of imprinted genes in human cancer. Nature 1993;362(6422):747-9.        [ Links ]

53. Tycko B. Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer. J Clin Invest 2000;105(4):401-7.        [ Links ]

54. Elliott M, Bayly R, Cole T, Temple IK, Maher ER. Clinical features and natural history of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: presentation of 74 new cases. Clin Genet 1994;46(2):168-74.        [ Links ]

55. DeBaun MR, Tucker MA. Risk of cancer during the first four years of life in children form The Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Registry. J Pediatr 1998;132(3 Pt 1):398-400.        [ Links ]

56. Everman DB, Shuman C, Dzolganovski B, O'riordan MA, Weksberg R, Robin NH. Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Pediatr 2000;137(1):123-7.        [ Links ]

57. Borer JG, Kaefer M, Barnewolt CE, et al. Renal findings on radiological followup of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Urol 1999;16(1):235-9.        [ Links ]

58. Choyke PL, Siegel MJ, Craft AW, Green DM, DeBaun MR. Screening for Wilms tumor in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome or idiopathic hemihypertrophy. Med Pediatr Oncol 1999;32(3):196-200.        [ Links ]

59. McNeil DE, Brown M, Ching A, DeBaun MR. Screening for Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndromes: a cost-effective model. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001;37(4):349-56.        [ Links ]

60. Moorhead PS, Norwell PC, Meliman WJ, Battips DM, Hungerford DA. Chromosome preparations of leukocyte cultures from human peripheral blood. Exp Cell Res 1960;20:654-6.        [ Links ]

61. Scheres JM. Human chromosome banding. Lancet 1972;1(7755):849.        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to
Marcus Vinícius de Matos Gomes
Departamento de Genética da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo
Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900 – Bloco C
Ribeirão Preto/SP – Brasil – CEP 14049-900
Tel: (+55 16) 602-3076/602-3164
E-mail: mvmgomes@rge.fmrp.usp.br

Sources of funding: CNPq (grant no. 130650/2002-1), FAPESP (grant no. 1998/16573-8) and PRONEX (grant no. 661036/1998-7)
Conflict of interest: Not declared
Date of first submission: November 28, 2002
Last received: December 13, 2002
Accepted: February 17, 2003

 

 

PUBLISHING INFORMATION

Marcus Vinícius de Matos Gomes. MSc student, Department of Genetics, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ester Silveira Ramos, MD, PhD. Department of Genetics, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License