Services on Demand
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
On-line version ISSN 1807-3107
Braz. oral res. vol.23 supl.1 São Paulo June 2009
Juliana Jobim JardimI; Luana Severo AlvesII; Marisa MaltzIII
IMSc, Graduate fellow
IIIPhD, Professor - Department of Social and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
This literature review reports the history and the current market of oral home-care products. It provides information extending from the products used by our ancestors to those currently available, as well as on the changes in the supply and consumption of these products. Although the scientific knowledge about oral diseases has improved greatly in recent years, our ancestors had already been concerned with cleaning their teeth. A variety of rudimentary products and devices were used since before recorded history, like chewing sticks, tree twigs, bird feathers, animal bones, tooth powder and home-made mouth rinses. Today, due to technological improvements of the cosmetic industry and market competition, home-use oral care products available in the marketplace offer a great variety of options. An increase in the consumption of oral care products has been observed in the last decades. Estimates show that Latin America observed a 12% increase in hygiene and beauty products sales between 2002 and 2003, whereas the observed global rate was approximately 2%. A significant increase in the per capita consumption of toothpaste, toothbrush, mouthrinse and dental floss has been estimated from 1992 to 2002, respectively at rates of 38.3%, 138.3%, 618.8% and 177.2%. Pertaining to this increased supply and consumption of oral care products, some related questions remain unanswered, like the occurrence of changes in disease behavior due to the use of new compounds, their actual efficacy and correct indications, and the extent of the benefits to oral health derived from consuming more products.
Descriptors: Oral hygiene; Dental devices, home care; Dentifrices; Mouthwashes.
The history of oral home-care products
Bacterial biofilm is a natural component of the oral environment and is compatible with health in balance situations. When biofilm accumulation on dental or gingival tissues occurs for a certain period of time and combined with others factors, it can lead to dental caries or periodontal disease - the major causes of tooth loss everywhere in the world1 and the two most common chronic human diseases.2
Although the scientific knowledge about the etiology and dynamics of the development of oral diseases has presented a great improvement in the last decades, man has tried to find ways to clean his teeth since a remote past.
A variety of oral hygiene measures has been used since before recorded history. This has been verified by excavations done all over the world, in which chewing sticks, tree twigs, bird feathers and animal bones were found.
The early history and evolution of the toothbrush has its origin in the chewing sticks used by the Babylonians as early as 3500 BC. Also known as "miswak" or "siwak", it was also an ancient pre-Islamic habit. Mohammed was an enthusiastic supporter of its use as a "purgative for the mouth". He used to report that "it makes the teeth white, clarifies the understanding, makes the breath fragrant, dries up the phlegm, strengthens the gums around the teeth, makes the glance clear, sharpens the power of the vision, opens the bowels and whets the appetite", evidencing that, for some, "miswak" was not only a personal hygiene habit but also a spiritual custom. The chewing stick was a rudimentary toothbrush used as a single agent or with tooth powder or extract of roses.2
The first true bristled toothbrush was originated in China at around 1600 AD. The first modern toothbrush was reinvented in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.2 The first patent for a toothbrush was credited to H. N. Wadsworth in 1857, in the United States, but due to the high price of the hog bristle, the mass production of the product in America only started in the end of the 19th century. As technology progressed, natural swine bristles were replaced by synthetic fibers, usually nylon. The first electric toothbrush, an attempt to offer the public a brush that could simulate the action of a manual brush, was developed in 1939 in Scotland, but did not appear on the market until the 1960s.
Ancient Greek and Roman literature had first reported the use of twigs as primitive toothpicks to remove food and debris from between the teeth. The intent of early humans was probably not to clean the teeth but simply to remove an unpleasant subjective sensation. The Greeks tended to keep these little instruments in their mouths continuously and were often referred to as "toothpick chewers".2 Around 1600 BC, the Chinese also used twigs made of trees carefully chosen from aromatic species that had the ability to clean and freshen the mouth. Wealthy citizens often carried their gold or silver toothpicks in fancy cases and used them ostentatiously at meals. Many religions, both before and after the Christian era, enjoined their adherents to practice cleanliness of the teeth using twig cuts as a tooth-pick.3
The development of toothpaste began as long ago as 300-500 BC in China and India. First attempts at tooth cleaning included using abrasives such as crushed bone, crushed egg and oyster shells.4 Tooth powder was the first noticeable advance, and was made up of elements like powdered charcoal, powdered bark, salt and some flavoring agents.5
Modern toothpastes were developed in the 1800s. As the years passed, new components were added to their formulations, as soap and chalk. In 1873, toothpaste was firstly mass-produced. Due to advancements in synthetic detergents after World War II, the soap was replaced for emulsifying agents such as sodium lauryl sulphate and sodium ricinoleate. Fluoride was added initially in 1914, but the American Dental Association at first criticized its introduction. The ADA finally consented to the use of fluoride in toothpastes in 1960.
Besides the traditional tooth paste and brush, a great variety of home-use oral products have been developed.
A concern about the cleaning of approximal surfaces was first reported by Levi Parmly (1790-1859), the inventor of dental floss.6 He stated that the device should "be passed through the interstices of the teeth, between their necks and the arches of the gum, to dislodge that irritating matter which no brush can remove and which is the real source of distress". Dental floss made of silk was used since the 19th century, while nylon floss was made available in the marketplace right after World War II. The difficulty of flossing explains its reduced use and makes this technique less than universal.2 Other interdental cleaning devices have been developed, such as rubber tip stimulators and interdental brushes.
The first known reference to mouth rinsing is found in Chinese medicine, around 2700 BC. Later on, in the Greek and Roman periods, mouth rinsing following mechanical cleansing became common among the upper classes, and Hippocrates recommended a mixture of salt, alum and vinegar2 while Pythagoras recognized the freshening effect of anise.5 Different products were used for mouth rinsing over the centuries. In the 1500s, wine or beer were used; in the late 19th century, around 1890, the use of essential oils was introduced among the dental care habits.2 Freshening bad breath has been the traditional use of mouth rinsing. Besides this cosmetic purpose, therapeutic mouth rinsing is now available, including fluoride, quaternary ammonium compounds and chlorhexidine.
Today, due to technological improvements of the cosmetic industry and market competition, home-use oral care products available in the marketplace offer the consumer a wide variety of options. The toothbrush head is presented in different forms and sizes; bristles are presented in different hardness options (hard, medium, soft or extra-soft). Toothpastes are presented in different concentrations of fluoride (from formulations without this component to versions with a very high concentration of it, such as 5000/ ppm); and special versions present natural components, such as propolis and jua, for specific purposes, as tooth bleaching, dental erosion control or to reduce sensitivity. Mouth rinses have a cosmetic or therapeutic use, just for mouth freshening or for controlling plaque, gingivitis and dental caries.
Owing to the wide variety of products available in the marketplace and the strong appeal to consumers exerted by the cosmetic industry, the consumption of oral care products has increased in the last decades. In the following section, the changes in the consumption of oral health products and their main reasons are discussed.
The market of oral home-care products
Nielsen Company7 (2004) studied the sales of hygiene and beauty products in 56 countries comprising 95% of the world Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 75% of the world population. They divided the Hygiene and Beauty products in 9 categories: baby products, cosmetics, hair products, paper products, oral hygiene, body hygiene and moisturizing, facial hygiene and moisturizing, sunscreen and hair removal. Although hygiene and beauty products are among the categories with the lowest sales increase in the world, around 2%, they rank fourth in sales (Graph 1). And Latin America has shown larger growth rates than those of the rest of the world. The oral hygiene products market presented an increase of 12% between 2002 and 2003, as shown in Graph 2.
The consulting firm Kline & Company8 (2004) studied the sales of oral care products in 16 countries. According to this study, Brazil occupied in 2004 the 10th position in sales of oral care products. The sales in Brazil were ahead of countries with higher economic power, like Canada and Spain, and countries in Latin America like Argentina (Table 1).
The consumption of toothpaste and toothbrush per inhabitant per year is respectively 90% and 110% higher in Brazil compared with Argentina,9 as shown in Table 2. In 2004, the sales of oral health products in Brazil was five times the sales of these products in Argentina, even though Argentina showed a sales increase 8 times higher than that of Brazil from 2003 to 2004. The consumption of toothpaste, toothbrush, mouthrinse and dental floss had increased significantly, as can be seen in Table 3 (absolute values) and Table 4 (average per capita).
Comparing the consumption per capita of these products, an increase of 38.3% in toothpaste, 138.3% in toothbrush and 177.2% in dental floss can be noticed from 1992 to 2002.9 Of all the oral care products, mouthrinse is the one that presented during this period the most outstanding increase in sales: 618.5%. This could be due to the fact that the supply of these products was significantly enhanced in the past 10 to 15 years. New mouthrinses for biofilm control and caries prevention, using different active compounds, such as essentials oils, natural products (propolis and jua), cetylpyridinium chloride and fluoride are available at lower prices, and are produced by a larger variety of companies. The newest product release on the marketplace is a mouthrinse for dental bleaching. There is no data concerning the increase in over-the-counter dental bleaching products in Brazil; however, global data from Nielsen7 (2004) showed a 48% sales increase from 2002 to 2003.
According to internal estimates from Colgate-Palmolive (unpublished data), toothpaste is in 99.9% of Brazilian homes. Each Brazilian consumes, per year, 1.67 toothbrush, 126 milliliters of mouthrinse and 18.8 meters of dental floss (which means 5.1 centimeters per day). Comparing these recent data with those showed previously, we can observe that the consumption of toothbrush increased from 1.12 in 2002 to 1.67 in 2009.
Current data from ABIHPEC10 (2008) shows that the market of oral care products has increased from 2002 to 2006 in Brazil, when it was handling around US$/ 746.1/ ×/ 103, as shown in Graph 3. As to the sales share in 2006, toothpaste represented 66%, dental floss, 21%, mouthrinse, 9% and toothbrush, 4% (Graph 4).10
In general, four reasons for this sales increase of oral care products in Brazil were pointed out by ABIHPEC10 (2004) and confirmed by Nielsen7. The reasons are:
1. Women's increasing participation in the labor market: this fact created a need for practical products, in addition to an increase in the purchasing power of the household. Hence, products that presented a faster and easier way of use, like disposable dippers, had their sales increased. Dental home bleaching products, for example, are also time- and moneysaving alternatives to a dental visit.
2. The use of cutting-edge technology by the industry, leading to increased productivity and, consequently, lower prices to consumers.
3. Constant release of different products, in an attempt to meet the consumers' needs for new and interesting formats. An example is the addition of the strip format to the mouth-refreshing category. Innovations in oral care products are constantly being released onto the marketplace, like combinations of dentifrice, mouthrinse, dental bleaching and desensitizer in a single product.
4. An increase in life expectancy, which leads to an increase in the proportion of elder consumers. This share of the population is growing faster in Latin America than in the rest of the world. The increasing desire to preserve a youthful appearance is reflected by an enhancement in the development of anti-aging products. The sales increase of dental bleaching agents is also a reflection of this situation.
Since remote times, our ancestors were concerned with cleaning their teeth and keeping their mouths fresh and healthy. They developed a variety of rudimentary devices and products, which ultimately led to today's availability of a wide range of oral home-care products. A large increase has been observed in the consumption of these products in a short time interval:/ 12% over one year in Latin America,7 for example. Some questions arise from observing the current data. Has the behavior of dental diseases changed over the time due to exposure to compounds like fluoride, antimicrobials or chlorhexidine? Do dental professionals know the actual efficacy and the correct indications of the available products? To what extent the increased supply and consumption of home-care products has actually promoted an improvement in oral health? Future investigations may answer these questions in order to guide consumers and professionals in using oral home-care products.
1. Baelum V, Luan WM, Chen X, Fejerskov O. Predictors of tooth loss over 10 years in adult and elderly Chinese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25:204-10. [ Links ]
2. Fischman S. The history of oral hygiene products: how far have we come in 6000 years? Periodontol 2000. 1999;15:7-14. [ Links ]
3. Campbell JM. Dentistry then and now. 2nd/ ed. Edinburgh: Privately Printed for the author; 1963. [ Links ]
4. Ring ME. História ilustrada da Odontologia. São Paulo: Manole; 1998. [ Links ]
5. Lerman S. Historia de la Odontologia y su ejercicio legal. 2nd/ ed. Buenos Aires: Mundi; 1964. [ Links ]
6. Sanoudos M, Christen AG. Levi Spear Parmly: The Apostle of Dental Hygiene. J Hist Dent. 1999;47(1):3-6. [ Links ]
7. Nielsen Company. Os produtos mais quentes do mundo - informações sobre o crescimento de categorias de higiene & beleza [online]. São Paulo: Nielsen Global Services; 2004. Available from: http://www.acnielsen.com.br. [ Links ]
8. Kline & Company. Global Cosmetics & Toiletries 2004: World Overview [online]. Kline & Company: Business proc-ess management consulting and industry market research reports. Available from: http://www.klinegroup.com/. [ Links ]
9. Manfredini MA. Características da indústria de equipamentos odontológicos e de produtos para higiene bucal no Brasil entre 1990 e 2002 [Dissertação de Mestrado]. São Paulo: Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo; 2006. [ Links ]
Faculdade de Odontologia - UFRGS
Departamento de Odontologia Preventiva e Social
Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2492
Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil CEP: 90035-003
Received for publication on May 04, 2009
Accepted for publication on May 12, 2009