SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue5Biological control of tomato wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici by rhizobacteriaSilicon reduces bacterial speck development on tomato leaves author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Tropical Plant Pathology

Print version ISSN 1982-5676

Trop. plant pathol. vol.38 no.5 Brasília Sept./Oct. 2013  Epub Aug 02, 2013

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-56762013005000020 

Sensitivity of Corynespora cassiicola from soybean to carbendazim and prothioconazole

 

 

Sheila A. XavierI; Marcelo G. CanteriI; Daiane C. M. BarrosI; Claudia V. GodoyII

IDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, 86051-970, Londrina, PR, Brazil
IIEmbrapa Soja, 86001970, Londrina, PR, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

The incidence of target spot disease on soybean has increased in recent years in Brazil even with intensive use of fungicides, and fungal resistance has been reported in recent studies. The objective of this study was to determine the fungicide sensitivity to carbendazim and prothioconazole in a sample of 24 isolates of Corynespora cassiicola from soybean collected from 1996 to 2011 in the states of Paraná, Mato Grosso and São Paulo (Brazil) and Corpus Christi (Paraguay). The 50% effective concentration (EC50) values were estimated by the relative mycelium growth reduction on fungicide-amended medium with the doses of 0, 0.5, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 µg of active ingredient/ mL. For carbendazim, four highly resistant isolates (EC50>50 µg/mL) were observed from samples collected from Mato Grosso in 2008 and from Paraná and Mato Grosso in 2011. The EC50 values for prothioconazole ranged from 0.47 µg/mL to 26.44 µg/mL (mean: 5.02 µg/ ml). The results reinforce the occurrence of C. cassiicola resistance to benzimidazole in Paraná and Mato Grosso states.

Key words: benzimidazole, fungicide resistance, triazole.


 

 

The fungus Corynespora cassiicola (Berk. & M. A. Curtis) C.T. Wei infects more than 350 host plants from over 50 tropical and subtropical countries (Farr & Rossman, 2013). On soybean it causes the target spot disease and affects leaves, stems, pods, seeds, hypocotyls, and roots. Severely affected leaves drop prematurely (Sinclair, 1999). Since 1976, when it was first reported in Brazil (Almeida et al., 1976), target spot has occurred mainly in soybean growing regions with moderate temperatures, and in regions at high altitudes in the savannas. In recent years, target spot incidence has increased due to the over utilization of high yielding susceptible cultivars and the disease can now be found in most soybean growing regions.

Fungicides of Methyl Benzimidazole Carbamates (MBC), Quinone outside Inhibitors (QoI) and DeMethylation Inhibitors (DMI) groups are registered to control target spot in Brazil (Agrofit, 2013). Fungicides were first recommended on soybean in Brazil during the 1996/97 season to control powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe diffusa (Cooke & Peck) U. Braun & S. Takam. , and some years later to control late season diseases caused by Cerspora kikuchii (Tak. Matsumoto & Tomoy.) M.W. Gardner and Septoria glycines Hemmi, mainly with sulfur and benzimidazoles (Anonymous, 1997). With the introduction of Asian soybean rust caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. & P. Syd. in 2001, the use of fungicides was intensified, with an average of two applications during one growing cycle. Because of the reduction of efficiency of the triazoles for rust control, in 2007 it was recommended that only mixtures of triazoles-strobilurins should be used for controlling rust (Godoy, 2012). Even with frequent fungicide application to control these multiple fungal diseases, target spot is still frequently observed in fields of a susceptible cultivar. Due to the low efficiency of triazoles-strobilurins fungicides mixtures to control target spot, it is a common practice to add benzimidazole in the application, or even to start with an application of benzimidazoles at the vegetative stage to increase target spot control.

Recommended and new fungicides were evaluated in trials in different regions in Brazil during the 2011-12 season (Godoy et al., 2012). Carbendazim (benzimidazole) had efficiency of only 16%, averaged across six trials from multiple regions. The mixture of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole had the highest efficiency among the registered products (32%), but it was not as efficient as the unregistered test mixture of pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole + fluxapyroxad (66% efficiency).

The lower efficiency of carbendazim can be due to the fungus resistance to this group. Benzimidazole fungicides were introduced for plant disease control in the 1960s and early 1970s. As site-specific inhibitors, benzimidazoles generally carry a high risk of resistance development in pathogens. Since commercialization started, at least 100 species of fungi have developed some degree of resistance to benzimidazoles (FRAC, 2013a) including C. cassiicola in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) (Date et al., 2004). In Brazil, failures in target spot disease control with benzimidazole were only noticed with the recent increase planting of susceptible soybean cultivars. Avozani (2011) and Teramoto et al. (2012) reported resistance of C. cassiicola isolates from soybean in Goiás and Mato Grosso States, respectively. Due to the intensive use of fungicides, resistant populations could have been present in the fields even before 2011.

Field samples of major target pathogens should be tested for levels of sensitivity before the fungicide is used commercially, to provide baseline data for subsequent comparisons (Brent, 2012). According to Hasama & Sato (1996) the 50% effective concentration (EC50) values for a baseline population of C. cassiicola to benzimidazole is between 0.08 µg/mL and 0.61 µg/mL. Resistance of C. cassiicola was also reported for dicarboximides, N-phenylcarbamates, QoI fungicides and boscalid (Hasama & Sato, 1996; Date et al., 2004; Takeuchi et al., 2006; Ishii et al., 2007; Myamoto et al., 2009). Prothioconazole was recommended for soybean in Brazil for the first time in 2010/11. Although some authors considered 1 µg/mL as a cut off for triazoles - C. cassiicola (Teramoto et al., 2011), no baseline data has been published for prothioconazole. Prothioconazole is the only DMI-fungicide that belongs to the chemical group triazolinthione (FRAC, 2013b).

The objective of this study was to determine EC50 for carbendazim (MBC) and prothioconazole (DMI) for 24 C. cassiicola isolates from the Embrapa Soja mycological collection (MES) obtained from multiple regions across Brazil from 1996 to 2011 (Table 1). The isolates were collected from soybean leaves, stem and pods. One isolate was from Paraguay (MES 692) and the others were isolated from different regions in the states of Paraná (10), Mato Grosso (10) and São Paulo (1). Some of the isolates were collected from unknown origins in Brazil (MES 307 and 657). The isolates have been maintained on potatodextrose-agar (PDA) media (20 g of dextrose, 15 g of agar, and infused of 200 g of potato in 1 L of distilled water) and stored at 5º C until use.

Commercial formulations of carbendazim [50% active ingredient (a.i.) Carbendazim Nortox®; Nortox SA] and prothioconazole (48% a.i., Proline®; Bayer CropScience) were used in all experiments. Carbendazim was chosen for the test as this fungicide was known to be the active degradation component of thiophanate-methyl and benomyl from MBC- fungicide group (Ishii, 2012). Prothioconazole is present in the mixture with the highest field efficiency among the products registered in Brazil (Godoy et al., 2012).

To test the sensitivity of C. cassiicola to these selected fungicides, PDA media were amended with 0, 0.5, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 µg of a.i./mL of carbendazim and prothioconazole. Media were poured into 9-mm-diameter Petri plates, using approximately 20 mL per plate, and allowed to solidify for 24 h. Six-millimeter-diameter mycelial plugs taken from the edge of a 10-day-old colony of each isolate were placed mycelium surface down onto PDA plates amended with each concentration of the fungicides. After the plates were incubated at 25±2ºC for 10 days in the dark, the radial growth (colony diameter) of each isolate was measured, with the original mycelial plug subtracted from each measurement. The average of the colony diameters measured in two perpendicular directions was used. Four replicates of each fungicide concentration were used per isolate. The experiment was performed once. For each isolate, a linear regression of the percent inhibition (relative to the mycelial growth of the control) versus the log10 transformation was obtained, and the EC50 was calculated with the PROC PROBIT function in SAS® Version 9.1.3. (SAS Intitute Inc.). The Pearson's chi-square test was used to check the goodness of fit (p-value>0.1). Cross-resistance was evaluated by the significance of the correlation coefficient (r) between log transformed EC50 values of carbendazim and prothioconazole.

For carbendazim, based on differences in sensitivity, tested isolates were divided into three phenotypes as follows: Highly Resistant (HR), EC50>50 µg/mL; Moderately Resistant (MR), 50 µg/mL>EC50>1 µg/mL; Sensitive (S), EC50<1.0 µg/mL (Edgington et al., 1971; Ma et al., 2003) (Table 1). For prothioconazole no cut off was assumed and the distribution of EC50 among isolates was plotted (Figure 1).

Two different resistance levels (moderate and high) were observed for 11 isolates of C. cassiicola based on their sensitivity to carbendazim. For the isolate MES 649, a complete inhibition was observed at concentration of 0.5 µg/ mL, whereas isolates MES 930 and MES 933 grew at 1000 µg/mL (Table 1). The calculated EC50 ranged from 0.3 µg/ mL to 575 µg/mL. The isolates with the highest resistance were collected in 2008 from Mato Grosso (MES 646) and in 2011 from Paraná and Mato Grosso states (MES 930, 932 e 933). From the isolates evaluated, 13 were considered sensitive to carbendazim. The isolate collected in 1996, before the first recommendation of fungicides on soybean, was classified as moderately resistant to carbendazim. Although samples highly resistant to carbendazim were detected in the collection only after 2008, this was not a general trend since sensitive isolates were also detected after 2008 in Mato Grosso (MES651, 667), Paraná (MES 649, 926), São Paulo (MES 670) and Canideyú, Paraguay (MES 692).

For prothioconazole all isolates were completely inhibited at 100 µg/mL. The EC50 ranged from 0.47 µg/ mL to 26.44 µg/mL (mean: 5.02 µg/mL). Sixty percent of the isolates presented EC50<2 µg/mL (Figure 1). Although four isolates presented EC50>10 after 2007, no trend was observed among years. Prothioconazole is a triazolinthione from DMI group and others DMIs have been intensely used on soybean since P. pachyrhizi introduction in 2001. Cross resistance can be present between DMIs fungicides active against the same fungus (Russell, 2004). The ideal situation to establish a baseline should be if the molecule being considered was the only representative on the market for that mode of action (Russell, 2004) but this data is not available for prothioconazole -C. cassiicola on soybean. The EC50 variation for prothioconazole could be due to the intrinsic characteristics of the isolates or to the selection pressure by the use of DMIs on soybean.

No significant correlation was observed for carbendazim and prothioconazole EC50 levels and this was expected since the two fungicides evaluated have different mode of action.

Avozani (2011) studied the sensitivity of five C. cassiicola soybean isolates (three from Mato Grosso, one from Minas Gerais and one from Rondônia, Brazil) to carbendazim and observed EC50 values of 0.2 mg/L and 0.26 mg/L for Minas Gerais and Rondônia isolates, respectively, and higher than 40 mg/L (maximum evaluated rate) for the Mato Grosso isolates. For the four DMI-fungicides evaluated for mycelium growth inhibition, the EC50 values ranged from 0.77 mg/L to 20.32 mg/L. The range of EC50 was similar to the one observed for prothioconazole (0.47 µg/mLto 26.44 µg/mL).

Teramoto et al. (2011) evaluated the sensitivity of five cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) C. cassiicola isolates from São Paulo and one from Goiás State, Brazil, using mycelium growth inhibition to azoxystrobin, difenoconazole, carbendazim, tebuconazole and thiophanate-methyl and found EC50 values higher than 50 µg/mL for azoxystrobin, carbendazin and thiophanate-methyl and below 50 µg/mL for difenoconazole and tebuconazole. Benzimidazoles and QoI resistance has been reported for C. cassiicola in cucumber with decrease in its use in Japan (Hasama, 1991; Hasama & Sato, 1996; Date et al., 2004; Takeuchi et al., 2006). The resistance to benzimidazole generally persists after development with some exceptions such as Mycosphaerella fijiensis M. Morelet in bananas (Musa spp.) (Smith, 1988; Brent, 2012). The use of benzimidazole-mancozeb mixtures is one control strategy that worked for peanut Cercospora leaf spots in the USA (Smith, 1988).

Although this research included a small number of isolates, the results reinforce the occurrence of C. cassiicola isolates highly resistant to benzimidazole in regions of Paraná and Mato Grosso States. A more detailed sampling should be conducted to map the distribution of the resistant isolates. The distribution curve of EC50 values for prothioconazole can be used to monitor shifts in the distribution peak in future samplings.

 

ACKNOWLEDEGMENTS

Authors are grateful to Steve Clough for reviewing a preliminary version of this manuscript. First and last authors are thankful to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq for providing the authors with a research scholarship and research fellowship, respectively. This paper was approved for publication by the Editorial Board of Embrapa Soja as manuscript number 02/2013.

 

REFERENCES

Agrofit (2013) Sistema de agrotóxicos fitossanitários. Available at: http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons/. Accessed on February 5, 2013.         [ Links ]

Almeida AMR, Machado CC, Ferreira LP, Lehman OS, Antonio H (1976) Ocorrência de Corynespora cassiicola (Berk. & Curt.)Wei no Estado de São Paulo. Fitopatologia Brasileira 1:111-112.         [ Links ]

Anonymous (1997) Recomendações técnicas para a cultura da soja na cultura da soja na região central do Brasil. Londrina PR. Embrapa Soja.         [ Links ]

Avozani A (2011) Sensibilidade de Corynespora cassiicola, isolados da soja, a fungicidas in vitro. Dissertação de Mestrado, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária. Passo Fundo RS, Brazil.         [ Links ]

Brent KJ (2012) Historical perspectives of fungicide resistance. In: Thind TS (Ed.) Fungicide resistance in crop protection: risk and management. Wallingford UK. CAB International. pp. 3-18.         [ Links ]

Date H, Kataoka E, Tanina K, Sasaki S, Inoue K, Nasu H, Kasuyama S (2004) Sensitivity of Corynespora cassicola, causal agent of Corynespora target spot of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), to thiophanate-methyl and diethofencarb. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 70:7-9.         [ Links ]

Edgington LV, Khew KL, Barron GL (1971) Fungitoxic spectrum of benzimidazole compounds. Phytopathology 61:42-44.         [ Links ]

Farr DF, Rossman AY (2013) Fungal Databases, Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. Available at: http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/. Accessed on February 5, 2013.         [ Links ]

FRAC (2013a) List of plant pathogenic organisms resistant to disease control agents. Available at: http://www.frac.info/publication/anhang/List-of-resistant-plant-pathogens_2013.pdf. Accessed on January 15, 2013.         [ Links ]

FRAC (2013b) Code list. Available at: http://www.frac.info/publication/anhang/FRAC%20Code%20List%202013-final.pdf. Accessed on April 5, 2013.         [ Links ]

Godoy CV (2012) Risk and management of fungicide resistance in the Asian soybean rust fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi. In: Thind TS (Ed.) Fungicide resistance in crop protection: Risk and management. Wallingford UK. CAB International. pp. 87-95.         [ Links ]

Godoy CV, Utiamada CM, Meyer MC, Campos HD, Pimenta CB, Borges EP, Siqueri FV, Nunes Junior J, Silva LHCP, Sato LN, Madalosso M, Volf, MR, Barros R, Balardin RS, Montecelli TDN, Carlin VJ (2012) Eficiência de fungicidas para o controle da mancha-alvo, Corynespora cassiicola, na safra 2011/12: resultados sumarizados dos ensaios cooperativos. Londrina PR. Embrapa Soja. (Circular Técnica 94)        [ Links ]

Hasama W (1991) Occurrence and characteristics of resistant strains of Corynespora melonis against benzimidazole compounds. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 57:312-318.         [ Links ]

Hasama W, Sato M (1996) Occurrence and distribution of fungicide-resistant field isolates of Corynespora cassiicola, causal fungus of target leaf spot of cucumber, in Kyushu and Okinawa districts. Proceedings of the Association for Plant Protection of Kyushu 42:26-30.         [ Links ]

Ishii H (2012) Resistance in Venturia nashicola to benzimidazoles and sterol demithylation inhibitors. In: Thind TS (Ed.) Fungicide resistance in crop protection: risk and management. Wallingford UK. CAB International. pp. 21-31.         [ Links ]

Ishii H, Nishimura K (2007) Boscalid sensitivity of strobilurin resistant fungal isolates. In: 32nd Annual Meeting of Pesticide Science Society of Japan, Abstracts... Tokyo Japan. Science Society of Japan. p. 207.         [ Links ]

Ma Z, Yoshimura MA, Michailides TJ (2003) Identification and characterization of benzimidazole resistance in Monilinia fructicola from stone fruit orchards in California. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69:7145-7152.         [ Links ]

Miyamoto T, Ishii H, Seko T, Kobori S, Tomita Y (2009) Occurrence of Corynespora cassiicola isolates resistant to boscalid on cucumber in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Plant Pathology 58:1144-1151.         [ Links ]

Russell PE (2004) Sensitivity baselines in fungicide resistance research and management. FRAC Monograph No. 3. Brussels Belgium. Crop Life International.         [ Links ]

Sinclair JB (1999) Target spot. In: Hartman GL, Sinclair JB, Rupe JC (Eds.) Compendium of soybean diseases. 4th Ed. St. Paul MN, USA. APS Press. p. 27.         [ Links ]

Smith CM (1988) History of benzimidazole use and resistance. In: Delp CJ (Ed.) Fungicide resistance in North America. St. Paul MN, USA. APS Press. pp. 23-24.         [ Links ]

Takeuchi T, Kubo C, Ishii H (2006) Sensitivity of Chiba Prefecture isolates of Corynespora cassiicola, the cause of Corynespora leaf spot on cucumber, to several fungicides. Annual Report of the Kanto-Tosan Plant Protection Society 53:55-60.         [ Links ]

Teramoto A, Martins MC, Ferreira LC, Cunha MG (2011) Reaction of hybrids, inhibition in vitro and target spot control in cucumber. Horticultura Brasileira 29:342-348.         [ Links ]

Teramoto A, Machado TA, Nascimento LM, Meyer MC, Cunha MG (2012) Sensibilidade a fungicidas de isolados de Corynespora cassiicola provenientes do Estado de Goiás. In: VI Congresso Brasileiro de Soja, Anais... Cuiabá MT, Brazil. CD-Rom.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received 6 February 2013
Accepted 15 April 2013

 

 

Author for correspondence: Claudia V. Godoy, email: claudia.godoy@embrapa.br
TPP 2013-0020
Section Editor: Adalberto C. Café filho

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License