SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.70 issue4Laboratory detection methods for methicillin resistance in coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolated from ophthalmic infectionsCataract extraction using the phacoemulsification technique in patients with uveitis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Print version ISSN 0004-2749

Abstract

FREITAS, Wilson de; MELO JUNIOR, Luiz Alberto Soares; SCHOR, Paulo  and  CAMPOS, Mauro. Comparative analyses between clinical refraction and automatic refraction obtained through a wave front sensor. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. [online]. 2007, vol.70, n.4, pp. 677-682. ISSN 0004-2749.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492007000400019.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare refractive errors obtained through clinical subjective and automatized wavefront refraction analyses in eyes under cycloplegia. METHODS: Prospective study of 147 patients, 279 eyes, undergoing preoperative examination for refractive surgery. Clinical subjective refraction was performed first followed by wavefront refraction. Results on astigmatism obtained from refraction were decomposed in power vectors for statistical analyses. Data were first analyzed in one eye and then in both eyes. RESULTS: The mean difference between clinical subjective refraction and automatized wavefront refraction on cycloplegic eyes was of -0.19 SD combined with -0.06 CD in the 15º axis for data in one eye, and -0.17 SD combined with -0.05 CD in the 3º axis for data in both eyes of the same patient. CONCLUSION: In the present study clinical subjective refraction and automatized wavefront refraction under cycloplegia had similar numerical values.

Keywords : Refractive errors [surgery]; Refraction, ocular; Optometry; Diagnostic techniques, ophthalmological; Comparative study.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · pdf in Portuguese