Kurysheva, 2016(1111 Kurysheva NI, Parshunina OA, Shatalova EO, Kiseleva TN, Lagutin MB, Fomin AV. Value of structural and hemodynamic parameters for the early detection of primary open-angle glaucoma. Cur Eye Res. 2016;3683:1-7.)
|
Glaucoma |
32 |
32 |
10.10 ± 1.60 |
548.10 ± 31.30 |
Control |
30 |
30 |
11.20 ± 1.70 |
549.30 ± 30.80 |
Pillunat, 2016(1212 Pillunat KR, Hermann C, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Analyzing biomechanical parameters of the cornea with glaucoma severity in open-angle glaucoma. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(7):1345-51.)
|
Glaucoma |
48 |
48 |
8.54 ± 1.86 |
530.60 ± 38.40 |
Control |
44 |
44 |
10.49 ± 1.67 |
556.20 ± 37.00 |
Shin, 2015(1313 Shin J, Lee JW, Kim EA, Caprioli J. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(1):144-54.)
|
Glaucoma |
97 |
97 |
9.90 ± 1.66 |
548.30 ± 34.82 |
Control |
89 |
89 |
10.59 ± 1.71 |
558.77 ± 31.19 |
Yazgan, 2014(1414 Yazgan S, Celik U, Alagöz N, Tas M. Corneal Biomechanical comparison of pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and healthy subjects. Cur Eye Res. 2015; 40(5):470-5.)
|
Glaucoma |
30 |
30 |
6.80 ± 1.70 |
509.00 ± 36.00 |
Control |
45 |
45 |
10.30 ± 1.50 |
546.30 ± 28.00 |
Costin, 2014(1515 Costin BR, Fleming GP, Weber PA, Mahmoud AM, Roberts CJ. Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(2):69-74.)
|
Glaucoma |
13 |
13 |
9.02 ± 1.52 |
546.70 ± 35.00 |
Control |
15 |
15 |
10.26 ± 1.30 |
546.10 ± 35.50 |
Insull, 2010(1616 Insull E, Nicholas S, Ang GS, Poostchi A, Chan K, Wells A. Optic disc area and correlation with central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis and ocular pulse amplitude in glaucoma patients and controls. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38(9):839-44.)
|
Glaucoma |
38 |
38 |
8.80 ± 1.52 |
532.00 ± 33.46 |
Control |
62 |
62 |
9.60 ± 1.49 |
550.00 ± 35.43 |
Sullivan-Mee, 2012(1717 Sullivan-Mee M, Katiyar S, Pensyl D, Halverson KD, Qualls C. Relative importance of factors affecting corneal hysteresis measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(5):e803-11.)
|
Glaucoma |
116 |
116 |
7.76 ± 1.60 |
541.00 ± 36.00 |
Control |
67 |
67 |
9.54 ± 1.60 |
552.00 ± 35.00 |
Kaushik, 2012(1818 Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):840-9.e2.)
|
Glaucoma |
36 |
36 |
7.90 ± 2.80 |
523.50 ± 35.50 |
Control |
71 |
71 |
9.50 ± 1.40 |
530.70 ± 33.40 |
Detry-Morel, 2012(1919 Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Hautenauven F, Pourjavan S. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(2): 118-24.)
|
Glaucoma |
30 |
30 |
9.20 ± 1.10 |
544.00 ± 37.00 |
Control |
25 |
25 |
10.80 ± 1.60 |
554.00 ± 19 .00 |
Morita, 2012(2020 Morita T, Shoji N, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, Shimizu K. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(1):48-53.)
|
Glaucoma |
83 |
83 |
9.20 ± 1.30 |
535.40 ± 24.90 |
Control |
83 |
83 |
10.80 ± 1.30 |
541.40 ± 26.80 |
Cankaya, 2011(2121 Cankaya AB, Anayol A, Özcelik D, Demirdogen E, Yilmazbas P. Ocular response analyzer to assess corneal biomechanical properties in exfoliation syndrome and exfoliative glaucoma. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(2):255-60.)
|
Glaucoma |
78 |
78 |
6.90 ± 2.10 |
537.90 ± 35.20 |
Control |
102 |
102 |
9.40 ± 1.40 |
539.80 ± 25.90 |
Grise-Dulac, 2012(2222 Grise-Dulac A, Saad A, Abitbol O, Febbraro JL, Azan E, Moulin-Tyrode C, et al. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and Comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. J Glaucoma. 2012; 21(7):486-9.)
|
Glaucoma |
38 |
75 |
10.03 ± 2.31 |
551.50 ± 38.90 |
Control |
22 |
44 |
11.05 ± 1.53 |
550.70 ± 29.30 |
Detry-Morel, 2011(2323 Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Pourjavan S. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the reichert ocular response analyzer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21(2):138-48.)
|
Glaucoma |
108 |
108 |
9.20 ± 1.60 |
536.00 ± 61.00 |
Control |
24 |
24 |
10.80 ± 1.80 |
550.00 ± 36.00 |
Xu, 2011(2424 Xu G, Lam DS, Leung CK. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(6):344-9.)
|
Glaucoma |
60 |
60 |
9.61 ± 1.56 |
541.40 ± 37.46 |
Control |
60 |
60 |
10.40 ± 1.62 |
541.75 ± 26.07 |
Abitbol, 2010(2525 Abitbol O, Bouden J, Doan S, Hoang-Xuan T, Gatinel D. Corneal hysteresis measured with the ocular response analyzer® in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(1):116-9.)
|
Glaucoma |
58 |
58 |
8.77 ± 1.40 |
535.34 ± 42.70 |
Control |
75 |
75 |
10.46 ± 1.60 |
560.20 ± 36.30 |
Mangouritsas, 2009(2626 Mangouritsas G, Morphis G, Mourtzoukos S, Feretis E. Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(8):901-5.)
|
Glaucoma |
108 |
108 |
8.95 ± 1.27 |
526.77 ± 35.73 |
|
Control |
74 |
74 |
10.97 ± 1.59 |
537.84 ± 41.93 |
Sullivan-Mee, 2008(2727 Sullivan-Mee M, Billingsley SC, Patel AD, Halverson KD, Alldredge BR, Qualls C. Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. o2008; 85(6):463-70.)
|
Glaucoma |
99 |
99 |
8.10 ± 1.50 |
541.00 ± 41.00 |
|
Control |
71 |
71 |
9.70 ± 1.50 |
546.00 ± 33.00 |
Villas-Bôas, 2009(2828 Villas-Bôas F, Doi L, Sousa A, Melo Jr L. Correlation between diurnal variation of intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and corneal structural properties. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(3):296-301.)
|
Glaucoma |
21 |
38 |
8.90 ± 2.10 |
514.80 ± 41.30 |
Control |
12 |
24 |
10.20 ± 1.60 |
529.00 ± 45.40 |
Beyazyıldız, 2014(2929 Beyazyildiz E, Beyazyildiz Ö, Arifoglu HB, Altintas AK, Köklü SG. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma patients. Ind J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(7):782-7.)
|
Glaucoma |
66 |
66 |
9.10 ± 1.90 |
550.40 ± 36.30 |
|
Control |
50 |
50 |
9.60 ± 1.70 |
537.30 ± 38.50 |