SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.55 issue6Alveolar recruitment maneuver in anesthetic practice: how, when and why it may be usefulSpinal block for urgency orthopedic surgery in Von Recklinghausen's disease patient: case report author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia

Print version ISSN 0034-7094

Abstract

CARRARETTO, Antonio Roberto; VIANNA, Pedro Thadeu Galvão; ALMEIDA, Armando Vieira de  and  GANEM, Eliana Marisa. Hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of volume or pressure controlled ventilation in dogs submitted to pneumoperitoneum. Comparative study. Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. [online]. 2005, vol.55, n.6, pp. 639-654. ISSN 0034-7094.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942005000600007.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) is available in anesthesia machines, but there are no studies on its use during CO2 pneumoperitoneum (CPP). This study aimed at evaluating pressure-controlled ventilation and hemodynamic and ventilatory changes during CPP, as compared to conventional volume controlled ventilation (VCV). METHODS: This study involved 16 dogs anesthetized with thiopental, fentanyl and pancuronium, which were randomly assigned to two groups: VC - volume controlled ventilation (n=8) and PC - pressure controlled ventilation (n=8). Hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters were monitored and recorded in 4 moments: M1 (before CPP), M2 (30 minutes after CPP = 10 mmHg), M3 (30 minutes after CPP=15 mmHg) and M4 (30 minutes after deflation). RESULTS: With CPP, there has been significant increase in tidal volume in PC group; there has been increase in airway pressures (peak and plateau), decrease in compliance with increase in CPP pressure, increase in heart rate, maintenance of mean blood pressure with higher values in the VC group in all stages; there was also increase in right atrium pressure with significant decrease after deflation, decrease in arterial pH with minor variations in PC group, greater arterial pCO2 stability in PC group, and no significant changes in arterial pO2. CONCLUSIONS: There were some differences in hemodynamic and ventilatory data between both ventilation control modes (VC and PC). It is possible to use pressure controlled ventilation during CPP, but the anesthesiologist must monitor and take a close look at alveolar ventilation, adjusting inspiratory pressure to ensure proper CO2 elimination and oxygenation.

Keywords : ANIMAL [Dog]; SURGERY, Abdominal [videolaparoscopic]; VENTILATION [mechanically controlled].

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish     · text in English | Portuguese     · pdf in English | Portuguese