SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52Analysis of socioeconomic gradients in the development of children aged 0–3 years in Fortaleza, Northeastern BrazilEvidence-based decision making and promotion of physical activity among directors of local health departments author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista de Saúde Pública

Print version ISSN 0034-8910On-line version ISSN 1518-8787

Abstract

ENTRINGER, Aline Piovezan; PINTO, Márcia  and  GOMES, Maria Auxiliadora de Souza Mendes. Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health. Rev. Saúde Pública [online]. 2018, vol.52, 91.  Epub Nov 23, 2018. ISSN 0034-8910.  http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000373.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of natural childbirth and elective C-section for normal risk pregnant women.

METHODS

The study was conducted from the perspective of supplemental health, a health subsystem that finances private obstetric care, represented in Brazil by health plan operators. The reference populations were normal risk pregnant women, who could undergo natural childbirth or elective C-section, subdivided into primiparous and multiparous women with previous uterine scar. A decision analysis model was constructed including choice of delivery types and health consequences for mother and newborn, from admission for delivery to maternity hospital discharge. Effectiveness measures were identified from the scientific literature, and cost data obtained by consultation with health professionals, health plan operators’ pricing tables, and pricing reference publications of health resources.

RESULTS

Natural childbirth was dominant compared with elective C-section for primiparous normal risk pregnant women, presenting lower cost (R$5,210.96 versus R$5,753.54) and better or equal effectiveness for all evaluated outcomes. For multiparous women with previous uterine scar, C-section presented lower cost (R$5,364.07) than natural childbirth (R$5,632.24), and better or equal effectiveness; therefore, C-section is more efficient for this population.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to control and audit C-sections without clinical indication, especially with regard to primiparous women, contributing to the management of perinatal care.

Keywords : Natural Childbirth, economics; Cesarean Section, economics; Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation; Supplemental Health.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English | Portuguese     · English ( pdf ) | Portuguese ( pdf )