SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 número4KATH’ HAUTA PREDICATES AND THE ‘COMMENSURATE UNIVERSALS’ índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Manuscrito

versão impressa ISSN 0100-6045versão On-line ISSN 2317-630X

Resumo

MORISON, Benjamim. THEORETICAL NOUS IN THE POSTERIOR ANALYTICS. Manuscrito [online]. 2019, vol.42, n.4, pp.1-43.  Epub 07-Nov-2019. ISSN 0100-6045.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2019.v42n4.bm.

According to Aristotle's definition of episteme (understanding) in the Posterior Analytics, you have episteme of the proposition that P when you know why P, and you know that it is necessary that P. Episteme is therefore only available for propositions which have an explanation, i.e. the theorems of the science. It is a demanding cognitive state, since knowing the explanation of a proposition in a science requires being able to demonstrate or prove it. Aristotle occasionally refers to the counterpart notion to episteme which applies to propositions which lack an explanation, i.e. the first principles of a science. This counterpart notion is nous, or non-demonstrative understanding. Aristotle never defines it, but it should turn out to be an equally demanding cognitive state to achieve. This paper proposes that you have nous of the proposition that P when you know that nothing explains why P, you know the various ways in which the proposition that P features in explanations in the science, and you know that it is necessary that P.

Palavras-chave : Aristotle; Knowledge; Understanding; Episteme; Nous.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )