SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número1Insuficiência e deficiência de vitamina D em pacientes portadores de doença renal crônicaAssociação entre fatores de risco clínicos e laboratoriais e progressão da doença renal crônica pré-dialítica índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Bookmark


Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia

versão impressa ISSN 0101-2800

Resumo

SOLORZANO, Grace Tamara Moscoso et al. Urinary protein/creatinine ratio versus 24-hour proteinuria in the evaluation of lupus nephritis. J. Bras. Nefrol. [online]. 2012, vol.34, n.1, pp. 64-67. ISSN 0101-2800.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-28002012000100010.

INTRODUCTION: The urinary protein/creatinine ratio has been used instead of 24-hour proteinuria in Nephrology practice for the follow-up of glomerular diseases, considering the advantages of collection and the low cost. However, there are still doubts as to its applicability both for an isolated evaluation and for the follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 24-hour proteinuria determinations and random urine samples, performing urinary creatinine correction and urinary protein/creatinine ratio in subjects with lupus nephritis. METHODS: 24-hour proteinuria and urinary protein/creatinine ratio were determined by conventional methods (automated Pyrogallol for proteinuria and alkaline picrate for creatinine). RESULTS: Seventy-eight urine samples of 41 patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus, according to the American Rheumatology Association, with lupus nephritis, were analyzed, and a good correlation between 24-hour proteinuria and urinary protein/creatinine ratio (r = 0.9010 and r² = 0.813) was observed. However, a poor correlation between random proteinuria (without creatinine correction) versus 24-hour proteinuria (r = 0.635 and r² = 0.403) or versus urinary protein/creatinine ratio (r = 0.754 and r² = 0.569) was seen. CONCLUSION: 24-hour proteinuria and urinary protein/creatinine ratio were useful in the follow-up of each case. However, we observed that the absolute values were different, which did not allow the replacement of one for the other during follow-up, especially when this result is used to define the activity of the disease. Based on these results, we suggest a period of intersection from one to the other (two to three determinations by both methods), and the choice of one marker for proteinuria follow-up, if necessary.

Palavras-chave : Lupus Nephritis; Proteinuria; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Diagnostic Tests; Routine.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português | Inglês     · pdf em Português | Inglês