Morgan et al.1818 Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM. Definitive landmarks for reproducible tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1995;11(03):275–2 (1995)
|
18 |
10 |
1.8 |
NE |
Park et al.1212 Park YB, Song YS, Kim SC, Park YG, Ha CW. The size of tibial footprint of anterior cruciate ligament and association with physical characteristics in Asian females. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015;135(07):985–992 (2015)
|
13.8 |
9.8 |
1.4 |
NE |
Park et al.1313 Park YB, Ha CW, Kim HJ, Park YG. Preoperative prediction of anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint size by anthropometric variables. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25(05): 1638–1645 (2017)
|
14.3 |
10.2 |
1.4 |
NE |
Tállay et aI.1919 Tállay A, Lim MH, Bartlett J. Anatomical study of the human anterior cruciate ligament stump’s tibial insertion footprint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008;16(08):741–746 (2008)
|
19.5 ± 2.6 |
10.3 ± 1.9 |
1.89 |
NE |
Kim et aI.1111 Kim SH, Lee HJ, Park YB, Jeong HS, Ha CW. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Footprint Size as Measured on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Does It Reliably Predict Actual Size? Am J Sports Med 2018;46(08):1877–1884 (2018)
|
13.8 |
7.2 |
1.91 |
NE |
Kopf et aI.33 Kopf S, Pombo MW, Szczodry M, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH. Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites. Am J Sports Med 2011;39(01):108–113 (2011)
|
17,0 ± 2,0 |
AM 9,2 ± 1,1 |
- |
NE |
|
|
PL 7,0 ± 1,0 |
- |
|
Guenther et al.88 Guenther D, Irarrázaval S, Albers M, et al. Area of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament as a predictor for graft size. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25(05): 1576–1582 (2017)
|
16.3 ± 1.6 |
9.7 ± 1.4 |
1.65 |
123.8 ± 21.5 |
Guenther et al.2020 Guenther D, Irarrázaval S, Nishizawa Y, et al. Variation in the shape of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament: classification is required. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25(08):2428–2432 (2017)
|
16.1 ± 2.6 |
9.6 ± 1.5 |
1.67 |
NE |
Edwards et al.2121 Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: Part 1: tibial attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15(12):1414–1421 (2007)
|
18 ± 2 |
9 ± 2 |
2.0 |
NE |
Purnell et al.55 Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W. Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 2008;36(11):2083–2090 (2008)
|
10.7 ± 1.3 |
7.4 ± 1.2 |
1.44 |
NE |
Ferretti et al.2222 Ferretti M, Doca D, Ingham SM, Cohen M, Fu FH. Bony and soft tissue landmarks of the ACL tibial insertion site: an anatomical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20(01):62–68 (2012)
|
18.1 ± 2.8 |
9 ± 2 |
2.0 |
NE |
Siebold et al.2323 Siebold R, Schuhmacher P, Fernandez F, et al. Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial “C”-shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015;23(11): 3136–3142 (2015)
|
12.6 ± 2.3 |
NE |
- |
110.9 ± 14.7 |
Fujimaki et al.2424 Fujimaki Y, Thorhauer E, Sasaki Y, Smolinski P, Tashman S, Fu FH. Quantitative In Situ Analysis of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Length, Midsubstance Cross-sectional Area, and Insertion Site Areas. Am J Sports Med 2016;44(01):118–125 (2016)
|
NE |
NE |
- |
175.8 ± 64.3 |
Tampere et al.66 Tampere T, Van Hoof T, CromheeckeM, et al. The anterior cruciate ligament: a study on its bony and soft tissue anatomy using novel 3D CT technology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25 (01):236–244 (2017)
|
NE |
NE |
- |
159.2 |
Iriuchishima et aI.44 Iriuchishima T, Ryu K, Aizawa S, Fu FH. Proportional evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint size and knee bony morphology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015;23(11):3157–3162 (2015)
|
NE |
NE |
- |
133.8 ± 31.3 |
Guenther et al.88 Guenther D, Irarrázaval S, Albers M, et al. Area of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament as a predictor for graft size. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25(05): 1576–1582 (2017)
|
16.6 ± 1.3 |
10.2 ± 1.0 |
1.62 |
132.8 ± 15.7 |
Guenther et al.88 Guenther D, Irarrázaval S, Albers M, et al. Area of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament as a predictor for graft size. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25(05): 1576–1582 (2017)
|
16.7 ± 1.3 |
10.4 ± 0.9 |
1.60 |
136.7 ± 15.4 |
Tashiro et al.99 Tashiro Y, Lucidi GA, Gale T, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion site is elliptical or triangular shaped in healthy young adults: high-resolution 3-T MRI analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26(02):485–490 (2017)
|
15.6 ± 1,8 |
14.5 ± 2.2 |
1.07 |
182.7 ± 41.1 |
Ichiba et al.77 Ichiba A, Kido H, Tokuyama F, Makuya K, Oda K. Sagittal view of the tibial attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament on magnetic resonance imaging and the relationship between anterior cruciate ligament size and the physical characteristics of patients. J Orthop Sci 2014;19(01):97–103 (2014)
|
15.2 ± 1.9 |
NE |
- |
NA |
Araki et al.1010 Araki D, Thorhauer E, Tashman S. Three-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging can provide a reliable estimate of the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion site anatomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26(05):1311–1318 (2017)
|
NE |
NE |
- |
134.7 ± 22.9 |
Kim et aI.1111 Kim SH, Lee HJ, Park YB, Jeong HS, Ha CW. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Footprint Size as Measured on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Does It Reliably Predict Actual Size? Am J Sports Med 2018;46(08):1877–1884 (2018)
|
12.4 |
8.8 |
1.40 |
NA |
Araki et al.1010 Araki D, Thorhauer E, Tashman S. Three-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging can provide a reliable estimate of the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion site anatomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26(05):1311–1318 (2017)
|
NE |
NE |
- |
135.2 ± 15.1 |
Our results
|
11.7 ± 2.0 |
7.1 ± 1.4 |
1.64 |
151.3 ± 22.29 |