BACKGROUND: Several diseases may be treated either medically or surgically; however, clinical and surgical therapies are often not treated as different options for the same patient but rather as different medical philosophies. AIM: To assess whether the main surgical and medical journals make references to their counterparts, with gastroesophageal reflux as a model of clinical/surgical disease. METHOD: It was reviewed the leading medical journals in order to verify if surgeons and clinicians make references to their counterparts on their work using gastroesophageal reflux disease as a model of a clinical/surgical disease. It was reviewed the five top-ranked journals in the field of gastroenterology, general surgery and general medicine and a neutral journal. The issues of the year 2008 of the selected journals were searched for papers dealing with gastroesophageal reflux disease. RESULTS: The search in the selected journals retrieved 49 papers, 36 (74%) in clinical journals, 5 (10%) in surgical journals, 2 (4%) in general medicine journals, and 6 (12%) in the neutral journal. Thirty one (63%) had a clinical origin, 13 (26%) a surgical origin, and 5 (10%) a neutral origin. Surgical journals published only surgical papers and general medicine journals published only clinical papers. Clinical journals and general medicine journals showed a higher proportion of clinical/surgical references compared to surgical journals (p<0.001) and the neutral journal (p<0.001). There was no differences in the proportion of clinical/surgical references when surgical and the neutral journal were compared (p=0.06). Clinical journals and general medicine journals showed a similar proportion of clinical/surgical references (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: Clinicians make significantly less references to surgical journals than surgeons do to clinical journals.
Surgery; Gastroenterology; Gastroesophageal reflux
