SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 issue3Projetos Socioeducativos: a naturalização da exclusão nos discursos de educadoresEm nome da "cultura": porta-vozes, mediação e referenciais de políticas públicas no Maranhão author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Sociedade e Estado

Print version ISSN 0102-6992

Abstract

MENDONCA, Daniel de. Teorizando o agonismo: crítica a um modelo incompleto. Soc. estado. [online]. 2010, vol.25, n.3, pp.479-497. ISSN 0102-6992.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69922010000300004.

In recent works, Chantal Mouffe presents, at the same time, two theoretical movements. In the one side, she criticizes deliberative theories, above all Rawls and Habermas accounts. In the other side, she presents the agonistic model of democracy. The Mouffe's critic to the deliberationists starts from the principle that these researchers aim to eliminate power relations from politics, changing them by a rational principle for decision making. For Mouffe, power elimination is impossible, once power ground the very ontological dimension of the political. In this paper, it argues, however, that the Mouffe's alternative to the deliberative models is unsatisfied, once her agonistic purpose is only an action principle and not necessarily a political theoretical model structured. The aim of this paper is to discuss Mouffe's theoretical purpose, presenting mainly its limitations in relation to its development.

Keywords : Agonism; Discourse Theory; Radical Democracy; Deliberative Democracy; Chantal Mouffe.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License