SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 número3Benefício do uso de recuperadores de hemácias em cirurgias cardiovascularesIntervenções cardíacas fetais: atualização de opções terapêuticas índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

versão impressa ISSN 0102-7638

Resumo

PRIETO, David et al. Results of heart transplantation in the urgent recipient - who should be transplanted?. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc [online]. 2014, vol.29, n.3, pp.379-387. ISSN 0102-7638.  http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20140072.

Objective:

To evaluate immediate and long-term results of cardiac transplantation at two different levels of urgency.

Methods:

From November 2003 to December 2012, 228 patients underwent cardiac transplantation. Children and patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded from the study. From the final group (n=212), 58 patients (27%) were hospitalized under inotropic support (Group A), while 154 (73%) were awaiting transplantation at home (Group B). Patients in Group A were younger (52.0±11.3 vs. 55.2±10.4 years, P=0.050) and had shorter waiting times (29.4±43.8 vs. 48.8±45.2 days; P=0.006). No difference was found for sex or other comorbidities. Haemoglobin was lower and creatinine higher in Group A. The characteristics of the donors were similar. Follow-up was 4.5±2.7 years.

Results:

No differences were found in time of ischemia (89.1±37.0 vs. 91.5±34.5 min, P=0.660) or inotropic support (13.8% vs. 11.0%, P=0.579), neither in the incidence of cellular or humoral rejection and of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. De novo diabetes de novo in the first year was slightly higher in Group A (15.5% vs. 11.7%, P=0.456), and these patients were at increased risk of serious infection (22.4% vs. 12.3%, P=0.068). Hospital mortality was similar (3.4% vs. 4.5%, P=0.724), as well as long-term survival (7.8±0.5 vs. 7.4±0.3 years).

Conclusions:

The results obtained in patients hospitalized under inotropic support were similar to those of patients awaiting transplantation at home. Allocation of donors to the first group does not seem to compromise the benefit of transplantation. These results may not be extensible to more critical patients.

Palavras-chave : Heart Transplantation; Thoracic Surgery; Postoperative Complications; Survival (Public Health).

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )