SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue100Global health and brazilian health responsibility: the case of polio eradicationAnalysis of scientific production on audit and public health based on the Virtual Health Library database author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Saúde em Debate

Print version ISSN 0103-1104

Abstract

GOMES, Dalila F. et al. Judicialization of health and public hearing convened by the Supreme Court in 2009: what has changed since then?. Saúde debate [online]. 2014, vol.38, n.100, pp.139-156. ISSN 0103-1104.  http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-104.20140008.

In 2009, the Supreme Court (STF) convened a Public Hearing to discuss the judicialization in health, in which 51 speeches were heard. Using a descriptive-analytical method, we aimed to systematize the speaker's arguments; to identify potential actions to overcome the problem; and to analyze what have been done since then. Public policies have failed in applying SUS principles in some individual levels and the judicialization should be seen as an exceptional instrument, not the rule of the system. The principal proposals adopted were: the use of scientific evidence in decision making (Executive and Judiciary) and the sustainability of health funding. In both cases there have been significant advances.

Keywords : Health policy; Judicialization; Right to health; Judicial power; Unified Health System.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )