Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação
Print version ISSN 0104-4036On-line version ISSN 1809-4465
Abstract
KLEIN, Ruben. A solution to the divergence of different standards in SAEB. Ensaio: aval.pol.públ.Educ. [online]. 2019, vol.27, n.103, pp.229-249. Epub May 02, 2019. ISSN 1809-4465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-40362019002702060.
In this article, we show that there is a necessity of building a consensus about terminology of proficiency levels, that the Todos pela Educação (All for Education) goals are reasonable, and that there is no disagreement with the disclosed levels of SAEB 2017, as long as the attainment goals for each level are correctly defined and the necessary corrections are made. For this purpose, we construct a reference distribution anchored to an empirical distribution of a target population. In the paper, it was used the population of students from OECD countries. We indicate that IDEB targets should be higher and consistent with Todos pela Educação goals.
Keywords : SAEB; PISA; IDEB; Proficiencies scale; Levels; Goals; Reference distribution.