Selection of rework measurement methodology utilizing AHP method

Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito; Bandeira, Renata Albergaria de Mello; Brandalise, Nilson

doi:10.1590/0104-530X2732-16

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Articles • Gest. Prod. 25 (1) • Jan-Mar 2018 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X2732-16 copy

Selection of rework measurement methodology utilizing AHP method

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

Civil construction has high rework rates, which entails additional costs and delays in project deadlines. In this way, several authors and entities have studied the problem and sought solutions to try to quantify and minimize the consequences of reworking. Several rework measurement methodologies have been developed, including: Construction Industry Institute Reduction Rework Program, Best Productivity Practices Implementation Index of the Construction Industry Institute, Methodology of the Construction Owners Association of Alberta, and Measuring and Classifying Construction Field Rework . In this context, this article aims to propose a procedure, based on the multicriteria analysis method Analytic Hierarchy Process – AHP, to assist in the process of selecting the most appropriate rework measurement methodology to be adopted in subsectors of the civil construction industry. The proposed procedure was applied to the industrial assembly segment, and the Rework Reduction Program methodology presented the best results regarding the rework measurement according to five criteria selected for analysis (coverage, deployment, costs, data entry and system operation), being the most indicated for use.

Keywords:
Rework; Civil construction; Industrial assembly; Multi-criteria analysis; AHP

Author	Country	Cost
Cusack (1992 apud Mastenbroek, 2010Mastenbroek, Y. C. (2010). Reducing rework costs in construction projects (Tese de bacharelado). University of Twente, Enschede.)	Australia	10%^* * % of contract value;
Borroughs (1993 apud Mastenbroek, 2010Mastenbroek, Y. C. (2010). Reducing rework costs in construction projects (Tese de bacharelado). University of Twente, Enschede.)	Australia	5%^* * % of contract value;
CIDA (1995)Construction Industry Development Agency and Masters Builders Australia – CIDA. (1995). Measuring up or muddling through: best practices in the Australian non-residential constrxuction industry (pp. 59-63). Sidney.	Australia	6,5%^* * % of contract value;
Lomas (1996 apud Mastenbroek, 2010Mastenbroek, Y. C. (2010). Reducing rework costs in construction projects (Tese de bacharelado). University of Twente, Enschede.)	Australia	>1%^* * % of contract value;
Love et al. (1999)Love, P. E. D., Smith, J., & Li, H. (1999). The propagation of rework benchmark metrics for construction. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 16(7), 638-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656719910249829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656719910249...	Australia	2.4 e 3.15%^* * % of contract value;
Love (2002)Love, P. E. D. (2002). Influence of project type and procurement method on rework cost in building construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(1), 18-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(18). http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-936...	Australia	6.4%^* * % of contract value;
CIDB (1989 apud Mastenbroek, 2010Mastenbroek, Y. C. (2010). Reducing rework costs in construction projects (Tese de bacharelado). University of Twente, Enschede.)	Singapore	5-10%^ % of design cost.
Burati et al. (1992)Burati, J. L., Farrington, J. J., & Ledbetter, W. B. (1992). Causes of quality deviations in design and construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 34-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:1(34). http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-936...	United States	12.4%^ % of design cost.
Abdul-Rahaman (1993 apud Mastenbroek, 2010Mastenbroek, Y. C. (2010). Reducing rework costs in construction projects (Tese de bacharelado). University of Twente, Enschede.)	England	2.5-5%^* * % of contract value;
Hammarlund et al. (1990 apud Mastenbroek, 2010Mastenbroek, Y. C. (2010). Reducing rework costs in construction projects (Tese de bacharelado). University of Twente, Enschede.)	Sweden	6%^ % of design cost.
Josephson & Hammarlund (1990, 1996 apud Mastenbroek, 2010Mastenbroek, Y. C. (2010). Reducing rework costs in construction projects (Tese de bacharelado). University of Twente, Enschede.)	Sweden	2.3-9.4%^* * % of contract value;
Josephson et al. (2002 apud Mastenbroek, 2010Mastenbroek, Y. C. (2010). Reducing rework costs in construction projects (Tese de bacharelado). University of Twente, Enschede.)	Sweden	4.4%^* * % of contract value;

Criteria	Ínconsistency index
Comprehensiveness	0.07017
Costs	0.06948
Data Entry	0.00772
Implementation	0.08062
System Operation	0.09363
Results	0.03120

Critério	Importância dos métodos
Comprehensiveness	RRP > PRRI > BPPII > FRDCS
Costs	PRRI > BPPII > RRP >FRDCS
Data Entry	PRRI > BPPII > RRP >FRDCS
Implementation	RRP > BPPII > PRRI > FRDCS
System Operation	BPPII > RRP = PRRI > FRDCS
Results	RRP >PRRI > BPPII = FRDCS

Universidade Federal de São Carlos Departamento de Engenharia de Produção , Caixa Postal 676 , 13.565-905 São Carlos SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 16 3351 8471 - São Carlos - SP - Brazil
E-mail: gp@dep.ufscar.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[TFN100] ^*
% of contract value;

[TFN200] ^**
% of design cost.