SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 número4Spectrography acoustic vocal modifications produced by reverse phonationSupport and singing voice: perspective of singing teachers and speech language pathologists índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista CEFAC

versión On-line ISSN 1982-0216

Resumen

BICALHO, Andressa Duarte; BEHLAU, Mara  y  OLIVEIRA, Gisele. Descriptive terms of one's own voice: comparison between speech-language pathologists and non speech-language pathologists' responses. Rev. CEFAC [online]. 2010, vol.12, n.4, pp.543-550.  Epub 28-Mayo-2010. ISSN 1982-0216.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462010005000048.

PURPOSE: to compare speech-language pathologists and non speech-language pathologists' responses concerning the evaluation of their own voices and to verify if speech-language pathologists have a different self-perception from the others. METHOD: two hundred female subjects, 100 speech-language pathologists and 100 non speech-language pathologists, with mean age: 35 year, took part in the study. The average time of university degree for the speech-language pathologists were mainly from 0 to 3 years (32%), most of them acting in the area of voice (55%) and oral motricity (45%). The non speech-language pathologists had all sort of professions, such as physicians, teachers, lawyers and others. There was no control on the professional use of voice. The participants in the study did a self-evaluation, using a 5 point scale: excellent, very good, good, reasonable and bad, and indicated positive and negative vocal attributes using a protocol developed by Behlau & Pontes (1995) based on the Distinctive terms for the voice (Boone, 1991). RESULTS: speech-language pathologists and non speech-language pathologists showed different responses in the self-evaluation of their voices. There was a greater occurrence of "very good" voices for speech-language pathologist (28%, p=0.041). Speech-language pathologists selected more positive characteristics that non speech-language pathologists (53.6% and 46.4 respectively). The positive characteristic of "adequate" voice was the most selected by speech-language pathologists (31%, p=0.001) and the negative word of "loud" voice was the most selected by non speech-language pathologists (34%, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: speech-language pathologists self-evaluated their own voices in a different way than non speech-language pathologists, especially on the categorization of "very good" quality of voice. While the "adequate" voice characteristic was the only positive qualifier in greater occurrence for speech-language pathologists, "loud" voice was the only negative qualifier for non speech- language pathologists.

Palabras clave : Voice; Self Concept; Speech perception.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf epdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons