SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue8Behavior pattern of beef heifers supplemented with different energy sources on oat and ryegrass pastureHeifer Retention Program in the Pantanal: a study with data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Malmquist index author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia

On-line version ISSN 1806-9290

Abstract

PIZZUTI, Luiz Angelo Damian et al. Production parameters and forage loss of oat and rye grass pastures managed with beef heifers fed diets with energy supplementation. R. Bras. Zootec. [online]. 2012, vol.41, n.8, pp. 1928-1936. ISSN 1806-9290.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000800018.

Production parameters of intercropped pastures of oat and rye grass managed with beef heifers supplemented with brown rice meal and/or protected fat were evaluated. Twenty-eight Charolais × Nellore crossbred heifers at initial average age of 18 months and initial average live weight of 274.9 kg were utilized in the experiment. Animals were kept on oat + rye grass pastures and distributed in the following treatments: no-supplementation (NS): heifers kept only in pastures; Megalac (MEG): supplementation with protected fat; brown rice meal (BRM): supplementation with BRM; BRM + MEG: supplementation with BRM plus protected fat. The greater participation of oat leaf was from July 5th to August 10th, 2009 and of rye grass, from August 30th to September 26th, 2009. The crude protein content increased until the 55th day (225.1 g/kg). Pasture total digestible nutrients presented a cubic behavior, with an average of 722.0 g/kg. The highest supply of leaf blades, 5.17 kg of dry matter/100 kg of live weight, was found in the second period. Pasture intake increased throughout the periods. Forage mass and support capacity of the animal did not differ between treatments, presenting means of 1245.02 kg of dry matter/ha and 882 kg of live weight/ha, respectively. Stoking rate, forage loss and pasture intake were not affected by the treatments. Supplementation of beef heifers with rice meal and/or protected fat did not change production parameters of oat + rye grass pastures or pasture intake. Increase in daily accumulation rate of dry matter and supporting capacity of the animals increases forage losses.

Keywords : crude protein; forage loss; forage mass; intake; leaf blade offer.

        · text in English     · pdf in English