SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 número2Laboratory diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemiasLaboratory information system in the assessment and management of costs in clinical laboratories índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Bookmark


Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial

versión impresa ISSN 1676-2444

Resumen

COLOMBELI, Adriana Scotti da Silva  y  FALKENBERG, Miriam. Comparison of product labelings of two marks of reagent strips for the chemical examination of urine. J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab. [online]. 2006, vol.42, n.2, pp. 85-93. ISSN 1676-2444.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1676-24442006000200005.

BACKGROUND: The urinalysis provides information about renal and urinary diseases, as well as about some extra renal diseases. The chemical examination of urine is done with reagent strips, which allows a quick, simple and economic analyze. OBJECTIVES: To compare drug labelings of two marks of reagent strips in urinalysis (Roche Combur10 Test® UX and Bayer Multistix® 10 SG). MATERIAL AND METHOD: The principles of pH, protein, glucose, ketone bodies, hemoglobin, bilirubin, urobilinogen, nitrite, specific gravity and leukocytes determinations, as well as the information about possible interferences were compared. RESULTS: There were differences in the detection’s reagents of some parameters, like urobilinogen (The Ehrlich’s reagent present in Multistix is less specific and more propense to analytical interferences than diazonium salt derived of methoxybenzene, used by Roche strip); the differences in the reagents used for nitrite, protein, glucose, bilirubin and hemoglobin determinations were relatively subtle. DISCUSSION: There was diversity of information about the potential interferences, which could be justified (at least partially) by differences in the reagents. Differences in the information about interferences had been detected between Spanish and Portuguese versions in the same product labeling, like the omission of some interferences in the product labeling in Portuguese. Great disparity in the reaction’s intensity and its expression in crosses were observed (e.g. for glucose), and it could lead to misunderstanding in the interpretation of laboratorial findings. CONCLUSION: These data reinforce the importance of standardizations in the urinalysis.

Palabras llave : Urinalysis; Reagent strips; Chemical examination; Comparison of product labelings.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · pdf en Portugués