SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número3Avaliação do efeito radioprotetor da carnosina (beta-alanil-1- histidina) no processo de cicatrização em ratosEfeito das dimensões do espécime na resistência à flexão de uma resina composta índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Journal of Applied Oral Science

versão impressa ISSN 1678-7757

Resumo

MAGALHAES, Cláudia Silami de et al. Microhardness evaluation around composite restorations using fluoride-containing adhesive systems. J. Appl. Oral Sci. [online]. 2005, vol.13, n.3, pp. 259-264. ISSN 1678-7757.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000300011.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microhardness of dental enamel around composite restorations bonded with fluoride-containing adhesive systems (FCAS), after thermo- and pH-cycling protocols. Standardized cylindrical cavities were prepared on enamel surfaces of 175 dental fragments, which were randomly assigned into seven experimental groups (n=25). Four groups used FCAS: Optibond Solo (OS); Prime&Bond 2.1 (PB); Syntac Sprint (SS) and Tenure Quick (TC). Other groups consisted of "Sandwich" technique restoration (STR) (glass ionomer liner + hydrophobic adhesive resin /restorative composite) or used Single Bond with (SB) or without (SBWC) cycling protocols. Adhesive systems were applied according to manufacturers' instructions and cavities were restored with a microfilled composite (Durafill VS). After finishing and polishing, all groups were submitted to 1,000 thermal cycles (5 ºC and 55 ºC) and to demineralization (pH 4.3) and remineralization (pH 7.0) cycling protocols, except for SBWC group. The Knoop microhardness of enamel surfaces were measured around restorations. Indentations were recorded at 150, 300 and 450-mm from the cavity wall. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Duncan's Test (a=0.05%). Means ± SD of enamel microhardness for the groups were (Kg/mm2): SBWC: 314.50 ± 55.93a ; SB: 256.78 ± 62.66b; STR: 253.90 ± 83.6b; TQ: 243.93 ± 68.3b; OS: 227.97 ± 67.1c; PB: 213.30 ± 91.3d; SS: 208.73 ± 86.6d. Means ± SD of microhardness for the distances 150, 300, 450mm from the cavity wall were, respectively: 234.46 ± 77.81a; 240.24 ± 85.12a; 262.06 ± 79.46b. SBWC group, which was not submitted to thermo- and pH-cycling protocols, showed the highest enamel microhardness mean value and the FCAS resulted in lower microhardness values. At 450 mm from the cavity wall, the enamel microhardness increased significantly.

Palavras-chave : Dental enamel; Fluoride; Adhesive systems; Microhardness.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Inglês     · pdf em Inglês