Kim, et al.5757 - Kim JW, Cho MH, Kim SJ, Kim MR. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone graft for vertical augmentation of severely atrophied alveolar ridges after 12 years of long-term follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116:540-9. (2013) |
Retrospective study |
14 28 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Ramus) |
41 61 |
Del 4.9 months Del 6.2 months |
7.1 ± 1.7 years 8.2 ± 2.0 years |
97.3 94.1 |
92.7 90.2 |
Pérez-Sayáns, et al.7979 - Pérez-Sayáns M, León-Camacho ML, Somoza-Martín JM, Fernández-González B, Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín S, Gándara-Rey JM, et al. Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e686-92. (2013) |
Retrospective study |
14 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
50 |
Del 3.0 months |
3 years |
100 |
96 |
Korpi, et al.5858 - Korpi JT, Kainulainen VT, Sandor GK, Oikarinen KS. Long-term follow-up of severely resorbed mandibles reconstructed using tent pole technique without platelet-rich plasma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:2543-8. (2012) |
Prospective study |
22 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
48 |
Imm |
3-9 years |
100 |
96 |
De Riu, et al.3131 - De Riu G, Meloni MS, Pisano M, Baj A, Tullio A. Mandibular coronoid process grafting for alveolar ridge defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114:430-6. (2012) |
Prospective study |
15 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Coronoid) |
40 |
Del 6.0 months |
2 years |
95 |
96.7 |
Zwetyenga, et al.114114 - Zwetyenga N, Vidal N, Ella B, Siberchicot F, Emparanza A. Results of oral implant-supported prostheses after mandibular vertical alveolar ridge distraction: a propos of 54 sites. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114:725-32. (2012) |
Retrospective study |
37 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
127 |
Del 5.8 months |
5.2 years |
100 |
96.2 |
Sezer, et al.9595 - Sezer B, Koyuncu BO, Gunbay T, Sezak M. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible: a clinical and histomorphometric study. Implant Dent. 2012;21:317-22. (2012) |
Prospective study |
10 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
40 |
Del 4.0 months |
3 years |
100 |
100 |
Kawakami, et al.5353 - Kawakami PY, Dottore AM, Bechara K, Feres M, Shibli JA. Alveolar osteotomy associated with resorbable non-ceramic hydroxylapatite or intra-oral autogenous bone for height augmentation in posterior mandibular sites: a split-mouth prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1060-4. (2013) |
Controlled split mouth study |
12 |
Man + Hor + Ver Man + Hor + Ver |
Inlay technique Inlay technique |
Autogenous (Ramus) Alloplastic graft |
22 22 |
Del 6.0 months |
1 year |
95.5 95.5 |
90.9 90.9 |
Annibali, et al.66 - Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Sammartino G, La Monaca G, Cristalli MP. Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation in localized alveolar deficient sites: a retrospective case series. Implant Dent. 2012;21:175-85. (2012) |
Retrospective study |
5 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Vertical guided bone regeneration |
Autogenous (Ramus) + Allograft |
16 |
Imm |
1.0 ± 0.1 years |
100 |
81.3 |
Nissan, et al.7272 - Nissan J, Marilena V, Gross O, Mardinger O, Chaushu G. Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxilla with cancellous bone block allograft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:84-9. (2012) |
Prospective study |
40 |
Max + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Allograft |
83 |
Del 6.0 months |
4.0 ± 1.8 years |
98.8 |
X |
Esposito, et al.3838 - Esposito M, Cannizarro G, Soardi E, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone? Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4:301-11. (2012) |
Randomized control trial |
30 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Inlay technique |
Xenograft |
61 |
Del 5.0 months |
3 years |
100 |
X |
Chiapasco, et al.2020 - Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1012-21. (2012) |
Prospective study |
11 7 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Ramus) Autogenous (Calvarium) |
29 31 |
Del 4-5 months Del 6-7 months |
1.6 years |
100 100 |
93.1 90.3 |
Acocella, et al.11 - Acocella A, Bertolai R, Ellis E 3rd, Nissan J, Sacco R. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with monocortical fresh-frozen bone blocks: a clinical, histological and histomorphometric study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:525-33. (2012) |
Prospective study |
16 |
Max + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Allograft |
34 |
Del 6.0 months |
1.5-2.5 years |
100 |
X |
Ludovichette, et al.6565 - Ludovichetti M, Di Stefano DA, Pagnutti S, Vaccari E, Ludovichetti FS, Celletti R. Vertical ridge augmentation using a flexible heterologous cortical bone sheet: three-year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:401-7. (2011) |
Prospective study |
19 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Alloplastic graft |
49 |
Imm |
3 years |
100 |
100 |
Rigo, et al.8585 - Rigo L, Viscioni A, Franco M, Lucchese A, Zollino I, Brunelli G, et al. Overdentures on implants placed in bone augmented with fresh frozen bone. Minerva Stomatol. 2011;60:5-14. (2011) |
Retrospective study |
17 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Inlay/onlay technique |
Allograft |
60 |
Del 6.0 months |
2.2 years |
100 |
100 |
Canullo, et al.1515 - Canullo L, Sisti A. Early implant loading after vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) using e-PTFE titanium-reinforced membrane and nano-structured hydroxyapatite: 2-year prospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3:59-69. (2010) |
Prospective study |
20 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Alloplastic graft |
42 |
Imm |
2 years |
100 |
100 |
Todisco, et al.100100 - Todisco M. Early loading of implants in vertically augmented bone with non-resorbable membranes and deproteinised anorganic bovine bone. An uncontrolled prospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3:47-58. (2010) |
Prospective study |
20 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Vertical guided bone regeneration |
Allograft |
64 |
Del 12 months |
1.2 years |
100 |
97 |
Corinaldesi, et al.2929 - Corinaldesi G, Pieri F, Sapigni L, Marchetti C. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants placed at the time of or after alveolar ridge augmentation with an autogenous mandibular bone graft and titanium mesh: a 3- to 8-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:1119-28. (2009) |
Retrospective study |
24 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Ramus) |
56 |
Imm / Del 8-9 months |
3-8 years |
100 |
96.4 |
Le, et al.6161 - Le B, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Screw "tent-pole" grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:428-35. (2010) |
Prospective study |
15 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Vertical guided bone regeneration |
Allograft |
32 |
Del 4-5 months |
1.4 years |
100 |
100 |
Pelo, et al.7878 - Pelo S, Boniello R, Moro A, Gasparini G, Amoroso PF. Augmentation of the atrophic edentulous mandible by a bilateral two-step osteotomy with autogenous bone graft to place osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:227-34. (2010) |
Prospective study |
19 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Ramus) |
141 |
Del 4.0 months |
4.0 years |
96 |
91 |
Sbordone, et al.9191 - Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris G, Sbordone C, Guidetti F. Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:695-703. (2009) |
Retrospective study |
40 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Ramus, Iliac) |
109 |
Del 3-5 months |
3.0 years |
99.1 |
X |
Elo, et al.3636 - Elo JA, Herford AS, Boyne PJ. Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35:181-4. (2009) |
Retrospective study |
65 17 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique Alveolar distraction |
Autogenous (Iliac, Chin, Retromolar, Tibia) |
184 56 |
Del 4-5 months |
3-5.1 years |
98.4 98.2 |
96.7 98.2 |
Ettl, et al.4040 - Ettl T, Gerlach T, Schüsselbauer T, Gosau M, Reichert TE, Driemel O. Bone resorption and complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14:481-9. (2010) |
Retrospective study |
30 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
82 |
Del 4.5 months |
4.2 years |
95.1 |
X |
Nissan, et al.7171 - Nissan J, Mardinger O, Calderon S, Romanos GE, Chaushu G. Cancellous bone block allografts for the augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:104-11. (2011) |
Prospective study |
31 |
Max + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Allograft |
63 |
Del 6.0 months |
2.8 ± 1.3 years |
98.1 |
X |
Felice, et al.4242 - Felice P, Pistilli R, Lizio G, Pellegrino G, Nisii A, Marchetti C. Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: a prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:e69-82. (2009) |
Prospective study |
10 10 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Inlay technique Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
20 23 |
Del 3-4 months |
1.5 years |
100 100 |
90 86.9 |
Nissan, et al.7070 - Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Mardinger O, Calderon S, Chaushu G. Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:279-85. (2011) |
Prospective study |
21 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Allograft |
85 |
Del 6.0 months |
3.1 ± 1.4 years |
95.1 |
X |
Urban, et al.105105 - Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:502-10. (2009) |
Retrospective study |
28 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Vertical guided bone regeneration |
Autogenous (Ramus, Chin) |
54 |
Del 6-9 months |
2.8 years |
100 |
94.7 |
Carinci, et al.1616 - Carinci F, Brunelli G, Zollino I, Franco M, Viscioni A, Rigo L, et al. Mandibles grafted with fresh-frozen bone: an evaluation of implant outcome. Implant Dent. 2009;18:86-95. (2009) |
Retrospective study |
21 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Allograft |
63 |
Del 6.0 months |
1.7 years |
96.8 |
X |
Robiony, et al.8686 - Robiony M, Zorzan E, Polini F, Sembronio S, Toro C, Politi M. Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma: combined use in restoration of severe atrophic mandible. Long-term results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1202-10. (2008) |
Prospective study |
12 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction + Inlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
47 |
Del 6.0 months |
5 years |
97.9 |
91.5 |
Pieri, et al.8080 - Pieri F, Corinaldesi G, Fini M, Aldini NN, Giardino R, Marchetti C. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and a combination of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone: a 2-year prospective study. J Periodontol. 2008;79:2093-103. (2008) |
Prospective study |
16 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Vertical guided bone regeneration |
Autogenous (Ramus) +Xenograft |
44 |
Del 8-9 months |
2 years |
100 |
93.1 |
Bianchi, et al.1010 - Bianchi A, Felice P, Lizio G, Marchetti C. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus inlay bone grafting in posterior mandibular atrophy: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:282-92. (2008) |
Prospective study |
5 6 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Inlay technique Alveolar distraction |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
21 16 |
Del 3-4 months Del 4-5 months |
1.8 years 2.5 years |
100 100 |
95.2 93.7 |
Chiapasco, et al.2525 - Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:432-40. (2007) |
Prospective study |
8 9 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique Alveolar distraction |
Autogenous (Ramus) |
19 21 |
Del 4-5 months Del 3 months |
2-4 years |
100 100 |
89.5 94.7 |
Uckan, et al.104104 - Uckan S, Oguz Y, Bayram B. Comparison of intraosseous and extraosseous alveolar distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:671-4. (2007) |
Retrospective study |
21 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
42 |
Del 3-4 month |
2.7 years |
88 |
X |
Polo, et al.8181 - Polo WC, Araujo NS, Lima YB, Joly JC, Sendyk WR, Cury PR. Peri-implant bone loss around posterior mandible dental implants placed after distraction osteogenesis: preliminary findings. J Periodontol. 2007;78:204-8. (2007) |
Prospective study |
10 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
34 |
Del 3-4 months |
1.0 ± 0.3 years |
100 |
X |
Levin, et al.6363 - Levin L, Nitzan D, Schwartz-Arad D. Success of dental implants placed in intraoral block bone grafts. J Periodontol. 2007;78:18-21. (2007) |
Retrospective study |
50 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Ramus, Iliac) |
129 |
Del 4-6 months |
2.0 ± 0.9 years |
96.9 |
91.9 |
Smolka, et al.9999 - Smolka W, Bosshardt DD, Mericske-Stern R, Iizuka T. Reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible using calvarial split bone grafts for implant-supported oral rehabilitation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:35-42. (2006) |
Prospective study |
10 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Calvarium) |
20 |
Del 6.0 months |
2.5 years |
95 |
X |
Enislidis, et al.3737 - Enislidis G, Fock N, Millesi-Schobel G, Klug C, Wittwer G, Yerit K, et al. Analysis of complications following alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant placement in the partially edentulous mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:25-30. (2005) |
Retrospective study |
32 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
94 |
Del 3-5 months |
3.0 years |
95.7 |
X |
van der Meij, et al.106106 - Van der Meij EH, Blankestijn J, Berns RM, Bun RJ, Jovanovic A, Onland JM, et al. The combined use of two endosteal implants and iliac crest onlay grafts in the severely atrophic mandible by a modified surgical approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:152-7. (2005) |
Retrospective study |
17 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Calvarium) |
34 |
Imm |
4.3 years |
88.2 |
88.2 |
Nyström, et al.7474 - Nyström E, Ahlqvist J, Gunne J, Kahnberg KE. 10-year follow-up of onlay bone grafts and implants in severely resorbed maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33:258-62. (2004) |
Retrospective study |
30 |
Max + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
177 |
Imm |
10 years |
72,8 |
X |
Chiapasco, et al.2121 - Chiapasco M, Consolo U, Bianchi A, Ronchi P. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a multicenter prospective study on humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:399-407. (2004) |
Prospective study |
37 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
138 |
Del 3 months |
2.8 years |
100 |
94.2 |
Chiapasco, et al.2222 - Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Casentini P, Rimondini L. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:82-95. (2004) |
Prospective study |
5 10 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Vertical guided bone regeneration Alveolar distraction |
Autogenous (Ramus) |
12 34 |
Del 6-7 months Del 3-4 months |
1-3 years |
100 100 |
75 94.1 |
Raghoebar, et al.8383 - Raghoebar GM, Liem RS, Vissink A. Vertical distraction of the severely resorbed edentulous mandible: a clinical, histological and electron microscopic study of 10 treated cases. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:558-65. (2002) |
Prospective study |
10 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
20 |
Del 2-3 months |
0.9 years |
95 |
X |
Jensen, et al.5050 - Jensen OT, Cockrell R, Kuhike L, Reed C. Anterior maxillary alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a prospective 5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:52-68. (2002) |
Prospective study |
28 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
84 |
Del 3-4 months |
1-4.4 years |
90.4 |
X |
Rachmiel, et al.8282 - Rachmiel A, Srouji S, Peled M. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:510-7. (2001) |
Retrospective study |
14 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
23 |
Del 2-3 months |
0.5-1.7 years |
95.7 |
X |
Simion, et al.9696 - Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, Benfenati SP. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with 1-5 year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:35-45. (2001) |
Retrospective study |
6 11 32 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Vertical guided bone regeneration |
Allograft Autogenous (Ramus, Chin) |
17 26 82 |
Imm |
5.3 years 3.3 years 2.5 years |
94.1 100 100 |
94.1 96.1 100 |
Gaggl, et al.4343 - Gaggl A, Schultes G, Kärcher H. Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distractors: a clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:701-10. (2000) |
Prospective study |
34 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Alveolar distraction |
|
62 |
Imm |
1 year |
96 |
X |
Keller, et al.5555 - Keller EE, Tolman DE, Eckert S. Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:197-209. (1999) |
Retrospective study |
28 4 |
Max + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
183 21 |
Imm Del 4-6 months |
5.6 years |
86.3 91 |
X |
Verhoeven, et al.109109 - Verhoeven JW, Cune MS, Terlou M, Zoon MA, de Putter C. The combined use of endosteal implants and iliac crest onlay grafts in the severely atrophic mandible: a longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26:351-7. (1997) |
Prospective study |
13 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
72 |
Imm |
2.4 ± 0.9 years |
100 |
X |
McGrath, et al.6666 - McGrath CJ, Schepers SH, Blijdorp PA, Hoppenreijs TJ, Erbe M. Simultaneous placement of endosteal implants and mandibular onlay grafting for treatment of the atrophic mandible. A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;25:184-8. (1996) |
Retrospective study |
18 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
36 |
Imm |
1.4 years |
91.6 |
91.6 |
Vermeeren, et al.110110 - Vermeeren JI, Wismeijer D, van Waas MA. One-step reconstruction of the severely resorbed mandible with onlay bone grafts and endosteal implants. A 5-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;25:112-5. (1996) |
Retrospective study |
31 |
Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
78 |
Imm |
5 years |
89.7 |
X |
Astrand, et al.77 - Astrand P, Nord PG, Branemark PI. Titanium implants and onlay bone graft to the atrophic edentulous maxilla: a 3-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;25:25-9. (1996) |
Retrospective study |
17 |
Max + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Iliac) |
92 |
Imm |
3-5 y |
75 |
X |
Donovan et al.3434 - Donovan MG, Dickerson NC, Hanson LJ, Gustafson RB. Maxillary and mandibular reconstruction using calvarial bone grafts and Branemark implants: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52:588-94. (1994) |
Retrospective study |
24 |
Max + Man + Hor + Ver |
Onlay technique |
Autogenous (Calvarium) |
43 50 |
Imm Del 6-8 months |
1.5 years 2.6 years |
97.7 86 |
X X |