OBJECTIVE: Simple diagnostic methods can facilitate the diagnosis of COPD, which is a major public health problem. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of clinical variables in the diagnosis of COPD. METHODS: Patients with COPD and control subjects were prospectively evaluated by two investigators regarding nine clinical variables. The likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of COPD was determined using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The study comprised 98 patients with COPD (mean age, 62.3± 12.3 years; mean FEV1, 48.3 ± 21.6%) and 102 controls. The likelihood ratios (95% CIs) for the diagnosis of COPD were as follows: 4.75 (2.29-9.82; p < 0.0001) for accessory muscle recruitment; 5.05 (2.72-9.39; p < 0.0001) for pursed-lip breathing; 2.58 (1.45-4.57; p < 0.001) for barrel chest; 3.65 (2.01-6.62; p < 0.0001) for decreased chest expansion; 7.17 (3.75-13.73; p < 0.0001) for reduced breath sounds; 2.17 (1.01-4.67; p < 0.05) for a thoracic index > 0.9; 2.36 (1.22-4.58; p < 0.05) for laryngeal height < 5.5 cm; 3.44 (1.92-6.16; p < 0.0001) for forced expiratory time > 4 s; and 4.78 (2.13-10.70; p < 0.0001) for lower liver edge > 4 cm from lower costal edge. Inter-rater reliability for those same variables was, respectively, 0.57, 0.45, 0.62, 0.32, 0.53, 0.32, 0.59, 0.52 and 0.44 (p < 0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Various clinical examination findings could be used as diagnostic tests for COPD.
Physical examination; Diagnosis; Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive
