Ahmed & Murbay1313. Ahmed KE, Murbay S. Survival rates of anterior composites in managing tooth wear: systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(2):145-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12360
https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12360...
|
Anterior* |
SP: >90% (2.5 yrs); 50% (5 yrs) |
Demarco et al.66. Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR et al. Anterior composite restorations: a systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015;31(10):1214-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07...
|
Anterior |
AFR: 0 to 4.1% SP: 53.4 to 100% |
Heintze et al.1414. Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations: a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015;31(5):481-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01...
|
Anterior |
SP: 95% (10 yrs - Class III) 90% (10 yrs - Class IV) |
Afrashtehfar et al.1515. Afrashtehfar KI, Ahmadi M, Emami E, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure of single-unit restorations on root filled posterior teeth: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12723
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12723...
|
Posterior** |
SP: 89.7% (3 yrs); 92.4% (5 yrs) |
Afrashtehfar et al.1616. Afrashtehfar KI, Emami E, Ahmadi M, Eilayyan O, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth:a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):345-53.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016....
|
Posterior |
SP: 50% to 100% |
Angeletaki et al.1717. Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:12-21.
|
Posterior |
SP: 83.2% (5 yrs) |
Ástvaldsdóttir et al.1818. Ástvaldsdóttir Á, Dagerhamn J, van Dijken JW, Naimi-Akbar A, Sandborgh-Englund G, Tranæus S et al. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults: a systematic review. J Dent. 2015;43(8):934-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07....
|
Posterior |
SP: 91% (5 yrs); 86% (12 yrs) |
Demarco et al.55. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJM. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09...
|
Posterior |
AFR: 1% to 3% |
Heintze and Rousson77. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations: a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(5):407-31. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28390
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28390...
|
Posterior |
SP: 90% (10 yrs) |
Moraschini et al.1919. Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Santos GO. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(9):1043-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06....
|
Posterior |
AFR: 3.2% |
Opdam et al.99. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(10):943-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217...
|
Posterior |
AFR: 1.8% (5 yrs); 2.4% (10 yrs) |
Sande et al.1212. Sande FH, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Opdam N. Restoration survival: revisiting patients’ risk factors through a systematic literature review. Oper Dent. 2016;41(S7):S7-S26. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-120-LIT
https://doi.org/10.2341/15-120-LIT...
|
Posterior |
AFR: 1.7% to 5.2% SP: 72% to 95% |