1) |
Szarewski et al. (99. Szarewski A, Cadman L, Ashdown-Barr L, Waller J. Exploring the acceptability of two self-sampling devices for human papillomavirus testing in the cervical screening context: a qualitative study of Muslim women in London. J Med Screen. 2009;16(4):193-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2009.009069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2009.00906...
) |
United Kingdom |
21 – 65 |
Transversal |
28 |
Low |
Questionnaire |
2) |
Mitchell et al. (1010. Mitchell S, Ogilvie G, Steinberg M, Sekikubo M, Biryabarema C, Money D. Assessing women’s willingness to collect their own cervical samples for HPV testing as part of the ASPIRE cervical cancer screening project in Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;114(2):111-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.01.028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.01...
) |
Uganda |
30 – 65 |
Transversal |
300 |
High |
Subjective |
3) |
Szarewski et al. (1111. Szarewski A, Cadman L, Mesher D, Austin J, Ashdown-Barr L, Edwards R, et al. HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening - a randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(6):915-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.48...
) |
United Kingdom |
29 – 65 |
Randomized |
3000 |
High |
Questionnaire |
4) |
Ortiz et al. (1212. Ortiz AP, Alejandro N, Pérez CM, Otero Y, Soto-Salgado M, Palefsky JM, et al. Acceptability of cervical and anal HPV self-sampling in a sample of Hispanic women in Puerto Rico. P R Health Sci J. 2012;31(4):205-12.) |
USA |
18 – 34 |
Case-control |
100 |
High |
Questionnaire |
5) |
Cerigo et al. (1313. Cerigo H, Coutlée F, Franco EL, Brassard P. Dry self-sampling versus provider-sampling of cervicovaginal specimens for human papillomavirus detection in the Inuit population of Nunavik, Quebec. J Med Screen. 2012;19(1):42-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2012.012011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2012.01201...
) |
Canada |
18 – 69 |
Case-control |
93 |
High |
Subjective |
6) |
Quincy et al. (1414. Quincy BL, Turbow DJ, Dabinett LN. Acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus specimens as a primary screen for cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(1):87-91, http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2011.625456. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2011....
) |
Nicaragua |
25 – 60 |
Case-control |
250 |
High |
Subjective |
7) |
Fielder et al. (1515. Fielder RL, Carey KB, Carey MP. Acceptability of sexually transmitted infection testing using self-collected vaginal swabs among college women. J Am Coll Health. 2013;61(1):46-53, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2012.750610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2012....
) |
USA |
18 – 69 |
Randomized |
483 |
High |
Subjective |
8) |
Penaranda et al. (1616. Penaranda E, Molokwu J, Hernandez I, Salaiz R, Nguyen N, Byrd T, et al. Attitudes toward self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among primary care attendees living on the US-Mexico border. South Med J. 2014;107(7):426-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000132. http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.000000000...
) |
Mexico |
30 – 65 |
Transversal |
21 |
High |
Subjective |
9) |
Sultana et al. (1717. Sultana F, English DR, Simpson JA, Brotherton JM, Drennan K, Mullins R, et al. Rationale and design of the iPap trial: a randomized controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for improving participation in cervical screening by never- and under-screened women in Australia. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:207, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-2...
) |
Australia |
30 – 69 |
Randomized |
8000 |
High |
Questionnaire |
10) |
Vanderpool et al. (1818. Vanderpool RC, Jones MG, Stradtman LR, Smith JS, Crosby RA. Self-collecting a cervico-vaginal specimen for cervical cancer screening: an exploratory study of acceptability among medically underserved women in rural Appalachia. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132 (Suppl 1):S21-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.1...
) |
USA |
30 – 64 |
Transversal |
31 |
High |
Subjective |
11) |
Racey et al. (1919. Racey CS, Gesink DC, Burchell AN, Trivers S, Wong T, Rebbapragada A. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability. J Womens Health. 2016;25(5):489-97, http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5348...
) |
Canada |
30 – 70 |
Randomized |
818 |
High |
Questionnaire |
12) |
Penaranda et al. (2020. Penaranda E, Molokwu J, Flores S, Byrd T, Brown L, Shokar N. Women’s Attitudes Toward Cervicovaginal Self-Sampling for High-Risk HPV Infection on the US-Mexico Border. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015;19(4):323-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000...
) |
Mexico |
30 – 65 |
Transversal |
110 |
High |
Subjective |
13) |
Sultana et al. (2121. Sultana F, Mullins R, Murphy M, English DR, Simpson JA, Drennan KT, et al. Women’s views on human papillomavirus self-sampling: focus groups to assess acceptability, invitation letters and a test kit in the Australian setting. Sex Health. 2015;12(4):279-86, http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH14236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH14236...
) |
Australia |
30 – 69 |
Transversal |
35 |
High |
Subjective |
14) |
Crofts et al. (2222. Crofts V, Flahault E, Tebeu PM, Untiet S, Fosso GK, Boulvain M, et al. Education efforts may contribute to wider acceptance of human papillomavirus self-sampling. Int J WomensHealth. 2015;7:149-54.) |
Cameroon |
30 – 65 |
Transversal |
450 |
High |
Questionnaire |
15) |
Fargnoli et al. (2323. Fargnoli V, Petignat P, Burton-Jeangros C. To what extent will women accept HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening? A qualitative study conducted in Switzerland. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:883-8.) |
Switzerland |
24 – 67 |
Transversal |
125 |
Low |
Subjective |
16) |
Sultana et al. (2424. Sultana F, Mullins R, English DR, Simpson JA, Drennan KT, Heley S, et al. Women’s experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:849, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1804-x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-180...
) |
Australia |
30 – 69 |
Transversal |
1521 |
High |
Questionnaire |
17) |
Dareng et al. (2525. Dareng EO, Jedy-Agba E, Bamisaye P, Isa Modibbo F, Oyeneyin LO, Adewole AS, et al. Influence of Spirituality and Modesty on Acceptance of Self-Sampling forCervical Cancer Screening. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0141679, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0...
) |
Nigeria |
18 – 69 |
Transversal |
600 |
High |
Questionnaire |
18) |
Boggan et al. (2626. Boggan JC, Walmer DK, Henderson G, Chakhtoura N, McCarthy SH, Beauvais HJ, et al. Vaginal Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Infection as a Primary Cervical Cancer Screening Tool in a Haitian Population. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42(11):655-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000...
) |
Haiti |
25 – 65 |
Case-control |
1845 |
High |
Subjective |
19) |
Wong et al. (2727. Wong EL, Chan PK, Chor JS, Cheung AW, Huang F, Wong SY. Evaluation of the Impact of Human Papillomavirus DNA Self-sampling on the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(1):E1-E11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000...
) |
China |
35 – 65 |
Randomized |
392 |
High |
Questionnaire |