Spatialization of <i>Tibraca limbativentris</i> Stål in irrigated rice: a geostatistical approach

Pasini, Mauricio Paulo Batistella; Engel, Eduardo; Lúcio, Alessandro Dal’Col; Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto; Ribeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paula; Bortolotto, Rafael Pivoto; Zamberlan, João Fernando

doi:10.1590/1808-1657001202018

Mauricio Paulo Batistella Pasini

Universidade de Cruz Alta – Laboratório de Entomologia – Cruz Alta (RS), Brazil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3538-8397

Eduardo Engel ^**Corresponding author: agron.engel@gmail.com

Universidade de São Paulo – Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia – Laboratório de Ecologia e Entomologia Florestal – Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” – Piracicaba (SP), Brazil

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8218-6248

Alessandro Dal’Col Lúcio

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – Departamento de Fitotecnia – Santa Maria (RS), Brazil

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-4200

Alberto Cargnelutti Filho

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – Departamento de Fitotecnia – Santa Maria (RS), Brazil

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8608-9960

Ana Lúcia de Paula Ribeiro

Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia Farroupilha – Laboratório de Entomologia – São Vicente do Sul (RS), Brazil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-2099

Rafael Pivoto Bortolotto

Universidade de Cruz Alta – Laboratório de Entomologia – Cruz Alta (RS), Brazil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-2471

João Fernando Zamberlan

Universidade de Cruz Alta – Laboratório de Entomologia – Cruz Alta (RS), Brazil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-2580

*Corresponding author: agron.engel@gmail.com

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Pasini, M.P.B.; Engel, E.; Lúcio A.D.C. Data curation: Pasini, M.P.B. Formal analysis: Pasini, M.P.B.; Engel, E.; Lúcio A.D.C.; Cargnelutti Filho, A. Methodology: Pasini, M.P.B.; Engel, E.; Lúcio A.D.C Cargnelutti Filho, A. Writing – review & editing: Pasini, M.P.B.; Engel, E.; Lúcio A.D.C; Cargnelutti Filho, A.; Ribeiro, A.L.P.; Zamberlan, J.F.; Bortolotto, R.P.

Statistics	Evaluation							Evaluation
Statistics	A1	A2	A3	A4	A5	A6	A7	A1	A2	A3	A4	A5	A6	A7
	Field 1							Field 2
Samples	143	143	143	143	143	143	143	385	385	385	385	385	385	385
Average	0.80	1.34	2.44	4.27	5.17	5.48	3.95	0.08	2.29	3.18	4.17	5.57	6.31	5.55
Standard deviation	1.08	1.50	1.93	2.85	3.25	3.74	2.89	0.41	2.46	2.88	3.54	4.37	4.87	3.97
Coefficient variation	1.36	1.11	0.79	0.67	0.63	0.68	0.73	5.09	1.08	0.90	0.85	0.78	0.77	0.72
Interval	5	7	8	12	13	15	10	4	11	12	18	24	26	23
Minimum	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Maximum	5	7	8	12	13	15	10	4	11	12	18	24	26	23
Sum	114	192	349	610	739	783	565	31	881	1224	1606	2146	2429	2137
Total Field	3.352							10.454
Assimetry	1.35	1.32	0.64	0.43	0.44	0.87	0.40	6.74	1.13	0.73	0.80	0.83	0.92	1.06
Kurtosis	1.35	1.90	-0.04	-0.34	-0.47	-0.27	-1.21	52.79	0.44	-0.52	0.14	0.89	0.88	1.77
p-value SW test	0.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.01	0.00
λ (Box-Cox)	-0.68	0	0.43	0.58	0.58	0.27	0.43	-2.5	0	0	0.33	0.43	0.43	0.43
p-value SW test	0.1	0.06	0.06	0.07	0.08	0.06	0.15	0.04	0.06	0.08	0.07	0.06	0.11	0.1
	Field 3							Field 4
Samples	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	30	30	30	30	30	30	30
Average	2.15	4.00	6.31	16.15	18.92	17.54	11.92	0.90	1.70	3.67	8.07	10.47	12.30	6.23
Standard deviation	0.899	1.633	1.75	3.363	4.499	2.402	1.498	0.803	1.317	1.845	4.042	4.876	3.771	1.5687
Coefficient variation	0.42	0.41	0.28	0.21	0.24	0.14	0.13	0.89	0.77	0.50	0.50	0.47	0.31	0.25
Interval	2	4	5	9	13	9	6	3	4	6	15	16	15	6
Minimum	1	2	4	12	13	14	9	0	0	0	3	5	6	4
Maximum	3	6	9	21	26	23	15	3	4	6	18	21	21	10
Sum	28	52	82	210	246	228	155	27	51	110	242	314	369	187
Total Field	1.001							1.300
Assimetry	-0.34	-0.14	0.32	0.01	0.31	0.78	-0.02	0.62	0.41	-0.50	1.03	0.90	0.34	0.68
Kurtosis	-1.78	-1.68	-1.18	-1.67	-1.48	0.86	1.05	0.06	-0.86	-0.93	0.48	-0.25	-0.63	-0.17
p-value SW test	0.06	0.07	0.26	0.19	0.25	0.29	0.19	0.02	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.19	0.02
λ (Box-Cox)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.32	0.47	-	0	-0.43	-	-0.48
p-value SW test	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.07	0.12	-	0.41	0.29	-	0.22

Evaluation	Model	Estimates
Evaluation	Model	C₀	C₁	a	Γ	SDI
Field 1
A1	Pentaspheric	0.000	1.574	252.9		100
A2	Circular	0.000	3.830	256.5		100
A3	Tetraspheric	0.000	1.132	38.3		100
A4	Circular	0.000	1.912	261.8		100
A5	Gaussian	0.000	4.378	43.4		100
A6	K-Bessel	0.000	4.649	36.9	10.0	100
A7	Gaussian	0.000	3.063	41.4		100
Field 2
A1	Circular	0.000	0.962	153.9		100
A2	Tetraspheric	0.000	8.762	478.4		100
A3	Pentaspheric	0.000	16.514	487.3		100
A4	K-Bessel	0.000	3.762	42.2	9.1	100
A5	Circular	0.000	4.259	39.5		100
A6	K-Bessel	0.045	6.972	124.1	7.8	99
A7	Stable	0.000	5.999	40.3	2.0	100
Field 3
A1	J-Bessel	0.000	7.746	71.7	10.0	100
A2	Circular	0.284	13.820	98.0		98
A3	Circular	0.000	10.047	51.2		100
A4	Circular	0.000	34.963	70.6		100
A5	Circular	0.000	48.328	56.1		100
A6	J-Bessel	0.000	13.511	41.9	3.9	100
A7	Cardinal Sine	0.340	5.165	84.1		94
Field 4
A1	Cardinal Sine	0.035	1.855	90.0		98
A2	K-Bessel	0.000	3.466	47.4	10.0	100
A3	K-Bessel	0.000	5.204	41.7	10.0	100
A4	Spheric	0.000	25.562	96.7		100
A5	K-Bessel	0.000	43.606	86.9	10.0	100
A6	Cardinal Sine	0.391	24.286	107.3		98
A7	Circular	0.000	6.894	89.4		100

[1] *Corresponding author: agron.engel@gmail.com

Brasil

Brasil

Spatialization of Tibraca limbativentris Stål in irrigated rice: a geostatistical approach

Espacialização de Tibraca limbativentris Stål em arroz irrigado: uma abordagem geoestatística

ABSTRACT