SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número2THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE CONSUMER RIGHTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CHILEAN LEGAL SYSTEM“MUTAÇÃO À BRASILEIRA”: UMA ANÁLISE EMPÍRICA DO ART. 52, X, DA CONSTITUIÇÃO índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista Direito GV

versão impressa ISSN 1808-2432

Resumo

MASTRODI, Josué. ON BALANCING RIGHTS AND PROPORTIONALITY OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS. Rev. direito GV [online]. 2014, vol.10, n.2, pp.577-595. ISSN 1808-2432.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-2432201424.

Research on the prevalence of interests and values of higher social groups over interests and values of lower social groups even in judicial decisions between two individuals only, author and defendant. Individual rights, by which modern State has been structured, tends to prevail. This prevalence is as well determinant in Robert Alexy’s theory of fundamental rights, by which is given same importance either to individual our social rights and, due to proportional balancing, there is chance social rights to win. It is possible to assert that each collision of rights will be decided differently, but proportionality does not attribute rationality to the criterion needed to give ratio decidendum to the decision. The proportional decision is more related to the chosen criterion than to the rights in conflict.

Palavras-chave : General Theory of Law; Theory of Fundamental Rights; Balancing of rights; Proportionality; Robert Alexy.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )