SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.77 issue1Neck dissection complicationsDoes chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis influence the staging of differentiated thyroid carcinoma? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Print version ISSN 1808-8694

Abstract

SAMELLI, Alessandra Giannella et al. Comparing audiological evaluation and screening: a study on presbycusis. Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) [online]. 2011, vol.77, n.1, pp. 70-76. ISSN 1808-8694.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000100012.

Given the high prevalence of presbycusis and the damage it brings about, a screening test can be useful in the identification of hearing loss in primary care. AIM: To estimate the prevalence of hearing loss in a representative sample of elderly people living at Butantan using an audiological screening method (questionnaire) and a basic audiological evaluation; to compare the results of the two kinds of evaluations, checking the validity of this tool for hearing loss screening. DESIGN: Cross sectional descriptive study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 200 individuals (above 60 years old, both genders) were randomly selected to undergo audiological screening (questionnaire). Another randomly selected group encompassed 100 individuals who were submitted to a set of audiological tests. Then, we compared the results from the two methods. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant associations between the questionnaire and the degree of hearing loss of the patients. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of hearing loss in our sample was of 56% in the screening and of 95% when checked by the audiological evaluation. Therefore, screening was not proven valid to assess hearing when compared to audiological evaluation.

Keywords : audiometry; hearing; aged; hearing loss; presbycusis.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese