Positive perception about facilities, programs, parks and playgrounds available for PA in the community |
Ceschini3030 Ceschini FL, Andrade DR, Oliveira LC, Araújo Júnior JF, Matsudo VKR.Prevalência de inatividade física e fatores associados em estudantes do ensino médio de escolas públicas estaduais. J Pediatr 2009;85(4):301-6., Southeast |
|
Do you know the Program Agita São Paulo |
|
Total: 71.9% (n=2,766) |
Coledam1616 Coledam DHCC, Ferraiol PF, Júnior RP, Gomes Ribeiro EA, Cabral Ferreira MA, de Oliveira AR. Concordância entre dois pontos de corte para atividade físicae fatores associados em jovens. Rev Paul Pediatr 2014;32(3):215-22., South |
|
|
|
Boys: 81.4%; Girls: 77.7% 300 min MVPA: 48.1%; 420 min MVPA: 27.3% |
Coledam1515 Coledam DHC, Ferraiol PF, Pires Junior R, dos-Santos JW, Oliveira AR de. Prática esportiva e participação nas aulas de educação física: fatores associados em estudantes de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2014;30(3):533-45., South |
|
≥1 places for the practice of PA |
|
Total: 68.0% |
Coledam55 Coledam DHC, Ferraiol PF, dos-Santos JW, Oliveira AR de. Factors associated with cardiorespiratory fitness in school students. Rev Bras Med Esporte2016;22(1):21-6., South |
|
|
|
<14 years: 80.1% (n=358); ≥14 years: 78.6% (n=378) |
Coledam1515 Coledam DHC, Ferraiol PF, Pires Junior R, dos-Santos JW, Oliveira AR de. Prática esportiva e participação nas aulas de educação física: fatores associados em estudantes de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2014;30(3):533-45., South |
|
Places proper for PA are close to my home |
|
Boys: 67.0%; Girls: 39.4% |
Farias Júnior1717 Farias Júnior JC, da Silva Lopes A, Mota J, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Hallal PC. Perception of the social and built environment and physical activity among Northeastern Brazil adolescents. Prev Med 2011;52(2):114-19., Northeast |
|
There are places for practicing PA (parks, squares, courts, fields, etc.) |
|
Boys: 66.9%; Girls: 40.4% |
|
The neighborhood offers many opportunities for practicing PA |
|
Boys: 70.0%; Girls: 41.2% |
Farias Júnior1818 Farias Júnior JC, Florindo AA, Santos MP, Mota J, Barros MVG. Perceived environmental characteristics and psychosocial factors associated with physical activity levels in adolescents from Northeast Brazil: structural equation modelling analysis. J Sports Sci 2014;32(10):963-73., Northeast |
|
Access to places for PA and their attractiveness (range 5-20)
|
|
Boys: 18.6 (4.7); Girls: 17.9 (5.0) |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., |
|
Places with opportunities to engage in PA |
|
Boys: 50.6% (n=607); Girls: 42.3% (n=692) |
Northeast |
|
Has public places to engage in PA |
|
Boys: 62.6% (n=749); Girls: 56.3% (n=909) |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., Northeast |
|
|
|
Boys: 69.5% (n=832); Girls: 63.7% (n=1,037) |
Lopes66 Lopes AA dos S, Lanzoni AN, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Reis RS. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among high school studentsfrom Curitiba, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014;17(4):938-53., South |
|
Has places I like to go to |
|
Total: 64.9% (n=1,045) Boys: 69.7% (n=453); Girls: 61.6% (n=592) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 94.0% (n=426); Girls: 78.0% (n=462) 60mins/ 5 time/week: Boys: 23.2% (n=105); Girls: 9.5% (n=56) |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., Northeast |
|
|
|
Boys: 61.0% (n=730); Girls: 57.9% (n=947) |
Lopes66 Lopes AA dos S, Lanzoni AN, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Reis RS. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among high school studentsfrom Curitiba, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014;17(4):938-53., South |
|
Seeing interesting things while walking |
|
Total: 37.2% (n=600) Boys: 41.2% (n=268); Girls: 34.6% (n=332) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 94.0% (n=252); Girls: 83.7% (n=278) 60min/ 5 time/week: Boys: 25.4% (n=68); Girls: 9.0% (n=30) |
Positive perception about the presence of sidewalks or bicycle lanes |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., Northeast |
|
There are sidewalks on most streets |
|
Boys: 74.8% (n=901); Girls: 71.8% (n=1184) |
Farias Júnior1717 Farias Júnior JC, da Silva Lopes A, Mota J, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Hallal PC. Perception of the social and built environment and physical activity among Northeastern Brazil adolescents. Prev Med 2011;52(2):114-19., Northeast |
|
|
Boys: 65.0%; Girls: 38.9% (physically active adolescents) |
Lopes66 Lopes AA dos S, Lanzoni AN, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Reis RS. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among high school studentsfrom Curitiba, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014;17(4):938-53., South |
|
|
Total: 63.4% (n=1.021) Boys: 66.5% (n=432); Girls: 61.3% (n=589) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 90.7% (n=392); Girls: 78.8% (n=464) 60min/ 5 time/week: Boys: 27.7% (n=98); Girls: 8.8% (n=52) |
Farias Júnior1717 Farias Júnior JC, da Silva Lopes A, Mota J, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Hallal PC. Perception of the social and built environment and physical activity among Northeastern Brazil adolescents. Prev Med 2011;52(2):114-19., Northeast |
|
|
|
Boys: 65.4%; Girls: 42.4% |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., Northeast |
|
There are bicycle lanes or places where I can ride a bicycle |
|
Boys: 25.6% (n=306); Girls: 27.7% (n=451) |
Lopes66 Lopes AA dos S, Lanzoni AN, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Reis RS. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among high school studentsfrom Curitiba, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014;17(4):938-53., South |
|
|
Total: 43.8% (n=705) Boys: 48.0% (n=312); Girls: 40.9% (n=393) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 92.6% (n=289); Girls: 75.6% (n=297) 60min/ 5 time/week: Boys: 23.4% (n=73); Girls: 10.2% (n=40) |
Positive perception of OPS or facilities for PA near the residence |
Reis99 Reis RS, Hino AAF, Florindo AA, Añez CRR, Domingues MR. Association between physical activity in parks and perceived environment: a study with adolescents. J Phys Act Health 2009;6(4):503-9., South |
|
Up to 30 min |
|
Boys: 54.4%; Girls: 46.2% |
|
More than 30 min |
|
Boys: 20.7%; Girls: 33.2% |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., Northeast |
|
Places near home to engage in PA |
|
Boys: 72.5% (n=869); Girls: 69.4% (n=1141) |
Lima2121 Lima AV, Fermino RC, Oliveira MP, Rodriguez Añez CR, Reis RS. Distância percebida até as instalações de lazer e sua associação com a prática de atividade física e de exercícios em adolescentes de Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2013;29(8):1507-21., South |
|
1-2 leisure facilities near the residence |
|
Total: 10.2% (n=150) Boys: 10.9% (n=66); Girls: 9.6% (n=84) |
|
≥ 3 leisure facilities near the residence |
|
Total: 33.6% (n=496) Boys: 38.8% (n=234); Girls: 30.1% (n=262) |
|
[< 5 min] Distance from the parks |
|
Total: 20.1% (n=296) Boys: 22.7% (n=137); Girls: 18.3% (n=159) |
|
[< 5 min] Distance to squares |
|
Total: 20.8% (n=306) Boys: 27.4% (n=165); Girls: 16.2% (n=141) |
|
[< 5 min] Distance to the gyms |
|
Total: 27.7% (n=409) Boys: 31.2% (n=188); Girls: 25.4% (n=221) |
|
[< 5 min] Distance gymnasiums or sports courts |
|
Total: 11.4% (n=168);Boys: 13.4% (n=81); Girls: 10.0% (n=87) |
|
[< 5 min] Distance bike paths or walking trails |
|
Total: 19.3% (n=284) Boys: 19.9% (n= 120); Girls: 18.8% (n=164) |
|
[6-10 min] Distance from the parks |
|
Total: 22.9% (n=338) Boys: 23.9% (n=144); Girls: 22.3% (n=194) |
|
[6-10 min] Distance to squares |
|
Total: 20.5% (n=302) Boys: 23.5% (n=142); Girls: 18.4% (n=160) |
|
[6-10 min] Distance to the gyms |
|
Total: 16.9% (n=249) Boys: 17.1% (n=103); Girls: 16.8% (n=146) |
|
[6-10 min] Distance gymnasiums or sports courts |
|
Total:14.8% (n=218) Boys: 15.8% (n=95); Girls: 14.1% (n=123) |
|
[6-10 min] Distance bike paths or walking trails |
|
Total: 16.1% (n=237) Boys: 14.3% (n= 86); Girls: 17.3% (n=151) |
|
[11 -20min] Distance from the parks |
|
Total: 22.1% (n=326) Boys: 21.4% (n=129); Girls: 22.6% (n=197) |
|
[11 -20min] Distance to squares |
|
Total: 18.6% (n=274) Boys: 18.2% (n=110); Girls: 18.8% (n=164) |
|
[11 -20min] Distance to the gyms |
|
Total: 13.4% (n=197) Boys: 14.4% (n=87); Girls: 12.6% (n=110); |
|
[11 -20min] Distance gymnasiums or sports courts |
|
Total: 13.1% (n=193)Boys o: 12.9% (n=78); Girls: 13.2% (n=115) |
|
[11-20min] Distance bike paths or walking trails |
|
Total: 7.7% (n=114) Boys: 8.1% (n=49); Girls: 7.5% (n=65) |
|
[21-30min] Distance from the parks |
|
Total: 12.2% (n=180) Boys: 11.1% (n=67); Girls: 13.0% (n=113) |
|
[21-30min] Distance to squares |
|
Total: 11.4% (n=168) Boys: 12.4% (n=75); Girls: 10.7% (n=93) |
|
[21-30min] Distance to the gyms |
|
Total: 7.5% (n=110) Boys: 7.8% (n= 47); Girls: 7.3% (n=63) |
|
[21-30min] Distance gymnasiums or sports courts |
|
Total: 50.5% (n=745) Boys: 46.9% (n=283); Girls: 53.0% (n= 462) |
|
[21-30min] Distance bike paths or walking trails |
|
Total: 23,3% (n=343) Boys: 18.9% (n=114); Girls: 26.3% (n=229) |
|
[≥31min] Distance from the parks |
|
Total: 22.7% (n=334) Boys: 20.9% (n=126); Girls: 23.9% (n=208) |
|
[≥31min] Distance to squares |
|
Total: 28.8% (n=424) Boys: 18.4% (n=111); Girls: 35.9% (n=313) |
|
[≥31min] Distance to the gyms |
|
Total: 34.5% (n=509) Boys: 29.5% (n=178); Girls: 38.0% (n=331) |
|
[≥31min] Distance gymnasiums or sports courts |
|
Total: 10.2% (n=150) Boys: 10.9% (n=66); Girls: 9.6% (n=84) |
Lima2121 Lima AV, Fermino RC, Oliveira MP, Rodriguez Añez CR, Reis RS. Distância percebida até as instalações de lazer e sua associação com a prática de atividade física e de exercícios em adolescentes de Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2013;29(8):1507-21., South |
|
[≥31min] Distance bike paths or walking trails |
|
Total: 33.6% (n=496) Boys: 38.8% (n=234); Girls: 30.1% (n=262) |
Positive perception about quality of the OPS and PA attributes in the neighborhood |
Farias Júnior1717 Farias Júnior JC, da Silva Lopes A, Mota J, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Hallal PC. Perception of the social and built environment and physical activity among Northeastern Brazil adolescents. Prev Med 2011;52(2):114-19., Northeast |
|
Places where I can practice of PA are well maintained |
|
Boys: 69.8%; Girls: 40.3% |
Farias Júnior1818 Farias Júnior JC, Florindo AA, Santos MP, Mota J, Barros MVG. Perceived environmental characteristics and psychosocial factors associated with physical activity levels in adolescents from Northeast Brazil: structural equation modelling analysis. J Sports Sci 2014;32(10):963-73., Northeast |
|
Structure and maintenance of the neighborhood (range 4-16)
|
|
Boys: 11.3 (n=2.8); Girls: 11.3 (n=2.9) |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., Northeast |
|
Well maintained venues to engage in PA |
|
Boys: 46.0% (n=553); Girls: 44.4% (n=730) |
Lopes66 Lopes AA dos S, Lanzoni AN, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Reis RS. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among high school studentsfrom Curitiba, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014;17(4):938-53., South |
|
Overall perception of the environmental (good and very good) |
|
Total: 47.3% (n=762) Boys: 54.3% (n=353); Girls 42.6% (n=409) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 51.1% (n=332); Girls: 34.1% (n=328) 60min/ 5 time/week: Boys: 13.4% (n=87); Girls: 4.2% (n=40) |
Positive perception of safety in the neighborhood |
Farias Júnior1717 Farias Júnior JC, da Silva Lopes A, Mota J, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Hallal PC. Perception of the social and built environment and physical activity among Northeastern Brazil adolescents. Prev Med 2011;52(2):114-19., Northeast |
|
Places where I can practice PA are not safe
|
|
Boys: 67.8%; Girls: 40.3% |
|
The neighborhood is violent, with a lot of muggings, crime, and drugs
|
|
Boys: 65.6%; Girls: 39.8% |
Farias Júnior1818 Farias Júnior JC, Florindo AA, Santos MP, Mota J, Barros MVG. Perceived environmental characteristics and psychosocial factors associated with physical activity levels in adolescents from Northeast Brazil: structural equation modelling analysis. J Sports Sci 2014;32(10):963-73., Northeast |
|
Security for the practice of physical activity (range 3-12)
|
|
Boys: 11.4 (3.2); Girls: 11.1 (3.2) |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., Northeast |
|
It is safe for walking and running |
|
Boys: 31.8%; Girls: 35.7% |
|
It is safe for riding a bike |
|
Boys: 29.6%; Girls: 35.7% |
Lopes66 Lopes AA dos S, Lanzoni AN, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Reis RS. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among high school studentsfrom Curitiba, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014;17(4):938-53., South |
|
There’s a lot of crime
|
|
Total: 53.0% (n=854) Boys: 51.9% (n=337); Girls: 53.8% (n=517) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 91.7% (n=309); Girls: 78.0% (n=403) 60min/ 5 time/week: Boys: 24.6% (n=83); Girls: 9.9% (n=51) |
|
It is safe |
|
Total: 47.1% (n=759) Boys: 57.5% (n=374); Girls: 40.1% (n=385) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 93.3% (n=349); Girls: 77.9% (n=300) 60min/ 5 time/week: Boys: 23.0% (n=86); Girls: 9.6% (n=37) |
|
There are streets lit |
|
Total: 44.2% (n=712) Boys: 46.6% (n=303); Girls: 42.6% (n=409) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 90.8% (n=275); Girls: 79.2% (n=324) 60min/ 5time/week: Boys: 22.8% (n=69); Girls: 9.5% (n=39) |
Positive perception about traffic safety around the homes |
Farias Júnior1717 Farias Júnior JC, da Silva Lopes A, Mota J, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Hallal PC. Perception of the social and built environment and physical activity among Northeastern Brazil adolescents. Prev Med 2011;52(2):114-19., Northeast |
|
Riding a bicycle in the streets around my house is not safe because of street traffic
|
|
Boys: 67.8%; Girls: 40.1% |
|
Walking or jogging in the streets around my house is not safe because of street traffic
|
|
Boys: 67.5%; Girls: 40.3% |
Lopes66 Lopes AA dos S, Lanzoni AN, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Reis RS. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among high school studentsfrom Curitiba, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014;17(4):938-53., South |
|
There’s too much traffic
|
|
Total: 79.8% (n=1,286) Boys: 82.6% (n=537); Girls: 77.9% (n=749) 20min/≤1 time/week: Boys: 92.4% (n=496); Girls: 77.7% (n=582) 60min/ 5 time/week: Boys: 22.2% (n=119); Girls: 8.9% (n=67) |
Positive perception of cleanliness or not pollution in the neighborhood |
Farias Júnior1717 Farias Júnior JC, da Silva Lopes A, Mota J, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Hallal PC. Perception of the social and built environment and physical activity among Northeastern Brazil adolescents. Prev Med 2011;52(2):114-19., Northeast |
|
The neighborhood is polluted, with open sewage, garbage and debris on the streets
|
|
Boys: 65.4%; Girls: 38.7% |
Mendonça77 Mendonça G, Florindo AA, Rech CR, Freitas DKS de, Farias Júnior JC de. Perceived neighborhood environmental characteristics and different types of physical activity among Brazilian adolescents. J Sports Sci 2018;36(9):1068-75., Northeast |
|
It is not polluted |
|
Boys: 25.8% (n=310); Girls: 25.5% (n=413) |