SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 issue2Representation, Epistemic Democracy, and Political Parties in John Stuart Mill and José de Alencar author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Political Science Review

On-line version ISSN 1981-3821

Abstract

KNIGHT, Robert D.. Strategic Coalitions and Agenda-Setting in Fragmented Congresses: How the PRI Sets the Legislative Agenda in Mexico. Bras. Political Sci. Rev. [online]. 2018, vol.12, n.2, e0001.  Epub May 21, 2018. ISSN 1981-3821.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800020001.

This essay suggests a theory of strategic legislative agenda control. It argues that a single party can effectively set the agenda under majoritarian gatekeeping rules without obtaining majority or even plurality status. The agenda-setting party need not be the median party in the assembly nor supported by executive-led parliamentary coalitions. The Mexican Chamber of Deputies provides a case study of how majoritarian gatekeeping and political context establish the conditions necessary for one-party-led agenda-setting in a fragmented congress with or without enduring coalitions. The failure of opposition coalitions to roll the ‘Partido Revolucionario Institucional’ evinces that party's ability to set the agenda through strategic coalition formation since 2000. High levels of party unity combined with strategic positioning have allowed the PRI to do so. The strategic nature of the PRI's coalition-making is documented and analyzed in the context of its historically pragmatic approach to coalition-making. The argument is supported by roll-call data analysis, using WNOMINATE, WRice scores, and roll rates.

Keywords : Legislatures; coalitions; agenda-setting; Mexico; WNOMINATE.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )