Johnston et al.2323. Johnston S, Coyer F, Nash R. Simulation debriefing based on principles of transfer of learning: a pilot study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;26:102-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.0...
|
Pilot study, randomized clinical, controlled with mixed approach, which tested debriefing using the principles of learning transfer theory |
Debriefing based on principles of transfer of learning Lead author: Salomon et al.3434. Salomon G, Perkins DN. Rocky roads to transfer: rethinking mechanism of a neglected phenomenon. Educ Psychol. 2010;24(2):113-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2402_1
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2402_...
|
Kuiper et al.2424. Kuiper RN, Heinrichy C, Matthias A, Graham MJ, Bell-Kotwallyy L. Debriefing with the OPT model of clinical reasoning during high fidelity patient simulation. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5:Article 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1466
https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1466...
|
Descriptive study reporting experiences with nursing students and comparing their ability to develop clinical reasoning supported by debriefing |
Debriefing using the OPT model of clinical reasoning Lead author: Kuiper et al.2424. Kuiper RN, Heinrichy C, Matthias A, Graham MJ, Bell-Kotwallyy L. Debriefing with the OPT model of clinical reasoning during high fidelity patient simulation. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5:Article 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1466
https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1466...
|
Poore et al.2525. Poore JA, Dawson JC, Dunbar DM, Parrish K. Debriefing interprofessionally: a tool for recognition and reflection. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(1):25-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000518
https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.000000000000...
|
Methodological study, validation and application of debriefing tool |
Interprofessional debriefing (DIPRR) Lead author: Poore et al.2525. Poore JA, Dawson JC, Dunbar DM, Parrish K. Debriefing interprofessionally: a tool for recognition and reflection. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(1):25-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000518
https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.000000000000...
|
Reierson et al. (2626. Reierson IÅ, Haukedal TA, Hedeman H, Bjørk IT. Structured debriefing: what difference does it make? Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;25:104-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.04.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.04.0...
|
Exploratory qualitative study conducted with nursing students, with traditional oral debriefing and structured debriefing associated with video recording |
Structured debriefing Lead authors: Fanning et al.3535. Fanning RM, Gabba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007:2(2):115-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539
https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318031...
and Phrampus et al.3636. Phrampus PE, O’Donnell JM. Healthcare simulation: from ‘best secret’ to ‘best practice’. In: Levine AI, DeMaria Jr S, Schwartz AD, Sim A. Comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 73-84.
|
Mariani et al.2727. Mariani B, Cantrell MA, Meakim C. Nurse educators' perceptions about structured debriefing in clinical simulation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2014;35(5):330-1. doi: https://doi.org/10.5480/13-1190.1
https://doi.org/10.5480/13-1190.1...
|
A descriptive, qualitative pilot study on structured debriefing |
Structured debriefing Lead authors: Fanning et al.3535. Fanning RM, Gabba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007:2(2):115-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539
https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318031...
, Phrampus et al.3636. Phrampus PE, O’Donnell JM. Healthcare simulation: from ‘best secret’ to ‘best practice’. In: Levine AI, DeMaria Jr S, Schwartz AD, Sim A. Comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 73-84.
|
Mariani et al.2828. Mariani B, Cantrell MA, Meakim C, Prieto P, Dreifuerst KT. Structured debriefing and students' clinical judgment abilities in simulation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013;9(5):e147-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.11.009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.11.0...
|
Mixed method quasi-experimental study with structured debriefing |
Structured debriefing Lead authors: Fanning et al.3535. Fanning RM, Gabba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007:2(2):115-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539
https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318031...
and Phrampus et al.3636. Phrampus PE, O’Donnell JM. Healthcare simulation: from ‘best secret’ to ‘best practice’. In: Levine AI, DeMaria Jr S, Schwartz AD, Sim A. Comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 73-84.
|
Maestre and Rudolph3232. Rudolph J.W, Maestrea JM. Teorías y estilos de debriefing: el método con buen juicio como herramienta de evaluación formativa en salud. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68(4):282-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.05.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.05...
|
Descriptive study, with a qualitative approach, on the principles of debriefing with good judgment |
Debriefing with good judgment Lead author: Maestre et al.3232. Rudolph J.W, Maestrea JM. Teorías y estilos de debriefing: el método con buen juicio como herramienta de evaluación formativa en salud. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68(4):282-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.05.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.05...
|
Dreifuerst3333. Dreifuerst KT. Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learning. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015;11(5):268-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.0...
|
Quasi-experimental study, with pre-test and post-test application to investigate the development of clinical reasoning in students through debriefing |
Debriefing for Meaningful Learning© Lead author: Dreifuerst3333. Dreifuerst KT. Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learning. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015;11(5):268-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.0...
|