SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 número3Prevalence and factors related to malocclusion, normative and perceived orthodontic treatment need among children and adolescents in BangladeshEfficiency of ODI and APDI of Kim’s cephalometric analysis in a Latin American population with skeletal open bite índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

versión impresa ISSN 2176-9451versión On-line ISSN 2177-6709

Resumen

CARRUITERO, Marcos J.; AMBROSIO-VALLEJOS, Ximena M.  y  FLORES-MIR, Carlos. Glabellar vertical line as a reference goal for anteroposterior maxillary position. Dental Press J. Orthod. [online]. 2019, vol.24, n.3, pp.45.e1-45.e5.  Epub 01-Ago-2019. ISSN 2176-9451.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.45.e1-5.onl.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of glabellar vertical line (GVL) as the anteroposterior maxillary position goal.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted assessing 129 participants (20.21 ± 1.99 years): 67 women (20.16 ± 1.99 years), and 62 males (20.26 ± 2.06 years). The facial profile photographs were taken with a posed smile in natural head position. The linear distance from the most facial convexity of the upper central incisor (FA) to the goal anterior-limit line (GALL) and also from FA to GVL were measured and compared. Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was applied. To determine the correlation between the distances, Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used. Simple and multiple linear regression were also performed.

Results:

The GALL-GVL separation was 0.54 ± 1.14 mm (95%CI: 0.34-0.74). A strong correlation between FA-GALL and FA-GVL distances (Spearman’s rho=0.983 [95%CI: 0.976-0.988], p< 0.01) was identified. The FA-GVL distance explains almost all the total variation of FA-GALL (R2=95.84%, p< 0.01). The FA-GALL distance can be predicted by using the formula: FA-GALL=0.5+0.9*(FA-GVL).

Conclusion:

These findings suggest that GVL could be used as an easier-to-use treatment goal to determine the maxillary anteroposterior position, compared to GALL, to improve facial harmony profile goals in cases where the maxillary incisors are properly positioned anteroposteriorly.

Palabras clave : Facial profile; Diagnosis; Orthodontics; Orthognathic surgery.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )