Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Adherence of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli to the ileal and colonic mucosa: an in vitro study utilizing the scanning electron microscopy

Aderência da Escherichia coli enteroagregativa a mucosas ileal e colônica: estudo in vitro utilizando microscopia eletrônica de varredura

Abstracts

CONTEXT: Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains have been associated with persistent diarrhea in several developing countries. In vivo procedures with animal models, in vitro assays with cellular lines and in vitro organ culture with intestinal fragments have been utilized to study these bacteria and their pathogenicity. OBJECTIVE: The present experimental research assessed the pathogenic interactions of three enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains, using the in vitro organ culture, in order to show the adherence to different regions of both, the ileal and the colonic mucosa and demonstrate possible mechanisms that could have the participation in the prolongation of diarrheiogenic process. METHODS: This study used intestinal fragments from terminal ileum and colon that were excised from pediatric patients undergoing intestinal surgeries and from adult patients that underwent to colonoscopic procedures. Each strain was tested with three intestinal fragments for each region. Tissue was fixed for scanning electron microscopic analysis. RESULTS: These bacteria colonized ileal and colonic mucosa in the typical stacked-brick configuration in the ileum and colon. In both regions, the strains were seen over a great amount of mucus and sometimes over the intact epithelium. In some regions, there is a probable evidence of effacement of the microvilli. It was possible to see adhered to the intestinal surface, bacteria fimbrial structures that could be responsible for the adherence process. CONCLUSION: In order to cause diarrhea, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains adhere to the intestinal mucosa, create a mucoid biofilm on the small bowel surface that could justify the digestive-absorptive abnormalities and consequently, prolonging the diarrhea.

Escherichia coli. Diarrhea; Microscopy, electron, scanning; Organ culture techniques


CONTEXTO: Cepas de Escherichia coli enteroagregativa têm sido associadas à diarreia persistente em vários países em desenvolvimento. Procedimentos in vivo com modelos animais, cultura de órgão in vitro com fragmentos intestinais e ensaios in vitro com linhas celulares têm sido utilizados para estudar essas bactérias e a sua patogenicidade. OBJETIVO: A presente investigação experimental avaliou as interações patogênicas de três cepas de Escherichia coli enteroagregativa, usando cultura de órgão in vitro, para mostrar a aderência a diferentes regiões do intestino: íleo e cólons e demonstrar possíveis mecanismos que poderiam ter participação na perpetuação do processo diarréico. MÉTODOS: Este estudo usou fragmentos de íleo terminal e cólon que foram retirados de pacientes pediátricos submetidos a cirurgias intestinais e de pacientes adultos que foram submetidos a colonoscopias. Cada cepa foi testada com três fragmentos intestinais para cada região. O tecido foi fixado para análise sob microscopia eletrônica de varredura. RESULTADOS: Estas bactérias colonizaram mucosa ileal e colônica na configuração típica de pilhas de tijolos. Em ambas as regiões, as bactérias foram vistas sobre grande quantidade de muco e, às vezes, sobre o epitélio intacto. Em algumas áreas, há evidência de provável achatamento de vilosidades. Foi possível ver sobre a superfície intestinal, estruturas fimbriais bacterianas que poderiam estar relacionadas ao processo de adesão. CONCLUSÕES: Para causar diarreia, cepas de Escherichia coli enteroagregativa aderem à mucosa intestinal e criam um biofilme de muco sobre a superfície do intestino delgado, o que poderia justificar as anormalidades digestivo-absortivas e, por conseguinte, prolongar a diarreia.

Escherichia coli. Diarreia; Microscopia eletrônica de varredura; Técnicas de cultura de órgãos


EXPERIMENTAL GASTROENTEROLOGY

Adherence of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli to the ileal and colonic mucosa: an in vitro study utilizing the scanning electron microscopy

Aderência da Escherichia coli enteroagregativa a mucosas ileal e colônica: estudo in vitro utilizando microscopia eletrônica de varredura

Jacy Alves Braga de AndradeI; Edna FreymüllerII; Ulysses Fagundes-NetoI

IDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, UNIFESP-EPM

IICenter of Electron Microscopy of the UNIFESP-EPM, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Correspondence Correspondence: Prof. Ulysses Fagundes-Neto Avenida Conselheiro Rodrigues Alves, 1239 - Vila Mariana 04014-012 - São Paulo, SP, Brasil E-mail: ufagundesneto@uol.com.br

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains have been associated with persistent diarrhea in several developing countries. In vivo procedures with animal models, in vitro assays with cellular lines and in vitro organ culture with intestinal fragments have been utilized to study these bacteria and their pathogenicity.

OBJECTIVE: The present experimental research assessed the pathogenic interactions of three enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains, using the in vitro organ culture, in order to show the adherence to different regions of both, the ileal and the colonic mucosa and demonstrate possible mechanisms that could have the participation in the prolongation of diarrheiogenic process.

METHODS: This study used intestinal fragments from terminal ileum and colon that were excised from pediatric patients undergoing intestinal surgeries and from adult patients that underwent to colonoscopic procedures. Each strain was tested with three intestinal fragments for each region. Tissue was fixed for scanning electron microscopic analysis.

RESULTS: These bacteria colonized ileal and colonic mucosa in the typical stacked-brick configuration in the ileum and colon. In both regions, the strains were seen over a great amount of mucus and sometimes over the intact epithelium. In some regions, there is a probable evidence of effacement of the microvilli. It was possible to see adhered to the intestinal surface, bacteria fimbrial structures that could be responsible for the adherence process.

CONCLUSION: In order to cause diarrhea, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains adhere to the intestinal mucosa, create a mucoid biofilm on the small bowel surface that could justify the digestive-absorptive abnormalities and consequently, prolonging the diarrhea.

Headings:Escherichia coli. Diarrhea. Microscopy, electron, scanning. Organ culture techniques.

RESUMO

CONTEXTO: Cepas de Escherichia coli enteroagregativa têm sido associadas à diarreia persistente em vários países em desenvolvimento. Procedimentos in vivo com modelos animais, cultura de órgão in vitro com fragmentos intestinais e ensaios in vitro com linhas celulares têm sido utilizados para estudar essas bactérias e a sua patogenicidade.

OBJETIVO: A presente investigação experimental avaliou as interações patogênicas de três cepas de Escherichia coli enteroagregativa, usando cultura de órgão in vitro, para mostrar a aderência a diferentes regiões do intestino: íleo e cólons e demonstrar possíveis mecanismos que poderiam ter participação na perpetuação do processo diarréico.

MÉTODOS: Este estudo usou fragmentos de íleo terminal e cólon que foram retirados de pacientes pediátricos submetidos a cirurgias intestinais e de pacientes adultos que foram submetidos a colonoscopias. Cada cepa foi testada com três fragmentos intestinais para cada região. O tecido foi fixado para análise sob microscopia eletrônica de varredura.

RESULTADOS: Estas bactérias colonizaram mucosa ileal e colônica na configuração típica de pilhas de tijolos. Em ambas as regiões, as bactérias foram vistas sobre grande quantidade de muco e, às vezes, sobre o epitélio intacto. Em algumas áreas, há evidência de provável achatamento de vilosidades. Foi possível ver sobre a superfície intestinal, estruturas fimbriais bacterianas que poderiam estar relacionadas ao processo de adesão.

CONCLUSÕES: Para causar diarreia, cepas de Escherichia coli enteroagregativa aderem à mucosa intestinal e criam um biofilme de muco sobre a superfície do intestino delgado, o que poderia justificar as anormalidades digestivo-absortivas e, por conseguinte, prolongar a diarreia.

Descritores:Escherichia coli. Diarreia. Microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Técnicas de cultura de órgãos.

INTRODUCTION

Diarrheal disorders in childhood account for a large proportion (20%) of children deaths with an estimated 2.2 million deaths yearly(9). Persistent diarrhea has high impact on infantile morbidity and mortality rates in developing countries and more than 50% of the deaths due to diarrhea are associated to persistent episodes(23, 35, 53).

Small intestinal mucosa injury has been incriminated as a central mechanism in the persistence of diarrhea(6, 19). However it is important to discriminate between the persistence of the infection that leads to an enteropathy and a post infectious enteropathy that fails to heal(31). Persistent diarrhea is often manifested by a chronic enteropathy, with impaired mucosal healing and diminished digestive and absorptive capacity(6, 19, 33). The majority of the studies have focused on the characterization of injury, identifying changes in the digestive-absorptive process, secretory and reabsorptive capacities for minerals, carbohydrates, protein and fats(6, 7). The small bowel lesions described in infants with persistent diarrhea may be caused by several noxious factors, acting separately or in an associated pattern, namely nutritional deficiencies, direct action of some enteropathogenic agents on the enterocyte, milk or food intolerance as well as prior to antibiotic therapy(19, 26, 34, 55).

Several studies have demonstrated different degrees of alterations in the small bowel mucosa(19, 20, 47, 48, 49) due to persistent diarrhea. Deficient intestinal repair is regarded as a key component of abnormal mucosal morphology(8). However the exact factors underlying ineffective repair processes and continuing injury are poorly understood. The end result of mucosal derangement is malabsorption of luminal nutrients and increased permeability of the gut to dietary and microbial antigens(6).

Enteric pathogens commonly cause illness by damaging the epithelial intestinal cells and/or secreting toxins, which bind to the enterocytes.

Some Escherichia coli serotypes presenting diverse adherence properties in tissue culture assays have been reported as important enteropathogens. One of these types of enteropathogenic properties called enteroaggregative is characterized by the ability of some Escherichia coli strains (EAEC) to produce an aggregative pattern of adherence (AA) in cultured HEp-2 cell monolayers(37). AA is identified by the presence of prominent bacterial autoagglutination on the cells' surfaces as well as on the glass coverslip free from cells. The main characteristic of AA, however, is the layering of bacteria, best described as a stacked-brick configuration.

The pathogenesis of EAEC is complex and EAEC strains are very heterogeneous(16). Human and animal studies indicate that these bacteria are able to bind to jejunal, ileal and colonic epithelium(5, 15, 28, 29, 30, 42, 44, 57, 58).

After epidemiologic evidences of association between EAEC infection and diarrhea(40), efforts have been made to explain the interaction of these agents with the intestinal mucosa. Numerous putative virulence factors have been identified, but the clinical implication of these factors remains unclear(4, 18, 36, 44). In order to cause diarrhea, EAEC needs to adhere to the intestinal epithelial cells, form a mucoid biofilm and induce toxic effects on the small bowel. More investigations on the interactions of EAEC with the intestinal mucosa are desirable.

The present study was designed to investigate the interaction of three EAEC strains, isolated from infants with persistent diarrhea with ileal and colonic mucosa utilizing the scanning electron microscopy.

METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

EAEC strains: 171-1(ONT: H1), 101-1(ONT: H1) and 71-1(ONT: H33), previously isolated from stool specimens of hospitalized infants with persistent diarrhea in São Paulo, Brazil, were selected for this study. These strains were characterized as EAEC based on the production of the AA pattern in HEp-2 cells adhesion assay(37) and EAEC probe hybridization(4).

As a positive control, the prototype strain 042 (O44: H18)(39) was used to infect the ileal and colonic fragments.

As a negative control, non-infected intestinal fragments were used.

Bacterial strains stored at room temperature in nutrient agar were routinely grown on tryptic soy broth, in a period of 18 hours at 37°C.

In vitro organ culture adhesion assay

Intestinal fragments were obtained from terminal ileum and colon that were excised from pediatric patients that underwent abdominal surgeries and from adult patients that underwent colonoscopic procedure. In both cases, macroscopically normal tissues were selected. The adhesion assays were performed as described by Knutton et al.(32) with some modifications, as follows: intestinal fragments obtained by biopsies were transported to the laboratory, after being placed in modified organ culture medium (MOCM) adapted from that described by Embaye et al.(17) consisting of NCTC-135 (SIGMA) with 2 mm of L-glutamin (SIGMA), MTT8 (FLOW) and new born calf serum. Some fragments were immediately fixed to microscopic evaluation (uncultured controls). Fragments were fixed in modified Karnovsky (mk) for analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). EAEC strains were tested with three intestinal fragments of each intestinal region. Three biopsy samples were placed with their villi tip in the upper position on sterile filters (AP 20; Millipore) in a plastic Petri dish (35 × 10 mm; Corning). The level of MOCM containing 1.0% D-mannose was adjusted to cover the biopsy specimens with a thin film of medium by capillary action. For adhesion studies, 60 µL of a bacterial broth culture (overnight cultures at 37°C) was added. Fragments of biopsy specimens were incubated with tissue culture medium without the addition of bacteria as negative controls.

Petri dishes were then incubated at 37°C in a 95% O2-5% CO2 atmosphere, for 2 hours. Then, biopsy samples were washed 4 times with sterile phosphate buffered saline and incubated with 2 mL of MOCM containing 1.0% D-mannose for additional 2, 4 and 6 hours at 37°C. The culture medium was changed completely every 2 hours to maintain pH and nutrient levels, without reinoculation with bacterial culture. After these incubation periods, biopsy samples were washed and prepared for SEM.

Tissue processing

For SEM, the intestinal fragments were fixed in mk and washed in 0.1M cacodylate solution and then dehydrated. After, biopsies were dried in a CPD 030 critical point dryer. Subsequently specimens were attached to 0.5 - inch aluminum stubs and coated with silver colloid (Silver Print). Later, they received a thin layer of gold (sputtering method) to become conductors. The observations were performed in SEM (JEOL JSM - 5300) in 10 Kv.

Ethical Considerations

This study protocol was approved by the Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP-EPM) Ethical Commitee for Human Experimentation. Informed written consent was obtained from adults and parents of each participating infant.

RESULTS

Adhesion to ileal fragments

Ileal fragments that were excised from children and from adults showed the same pattern of lesions. Analysis by SEM of the intestinal fragments infected with 171-1 strains revealed bacterial aggregates, with a stacked brick pattern similar to that seen on HEp-2 cells(39) adhering to a layer of mucus overlying the mucosa and inducing effacement of the microvilli (Figures 1A and 1B). In some specimens of tissue the bacterial aggregates were also seen adhering directly to the epithelium (Figure 2). Non-characterized fimbrial structures on bacterial surface were observed, apparently mediating bacteria-bacteria and bacteria-cell interactions (Figures 3A and 3B). Negative controls showed apparently intact microvilli and lack of adherent bacteria on the mucosal surface (Figure 4). The different strains showed the same pattern of adherence as well as the 042 strain (positive control).







Adhesion to colonic fragments

Colonic fragments that were excised from children and from adults showed the same pattern of lesions. In the infected fragments of the colonic mucosa bacteria were seen over a large amount of mucus and in some other areas, bacteria were seen in contact directly with the intact mucosa (Figures 5A, 5B and 5C). Analysis of negative controls showed intact epithelium (Figure 6). The positive control showed the same aspects that were observed with the wild strains.





DISCUSSION

EAEC infection represents an important cause of diarrhea in developing countries(2, 3, 8, 12, 21, 22, 25, 41, 45). A Brazilian study identified EAEC infection as the most common cause of bacterial diarrhea in infants(2). In United States, EAEC has also been reported as a common pathogen in children with diarrhea(24).

The analysis of EAEC strains in several models, such as in vivo assays in animal models(50, 51, 52) and in vitro organ culture (IVOC) with isolated enterocytes(42) or cellular lines like T84, Caco 2, HT29, HeLa e Hep-2(1, 11, 27, 54) and with intestinal fragments(33) have shown that a plausible explanation for the persistent nature of EAEC disease involves intestinal mucosal damage. However, the mechanism of this mucosal damage is not fully understood.

There are evidences that EAEC can colonize both, the small bowel and the colonic mucosa, but there may be variations among the different EAEC strains(28, 29, 30, 57, 58).

Hicks et al.(30) examined the interaction between EAEC and the human intestine using the IVOC model utilizing intestinal mucosa biopsies obtained from infants with diarrhea. They used two prototype strains (17-2 and JM221) that adhered to jejunal, ileal and colonic mucosa. Their wild type strains showed a variation in adhesion location: two adhered to all intestinal levels, one adhered to jejunum and ileum, another adhered to the ileum only and the last one adhered to both. Most bacteria were associated with the mucus layer above the intestinal mucosa and few of them were found in close association with the mucosal surface. EAEC adhered in large groups which obscured the view of the underlying epithelial surface. In the present study the three wild strains adhered to both, the ileal and colonic mucosa inducing the same pattern of mucosal injury. We have shown that wild EAEC strains adhered to both evaluated regions over a thick mucus layer and sometimes directly to the mucosa. In some regions, there is a probable evidence of effacement of the microvilli (Figure 1).

In all cases in which EAEC strains adhered to the mucosa in significant numbers, they did so in aggregates with a stacked brick pattern similar to that seen on HEp-2 cells in culture.

Hicks et al.(30) suggested that these bacteria must penetrate the mucus layer to reach the epithelium. The IVOC model allows a direct access to the mucosa, and it indicates that this large production of mucus that was observed in the infected fragments by EAEC strains could be an inflammatory response to infection, since that this excessive amount of mucus production was not observed in control fragments. Wanke et al.(56) demonstrated this great affinity of these bacteria to the biofilm that covers the epithelium suggesting that this adherence to the mucus seems to be an important role in the bacterial colonization.

Several aspects of EAEC mucosal adherence have been elucidated. It was described the related aggregative adherence fimbriae I, II and III (AAF/I, AAF/II and AAF III), which are encoded on ≈ 60 mda virulence plasmids called pAA(5, 14, 15, 38). Other investigators have described in outer membrane of proteins that may contribute to adherence as well(13, 15). Thus, the full understanding mechanism of EAEC adhesins has yet to be defined. The production of mucus was confirmed by Sheikh et al.(46) that suggested that the EAEC biofilm is distinct from the biofilms described previously for non-pathogenic E. coli and has features that distinguish it from well-characterized biofilms formed by other bacteria. They used an in vitro model of EAEC biofilm formation and found that the defining property of EAEC, aggregative adherence, appears to represent the early stages of biofilm formation in rich growth medium. This mucus layer has unique aspects and is dependent on the AAF or functionally similar structures. Further analysis of this system may yield other important observations concerning adherence and colonization by EAEC.

In the present study, it was observed increased mucus discharge in both evaluated regions that were infected by these strains.

The fimbrial structures that were shown binding bacteria - bacteria and bacteria - epithelium could be involved with other virulence factors that must be better studied. Immunohistochemical analyses would be necessary for a better understanding of these interactions.

In conclusion, this study, which examined the interaction of three EAEC strains with human intestinal tissues, has confirmed that EAEC colonizes both the small bowel and the colonic mucosa. EAEC infection may lead to damage to the absorptive epithelium of the small bowel, resulting in perpetuation of diarrhea. In the colonic mucosa the inflammatory lesions described in the present study could explain the colitis that had been reported in children suffering from EAEC infection(10, 43).

Received 22/11/2010.

Accepted 19/1/2011.

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and the Center of Electron Microscopy of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP-EPM), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • 1. Abe CM, Knutton S, Pedroso MZ, Freymüller E, Gomes TA.  An enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strain of serotype O111:H12 damages and invades cultured T84 cells and human colonic mucosa.  FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;203:199-205.
  • 2. Araujo JM, Tabarelli GF, Aranda KR, Fabbricotti SH, Fagundes-Neto U, Mendes CM, Scaletsky IC.  Typical enteroaggregative and atypical enteropathogenic types of Escherichia coli are the most prevalent diarrhea-associated pathotypes among Brazilian children.  J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3396-9.
  • 3. Bardhan PK, Albert MJ, Alam NH, Faruque SM, Neogi PK, Mahalanabis D.  Small bowel and fecal microbiology in children suffering from persistent diarrhea in Bangladesh.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;26:9-15.
  • 4. Baudry B, Savarino SJ, Vial P, Kaper JB, Levine MM.  A sensitive and specific DNA probe to identify enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, a recently discovered diarrheal pathogen.  J Infect Dis. 1990;161:1249-51.
  • 5. Bernier C, Gounon P, Le Bouguénec C.  Identification of an aggregative adhesion fimbria (AAF) type III- encoding operon in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli as a sensitive probe for detecting the AAF-encoding operon family.  Infect Immun. 2002;70:4302-11.
  • 6. Bhutta ZA, Ghishan F, Lindley K, Memon IA, Mittal S, Rhoads M.  Persistent and chronic diarrhea and malabsorption: Working Group Report of the Second World Congress of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39:s711-6.
  • 7. Binder HJ.  Causes of chronic diarrhea.  N Engl J Med. 2006;355:236-9.
  • 8. Black RE.  Persistent diarrhea in children of developing countries.  Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12:751-64.
  • 9. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J.  Where and why are 10 million children dying every year?  Lancet. 2003;361:2226-34.
  • 10. Bouckenooghe AR, Dupont HL, Jiang ZD, Adashi J, Mathewson JJ, Verenkar MP, Rodrigues S, Steffen R.  Markers of enteric inflammation in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli diarrhea in travelers.  Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62:711-3.
  • 11. Bouzari S, Jafari A, Farhoudi-Moghaddam AA, Shokouhi F, Parsi M.  Adherence of non-enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to heLa cells.  J Med Microbiol. 1994;40:95-7.
  • 12. Bouzari S, Jafari A, Azizi A, Oloomi M, Nataro JP.  Short report: characterization of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli isolates from Iranian children.  Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:13-4.
  • 13. Chart H, Spencer J, Smith HR, Rowe B.  Magnesium ions are required for HEp-2 cell adhesion by enteroaggregative strains of Escherichia coli O126:H27 and O44:H18. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;148:49-52.
  • 14. Czeczulin JR, Balepur S, Hicks S, Phillips A, Hall R, Kothary MH, Navarro-Garcia F, Nataro JP.  Aggregative adherence fimbria II, a second fimbrial antigen mediating aggregative adherence in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli  Infect Immun. 1997;65:4135-45.
  • 15. Debroy C., Yealy J, Wilson RA, Bhan M, Kumar R.  Antibodies raised against the outer membrane protein interrupt adherence of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli  Infect Immun. 1995;63:2873-9.
  • 16. Elias WP, Uber AP, Tomita SK, Trabulsi LR, Gomes TA.  Combinations of putative virulence markers in typical and variant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains from children with and without diarrhoea.  Epidemiol Infect. 2002;129: 49-55.
  • 17. Embaye H, Batt RM, Saunders JR, Getty B, Hart CA.  Interaction of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O111 with rabbit intestinal mucosa in vitro.  Gastroenterology. 1989;96:1079-86.
  • 18. Eslava C, Villaseca JM, Morales R, Navarro A, Cravioto A.  Identification of a protein with toxigenic activity produced by enteroaggregative Escherichia coli [abstract].  In: Abstracts of the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology; 1993. Washington DC: The Society; 1993.  Abstract B-105:44.
  • 19. Fagundes-Neto U, Kallas MR, Patrício FR.  Morphometric study of the small bowel mucosa in infants with diarrhea due to enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1051-6
  • 20. Fagundes-Neto U, De Martini-Costa S, Pedroso MZ, Scaletsky ICA.  Studies of small bowel surface by scanning eletron microscopy in infants with persistent diarrhea.  Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33:1437-42.
  • 21. Falcão JP, Falcão DP, Gomes TA.  Ice as a vehicle for diarrheagenic Escherichia coli  Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;91:99-103.
  • 22. Fang GD, Lima AA, Martins CV, Nataro JP, Guerrant RL.  Etiology and epidemiology of persistent diarrhea in northeastern Brazil: a hospital-based, prospective, case-control study.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995;21: 137-44.
  • 23. Fauveau V, Henry FJ, Briend A, Yunus M, Chakraborty J.  Persistent diarrhea as a cause of childhood mortality in rural Bangladesh.  Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1992;381:12-4.
  • 24. Flores J, Okhuysen PC.  Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli infection.  Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009;25:8-11.
  • 25. Gioppo NM, Elias WP Jr, Vidotto MC, Linhares RE, Saridakis HO, Gomes TA, Trabulsi LR, Pelayo JS.  Prevalence of HEp-2 cell-adherent Escherichia coli and characterisation of enteroaggregative E. coli and chain-like adherent E. coli isolated from children with and without diarrhoea, in Londrina, Brazil.  FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;190:293-8.
  • 26. Guarino A, De Marco G. Persistent Diarrhea. In: Walker AW, Kleinman RE, Sherman PM, Shneider BL, Sanderson IR, editors. Pediatric gastrointestinal disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management.  4th ed.  Lewiston, NY: BC Decker; 2004.  p.180-93.
  • 27. Harrington SM, Strauman MC, Abe CM, Nataro JP.  Aggregative adherence fimbriae contribute to the inflammatory response of epithelial cells infected with enteroaggregative Escherichia coli  Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:1565-78.
  • 28. Hicks S, Candy DC, Philips AD.  Adhesion of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli to formalin-fixed intestinal and ureteric epithelia from children. J Med Microbiol. 1996;44:362-71.
  • 29. Hicks S, Candy DC, Philips AD.  Adhesion of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli to pediatric intestinal mucosa in vitro.  Infect Immun. 1996;64:4751-60.
  • 30. Hicks S, Nataro JP, Knotton S, Philips AD.  Cytotoxic effects of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (Eaggec) on human intestinal mucosa in vitro.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996;22:432.
  • 31. Islam D, Bandholtz L, Nilsson J, Wigzell H, Christensson B, Agerberth B, Gudmundsson GH.  Downregulation of bactericidal peptides in enteric infections: a novel immune escape mechanism with bacterial DNA as a potential regulator.  Nat Med. 2001;7:180-5.
  • 32. Knutton S, Lloyd DR, Mcneish AS.  Adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to human intestinal enterocytes and cultured human intestinal mucosa.  Infect Immun. 1987;55:69-77.
  • 33. Knutton S, Shaw RK, Bhan MK, Smith HR, McConnell MM, Cheasty T, Williams PH, Baldwin TJ.  Ability of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains to adhere in vitro to human intestinal mucosa.  Infect Immun. 1992;60:2083-91.
  • 34. Lima AA, Guerrant RL.  Persistent diarrhea in children: epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, nutritional impact, and management.  Epidemiol Rev. 1992;14:222-42.
  • 35. Mathers CD, Bernard C, Iburg KM, Inoue M, Fat DM, Shibuya K, Stein C, Tomijima N, Xu H.  Global burden of disease in 2002: data sources, methods and results [Internet].  Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.  (Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper No. 54). World Health Organization - WHO. Geneva; 2003 [cited 2009 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper54.pdf
  • 36. Moon JY, Park JH, Kim YB.  Molecular epidemiological characteristics of virulence factors on enteroaggregative E. Coli.  FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;253:215-20.
  • 37. Nataro JP, Kaper JB, Robins-Browne R, Prado V, Vial P, Levine MM.  Patterns of adherence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells.  Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987;6:829-31.
  • 38. Nataro JP, Deng Y, Maneval DR, German AL, Martin WC, Levine MM.  Aggregative adherence fimbriae I of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli mediate adherence to HEp-2 cells and hemagglutination of human erythrocytes.  Infect Immun. 1992;60:2297-304.
  • 39. Nataro JP, Deng Y, Cookson S, Cravioto A, Savarino SJ, Guers LD, Levine MM, Tacket CO.  Heterogeneity of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli virulence demonstrated in volunteers.  J Infect Dis. 1995;171:465-8.
  • 40. Nataro JP, Kaper JB.  Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli  Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:142-201.
  • 41. Nataro JP.  Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli pathogenesis.  Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005;21:4-8.
  • 42. Raj P, Bhan MK, Srivastava R, Kumar R, Bhandari N, Arora NK.  Human enterocyte adhesion of enteroadherent Escherichia coli  Indian J Med Res. 1990;91:368-71.
  • 43. Regua-Mangia AH, Gomes TA, Vieira MA, Andrade JR, Irino K, Teixeira LM.  Frequency and characteristics of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from children with and without diarrhoea in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  J Infect. 2004;48:161-7.
  • 44. Sainz T, Perez J, Fresan MC, Flores V, Jimenez L Hernandez U Herrera I, Eslava C.  Histological alterations and immune response induced by Pet toxin during colonization with enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) in a mouse model infection.  J Microbiol. 2002;40:91-7.
  • 45. Sang WK, Oundo JO, Mwituri JK, Waiyaki PG, Yoh M, lida T, Honda T.  Multidrug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli associated with persistent diarrhea in Kenyan children.  Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:373-4.
  • 46. Sheikh J, Hicks S, Dall'Agnol M, Phillips AD, Nataro JP.  Roles for Fis and Yafk in biofilm formation by enteroaggregative Escherichia coli Mol Microbiol. 2001;41:983-97.
  • 47. Shiner M, Nichols VN, Barrish JP, Nichols BL.  Pathogenesis of small intestinal mucosal lesions in chronic diarrhea of infancy: II. an electron microscopy study.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1990;11:464-80.
  • 48. Shiner M, Putman M, Nicholas VN, Nichols BL.  Pathogenesis of small intestinal mucosal lesions in chronic diarrhea of infancy: I. a light microscopy study.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1990;11:455-63.
  • 49. Sullivan PB, Marsh MN.  Small intestinal mucosal histology in the syndrome of persistent diarrhoea and malnutrition: a review.  Acta Paediatrica Suppl. 1992;381:72-7.
  • 50. Tickoo SK, Bhan MK, Srivastava R, Dass BK, Shariff M, Saini S, Kumar R.  Intestinal colonization & production of diarrhoea by enteroadherent-aggregative Escherichia coli  Indian J Med Res. 1992;95:278-83.
  • 51. Tzipori S, Montanaro J, Robins-Browne RM, Vial P, Gibson R, Levine MM.  Studies with enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in the gnotobiotic piglet gastroenteritis model.  Infect Immun. 1992;60:5302-6.
  • 52. Vial PA, Robins-Browne R, Lior H, Prado V, Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Maneval D, Elsayed A, Levine MM.  Characterization of enteroadherent-aggregative Escherichia coli, a putative agent of diarrheal disease.  J Infect Dis. 1988;158:70-9.
  • 53. Victora CG, Hutttly SR, Fuchs SC, Nobre LC, Barros FC.  Deaths due to dysentery, acute and persistent diarrhoea among Brazilian infants.  Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1992;381:7-11.
  • 54. Villaseca JM, Navarro-García F, Mendoza-Hernández G, Nataro JP, Cravioto A, Eslava C.  Pet toxin from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli produces cellular damage associated with fodrin disruption.  Infect Immun. 2000;68:5920-7.
  • 55. Walker-Smith JA.  Food allergy and bowel disease in childhood.  Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse. 1984;20:308-16.
  • 56. Wanke CA, Cronan S, Goss C, Chadee K, Guerrant RL.  Characterization of binding of Escherichia coli strains which are enteropathogens to small-bowell mucin.  Infect Immun. 1990;58:794-800.
  • 57. Yamamoto T, Endo S, Yokota T, Echeverria P.  Characteristics of adherence of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli to human and animal mucosa.  Infect Immun. 1991;59:3722-39.
  • 58. Yamamoto T, Koyama Y, Matsumoto M, Sonoda E, Nakayama S, Uchimura M, Paveenkittiporn W, Tamura K, Yokota T, Echeverria P.  Localized, aggregative and diffuse adherence to HeLa cells, plastic and human small intestines by Escherichia coli isolated from patients with diarrhea.  J Infect Dis. 1992;166:1295-310.
  • Correspondence:

    Prof. Ulysses Fagundes-Neto
    Avenida Conselheiro Rodrigues Alves, 1239 - Vila Mariana
    04014-012 - São Paulo, SP, Brasil
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      12 Sept 2011
    • Date of issue
      Sept 2011

    History

    • Accepted
      19 Jan 2011
    • Received
      22 Nov 2010
    Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. Rua Dr. Seng, 320, 01331-020 São Paulo - SP Brasil, Tel./Fax: +55 11 3147-6227 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: secretariaarqgastr@hospitaligesp.com.br