Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of Rolandra fruticosa (asteraceae) in response to shade

Crescimento, alocação de biomassa e fotossíntese de Rolandra fruticosa (asteraceae) em resposta ao sombreamento

Abstracts

The effects of shade on growth, biomass allocation patterns and photosynthetic response was examined for Rolandra fruticosa (L.) Kuntze, a common perennial weed shrub in cultivated pastures and agricultural areas of Brazilian Amazonia, for plants grown in full sunlight and those shaded to 30 % of full sunlight over a 34-d period. Specific leaf area and leaf area ratio were higher for shade plants during all the experimental period. Shade plants allocated significantly less biomass to root tissue than sun plants and relative growth rate was higher in sun plants. Sun leaves had significantly higher dark respiration and light saturated rates of photosynthesis than shade leaves. The apparent quantum efficiency was higher for shade leaves, while light compensation point was higher for sun leaves. These results are discussed in relation to their ecological and weed management implications.

Specific leaf area; leaf area ratio; growth analysis; tropics


Estudou-se o efeito do sombreamento nocrescimento, alocação de carbono e respostas fotossintéticas de Rolandra fruticosa (L.) Kuntze, uma planta daninha de porte arbustivo, comum em áreas de pastagem e agrícolas da Amazônia Brasileira, submetida a condições de pleno sol e a 70 % de interceptação da luz solar, durante 34 dias. A área foliar específica e a razão de área foliar foram maiores nas plantas sombreadas durante todo o período experimental. Plantas sombreadas alocaram menor quantidade de biomassa para as raízes, quando comparadas às plantas de sol e a taxa de crescimento relativo foi maior para as plantas de sol. A respiração no escuro e a taxa de fotossíntese máxima foram maiores para as folhas de plantas não sombreadas. A eficiência quântica aparente foi maior para as folhas de plantas sombreadas, enquanto que o ponto de compensação de luz foi maior para folhas a pleno sol. Esses resultados são discutidos com relação as suas importâncias ecológica e de manejo.

Área foliar específica; razão de área foliar; análise de crescimento; trópicos


Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of Rolandra fruticosa (asteraceae) in response to shade

Crescimento, alocação de biomassa e fotossíntese de Rolandra fruticosa (asteraceae) em resposta ao sombreamento

Moacyr B. Dias-FilhoI; Aloisio F. Chagas JúniorII

IResearch agronomist, Ph.D., Lab. Ecofisiologia Vegetal, Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Caixa Postal 48, CEP 66017-970, Belém-PA, Brazil, e-mail: moacyr@cpatu.embrapa.br. CNPq fellow

IIGraduate Student, INPA, Manaus-AM, Brazil, Former PIBIC/CNPq fellow

ABSTRACT

The effects of shade on growth, biomass allocation patterns and photosynthetic response was examined for Rolandra fruticosa (L.) Kuntze, a common perennial weed shrub in cultivated pastures and agricultural areas of Brazilian Amazonia, for plants grown in full sunlight and those shaded to 30 % of full sunlight over a 34-d period. Specific leaf area and leaf area ratio were higher for shade plants during all the experimental period. Shade plants allocated significantly less biomass to root tissue than sun plants and relative growth rate was higher in sun plants. Sun leaves had significantly higher dark respiration and light saturated rates of photosynthesis than shade leaves. The apparent quantum efficiency was higher for shade leaves, while light compensation point was higher for sun leaves. These results are discussed in relation to their ecological and weed management implications.

Key words: Specific leaf area, leaf area ratio, growth analysis, tropics.

RESUMO

Estudou-se o efeito do sombreamento nocrescimento, alocação de carbono e respostas fotossintéticas de Rolandra fruticosa (L.) Kuntze, uma planta daninha de porte arbustivo, comum em áreas de pastagem e agrícolas da Amazônia Brasileira, submetida a condições de pleno sol e a 70 % de interceptação da luz solar, durante 34 dias. A área foliar específica e a razão de área foliar foram maiores nas plantas sombreadas durante todo o período experimental. Plantas sombreadas alocaram menor quantidade de biomassa para as raízes, quando comparadas às plantas de sol e a taxa de crescimento relativo foi maior para as plantas de sol. A respiração no escuro e a taxa de fotossíntese máxima foram maiores para as folhas de plantas não sombreadas. A eficiência quântica aparente foi maior para as folhas de plantas sombreadas, enquanto que o ponto de compensação de luz foi maior para folhas a pleno sol. Esses resultados são discutidos com relação as suas importâncias ecológica e de manejo.

Palavras chave: Área foliar específica, razão de área foliar, análise de crescimento, trópicos.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

LITERATURE CITED

Received for publication on 18/02/99 and in the revised form on 16/05/99.

  • BJÖRKMAN, O. Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: LANGE, O. L., NOBEL, P. A.; OSMOND, C. B.; ZIEGLER, H. (Eds.). Physiological plant ecology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981. p.57-107. (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, 12 A).
  • BUGBEE, B.G. Growth analysis and yield components. In: SALISBURY, F.B. (Ed.). Units symbols, and terminology for plant physiology: a reference for presentation of research results in the plant science. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. p.115-119.
  • CUI, M.; CALDWELL, M.M. Shading reduces exploitation of soil nitrate and phosphate by Agropyrun desertorum and Artemisia tridentata from soils with patchy and uniform nutrient distribution. Oecologia, v.109, p.177-183, 1997.
  • DIAS FILHO, M.B. Plantas invasoras em pastagens cultivadas da Amazônia: estratégias de manejo e controle. Belém: Embrapa-CPATU, 1990. 103p. (Embrapa-CPATU. Documentos, 52).
  • DIAS FILHO, M. B. Physiological responses of Vismia guianensis to contrasting light environments. Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Veg., v.7, p.35-40, 1995.
  • DIAS FILHO, M.B.; CHAGAS JÚNIOR, A.F.; CARVALHO, C.J.R. de. Respostas morfológicas e fisiológicas de Panicum maximum a diferentes condições de luminosidade. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 33., 1996, Fortaleza. Anais... Fortaleza: SBZ, 1996. p.62-64.
  • DIAS FILHO, M.B. Physiological responses of Solanum crinitum to contrasting light environments. Pesq. Agropec. Bras, v.32, p.789-796, 1997.
  • GLOSER, V., GLOSER, J. Acclimation capability of Clamoagrostis epigejos and C. arundinaceae to changes in radiation environment. Oecologia, v.32, p.202-212, 1996.
  • GRONINGER, J.W.; SEILER, J.R., PETERSON, J.A.; KREH, R.E. Growth and photosynthetic responses of four Virginia Piedmont tree species to shade. Tree Physiology, v.16, p.773-778, 1996.
  • HOLT, J.S. Plant response to light: a potential tool for weed management. Weed Sci., v.43, p.474-482, 1995.
  • HORTON, J.L.; NEUFELD, H. S. Photosynthetic responses of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus, a shade-tolerant, C4 grass, to variable light environments. Oecologia, v.114, p.11-19, 1998.
  • HUANTE, P.; RINCÓN, E. Responses to light changes in tropical deciduous woody seedlings with contrasting growth rates. Oecologia, v.113, p.53-66, 1998.
  • HUNT, R. Basic growth analysis: plant growth analysis for beginners. London: Unwin Hyman. 1990. 112p.
  • JONES, H.G. Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Second ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1992. 428p.
  • LAMBERS, H.; POORTER, H. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res., v.23, p.187-261, 1992.
  • OGREN, E.; SUNDIN, U. Photosynthetic responses to variable light: a comparison of species form contrasting habitats. Oecologia, v.106, p.18-27, 1996.
  • PATTERSON, D.T. Effects of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed Sci., v.43, p.483-490, 1995.
  • REGNIER, E.; HARRISON, S.K. Compensatory responses of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and velvetleaf (Abutlion theophrasti) to partial shading. Weed Sci., v.41, p.541-547, 1993.
  • REGNIER, E.E.; SALVICCI, M.E.; STOLLER, E.W. Photosynthesis and growth responses to light in soybean (Glycine max) and three broadleaf weeds. Weed Sci., v.36, p.487-496, 1988.
  • RIDDOCH, I.; GRACE, J.; FASEHUN, F.E.; RIDDOCH, B.; LAPIDO, D.O. Photosynthesis and successional status of seedlings in a tropical semi-deciduous rain forest in Nigeria. Journal of Ecology, v.79, p.491-503, 1991.
  • SULTAN, S.E.; WILCZEK, A.M., BELL, D.L., HAND, G. Physiological response to complex environments in annual Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Oecologia, v.115, p.564-578, 1998.
  • THOMPSON, W.A.; HUANG, L.-K.; KRIEDEMANN, P.E. Photosynthetic response to light and nutrients in suntolerant and shade-tolerant rainforest trees. II. Leaf gas exchange and component processes of photosynthesis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, v.19, p.19-42. 1992.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    04 May 2010
  • Date of issue
    2000

History

  • Accepted
    16 May 1999
  • Received
    18 Feb 1999
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas Departamento de Fitotecnia - DFT, Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV, 36570-000 - Viçosa-MG - Brasil, Tel./Fax::(+55 31) 3899-2611 - Viçosa - MG - Brazil
E-mail: rpdaninha@gmail.com