Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy

Abstract

The reliance on courts for addressing public policy questions and political controversies is a central phenomenon in contemporary democracies. The judicialization of politics is the result of a shift in core issues regarding democratic legitimacy, both in the sphere of institution building as well as political culture. Social justice arose as a central variable in the legitimacy of democracies, becoming vital in establishing support towards democratic political systems. This article explores the relation between perceptions on justice, judicialization of politics and how the agency of judicial institutions impacts dissatisfaction with democracy. Based on a survey carried out in the metropolitan regions of Belo Horizonte, Goiânia, Porto Alegre and Recife, it is argued that the discontent towards political institutions in Brazil does not justify the ongoing judicialization process since the perceptions on inequalities place the Judiciary within the citizens' critical stance towards institutions. Just like other representative institutions, the Judiciary has not been able to mitigate the perceptions on inequalities and the ineffectiveness of the empire of law, being therefore unable to provide a satisfactory performance in regards to the normative ends of contemporary notions of democratic legitimacy and citizenship.

Perception of justice; distrust; judicialization; democracy

• ARANTES, Rogério B. (2011), Polícia Federal e construção institucional. In: Corrupção e sistema político no Brasil, edited by Leonardo Avritzer and Fernando Filgueiras. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
• BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal, 1988.
• CARVALHO, Ernani. (2007), Revisão judicial e judicialização da política no direito ocidental: aspectos relevantes de sua gênese e desenvolvimento. Revista de Sociologia e Política, n° 28, pp. 161-179.
• CITTADINO, Gisele. (2000), Pluralismo, direito e justiça distributiva - elementos da filosofia constitucional contemporânea Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris.
• DALTON, Russell. (1999), Political support in advanced industrial democracies. In: Critical citizens. Global support for democratic government, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• DALTON, Russell. (2004), Democratic challenges, democratic choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• DWORKIN, Ronald. (2001), Uma questão de princípio. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
• ELY, John Hart. (1980), Democracy and distrust: a theory of judicial review Harvard: Harvard University Press.
• FERRAZ Jr., Tércio Sampaio. (2007), Direito Constitucional. Barueri: Manole.
• FILGUEIRAS, Fernando. (2008), Corrupção, democracia e legitimidade. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG.
• FILGUEIRAS, Fernando. (2011), Transparência e controle da corrupção no Brasil. In: Corrupção e sistema político no Brasil, edited by Leonardo Avritzer and Fernando Filgueiras. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
• HARDIN, Russell. (1999), Do we want trust in government? In: Democracy and trust, edited by Mark Warren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• HIRSCHL, Ran. (2007), Towards juristocracy. The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• INGLEHART, Ronald and WELZEL, Christian. (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: the human development sequence New York: Cambridge University Press.
• KLINGEMANN, Hans-Dieter and FUCHS, Dieter. (ed.). (1995), Citizens and the state Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• LEVI, Margaret. (1998), A state of trust. In: Trust and Governance, edited by Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• LUHMANN, Niklas. (1996), Confianza. Ciudad de México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
• MENEGUELLO, Rachel. (2007), Grounds of democratic adherence: Brazil 2002-2006. Lanic Etext Collection, vol. 1, pp. 1-38.
• MOISÉS, José Álvaro and CARNEIRO, Gabriela P. (2008), Democracia, desconfiança política e insatisfação com o regime: o caso do Brasil. Opinião Pública, vol. 14, nº 1, pp. 1-42.
• NEWTON, Kenneth. (1999), The Impact of Social Trust on Political Support. In: Critical citizens. Global support for democratic government, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• NORRIS, Pippa. (1999), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• NORRIS, Pippa. (2011), Democratic deficit. Critical citizens revisited New York: Cambridge University Press.
• OFFE, Claus. (1999), How can we trust our fellow citizens? In: Democracy and trust, edited by Mark Warren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• PHARR, Susan J. and PUTNAM, Robert D. (2000), Disaffected Democracies: What´s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• PUTNAM, Robert. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• RIBEIRO, Ednaldo A. (2011), Valores pós-materialistas e cultura política no Brasil. Maringá: EDUEM.
• ROSANVALLON, Pierre. (2006), La contre-démocratie: la politique à l'âge de la défiance Paris: Seuil.
• SIMMEL, Georg. (1977), El secreto y la sociedad secreta. In: Sociologia: Estudios sobre las formas de socialización Madrid: Biblioteca de la Revista Del Occidente.
• TATE, Neal. (1997), Why the expansion of judicial power? In: The global expansion of judicial power, edited by Neal Tate and Tornjorrn Vallinder. New York: New York University Press.
• VALA, Jorge and MARINHO, Cristina. (2003), Percepções de justiça social, confiança e avaliação do sistema político. In: Desigualdades sociais e percepções de justiça, edited by Manuel Villaverde Cabral, Jorge Vala and André Freire. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
• WERNECK VIANNA, Luiz; BURGOS, Marcelo B.; SALLES, Paula M. (2007), Dezessete anos de judicialização da política. Tempo Social, vol. 19, n° 2, pp. 39-85.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  08 Oct 2013
• Date of issue
  2013

History

• Received
  Aug 2012
• Accepted
  July 2013