Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

REPORTING DELAY DURING THE YELLOW FEVER OUTBREAK, ANGOLA, 2016

Sao Paulo, October 17, 2016

Dear Editor

A yellow fever outbreak was detected in Angola late in December 2015 and was confirmed by the National Institute for Communicable Diseases in South Africa and Institut Pasteur of Dakar, Senegal in 20 January 201611. World Health Organization. Emergencies. Timeline: yellow fever outbreak. [cited 2016 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/emergencies/yellow-fever/mediacentre/timeline/en/
http://www.who.int/emergencies/yellow-fe...
. Subsequently, a rapid increase in the number of cases was observed. From 5 December 2015 to 22 September 2016, 4,143 suspected cases were registered, among them 884 laboratory confirmed cases and 121 deaths (case fatality rate: 13.7%)22. World Health Organization. Situation report. Yellow fever. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250254/1/yellowfeversitrep30Sep16-eng.pdf?ua=1
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665...
. Considering the epicurve of suspected and confirmed cases, the epidemic peak occurred between February and March 201622. World Health Organization. Situation report. Yellow fever. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250254/1/yellowfeversitrep30Sep16-eng.pdf?ua=1
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665...
,33. World Health Organization. Incident management team-Angola. Yellow fever outbreak weekly situation report. Situation report W36, 11 Sept 2016. [cited 2016 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/sitreps/item/9039-situation-report-yellow-fever-outbreak-in-angola-11-september-2016.html
http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/...
.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and partners supported the government of Angola to control the outbreak, to strengthen measures to prevent new cases and to avoid its spread to other countries. Five priority areas were focused: surveillance and risk assessment, vaccination, case management, vector control, social mobilization and risk communication44. World Health Organization. Yellow fever strategic response plan. [cited 2016 Oct 1]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/246103/1/WHO-YF-ENB-16.2-eng.pdf?ua=1
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665...
.

The Incident Management Team-Angola periodically published Situation Reports55. World Health Organization. Yellow fever situation reports. [cited 2016 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/sitreps/
http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/...
. We considered them to discuss the average days of reporting delay and the surveillance system response. The average days of reporting delay means "the average of difference between date of receipt of case report at national level and date of case notification"66. World Health Organization. Incident management team-Angola. Yellow fever outbreak weekly situation report. Situation report, 13 June 2016. [cited 2016 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/sitreps/item/8744-situation-report-yellow-fever-outbreak-in-angola-13-june-2016.html
http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/...
. We analyzed the public data from 05 December, 2015 to 11 September, 2016 available in the published Situation Reports55. World Health Organization. Yellow fever situation reports. [cited 2016 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/sitreps/
http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/...
, estimating the average days and standard deviation () of the delay by Province.

The provinces that presented higher average days of delay reporting were: Cuanza Norte (14;  ±3), Lunda Norte (13;  ±9) and Cunene (12;  ±3) (Fig. 1).

Fig.1
Average days and standard deviation of the reporting delay during the yellow fever outbreak, by Province. Angola, 2016.

However, we can see in the graph bar, at the end of May, that the reporting delay occurred in all the provinces. But in the wake of the epidemiological weeks, the delay in the notification process was reduced in the first month and then stabilized. For this fact, we present some hypotheses. First, the surveillance system is self-limited and does not depend on external factors such as the WHO task force and partners to the yellow fever outbreak response. Despite all the efforts, the surveillance system could not further reduce the delay in notification. Second, the surveillance system has reached the response capacity limit, or for operational reasons or by the system stability. It might be related to the surveillance system weakness resulting in the yellow fever outbreak or be weakened by it.

Angola is a country with limited health care and transportation facilities (like many others!). However, a reasonable time for reporting is difficult to define. The important is the opportunity of surveillance in all the government levels.

We reinforce the importance of the routine surveillance to apply control measures timely and efficiently, and we cannot conclude that the delay in notifications has influenced the response and control of the outbreak. Conversely, the observation of the impact of the vaccination was deferred because of the reporting delay.

Data until the last vaccination campaign, 09 Sep 2016, shows that 16,001,164 people were vaccinated against yellow fever in Angola33. World Health Organization. Incident management team-Angola. Yellow fever outbreak weekly situation report. Situation report W36, 11 Sept 2016. [cited 2016 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/sitreps/item/9039-situation-report-yellow-fever-outbreak-in-angola-11-september-2016.html
http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/...
, and, as shown by the two other Letters to the Editor of Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal77. Calisher CH, Woodall JP. Yellow fever: more a policy and planning problem than a biological one. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1859-60.,88. Grobbelaar AA, Weyer J, Moolla N, Jansen van Vuren P, Moises F, Paweska JT. Resurgence of yellow fever in Angola, 2015-2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1854-5., mass vaccination is incontestable to control the outbreak and prevent a new one.

It is not less important to remember that October comes with heat and rain and besides the epidemiologic surveillance, it will be necessary to improve the vector surveillance and control.

Many lessons were learned from this outbreak. Perhaps, it is time for a new approach and to apply a new work front, contrasting with the One Health concept. The current rabies outbreak could be an opportunity to try a new approach.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Maria Martha Iglesias, a specialist in field of epidemiology and international public health at the Ministry of Health of Argentina, for her technical support with WHO reports.

REFERENCES

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    2016

History

  • Received
    17 Oct 2016
  • Accepted
    24 Oct 2016
Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, 05403-000 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil, Tel. +55 11 3061-7005 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revimtsp@usp.br