SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.24 número6Removal of calcium hydroxide from Weine Type II systems using photon-induced photoacoustic streaming, passive ultrasonic, and needle irrigation: a microcomputed tomography studyEvaluation of phenyl-propanedione on yellowing and chemical-mechanical properties of experimental dental resin-based materials índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados




Links relacionados


Journal of Applied Oral Science

versão impressa ISSN 1678-7757versão On-line ISSN 1678-7765

J. Appl. Oral Sci. vol.24 no.6 Bauru nov./dez. 2016 


Risk of developing palatally displaced canines in patients with early detectable dental anomalies: a retrospective cohort study

Daniela Gamba GARIB1 

Melissa LANCIA2 

Renata Mayumi KATO2 

Thais Marchini OLIVEIRA1 

Lucimara Teixeira das NEVES3 

1- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Odontopediatria, Ortodontia e Saúde Coletiva; Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, SP, Brasil.

2- Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, SP, Brasil.

3- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, SP, Brasil.


The early recognition of risk factors for the occurrence of palatally displaced canines (PDC) can increase the possibility of impaction prevention.


To estimate the risk of PDC occurrence in children with dental anomalies identified early during mixed dentition.

Material and Methods

The sample comprised 730 longitudinal orthodontic records from children (448 females and 282 males) with an initial mean age of 8.3 years (SD=1.36). The dental anomaly group (DA) included 263 records of patients with at least one dental anomaly identified in the initial or middle mixed dentition. The non-dental anomaly group (NDA) was composed of 467 records of patients with no dental anomalies. The occurrence of PDC in both groups was diagnosed using panoramic and periapical radiographs taken in the late mixed dentition or early permanent dentition. The prevalence of PDC in patients with and without early diagnosed dental anomalies was compared using the chi-square test (p<0.01), relative risk assessments (RR), and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV).


PDC frequency was 16.35% and 6.2% in DA and NDA groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed between groups (p<0.01), with greater risk of PDC development in the DA group (RR=2.63). The PPV and NPV was 16% and 93%, respectively. Small maxillary lateral incisors, deciduous molar infraocclusion, and mandibular second premolar distoangulation were associated with PDC.


Children with dental anomalies diagnosed during early mixed dentition have an approximately two and a half fold increased risk of developing PDC during late mixed dentition compared with children without dental anomalies.

Key words: Tooth abnormalities; Canine tooth; Etiology; Orthodontics


Apart from the third molars, the canines represent the permanent teeth that most commonly show eruptive disorders14. The prevalence of cases in which maxillary ectopic canines palatally deviate is 1.7%14, commonly affecting three females for each male24,25,27. Less frequently, the maxillary canines are buccally impacted and this irregularity seems to be a clinical manifestation of anterior crowding20. The ratio between buccal and palatal impaction of permanent maxillary canines reported in literature is 1:620.

Two theories have been presented to explain the occurrence of palatally displaced maxillary canines (PDC): “guidance” and “genetic” theories. According to the guidance theory, local conditions, such as maxillary lateral incisor agenesis or microdontia, are related to canine displacement7,8. PDC has a genetic background according to the genetic theory24, which was based on observed increased prevalence in families of affected patients, different prevalences between genders and ethnical backgrounds, and increased frequencies of other concomitant dental anomalies24,26. The search for associated dental anomalies was considered the most relevant method to investigate the genetic determinants of PDC2,24. Peck, Peck and Kataja25 (1996) found that patients with PDC have increased prevalence of permanent tooth agenesis, excluding third molars (17%), and show the mandibular second premolar as the most frequently absent tooth. Additionally, these authors found that approximately 20% of patients with PDC have small lateral incisors not necessarily at the same arch side of the ectopic canine.

The study by Sacerdoti and Baccetti27 (2004) does not offer support to the hypothesis that local conditions may be a cause for PDC7,8, since they did not detect association between the occurrence of bilateral PDC and the occurrence of bilateral agenesis or microdontia of lateral incisors. Additionally, unilateral PDC in cases with unilateral agenesis of maxillary incisors rarely occurs at the same arch side27. Sigler, Baccetti and McNamara Jr30 (2011) showed that individuals with PDC exhibited significantly higher prevalence of small maxillary lateral incisors (six-fold higher), distoangulation of mandibular second premolars (three-fold higher), and infraocclusion of deciduous molars (two-fold higher) compared with a control group. Other studies verified an increased prevalence of PDC in patients screened for other dental anomalies such as second premolar agenesis, small lateral incisors, infraocclusion of deciduous molars, and enamel hypoplasia2,19,29. Family history has already been identified as a risk factor for PDC and other heritable dental anomalies, as well as the gender bias mentioned24,26,27.

Ectopic eruption of maxillary canines has two major clinical concerns: the consequent impaction of the canine and the possibility of incisor external root resorption9,15-18. The treatment protocol for PDC during permanent dentition is often canine traction, which may present some collateral effects such as root resorption of neighboring teeth, crest bone loss at the mesial aspect of the canine, and tooth discoloration9,13. Extraction may also be indicated for canines with initial unfavorable position, or in case of tooth ankyloses16.

Conversely, when there is an early orthodontic diagnosis of PDC, simpler clinical approaches such as deciduous canine extraction and rapid maxillary expansion can lead to spontaneous canine eruption in a high percentage of children3,5,23,30. These early approaches can prevent canine impaction, incisor root resorption, and collateral effects related to tooth traction. Therefore, the recognition of risk factors for the occurrence of PDC can increase the possibility of early diagnosis and intervention. The objective of this study was to evaluate longitudinal records of patients with some early-diagnosed dental anomalies to estimate risks of developing PDC during the late mixed dentition.


This retrospective longitudinal study was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC-USP) (379/2010). The patient records were anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis. The initial sample was composed of the orthodontic files of 810 children treated from 1980 to 2005 at the Society for the Social Promotion of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients (PROFIS). Inclusion criteria were: presence of an initial panoramic radiograph taken during the first transitional period or inter-transitional period of mixed dentition, according to the Van der Linden31 (1983) classification, and presence of at least one more panoramic radiograph taken either during the second transitional period of mixed dentition or during the early permanent dentition. Exclusion criteria were: poor quality records (dark or distorted panoramic radiographs; absence of periapical radiographs in cases showing ectopic canines) and presence of syndromes or craniofacial anomalies. Eighty individuals were excluded based on these exclusion criteria.

The final sample was composed of 730 orthodontic records from children with an initial mean age of 8.3 years (SD=1.36), from both genders (448 females and 282 males). A rough estimate of the ethnic background of the sample based on facial photograph was: White (84%), Black (12%), and Asian (4%). The experimental and control groups included 263 and 467 records, respectively, and were composed based on the analyses of the initial panoramic radiographs and dental casts to investigate the presence of the following dental anomalies: 1. Agenesis of any permanent teeth, except for third molars; 2. Microdontia of maxillary lateral incisors; 3. Infraocclusion of deciduous molars; 4. Distoangulation of mandibular second premolars; 5. Tooth transpositions.

All the records were analyzed by a single calibrated examiner (ML). The examiner was precalibrated showing an agreement index ranging from 90 to 100% (Kappa test). The maxillary lateral incisor was considered as presenting microdontia when the maximum mesiodistal crown diameter was smaller than the same dimension of the opposing mandibular lateral incisor in the same patient, using the dental casts19. This category also included conical or peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors. The presence of infraocclusion of deciduous molars was determined by visual inspection of the initial dental casts and panoramic radiograph series. A deciduous molar was considered in infraocclusion when more than 1 mm of vertical discrepancy was measured from the mesial marginal ridge of the closest permanent first molar29. Maxillary and mandibular first and second deciduous molars were considered in the analysis of infraocclusion. The diagnosis of distoangulation of mandibular second premolars followed the criteria described by Shalish, et al.28 (2002).

The sample was divided into two groups. The dental anomaly group (DA) was composed of 263 patients with at least one dental anomaly identified in the initial or middle mixed dentition. Records from children without these dental anomalies in the early/middle mixed dentition (n=467) composed the non-dental anomaly group (NDA). Age and gender distribution in both groups is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Age and gender distribution in dental anomaly (DA) and non-dental anomaly (NDA) groups 

Mean age at first evaluation (SD) Mean age at second evaluation (SD) Male Female
DA group (n=263) 8y2m (1.46) 10y10m (0.88) 95 168
NDA group (n=467) 8y6m (1.26) 10y4m (0.42) 187 280
Total (n=730) 8y4m (1.36) 10y8m (0.79) 282 448

Panoramic radiographs from late mixed dentition and/or early permanent dentition were evaluated to assess risks for the development of PDC in both groups. Considering the findings of Ericson and Kurol15 (1986) showing that the attempt to radiographically determine the eruption path of maxillary canines is generally of little value in children younger than 10 years old, we only examined panoramic radiographs in records from children aged 10 years or older. The PDC diagnosis followed the radiographic parameters suggested by Lindauer, et al.22 (1992) and was confirmed through the interpretation of periapical radiographs according to the Clark’s technique12. Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) performed during the mixed dentition was registered in both groups because RME may have a positive influence on PDC cases6.

The frequency of PDC development was calculated in DA and NDA groups. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the Chi-square test with a significance level of 5%. In order to measure the strength of associations between occurrences of early-diagnosed dental anomalies and PDC, the relative risk (RR) at the 95% confidence interval and the positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. Additionally, the frequency of PDC development was separately calculated for each dental anomaly and compared with the control group using the Chi-square test (p<0.01) and relative risk assessment.


Seventy-two individuals were affected by PDC (9.86%) with a male:female ratio of 1:3 in the combined DA and NDA groups (n=730). In this subgroup of individuals with PDC, 29.1% (n=21) showed bilateral expression, 31.9% (n=23) unilateral right expression, and 38.9% (n=28) unilateral left expression.

The DA group presented PDC frequency of 16.3% compared with 6.2% of the NDA group (Table 2). This difference was statistically significant and indicated a two and a half fold increase in risk of PDC in patients with early-diagnosed dental anomaly (Table 2). Positive predictive value (PPV) corresponded to 16% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 93%.

Table 2 Comparison between dental anomaly (DA) and non-dental anomaly (NDA) groups based on the development of palatally displaced canines (PDC) 

DA group (n=263) NDA group (n=467) Pooled groups (n=730) Difference chi-square (χ 2 ) Relative Risk (RR) 95% Confidence Interval
PDC Development 43 (16.34%) 29 (6.21%) 72 (9.86%) 18.33 p<0.01* 2.63 (1.69-4.11)
Absence of PDC 220 (83.65%) 438 (93.79%) 658 (90.13%)
Total 263 (100%) 467 (100%) 730 (100%)

* Statistically significant difference at p<0.01

Statistically significant associations were observed between increased frequencies of PDC development and some of the dental anomalies were separately evaluated (Table 3). The relative risk of PDC in children with these specific dental anomalies varied from 2.4 to 4.3 (Table 3). Tooth transposition was absent in the sample.

Table 3 Prevalences of palatally displaced canines (PDC) development associated with each separate dental anomaly compared with the non-dental anomaly group 

Dental Anomaly Number of patients Prevalence of PDC Development Prevalence of PDC in the NDA group Difference chi-square (χ 2) p Relative Risk (RR) Confidence interval (95%)
Mandibular second premolar distoangulation 49 26.53% (13/49) 21.85 <0.001* 4.27 (2.38-7.66)
Agenesis of mandibular second premolars 22 9.09% (2/22) 0.01 0.925 1.46 (0.37-5.75)
Agenesis of maxillary second premolars 8 25.00% (2/8) 1.99 0.158 4.03 (1.15-14.06)
Agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors 7 14.29% (1/7) 6.21% (29/467) 0.01 0.929 2.30 (0.36-14.61)
Small maxillary lateral incisor 82 23.17% (19/82) 23.07 <0.001* 3.73 (2.20-6.33)
Maxillary lateral incisor and/or second premolar agenesis 32 15.63% (5/32) 2.83 0.093 2.52 (1.04-6.06)
Deciduous molar infraocclusion 159 15.09% (24/159) 10.96 0.001* 2.43 (1.46-4.05)

* Statistically significant difference at p<0.01

The frequency of RME performed during the mixed dentition was similar in both DA and control groups (Table 4). No other type of transversal expansion was registered except RME. Extraoral traction was performed in 38.8% of DA group and 40.8% of NDA group. Serial extraction was performed in only one case of DA group and five cases of NDA group.

Table 4 Frequency of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) performed in both groups during mixed dentition and intergroup comparison (Chi-square test) 

RME Non RME Total Difference chi-square (χ2) p
DA group 144 (58.5%) 102 (41.5%) 246 (100%) 3.02 0.082
NDA group 219 (52.3%) 208 (48.7%) 427 (100%)


This study evaluated longitudinal records from patients with early-diagnosed dental anomalies to estimate risks for developing PDC during the late mixed dentition.

Previous cross-sectional studies showed an association between PDC and other dental anomalies including small maxillary lateral incisors, tooth agenesis, deciduous molar infraocclusion, and other slight tooth ectopia2,19,25. These studies evaluated the concomitant occurrence of canine ectopic eruption and other dental anomalies, and pointed to some risk indicators for PDC.

The present study is the first to evaluate a large sample with longitudinal records for dental anomalies that could be used as markers to estimate PDC risks11. Our results showed that children with early recognizable dental anomalies have an increased risk of 2.5 fold to develop PDC later in life compared with children without these anomalies (Table 2). According to positive predictive value (PPV), the frequency of positive results (presence of an early-diagnosed dental anomaly) that were true positive (patients who developed PDC) was 16%. Considering the negative predictive value (NPV), 93% of patients with negative results (absence of dental anomaly) were true negative and did not develop PDC. The results of this study corroborates that PDC belongs to a spectrum of interrelated dental anomalies26. The literature shows the occurrence of other dental anomalies concomitant with PDC2,19,24. Additionally, a higher prevalence of dental anomalies is observed not only in patients with PDC but also in their first and second-degree relatives26.

Small maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular second premolar distoangulation were the main risk factors for PDC among the early-diagnosed dental anomalies (Table 3). These results corroborate previous cross-sectional studies that demonstrated significant association between small maxillary lateral incisor and PDC2,25,27. Distoangulation of the mandibular second premolar was early described as a mild expression of the same genetic origin identified for antimere agenesis28. Recently, a cross-sectional study demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the prevalence of PDC (28%) in patients with distoangulation of the mandibular second premolars and in a control group (4.2%)4.

Deciduous molar infraocclusion was also confirmed to be a risk factor for PDC (Table 3); this association was previously reported in a cross-sectional study29. The prevalence of deciduous molar infraocclusion, reported from cross-sectional studies in a white population, varies from 1.3% to 8.9%1,10,21. The prevalence of deciduous molar infraocclusion in our combined sample (21.8%) was much higher than the frequency reported in previous studies (Table 3) and could be explained by our longitudinal period of observation.

No significant differences were observed between PDC development in individuals with agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors or second premolars, and the NDA group (Table 3). Peck, Peck and Kataja25 (1996) also showed that agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors was not significantly associated with PDC. On the other hand, previous cross-section studies have shown significant associations between PDC and second premolar agenesis2,19,25. Although second premolar agenesis has been previously identified as a risk indicator for PDC in cross-sectional studies, the association was not significant in our cohort evaluation; this difference could be explained by reference values, which considered general population frequencies in the former.

A limitation of this study is the possibility of false-positive diagnosis for PDC using panoramic radiographs22. However, the false-positive rate is low (4.22%) and seems not to compromise the study results22. The 80 individuals that were excluded from the sample were not analyzed either because the absence or bad quality of radiographs. Other limitation of this study could be the bias of sample selection because the study was retrospective. However, the sample selection followed the criteria of a time interval when the patients started the orthodontic treatment (from 1980 to 2005). Another concern regarding the methodology is that the early orthodontic treatment with RME might have had an influence on the spontaneous eruption of ectopic canines. However, both DA and control groups showed similar RME frequencies (Table 4) and the prevalence of PDC was still significantly higher in DA group.

Our results show that small maxillary lateral incisors, distoangulation of mandibular second premolar, and deciduous molar infraocclusion are early risk markers for PDC. Pediatric and orthodontic population with such dental anomalies diagnosed during the early mixed dentition should be carefully monitored during the critical age period for early diagnosis and intervention of maxillary canine ectopic eruption. The recognition of risk markers for the occurrence of PDC can increase the possibility of early diagnosis and intervention. Future longitudinal studies could contribute to identify other potential risk indicators for PDC including family history, female gender, hypodivergent pattern, and enamel hypoplasia2,27.


Children with some dental anomalies diagnosed during the early mixed dentition have an approximately two and a half fold increase in risk of developing PDC during the late mixed dentition compared with children without these dental anomalies. Microdontia of maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular second premolars distoangulation, and deciduous molar infraocclusion constitute early risk markers for PDC development. When the maxillary canines are not palpable, a panoramic radiograph is highly recommended in 10-year-old children with clinically or radiographically diagnosed DA in order to investigate PDC.


1 - Andlaw RJ. Submerged deciduous molars: a prevalence survey in Somerset. J Int Assoc Dent Child. 1977;8:42-5. [ Links ]

2 - Baccetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:267-74. [ Links ]

3 - Baccetti T, Leonardi M, Armi P. A randomized clinical study of two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:381-5. [ Links ]

4 - Baccetti T, Leonardi M, Giuntini V. Distally displaced premolars: a dental anomaly associated with palatally displaced canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:318-22. [ Links ]

5 - Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Leonardi M, Cozza P. Interceptive treatment of palatal impaction of maxillary canines with rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:657-61. [ Links ]

6 - Baccetti T, Sigler LM, McNamara JA Jr. An RCT on treatment of palatally displaced canines with RME and/or a transpalatal arch. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:601-7. [ Links ]

7 - Becker A, Sharabi S, Chaushu S. Maxillary tooth size variation in dentitions with palatal canine displacement. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:313-18. [ Links ]

8 - Becker A, Zilberman Y, Tsur B. Root length of lateral incisors adjacent to palatally-displaced maxillary cuspids. Angle Orthod. 1984;54:218-25. [ Links ]

9 - Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:159-71. [ Links ]

10 - Brearley LJ, McKibben DH Jr. Ankylosis of primary molar teeth. I. Prevalence and characteristics. ASDC J Dent Child. 1973;40:54-63. [ Links ]

11 - Burt BA. Concepts of risk in dental public health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;3:240-7. [ Links ]

12 - Clarck CA. A method of ascertaining the relative position of unerupted teeth by means of film radiographs. Proc R Soc Med. 1910;3:87-90. [ Links ]

13 - Crescini A, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Baccetti T, Cortellini P, Prato GP. Combined surgical and orthodontic approach to reproduce the physiologic eruption pattern in impacted canines: report of 25 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27:529-37. [ Links ]

14 - Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3,874 routine full-month radiographs. II. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961;14:1165-9. [ Links ]

15 - Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine eruption in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbance. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:133-40. [ Links ]

16 - Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:283-95. [ Links ]

17 - Ericson S, Kurol J. Incisor root resorptions due to ectopic maxillary canines imaged by computerized tomography: a comparative study in extracted teeth. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:276-83. [ Links ]

18 - Ericson S, Kurol PJ. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:415-23. [ Links ]

19 - Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:436-41. [ Links ]

20 - Jacoby H. The etiology of maxillary canine impactions. American J Orthod. 1983;84:125-32. [ Links ]

21 - Kurol J. Infraocclusion of primary molars: an epidemiologic and familial study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981;9:94-102. [ Links ]

22 - Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Hang WM, Andersen WC, Isaacson RJ. Canine impaction identified early with panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992;123:91-2,95-7. [ Links ]

23 - Naoumova J, Kurol J, Kjellberg H. Extraction of the deciduous canine as an interceptive treatment in children with palatal displaced canines - part I: shall we extract the deciduous canine or not? Eur J Orthod. 2015;37:209-18. [ Links ]

24 - Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:249-56. [ Links ]

25 - Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Prevalence of tooth agenesis and peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisor associated with palatally displaced canine (PDC) anomaly. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:441-3. [ Links ]

26 - Pirinen S, Arte S, Apajalahti S. Palatal displacement of canine is genetic and related to congenital absence of teeth. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1742-6. [ Links ]

27 - Sacerdoti R, Baccetti T. Dentoskeletal features associated with unilateral or bilateral palatal displacement of maxillary canines. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:725-32. [ Links ]

28 - Shalish M, Peck S, Wasserstein A, Peck L. Malposition of unerupted mandibular second premolar associated with agenesis of its antimere. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:53-6. [ Links ]

29 - Shalish M, Peck S, Wasserstein A, Peck L. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with infraocclusion of deciduous molars. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:440-5. [ Links ]

30 - Sigler LM, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Effect of rapid maxillary expansion and transpalatal arch treatment associated with deciduous canine extraction on the eruption of palatally displaced canines: a 2-center prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:e235-44. [ Links ]

31 - Van Der Linden FP. Development of the dentition. Chicago: Quintessense Publishing Co; 1983. [ Links ]

Recebido: 19 de Novembro de 2015; Revisado: 8 de Abril de 2016; Aceito: 25 de Abril de 2016

Corresponding address: Daniela Gamba Garib - Departamento de Odontopediatria, Ortodontia e Saúde Coletiva - Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru - Universidade de São Paulo - Alameda Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75 - Bauru - SP - Brazil - 17012-901 - Phone/Fax: 55 14 2344480 - e-mail:

Creative Commons License  This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.