Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Print version ISSN 0001-3765
On-line version ISSN 1678-2690
An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. vol.72 n.2 Rio de Janeiro June 2000
Surfaces in E3 Invariant under a One Parameter Group of Isometries of E3
IOANNIS M. ROUSSOS
Department of Mathematics, Hamline University
1536 Hewitt Avenue, Mail No. 130 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104-1284, U.S.A.
Manuscript received on December 13, 1999; accepted for publication on February 8, 2000;
presented by MANFREDO DO CARMO
We develop a convenient surface theory in E3 in order to apply it to the class of the surfaces invariant under a one-parameter group of isometries of E3. In this way we derive intrinsic characterizations along with several results of subclasses of this class of surfaces that satisfy certain preassigned properties. In the process all results are also effortlessly derived. Among these subclasses are those with surfaces; of constant mean curvature, of constant Gaussian curvature, isothermic, with constant difference or ratio of the principal curvatures.
Key Words: Invariant, parameter, group, isometry, mean, Gaussian, principal, curvature.
In this part we develop some general surface theory in E3 to be applied to the surfaces invariant under a one parameter group of isometries of E3, that is, generalized cylinders, surfaces of revolution and helicoidal surfaces. This theory develops some very useful results of surface theory in an easy and straightforward manner, some of which can apply to any surface and not necessarily to surfaces invariant under a one parameter group of isometries of E3. Furthermore, we reach results concerning the class of surfaces with constant mean curvature.
When this theory is applied to the class of surfaces invariant under a one parameter group of isometries of E3 we derive very easily some older known and many new results. Among the new results we distinguish: (1) Intrinsic characterization of those surfaces in this class with the difference of the principal curvatures constant. (2) Intrinsic characterization of the isothermic helicoidal surfaces. (3) New intrinsic characterization of the surfaces in this class with constant mean curvature. (4) Various interesting ordinary differential equations study worthy in their own sake.
The study and the solutions of the ordinary differential equations involved can change the intrinsic results into explicit ones. These differential equations are very hard to crack down. They are of second order and highly non-linear. Even though they can easily be reduced to first order differential equations the integrals of these first order differential equations are far from being elementary. In the case of minimal surfaces the Gauss equation can be easily integrated and yields all known results in a very nice and straight way. Also, when the mean curvature is a non-zero constant we can integrate the same equation by making use of elliptic integrals and thus obtain an intrinsic characterization and some old and new results.
Finally, we examine the flat helicoidal surfaces with non-constant mean curvature (the ones with constant mean curvature being the right circular cylinders). These are exactly the tangential developable surfaces of circular helices. Apart from their ``usual'' parameters we find the principal and the natural parameters. Next, we examine the helicoidal surfaces with non-zero constant Gaussian curvature and the surfaces of revolution with constant Gaussian curvature. Last of all, we examine the helicoidal surfaces and the surfaces of revolution with ratio of principal curvatures constant. In all of the above cases we try to find all fundamental quantities of the surfaces as explicitly as the equations allow in a certain coordinate system that we call natural coordinates.
1. SOME GENERAL SURFACE THEORY IN E3
A) We consider a surface in E3 connected, oriented and of sufficient smoothness. We assume that over there is a well-defined field of orthonormal frames such that , is an orthonormal basis of the tangent plane of at and is the unit normal vector to at . On we consider the well known forms , which are the dual forms to the vectors and for we define which are the connection one-forms on . All these forms satisfy the following well-known equations on :
is the symbol of the wedge product of forms and is the exterior derivative of forms.)
Since is a basis of forms on , for the connection form we can write
for some smooth functions . Then by (2) we get that
Since on then on and by (2) we have that So, by Cartan's Lemma we can write that
or some smooth functions .
We also have the following equations:
he mean and Gaussian curvatures of are respectively
We will use the Hodge operator which rotates the frames of the tangent and cotangent space of by . So, acting on the one forms we have that
B) We will need the following result. Suppose that has orthogonal parameters such that the first fundamental form is given by
hese parameters become isothermal, that is, we can rewrite as
f and only if
see Eisenhart 1909, Stephanidis 1987).
With , and the corresponding connection form, then this condition in terms of forms is easily proven to be equivalent to
see Stephanidis 1987).
C) Now, we consider another typical field of frames on , with the coframe corresponding to and , the corresponding connection forms. We take to have the same orientation with . Then we can find a branch of the angle from to , so that we can write
The forms and are related by
The relations (10) and (11) follow from the previous equations by straightforward calculation.) Therefore, . We know that with the Laplace-Beltrami operator and the area element of . Hence by (7) we obtain the following useful result:
If is derived from isothermal coordinates, then is also derived from isothermal coordinates if and only if . Therefore, the angle between any two isothermal systems is harmonic.
D) Next, we are assuming that has no umbilic points and are the principal unit vectors corresponding to principal curvatures . Since is connected we may assume . We have
From , (9), (10), (12), (13) and (15) we can compute that
We write the differentials
(thus defining ).
From (3), (4), (5), (6) and (16) we can solve for and find
So, the differential of is given by
his equation (17) along with consist of an equivalent form of the Codazzi-Mainardi Equations when .
E) From (17) we can easily conclude two known facts about surfaces with constant mean curvature. From (17) we get that is constant if and only if Taking its exterior derivative and using the Gauss Equation we get
So, all surfaces with constant mean curvature and without umbilic points satisfy the following partial differential equation:
(This equation was first observed by G. Ricci. Also see Tribuzy 1980). In addition, if the surface is minimal without umbilic points then .)
Furthermore, if is constant and , are the principal vectors , , then (mod ) and (11) with (17) give
(This equation is of course valid for any constant when is constant.) Taking its exterior derivative we find
Using (7) we conclude that
All surfaces with constant mean curvature and without umbilic points have principal coordinates that can become isothermal. (By definition, the surfaces for which their principal coordinates can become isothermal are called to be isothermic surfaces. (See, e.g., Eisenhart 1909).
Moreover, by putting in (17) we straightforwardly obtain the following general characterization of isothermic surfaces in E3: A surface in E3 without umbilic points is isothermic if and only if
where here and are determined by the relation . With principal coordinates, this relation is equivalent to the following second order hyperbolic homogeneous partial differential equation for
Also, if we obtain that the geodesic curvatures of the principal curves when are
Therefore, if one of the principal curvatures is constant then the corresponding principal curve is a geodesic. If both principal curvatures are constants then and so . Therefore, and hence or . (If then and the surface is a piece of the plane, if constant and then and the surface is a piece of a right circular cylinder of radius and if constant then and the surface is a pience of a sphere of radius .) Similar manipulations of the previous formulae yield various well-known results in surface theory (e.g., Liouville's formula, , see Stephanidis 1987, applications to Bonnet surfaces etc.).
REMARK AND NOTE. Except for the planes and the spheres all surfaces with constant mean curvature have isolated umbilic points. So, the above two results hold true over an open dense subset of the surface whose complement consists of isolated umbilic points only. The isolatedness of the umbilic points when is constant, is a well-known fact that follows from (the analyticity of such a surface and) the holomorphicity of the Hopf quadratic differential. (See Spivak 1979, Vol. V, Ch. 10 and Hopf 1956, pp. 136-139.)
2. APPLICATION TO SURFACES INVARIANT UNDER A ONE-PARAMETER GROUP OF ISOMETRIES
A) A surface invariant under a one-parameter group of isometries of E3, is either a generalized cylinder or a surface of revolution or a helicoidal surface. The first fundamental form for these surfaces can be written as
where is parameter along the orbits of the group of the isometries (straight lines, circles, helices respectively) and is parameter along the curves perpendicular to the orbits which are geodesics (see Baikoussis & Koufogiorgos 1997, 1998, Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982, Hitt & Roussos 1991, Eisenhart 1909, Soyuçok 1995). So, are isothermal geodesic coordinates and we call them natural coordinates. We now let
Also, we know that , , . We then write
Whereas the generalized cylinders and the surfaces of revolution may contain umbilic points the helicoidal surfaces contain no umbilic points (see Baikoussis & Koufogiorgos 1997 1998, Hitt & Roussos 1991, Roussos 1988ab). But, where from (17) and (18) we have that
Therefore we have
B) For generalized cylinders and surfaces of revolution , mod
. The first equation of (19) is then satisfied identically. The second equation of (19) gives
This equation is satisfied by all generalized cylinders and surfaces of revolution without umbilic points and it implies that is a global function. Moreover, if in this situation is constant--Delaunay Surfaces--we observe that
The Delaunay surfaces contain no umbilic points, for otherwise the umbilic points could not be isolated. Then non-constant and the Gauss Equation with (15) give
Here and by (21) and (22) we get
C) By means of differential equations we can intrinsically determine the generalized cylinders and the surfaces of revolution for which constant. By (20) we have
The Gauss equation (22) becomes
From this differential equation we find and then we find . It is of course trivially satisfied for constant, in which case we have the right circular cylinders. The second fundamental forms of these surfaces are given by
REMARK. If for a surface then the surface is totally umbilical (the principal curvatures are equal to one another). The totally umbilical surfaces are known to be pieces of planes and/or spheres. Also, if is a negative constant then a change of the orientation of a connected surface changes to be a positive constant.
D) Now assume , mod , that is, the surface is a helicoidal one. Equations (19) become
Let us assume without loss of generality that . Then
(In a bit more general setting we may simply assume .) We observe the following geometric characterization: ``A helicoidal surface has constant mean curvature if and only if the angle between the principal curves and the helices is constant.'' (See Roussos 1988 ab)
The helicoidal surfaces with constant mean curvature have been completely determined in explicit form in Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982. Some additional properties of them are in Hitt & Roussos 1991. Here, by means of (26) we give an alternative intrinsic characterization, as follows:
When and are constant with the Gauss equation given by (22) transforms into an equation in as
The solution of this equation determines and then by (26). For the second fundamental form we have
We observe that the constant is the pitch of the helicoidal motion, in Baikoussis & Koufogiorgos 1997, Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982, Soyuçok 1995, etc.
Changing by a constant, for two constant values and of we consider and constants satisfying
We then obtain two helicoidal surfaces with the same , and (= constant). Therefore, they are non-trivially isometric (since ) with the same constant mean curvature. For = 0 or relation (28) forces = 0 and then the corresponding surface is a surface of revolution with the same constant mean curvature , i.e., it is a Delaunay surface. This describes the periodic deformation of a helicoidal surface with constant mean curvature through helicoidal surfaces of the same constant mean curvature. Moreover, all possible helicoidal surfaces with given constant are obtained in this way via this periodic deformation of the Delaunay surfaces. See Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982, Hitt & Roussos 1991, and for their limit surfaces with respect to the parameters involved see Sasai 1996.
E) We observe that all cylinders and all surfaces of revolution are isothermic. We notice that, by (18) and corresponds to the principal coframe. Most helicoidal surfaces are not isothermic. So, here we are going to give an intrinsic characterization of the isothermic helicoidal surfaces. For the isothermic helicoidal surfaces we have that both the and principal coordinate systems are isothermal. Therefore, the angle between them, as explained in section 1(C) is harmonic. Since , is isothermal system of coordinates and we get that
If then constant. This case was developed in the previous section (D) and we have that is constant if and only if is constant. Notice of course that all surfaces of constant mean curvature and without umbilic points are isothermic, as we have proved in section 1 (E). Therefore, in this section we will assume that . Then the constant can be geometrically eliminated by replacing by . Hence, without loss of generality we shall assume that
Now, (26) becomes
Then the Gauss equation (22) becomes
Notice that by the first equation of (29), in this setting, and thus is strictly decreasing.
Equation (30) is of type Painlevé VI. Its integration is very involved and has been carried out in Bobenko & Eitner 1998, by means of elliptic integrals and certain hypergeometric transcendents. We refer the interested reader to this reference for the integration of this equation.
We note that in this situation cannot be a constant. For otherwise, equations (29) and (30) are not compatible. By (29) we find that it would be
with , , constants. Then we plug this into (30) and we see that it does not satisfy the equation. In such a situation can be constant, only when is constant. Then the helicoidal surface is a right circular cylinder considered as helicoidal surface.
Similarly, none of the following functions can be constant
unless again is a constant and the surface is a right circular cylinder.
By (30) we find and then from (29) we find . For the second fundamental form we have
Again is the pitch of the helicoidal motion that generates the helicoidal surface.
For the two parameter family of isometric helicoidal surfaces (without preservation of the mean curvature, in general), as done in Baikoussis & Kouforgiorgos 1997 1998, Bour 1862, Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982, Hitt & Roussos 1991, we have that
Plugging this into (30) we find a differential equation for of order four, much more complicated than (30) itself. Therefore, it is much better to deal with (30), as done in Bobenko & Eitner 1998, to find and then find , by (29). This is an effective way of determining explicitly the isothermic helicoidal surfaces.
F) We can also characterize the helicoidal surfaces with constant and non-constant. As we have explained before in (E) these surfaces cannot be isothermic. From (25) we find that for constant and mod .
Then the Gauss equation (22) gives
Solving this equation we find and then and from (31).
The second fundamental form is computed as before, by
REMARK. If both and are constant for a surface then both principal curvatures are constant. In such a case the surface is a piece of a plane, or a right circular cylinder, or a sphere.
G) Further Known Facts.
G1) All helicoidal surfaces with constant mean curvature can be isometrically and periodically deformed under preservation of the constant mean curvature to a surface of revolution of the same constant mean curvature (Delaunay surface). This deformation is differentiable and the intermediate surfaces are helicoidal of the same constant mean curvature. All helicoidal surfaces of a given constant mean curvature are obtained by this deformation. (See Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982, Hitt & Roussos 1991).
G2) The isothermic helicoidal surfaces with non-constant mean curvature accept a differentiable one-parameter family of non-trivial and geometrically distinct isometries that preserve the mean curvature from the surface to itself. Also, there are three other isometric associate surfaces to a given isothermic helicoidal surface with the same mean curvature at the corresponding points of the isometries.(See Bobenko & Eitner 1998, Cartan 1942, Roussos 1988b 1999a, Soyuçok 1995).
G3) All helicoidal surfaces admit the isometry from the surface to itself. It is non-trivial when the orientation of the image surface of this isometry is kept to be the same with the original orientation of the given helicoidal surface. This isometry obviously preserves at the corresponding points. (See Roussos 1988b 1999b, Soyuçok 1995).
From these three facts we conclude that all helicoidal surfaces are Bonnet surfaces (see Roussos 1988b). By definition, a surface in E3 is called to be a Bonnet surface if it admits at least one non-trivial isometry from the surface to another surface or to itself that preserves the mean curvature (equivalent to, preseves each principal curvature). (See Bobenko & Eitner 1998, Cartan 1942, Roussos 1988b, 1999a, Soyuçok 1995, Voss 1993). It is a fact that if a surface admits two non-trivial and geometrically distinct isometries (that is, one is not the composition of the other followed by an isometry of the whole E3) that preserve the mean curvature then it admits a whole one-parameter and differentiable family of such isometries and the surface is isothermic. (See the above references.)
G4) The helicoidal surfaces found in Baikoussis & Koufogiorgos 1997 satisfy that the ratio of their principal curvatures is constant . Therefore, as we have seen in (E), they cannot be isothermic. So, they admit only one non-trivial isometry preserving the mean curvature, the one of (G3).
3. THE GAUSS EQUATIONS OF THE PREVIOUS SECTION
In this section we will discuss the Gauss equations found in the previous section. These are given by the second order ordinary differential equations:
(The Gauss equation (30) has been completely examined in Bobenko & Eitner 1998.)
A) We observe that (23) and (27) are the same differential equations. We can put the constants and under the same name A, so that both are written as
This differential equation was derived for the surfaces in our considerations with constant and under the assumption . By (21) and (26) we had that , so that . We could make the whole consideration a bit more general by allowing and constant such that . Then the Gauss equation becomes
This differential equation can be expanded as
We observe that in this new form is allowed and we trivially obtain three constant solutions, namely
From these three trivial solutions we can distinguish the three following cases:
These three cases were known a-priori to be surfaces invariant under a one-parameter group of isometries of E3 and with constant mean curvature . Even though they are derived from (35) they cannot be derived by (33) and/or (34). So, equation (35) describes the surfaces in E3 with constant mean curvature and invariant under a one-parameter group of isometries of E3 in all generality. Apart from these three trivial cases we are going to examine the following harder ones: , (minimal surfaces) and constant. In both cases, since is constant and the surface is invariant under a one-parameter group of isometries of E3 the isolatedness of the umbilic points implies that there cannot exist any umbilic points. So, on a connected surface here, either or , i.e., cannot change sign and cross zero at a point. Now we take up each of the above cases.
Case , (minimal surfaces).
We write (33) as
The transformation , function, turns this equation into
so that neither nor can be zero at any point. Then cannot be zero in any open interval and so the last equation is equivalent to
which can be written as
The solutions of this equation are
Since is an even function, without loss of generality we have
with , , constants. The constant may be geometrically eliminated by a translation of , i.e., replace by .
The second fundamental forms of these surfaces in the coordinates is given by
for the minimal surfaces of revolution--catenoids--and
for the minimal helicoids.
We observe that by changing the constant we get the periodic deformation of the helicoids into catenoids and vice versa, under preservation of the mean curvature . Because we were able to easily integrate the above Gauss equation we have completely described what happens in this case of minimal surfaces. (For another exposition of these surfaces, see Wunderlich 1952.)
We observe that is bounded above by and as . Also, is bounded below by and as . Therefore, all these surfaces are complete and for all which agrees with the fact that they contain no umbilic points. Moreover, is a global function.
Case , constant.
In this situation equation (35) is a bit difficult to integrate. We can reduce its order by making the transformation
where, for convenience in what follows, we have put as the constant of integration. Going back to we find
, constants and . As we see, the integral of the last equation is not elementary. In general, it can be computed in terms of an elliptic integral of the first kind whose lower limit of integration is zero and its upper limit varies in the interval . To solve the differential equation (35) we must compute the integral of
Since J cannot be zero at any point and the surface is connected we first assume that
Then we need . Let
We must have such that
For this, it must be and . Under these conditions we have
and is in the interval . So we must compute
Let . Then and . Then the integral transforms into
Now, we let . Then
and the integral becomes
Finally, we let . Then
and the integral changes to
is an elliptic integral of the first kind in its Legendre's form. Also the constant is given as
and the integration of the differential equation leads to
is a constant that can be geometrically eliminated, as a translation of the parameter . Therefore, we are going to omit it. Hence we get
where, with fixed, is the inverse function of considered as function of . We also have
Thus, using the definitions of and we find that
Then, we find the first fundamental form by
(Remind: , , constants and is the inverse function of considered as a function of . The constant is kept fixed at a time.)
If we consider the case , then constant and for the constant we must have , constant. The results again are exactly the same.
For the second fundamental form we do the same computations as we have already done in various places earlier (see parts of section 2).
As , constant, is never singular we may allow vary from to .
varies from to , also. We notice that is a global function bounded below by the positive constant
and bounded above by the positive constant
These constants are sharp, since they are assumed by . Therefore, the surfaces here are complete, and the curves which are geodesics have arc-length (not the parameter , but ) that extends from to . Also, the global function cannot approach zero and cannot become large either for any given constant. Similarly, the global function is bounded below by the positive constant
and above by the positive constant
These constants are sharp, since they are assumed by . This means, ( are the principal curvatures) cannot approach zero and cannot become large either for any given constant.
In conclusion, the work of this part provides a new intrinsic characterization of all surfaces in E3 invariant under a one-parameter group of isometries of E3 and with constant mean curvature. This new exposition is original in the sense that it makes use of the global function and it is based on the general theory of section 1. Moreover, several old and new facts about these surfaces are easily drawn.
REMARK. Another approach to find the solution of the differential equation (35) when constant, is to use the results in Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982. We find and invert the parameter (page 433) in terms of elliptic integrals and then plug it into (3.9) (page 430). Then we have
Note that our parameters here are the in Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982 and
REMARK. In the limiting case we get that
So, either is constant and or and constant. In this case we get the right circular cylinders described as helicoidal surfaces, which are the only flat helicoidal surfaces with constant mean curvature, see Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982 and Hitt & Roussos 1991.
B) We can write (24) more general as
We have the trivial solutions constants. Then constant and the surface is a right circular cylinder, a result expected a-priori, for surfaces with constant.
We can reduce the order of this differential equation by one by making the standard transformation
After the computation we find
We see that this is non-trivial to integrate.
C) Similarly, in equation (32) we may have constant and a constant such that . We can write equation (32) as
We observe that , are limiting constant solutions, i.e., the first side of the equation becomes zero for , and the second side of the equation has limit equal to zero, as or .
Again as we did in (B), we can reduce the order by one, if we use the transformation
and carry out the computation in the equation.
4. THE FLAT HELICOIDAL SURFACES WITH NON-CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE
In this section we study the flat helicoidal surfaces with non-constant mean curvature. Since is non-constant, and there are no umbilic points these surfaces must be tangential developable surfaces of curves in E3 (see Klingenberg 1977, page 59, 3.7.9 Theorem and 3.7.10 Proposition). We will show that these curves are precisely the circular helices. By the facts proven in section 2, part (E), these surfaces cannot be isothermic. First, we need to start with:
A) Some Preliminary Facts About the Tangential Developable Surfaces in E3. A tangential developable in E3 can be ``naturally" expressed as
where is a curve in E3, paramaterized by its arclength , and gives the second sheet of the tangential developable). (See Roussos 1999b, Soyuçok 1995) We can call the usual parameters of the tangential developable surface. Let be the principal normal of . Then where is the curvature of . Then we have
So, the tangent plane of is spanned by and as long as and . (Even though the vectors are originally defined along , their parallel translations along the geodesic straight lines that foliate the whole tangential developable surface make up a global frame field over the whole surface.) The first fundamental form in the coordinates is given by:
Now, we write
So, we have
We orient the surface by the binormal of . We let be the torsion of . Then by the formulas of Frenet-Serret we find:
This shows that is the principal frame with corresponding principal coframe and corresponding principal curvatures
We observe that if we have at some then the whole straight line would consist of nonisolated umbilic points. (In particular the umbilic points at which both principal curvatures are zero are called planar points.) (For more information about these surfaces see Eisenhart 1909, where minimal curves and isotropic developables are discussed.)
From the previous exposition we easily get that the principal coordinates of are such that
In these coordinates the first fundamental form is
and the second fundamental form is
B) Tangential Developables of Circular Helices. In this part we are going to prove that the flat helicoidal surfaces of non-constant mean curvature are exactly the tangential developables of the circular helices. The flat helicoidal surfaces of constant mean curvature are the circular cylinders, which can also be considered as surfaces of revolution (and Delaunay Surfaces, since the mean curvature is constant). Since the flat surfaces are the cylinders, cones, the tangential developables and smooth darnings of pieces of theirs (see Klingenberg 1977 for instance) we see that apart from the circular cylinders, a flat helicoidal surface must be a tangential developable. We consider the tangential developable of a non-plane curve in E3
which we assume to be helicoidal. is the arclength parameter of and . The curvature , and torsion of are not zero. We plan to show that are constants (non-zero), which is just as proving that is a circular helix (see Millman & Parker 1977). Notice that here, the parametrization is not the natural one, that is, the one of section 2, but what we have earlier called usual parametrization. is foliated by the circular helices of the helicoidal motion. We pick one of these helices, , parametrized by its arclength . We have We let be the principal normal of . is the binormal of . In the previous part we saw that are the principal directions of and is its normal vector. The frame is the Serret-Frenet frame of , and the Serret-Frenet formulas for are:
(here the speed of is , since is the arclength parameter). We put and we find:
Since a helicoidal motion is a rigid motion of E3, for all helicoidal surfaces, we have that the angle , as defined in section 2, is constant along each of the helices of the helicoidal motion, but not necessarily all are the surface, unless the mean curvature of the surface is constant. This then gives
We now let be the Darboux frame of with respect to . Then . Also, the following general formulas hold (see Spivak 1979, Volume 3, Chapter 4)
The helices of the helicoidal motion in a helicoidal surface other than the circular cylinder are not: geodesics, principal curves and asymptotic curves. (Use Chapter 4, Volume 3 in Spivak 1979 and the first and second fundamental forms of a helicoidal surface in the natural coordinates as described earlier or as may be found in Baikoussis & Koufogiorgos 1997, 1998, Do Carmo & Dajczer 1982). Therefore, as before for , we have that , , are all non-zero constants (along each individual helix). , are the geodesic and normal curvature respectively, and is the geodesic torsion of .
Also, since , are true we compute that
So we get
We observe that cannot be constant (otherwise would be a straight line and not a helix), so , and . Then from and we have that and . Since is constant then is never zero. This means that the helix never intersects the curve . Now from and we have
Then , so that from we get
or from we get and
from which we have
The above computations show that , are non-zero constants. Thus, is a circular helix, proving our assertion. Now, we examine the tangential developable surface of a circular helix more closely. We consider a circular helix with the arclength and
the corresponding tangential developable. is the unit tangent vector of and let , constants be the curvature and torsion of respectively. Assume to be the axis of with direction vector . Then is a fixed unit vector and from the theory of helices we know that
Hence, by taking derivative we get
(For more information about the theory of helices, see Millman & Parker 1977, sections 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5.)
Now, for any fixed we consider the curve Then the tangent vector of is
This has length
So, the unit tangent vector of is
Therefore, is a helix with axial direction the same with the initial helix . The fact that is a circular helix follows from the computation of its curvature and torsion, which both turn out to be respectively the constants.
So, is a circular helix with axis parallel to . Now, is, in fact, the axis of because if constant is the distance of any point of from then the distance of any point of from is easily computed to be
which is constant for any given fixed. Therefore, all 's are coaxial helices with and the tangential developable surface is a helicoidal surface.
C) Here, we study some consequences of the natural coordinates for the flat helicoidal surfaces with non-constant mean curvature. Depending on the orientation we have
(, for the cylinders). The constant can be geometrically set at . So, equations (19) in section (2) become
From the first one we get that
and then the second equation gives
Both equations are integrated elementarily and we find
Essentially both answers are the same. is a new constant and , are non-zero constants found before. So, we have found expressions of , , , , up to some constants, in the natural parameters. (We remark that equations (26) could be used to solve the above equations a bit faster.)
We are going to find the characterization of these surfaces in their natural parameters and find the relation of the parameters with the usual parameters .
To make the computations simpler we will impose some normalization and the other cases are variations of the one we discuss next. We eliminate the constant by replacing by so that we have
We consider the case
So, we must have . Then by the previous formulae we have
Since we are allowed to approach the initial helix by letting and/or we get that it must be and therefore
Hence we consider and (or and ) and we get
Set for convenience We have
If now we take
So, by comparison with we get
These relations imply and consequently
So, in the natural parameters we have that the first fundamental form is
and the relation between and is Now, the second fundamental form is given by
such that, after direct computation and using that arctan with and the expressions for and ,
(We observe that the pitch of the helicoidal motion is , as it is the case for unit speed helices. is a unit speed helix because we have assumed that is the arclength parameter. We have analogous results for , etc.)
So, we have expressed all the fundamental quantities of the flat helicoidal surfaces in the natural parameters .
There are two expressions for in terms of and of opposite sign. By keeping the orientation the same in both cases the mapping from the surface to itself is an isometry that preserves the mean curvature
and it is not trivial, because the new coefficient will be and therefore different from the old one . (See also Roussos 1999b.) We also observe that
Therefore, a vector with direction
is an asymptotic vector. Solving this differential equation we get
This is exactly the equation of the ruling straight lines in the coordinates of this tangential developable, which are asymptotic lines as well as lines of curvature with principal curvature zero and geodesics. Finally, since the relation of the principal coordinates with the usual ones was found earlier to be and we immediately obtain the relation of the principal coordinates with the natural coordinates .
5. HELICOIDAL SURFACES WITH NON-ZERO CONSTANT GAUSSIAN CURVATURE AND SURFACES OF REVOLUTION WITH CONSTANT GAUSSIAN CURVATURE
A) Assume that for a helicoidal surface the Gaussian curvature is constant. (The case was thoroughly examined in section 4.) Then by the Gauss Equation we have
This is easily integrated, like equation (36) in section 3. We find that: If then
If then we have the following three solutions:
Now, from we have that
We assume that (analogous work if . So, the first equation of (26) gives
For any constant this gives
Then from the second equation of (26) we get
Thus, with the we have
and with the
Now, for each of the found earlier, we solve for and then we find . From and we find and by their formulas just reported. Then in the usual way we find the coefficients of the second fundamental form , , of this helicoidal surface. Hence, all fundamental quantities are explicitly discovered in terms of . As a matter of fact: With the we find
and with the
The rest of the computations proceed as usual.
B) The formulas found for when or constant are unchanged if the surface is a surface of revolution instead of a helicoidal surface. Also, for we get , , are constants (the same as in section 4). In this case , mod , so by equation (20) we get (again assume and we have
We solve this for . When constant we find
When we find that either and is anything or , and , constant. (In the first alternative we have the planes, the right circular cylinders and all generalized cylinders. In the second alternative we have the right circular cones.) So, we have found , , for all surfaces of revolution with constant Gaussian curvature (zero, or non-zero) and then
Therefore, we have a complete intrinsic characterization of these surfaces. Notice that the generalized cylinders are included too. They may be considered as surfaces of revolution with axis at infinity. For the generalized cylinders we may allow to be zero at some points and therefore along the generators containing these points.
6. HELICOIDAL SURFACES AND SURFACES OF REVOLUTION WITH RATIO OF PRINCIPAL CURVATURES CONSTANT
A) The Helicoidal surfaces with ratio of principal curvatures constant were studied in Baikoussis & Koufogiorgos 1997, because of their special properties. They were characterized implicitely by means of a first order differential equation. Here we apply the previous theory and we are going to characterize them again by a first order differential equation. When the principal curvatures satisfy
Then and . Therefore
Hence, the first equation of (26) gives
and the second equation of (26)
The Gaussian curvature is
Therefore the Gauss equation becomes
The solution(s) of this equation will determine and then , , , , , , in the way we have already seen several times before. To solve this equation for when , is very hard. We can expand it to
After some trivial simplification we can reduce the order by one by making the standard transformation
The resulting first order differential equation characterizes these surfaces implicitely. Its complete solution seems to be illusive. However, one may want to try some specific combinations of , , lest he comes up with an equation easy to solve. (Say , , , etc.) Finding by solving this equation, we find , , , that is, all fundamental quantities of the surface.
B) The same problem for the surfaces of revolution is much easier because , mod and the equations can be explicitly integrated. (Also see Baikoussis & Koufogiorgos 1997 and Kühnel 1981, Baikoussis & Koufogiorgos 1997.)
Again , . Equation (20) gives
Then the Gauss equation becomes
This is an equation for of the form
It can be solved by making the transformation
The solutions of these new equations have been found in previous sections and are:
In all these solutions extends in the maximal intervals so that the corresponding solutions stay positive.
Hence, in any case is explicitly determined and then we get , , , , , explicitly. So, we obtain an explicit determination of all fundamental quantities of the surface. We observe that in the first case the resulting surface could be complete, since . In the second case the surfaces are not complete, since is not allowed to run from to . In the former case the completeness of the surfaces depends on the behavior of at . But in the latter case the surfaces are not complete for sure.
BAIKOUSSIS C & KOUFOGIORGOS T. 1997. On the inner curvature of the second fundamental form of helicoidal surfaces, Arch Math 68: 169-176. [ Links ]
BAIKOUSSIS C & KOUFOGIORGOS T. 1998. Helicoidal surfaces with prescribed mean or Gaussian curvature, J Geometry 63: 25-29. [ Links ]
BOBENKO A I & EITNER U. 1998. Bonnet surfaces and Painlevé Equations, J Reine Angew Math 499: 47-79 (SFB 288 Preprint 151, T U Berlin 1994). [ Links ]
BOUR E. 1862. Memoire sur le deformation de surfaces, J de l' École Polytechnique, XXXIX Cahier, 1-148. [ Links ]
CARTAN E. 1942. Sur la couples de surfaces applicables avec conservation de courbures principales, Bulb Soc Math 66: 55-85, or Oeuvres Complètes, III (2), 1591-1620. [ Links ]
DO CARMO MP & DAJCZER M. 1982. Helicoidal surfaces with constant mean curvature, Tôhoku Math J, Second Series, 34: 425-435. [ Links ]
EISENHART LP. 1909. A Treatise on the Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Ginn and Company, Boston, U.S.A. (Especially, pp. 387-389, etc.) [ Links ]
HITT LR & ROUSSOS IM. 1991. Computer graphics of helicoidal surfaces with constant mean curvature, An Acad Brasil Ciênc 63: 211-228. [ Links ]
HOPF H. 1956. Differential Geometry in the Large, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1000, Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
KLINGENBERG W. 1977. A course in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, GTM 51. [ Links ]
KÜHNEL W. 1981. Zur inneren Krümmung der zweiten Grundform, Monatsh Math 91: 241-251. [ Links ]
MILLMAN RS & PARKER GD. 1977. Elements of Differential Geometry, Prentice Hall. [ Links ]
ROUSSOS IM. 1988a. A geometric characterization of helicoidal surfaces of constant mean curvature, Publ. de L'Inst Math, Nouvell Serie, 43(57): 89-95. [ Links ]
ROUSSOS IM. 1988b. The Helicoidal surfaces as Bonnet Surfaces, Tôhoku Math J, Second Series, 40(d): 486-490. [ Links ]
ROUSSOS IM. 1999a. Global results on Bonnet Surfaces, J Geometry 65: 151-168. [ Links ]
ROUSSOS IM. 1999b. The tangential developable surfaces as Bonnet Surfaces, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, April, 15(2): 269-276. [ Links ]
SASAI T. 1996. On helicoidal surfaces with constant mean curvature and their limiting surfaces, Tokyo J Math 19(1): 39-48. [ Links ]
SOYUÇOK Z. 1995. The problem of non-trivial isometries of surfaces preserving the principal curvatures, J Geometry 52: 173-188. [ Links ]
SPIVAK M. 1979. A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry, vols. 1-5, Publish or Perish. [ Links ]
STEPHANIDIS NK. 1987. Differential Geometry (two volumes, in Greek). Thessaloniki, Greece, 1982-1987. (Especially, Volume II, pp. 23-29.) [ Links ]
TRIBUZY R DE A. 1980. A characterization of tori with constant mean curvature in a space form, Bol Soc Bras Math II: 259-274. [ Links ]
VOSS K. 1993. Bonnet surfaces in spaces of constant curvature, Lecture Notes II of 1st MSJ Research Institute, Sendai, Japan: 295-307. [ Links ]
WUNDERLICH W. 1952. Beitrag zur Kentnis der Minimalschraubflächen, Composito Math., 297-311. [ Links ]