Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Diet influence on egg production of the copepod Acartia tonsa (Dana, 1896)

Abstracts

Egg production in the copepod Acartia tonsa was evaluated using different densities of the microalgae Thalassiosira weissflogii, Chaetoceros muelleri and Isochrysis galbana. Male and female were kept under controlled conditions (salinity 30, 20°C, photoperiod 12L:12D), acclimated to the experimental conditions and left over a period of 24 h to allow copulation. Algal densities tested were equivalent in biovolume and corresponded to 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60.10³ cells.mL-1 of T weissflogii. Ten acclimated female were separated, transferred to glass bottles and exposed for further 24 h to the corresponding experimental medium. After this period, the eggs were fixed and counted. Copepod egg production reached a threshold value when T weissflogii, C. muelleri and I. galbana were supplied at 10.10³, 140.10³ and 640.10³ cells.mL-1, respectively. Mean egg production corresponded to 28.0 ± 0.5, 20.1 ± 1.0 and 22.0 ± 3.5 eggs.female-1 .day-1, respectively. Copepods fed T weissflogii showed the highest mean egg production while those fed I. galbana reached a maximum egg production when the algae were supplied at a density two- to fourfold higher, considering the biovolume of T weissflogii and C. muelleri. These differences are explained considering the different sizes of the microalgae used to feed the copepods.

egg production; Acartia tonsa; microalgae


A produção de ovos do copépode Acartia tonsa foi avaliada utilizando diferentes densidades das microalgas Thalassiosira weissflogii, Chaetoceros muelleri e Isochrysis galbana. Machos e fêmeas foram colocados sob condições controladas (salinidade 30, 20°C, fotoperíodo 12L:12D), aclimatados às condições experimentais e mantidos juntos por 24 h para permitir a copula. As densidades de algas foram equivalentes em biovolume e corresponderam a 0, 2,5, 5, 10, 20, 40 e 60,10³ células.mL-1 de T. weissflogii. Dez fêmeas aclimatadas foram separadas, transferidas para frascos de vidro e expostas por mais 24 h ao meio experimental correspondente. Após este período, os ovos foram fixados e contados. A produção de ovos alcançou um valor limiar quando T. weissflogii, C. muelleri e I galbana foram oferecidas a concentrações de 10,10³,140,10³ e 640,10³ células.mL-1, respectivamente. A média de produção de ovos correspondeu a 28,0 ± 0,5, 20,1 ± 1,0 e 22,0 ± 3,5 ovos.fêmea-1.dia-1, respectivamente. Copépodes alimentados com T. weissflogii mostraram a maior produção de ovos média enquanto os alimentados com I. galbana alcançaram uma produção de ovo máxima quando as algas foram providas a uma densidade de duas a quatro vezes maior, considerando o biovolume de T. weissflogii e C. muelleri. Estas diferenças podem ser explicadas considerando os diferentes tamanhos das microalgas utilizadas para alimentar os copépodes.

produção de ovos; Acartia tonsa; micro-algas


BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES

Diet influence on egg production of the copepod Acartia tonsa (Dana, 1896)

Priscila F. TeixeiraI; Sonia M. KaminskiI; Tatiana R. AvilaI; Alessandro P. CardozoII; José G.F. BersanoIII; Adalto BianchiniIV

IUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande, FURG, Instituto de Oceanografia, Laboratório de Zooplâncton Av. Itália, km 8, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brasil

IIUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande, FURG, Instituto de Oceanografia Laboratório de Ecologia de Fitoplâncton e Microorganismos Marinhos, Av. Itália, km 8, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brasil

IIIUniversidade Federal do Paraná, UFPR, Centro de Estudos do Mar, Av. Beira Mar s/n Caixa Postal 50002, 83255-000 Pontal do Paraná, PR, Brasil

IVUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande, FURG, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Zoofisiologia Av. Itália, km 8, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brasil

Correspondence to Correspondence to: Tatiana Ramos Avila E-mail: tatioceano@yahoo.com.br

ABSTRACT

Egg production in the copepod Acartia tonsa was evaluated using different densities of the microalgae Thalassiosira weissflogii, Chaetoceros muelleri and Isochrysis galbana. Male and female were kept under controlled conditions (salinity 30, 20°C, photoperiod 12L:12D), acclimated to the experimental conditions and left over a period of 24 h to allow copulation. Algal densities tested were equivalent in biovolume and corresponded to 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60.103 cells.mL-1 of T weissflogii. Ten acclimated female were separated, transferred to glass bottles and exposed for further 24 h to the corresponding experimental medium. After this period, the eggs were fixed and counted. Copepod egg production reached a threshold value when T weissflogii, C. muelleri and I. galbana were supplied at 10.103, 140.103 and 640.103 cells.mL-1, respectively. Mean egg production corresponded to 28.0 ± 0.5, 20.1 ± 1.0 and 22.0 ± 3.5 eggs.female-1 .day-1, respectively. Copepods fed T weissflogii showed the highest mean egg production while those fed I. galbana reached a maximum egg production when the algae were supplied at a density two- to fourfold higher, considering the biovolume of T weissflogii and C. muelleri. These differences are explained considering the different sizes of the microalgae used to feed the copepods.

Key words: egg production, Acartia tonsa, microalgae.

RESUMO

A produção de ovos do copépode Acartia tonsa foi avaliada utilizando diferentes densidades das microalgas Thalassiosira weissflogii, Chaetoceros muelleri e Isochrysis galbana. Machos e fêmeas foram colocados sob condições controladas (salinidade 30, 20°C, fotoperíodo 12L:12D), aclimatados às condições experimentais e mantidos juntos por 24 h para permitir a copula. As densidades de algas foram equivalentes em biovolume e corresponderam a 0, 2,5, 5, 10, 20, 40 e 60,103 células.mL-1 de T. weissflogii. Dez fêmeas aclimatadas foram separadas, transferidas para frascos de vidro e expostas por mais 24 h ao meio experimental correspondente. Após este período, os ovos foram fixados e contados. A produção de ovos alcançou um valor limiar quando T. weissflogii, C. muelleri e I galbana foram oferecidas a concentrações de 10,103,140,103 e 640,103 células.mL-1, respectivamente. A média de produção de ovos correspondeu a 28,0 ± 0,5, 20,1 ± 1,0 e 22,0 ± 3,5 ovos.fêmea-1.dia-1, respectivamente. Copépodes alimentados com T. weissflogii mostraram a maior produção de ovos média enquanto os alimentados com I. galbana alcançaram uma produção de ovo máxima quando as algas foram providas a uma densidade de duas a quatro vezes maior, considerando o biovolume de T. weissflogii e C. muelleri. Estas diferenças podem ser explicadas considerando os diferentes tamanhos das microalgas utilizadas para alimentar os copépodes.

Palavras-chave: produção de ovos, Acartia tonsa, micro-algas.

INTRODUCTION

Copepods from the genus Acartia play an important role in the food webs of estuaries in both tropical and subtropical areas (Björnberg 1981, Mauchline 1998). Generally, they show the higher biomass values in most shallow enclosed bays and estuaries (Azaiteiro et al. 2005, Leandro et al. 2007). This fact may be related to their omnivorous feeding behavior, being able to survive and reproduce under different diets (Kleppel 1992, Saiz et al. 2007). Such characteristic makes Acartia species relatively easy to cultivate at small- and large-scale under laboratory conditions, providing enough biomass for use as an alternative live food in marine aquaculture (Støttrup and Nosker 1997, McKinnon et al. 2003) and a biological model in toxicological tests (Bielmyer et al. 2006, Pedroso et al. 2007, Pinho et al. 2007).

The increased use of copepods as live food in commercial fish hatcheries (Delbare et al. 1996, Schipp et al. 1999) can be explained by the use of different developmental stages of copepods as food source for fish of different sizes. The high nutritional value of cope-pods, which is characterized by a rich content in phospholipids, highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA), and natural antioxidants (Watanabe et al. 1983, Kraul et al. 1992, Sargent et al. 1997, Stottrup and Nosker 1997, Stottrup 2000, Helland et al. 2003), can also explain their actual broad use in aquaculture.

The success of a copepod culture depends on survival and fecundity rates of the cultivated animals, which are limited by food availability (Checkley 1980), temperature (Gaudy et al. 2000), and water salinity (Cardozo 2004). Egg production estimation is commonly used as an indicator ofthe nutritional quality ofthe food employed to feed the cultivated copepods (Butler and Dam 1994, Ceballos and Ianora 2003). Also, some studies have been performed to characterize the influence of different natural diets on copepod growth and egg production (Jakobsen et al. 2005, Kaminski and Montú 2005). All the information generated from these studies is important to select feeding regimes in order to improve copepod culture in laboratory (Stottrup and Jensen 1990, Castro-Longoria 2003, Cardozo 2004).

In light of the above, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of the source and amount of food available on egg production in the copepod A. tonsa, using three different species of marine microalgae at different densities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The marine microalgae Thalassiosira weissflogii (∅ 13.2 μm), Chaetoceros muelleri (∅ 7.3 μm) and Isochrysis galbana (∅ 4.7 μm) were used in the present study as food source for copepods. They were grown in 5-L bottles, using the Guillard F/2 adapted method (Guillard and Ryther 1962).

Copepods used in the tests were isolated from field samples collected in the Patos Lagoon estuary (Rio Grande, RS, Southern Brazil) and kept under laboratory conditions for approximately 5 generations. The culture was carried out in non-toxic plastic tanks (70 L) containing saltwater (salinity 30). Tanks were kept in a experimental room with fixed temperature (20 ± 1°C) and photo-period (12L:12D). Copepods were daily fed a mixture of the three cultivated microalgae. Food was supplied in excess.

For each feeding regime (food source and density) adult copepods (50 males and 50 females) were acclimated for 24 h in glass bottles (1 L) containing filtered (1 / m) saltwater (salinity 30) and the microalgae to be tested at the desired density. For each feeding regime, 6 different microalgae densities were tested, including one control condition where no food was added to the experimental medium. Therefore, 19 glass bottles were used, each one containing 100 copepods (50 males and 50 females). Bottles containing copepods and the experimental medium were kept under fixed temperature (20 ± 1°C) and photoperiod (12L:12D) and gently aerated to prevent algae sedimentation.

Algae densities were selected based on the saturation curve of egg production for A. tonsa fed on Rhodomonas baltica (Kiørboe et al. 1985). These authors have shown that A. tonsa achieved a stabilization on egg production at ~ 500 μg C.L-1. Considering the amount of carbon and the volume of R. baltica, the equivalent in biovolume required to achieve ~ 500 μg C.L-1 would be 20.103, 280.103 and 320.103 cells.mL-1 for T. weissflogii, C. muelleri and I. galbana, respectively. The other 5 algae densities were selected to bracket that giving ~ 500 μg C.L-1 and ere calculated based on the T. weissflogii densities (Table I), using the equivalent biovolume approach (Hillebrand et al. 1999).

The first 24-h period of test was used to acclimate copepods to the feeding regime and allow them to copulate. After this period, 3 groups of 10 female copepods from each bottle (experimental condition) were randomly collected and transferred to 300-L glass bottles (10 female copepods per bottle) containing the corresponding experimental medium. Therefore, each experimental condition (food source and density) was tested in triplicate, totalizing 63 experimental units. Female copepods were then kept for a further 24 h under the same experimental conditions (feeding regime, salinity 30, temperature 20 ± 1°C, and photoperiod 12L:12D). Experimental medium were gently aerated to prevent algae sedimentation. Every 4 h, bottles were carefully agitated to keep algae cells in suspension.

After the second 24-h period of test, the experimental medium from each bottle was filtered (20-μm mesh filter). Eggs retained in the filter were transferred to 20-mL bottles, fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution, and counted in squared Petri dishes under a stereomicro-scope. Egg production was expressed as eggs.female-1. day-1, considering the number of living females after the 48-h period of test.

Data from each experimental condition were expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3). Considering the facts that food availability is a natural factor limiting A. tonsa egg production and that the relationship between egg production and food quantity measured as algal density follows a saturation curve (e.g. Berggreen et al. 1988), the maximum egg production for each microalgae was determined through non-linear regression analysis (exponential with saturation), using SigmaPlot 2001 for Windows version 7.0 (SPSS Inc., USA).

RESULTS

For the three microalgae species used, mean egg production rate was dependent on the density of food supplied to copepods (Fig. 1). Mean egg production in copepods fed on T. weissflogii, C. muelleri and I. galbana increased as the algae cell density increased, until reaching 10.103, 140.103 and 640.103 cells.mL-1, respectively. In all cases, egg production did not change at higher cell densities. In fact, data obtained fitted well to a saturation-type kinetic model, especially for T. weissflogii and C. muelleri, where very high regression coefficients were observed (R2 = 0.99 and 0.95, respectively). For I. galbana, a significant data regression to a saturation-type kinetic model was also obtained, but a lower regression coefficient was observed (R2 = 0.85).


This lower R2 value ould be associated ith an apparent outlier mean value observed at the density of 160.103 cells.ml-1 (Fig. 1).

Copepod egg production was also dependent on food source provided to animals tested (Fig. 1). Based on the data regression model employed, the maximum mean egg production obtained was 28.0 ± 0.5, 22.0 ± 3.5, and 20.1 ± 1.0 eggs.female-1.day-1 with T. weissflogii, I. galbana and C. muelleri.

DISCUSSION

Data from the present study shows an influence of the microalgae species and density on the egg production in the copepod Acartia tonsa. At low microalgae densities, a low egg production was observed for the three micro-algae tested. This fact could be explained by a decreased efficiency of food capture at low microalgae densities, as observed in A. tonsa fed with T. weissflogii (Paffenhofer and Stearns 1988). At high microalgae densities, egg production became stable was obtained for the three microalgae tested. Considering the equivalent biovol-ume approach (Hillebrand et al. 1999), density of T. weissflogii and C. muelleri showing stabilization in egg production corresponded to half of that using Rhodomonas baltica (~ 500 μg C.L-1). On the other hand, it corresponded to double for I. galbana (Kiorboe et al. 1985). These findings suggest that different carbon concentrations are required to obtain stabilization in egg production in A. tonsa when different food sources are employed.

For the three microalgae species, mean values of saturation in egg production (20 to 28 eggs.female-1. day-1) ere al ays higher than those easured in the field (1 to 16 eggs.female-1.day-1) for A. tonsa (Klep-pel et al. 1998, Kleppel and Hazzard 2000). For cope-pods fed on the same algae (T weissflogii) under controlled conditions, the mean value observed for A tonsa in the present study (28 eggs.female-1 .day-1) was slightly higher than that reported for A clausi (21 to 26 eggs. female-1 .day-1) by Richardson and Verheye (1998).

A tonsa showed a higher egg production when fed on T. weissflogii than on C. muelleri or I. galbana. In turn, maximum egg production with I. galbana was similar to that with C. muelleri. However, a two- to four-fold higher biovolume (or amount of carbon) of I. galbana was needed. These findings could be explained by the reduced food capture efficiency in A. tonsa when particles are between 2 and 4 μm (Irigoien et al. 2003, Katechakis et al. 2004). In this context, it is important to emphasize that I. galbana has a smaller size (~ 5 μm) than T. weissflogii (~ 13 μm) and C. muelleri (5-10 μm) (Berggreenetal. 1988). According to the size preference for food capture, T. weissflogii shows a more ideal size (~ 13 mm) for the adult stage of the copepod A. tonsa (Berggreen et al. 1988). Furthermore, A. tonsa can have low sensitive chemoreception mechanisms (Paffenhofer and Stearns 1988), requiring a higher biomass ofsmaller algae (e.g. I. galbana) than that of larger ones (e.g. T. weissflogii) (Støttrup and Jensen 1990) to achieve the alimentary response. These facts can explain, at least in part, the highest maximum egg production observed with T. weissflogii. It is important to note that the sloppy feeding was not considered when comparing feeding efficiency among the different microalgae tested. According to Moller and Nielsen (2001), A. tonsa does not show sloppy feeding when capturing algae of sizes similar to those employed in the present study (~ 10 μm or less).

Ismar et al. (2008) reported that both T. weissflogii and C. muelleri allow the development of all life stages of A. tonsa. In the present study, A. tonsa fed on T. weissflogii and C. muelleri reached a saturated egg production at concentrations equivalent in biovolume. However, copepods fed on T. weissflogii produced in average 40% more eggs (28 eggs.female-1.day-1) than those fed on C. muelleri (20 eggs.female-1.day-1). Despite the fact that Chaetoceros sp. is a food source for copepods in nature (Uchima 1988, Wu et al. 2004), the higher fecundity observed with T. weissflogii suggests a preference for use of this microalgae under laboratory conditions. The fact that higher survival rates and better physiological responses and development of various stages of copepods are observed with T. weissflogii than with I. galbana under controlled conditions (Tirelli and Mayzaud 2005, Ismar et al. 2008, Koski et al. 2008) also supports this choice.

Despite the fact that a maximum egg production was obtained in the present study with a single food source, especially for T. weissflogii, a combination of at least two microalgae species could enhance A. tonsa egg production. For example, a higher egg production (32 eggs.female-1.day-1) was obtained in A. tonsa fed with a mixture of I. galbana and Rhinomonas reticulata (Medina and Barata 2004) than in those fed only with I. galbana (22 eggs.female-1.day-1) at an equivalent bio-volume concentration. In other copepod species, better results were also obtained with plurialgal diets (Buttino et al. 2009).

In summary, data reported in the present study indicate that the feeding regime (microalgae species and density) influences egg production in the copepod Acartia tonsa. Differences in egg production with the different feeding regimes tested in the present study were explained considering the different sizes of the microal-gae employed to feed the copepods.

KI∅RBOE T, MOHLENBERG F AND HAMBURGER K. 1985. Bioenergetics of the planktonic copepod Acartia tonsa: relation between feeding, egg production and respiration, and composition of specific dynamic action. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 26: 85-97.

Manuscript received on January 22, 2009; accepted for publication on August 4, 2009

  • AZAITEIRO UM, MARQUES SC, VIEIRA LMR, PASTO-RINHO MRD, PEREIRA PAB, RÉ MJ AND MORGADO FMR. 2005. Dynamics of the Acartia genus (Calanoida: Copepoda) in a temperate shallow estuary (the Mondego estuary) on the west cost of Portugal. Acta Adriat 46: 7-20.
  • BERGGREEN U, HANSEN B AND KI0RBOE T. 1988. Food size spectra, ingestion and growth of the copepod Acartia tonsa during development: implications for determination ofcopepod production. Mar Biol 99: 341-352.
  • BIELMYER GK, GROSEL M AND BRIX KV. 2006. Toxicity of silver, zinc, copper, and nickel to the copepod Acar-tia tonsa exposed via a phytoplankton diet. Environ Sci Technol 40: 2063-2068.
  • BJÖRNBERG TSK. 1981. Copepoda. In: BOLTOVSKOY D (Ed), Atlas del zooplancton del Atlantico Sudoccidenteal y Metodos de Trabajos con el zooplancton Marino. INI-DEP, Mar del Plata, Argentina, p. 587-677.
  • BUTLER M AND DAM HG. 1994. Production rates andcharacteristics of fecal pellets of the copepod Acartia tonsa under simulated phytoplankton bloom conditions: implications for vertical fluxes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 114: 81-91.
  • BUTTINO I, IANORA A, BUONO S, VITELLO V, SANSONE G AND MIRALTO A. 2009. Are monoalgal diets inferior to plurialgal diets to axiize cultivation of the calanoid copepod Temora stylifera? Mar Biol 156: 1171-1182.
  • CARDOZO AP. 2004. Influência de diferentes salinidades na reprodução e crescimento de Acartia tonsa (Copepoda, Calanoida). Disponível em: http://www.pluridoc.com
  • CASTRO-LONGORIA E. 2003. Egg Production and hatching success of four Acartia species under different temperature and salinity regimes. J Crust Biol 23: 289-299.
  • CEBALLOS S AND IANORA A. 2003. Different diatoms induce contrasting effects on the reproductive success of the copepod Temora stylifera. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 294: 189-202.
  • CHECKLEY DM. 1980. The egg production of amarineplank-tonic copepod in relation to its food supply: laboratory studies. Limnol Oceanogr 25: 430-446.
  • DELBARE D, DHERT P AND LAVENS P. 1996. Zooplankton. In: MANUAL ON THE PRODUCTION AND USE OF LIVE FOOD FOR AQUACULTURE. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, p. 252-281.
  • GAUDY R, CERVETTO G AND PAGANO M. 2000. Comparison of the metabolism of Acartia clausi and Acartia tonsa: influence of temperature and salinity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 247: 51-65.
  • GUILLARD RRL AND RYTHER JH. 1962. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms Cyclotella nanna (Hustedt) and Detonula convervacea (Cleve). Gran Can J Microbiol 8: 229-239.
  • HELLAND S, TERJESEN BF AND BERG L. 2003. Freeamino acid and protein content in the planktonic copepod Temora longicornis compared to Artemia franciscana. Aquaculture 215: 213-228.
  • HILLEBRAND H, DÜRSELEN CD, POLINGHER U AND ZOHARY T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol 35: 403-424.
  • IRIGOIEN X, TITELMAN J AND HARRIS RP. 2003. Feeding of Calanus finmarchicus nauplii in the Irminger Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 262:193-200.
  • ISMAR MH, HANSEN T AND SOMMER U. 2008. Effect of food concentration and type of diet on Acartia survival and naupliar development. Mar Biol 154: 335-343.
  • JAKOBSEN HH, HALVORSEN E, HANSEN BW AND VISSER AW. 2005. Effects of prey motility and concentration on feeding in Acartia tonsa and Temora longicornis: the importance of feeding modes. J Plankton Res 27: 775-785.
  • KAMINSKI SM AND MONTÚ MA. 2005. Produção de ovos dos copépodes costeiros Acartia tonsa, Temora stylifera e Temora turbinata da Praia do Cassino, Rio Grande, RS. Atlântica 27: 103-111.
  • KATECHAKIS A, STIBOR H, SOMMER U AND HANSEN T. 2004. Feeding selectivities and food-niche separation of Acartia clausi, Penilia avirostris (Crustacea) and Doliolum denticulatum (Thaliacea) in Blanes Bay (Catalan Sea, NW Mediterranean). J Plankton Res 26: 589-603.
  • KLEPPEL GS. 1992. Environmental regulation of feeding and egg production by Acartia tonsa off southern California. Mar Biol 112: 57-65.
  • KLEPPEL GS AND HAZZARD SE. 2000 Diet and egg production of the copepod Acartia tonsa in Florida Bay. II. Role of the nutritional environment. Mar Biol 137: 111-121.
  • KLEPPEL GS, BURKART CA, HOUCHIN L AND TOMAS C. 1998. Egg production of the copepod Acartia tonsa in Florida Bay during Summer. 1. The roles of food environment and diet. Estuaries 21: 328-339.
  • KOSKI M, WICHARD T AND JÓNASDÓTTIR SH. 2008. "Good" and "bad" diatoms: development, growth and juvenile mortality of the copepod Temora longicornis on diatom diets. Mar Biol 154: 719-734.
  • KRAUL S, NELSON A, BRITTAIN K, AKO H AND OGA-SAWARA A. 1992. Evaluation of live feeds for larval and postlarval mahimahi Coryphaena hippurus. J World Aquacult Soc 23: 299-307.
  • LEANDRO SM, MORGADO F, PEREIRA F and QUEIROGA H. 2007. Temporal changes of abundance, biomass and production of copepod community in a shallow temperate estuary (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal). Est Coast Shelf Sci 74: 215-222.
  • MAUCHLINE J. 1998. The Biology of Calanoid Copepods. Advances in Marine Biology. London, Academic Press, 710 p.
  • MCKINNON AD, DUGGANA S, NICHOLS PD, RIMMER MA, SEMMENS G AND ROBINO B. 2003. The potential of tropical paracalanid copepods as live feeds in aquacul-ture. Aquaculture 223: 89-106.
  • MEDINA M AND BARATA C. 2004. Static-renewal culture of Acartia tonsa (Copepoda: Calanoida) for ecotoxicological testing. Aquaculture 229: 203-213.
  • M∅LLER EF AND NIELSEN TG. 2001. Production of bacterial substrate by arine copepods: effectofphytoplankton biomass and cell size. J Plankton Res 23: 527-536.
  • PAFFENHOFER GA AND STEARNS DE. 1988. Why is Acartia tonsa (Copepoda: Calonoida) restricted to nearshore environments? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 42: 33-38.
  • PEDROSO MS, BERSANO JG AND BIANCHINI A. 2007. Acute silver toxicity in the euryhaline copepod Acartia tonsa: influence of salinity and food. Environ Toxicol Chem26: 2158-2165.
  • PINHO GLL, PEDROSO MS, RODRIGUES SC, SOUZA SS AND BIANCHINI A. 2007. Physiological effects of copper in the euryhaline copepod Acartia tonsa: waterborne versus waterborne plus dietborne exposure. Aquat Toxicol 84: 62-70.
  • RICHARDSON AJ AND VERHEYE HM. 1998. The relative importance of food and temperature to copepod egg production and somatic growth in the southern Benguela up-welling system. J Plankton Res 20: 2379-2399.
  • SAIZ E, CALBET A, ATIENZA D AND ALCARAZ M. 2007. Feeding and production of zooplankton in the Catalan Sea (NW Mediterranean). Progr Oceanog 74: 313-328.
  • SARGENT JR, MCEVOY LA AND BELL JG. 1997. Requirements, presentation and sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids in marine larval feeds. Aquaculture 155: 117-127.
  • SCHIPP GR, BOSMANS JMP AND MARSHALL AJ. 1999. A method for hatchery culture of tropical calanoid copepods, Acartia spp. Aquaculture 174: 81-88.
  • STøTTRUP JG. 2000. The elusive copepods: theirproduction and suitability in marine aquaculture. Aquacult Res 31: 703-711.
  • STøTTRUP JG AND JENSEN J. 1990. Influence of algal diet on feeding and egg-production of the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa Dana. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 141: 87-105.
  • STøTTRUP JG AND NOSKER NH. 1997. Production and use of copepods in marine fish larviculture. Aquaculture 155: 231-247.
  • TIRELLI V AND MAYZAUD P. 2005. Relationship between functional response and gut transit time in the calanoid copepod Acartia clausi: role of food quantity and quality. J Plankton Res 27: 557-568.
  • UCHIMA M. 1988. Gut content analysis of neritic copepods Acartia omorii and Oithona davisae by a new method. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 48: 93-97.
  • WATANABE T, KATAJIMA C AND FUJITA S. 1983. Nutritional value of live organisms used in Japan for mass propagation of fish: a review. Aquaculture 34: 115-143.
  • WU CH, HWANG JS AND YANG JS. 2004. Diets of three copepods (Poecilostomatoida) in the Southern Taiwan Strait Zool Stud 43: 388-392.
  • Correspondence to:
    Tatiana Ramos Avila
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      11 June 2010
    • Date of issue
      June 2010

    History

    • Received
      22 Jan 2009
    • Accepted
      04 Aug 2009
    Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rua Anfilófio de Carvalho, 29, 3º andar, 20030-060 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 3907-8100 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
    E-mail: aabc@abc.org.br