Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

New classes of polynomial maps satisfying the real Jacobian conjecture in 2

Abstract

Abstract: We present two new classes of polynomial maps satisfying the real Jacobian conjecture in 2. The first class is formed by the polynomials maps of the form (q(x)–p(y), q(y)+p(x)) : R2R2 such that p and q are real polynomials satisfying p'(x)q'(x) ≠ 0. The second class is formed by polynomials maps (f, g): R2R2 where f and g are real homogeneous polynomials of the same arbitrary degree satisfying some conditions.

Key words
injective polynomial maps; global center; real Jacobian conjecture; planar Hamiltonian systems


Introduction

Let F=(f,g):22be a polynomial map such that its Jacobian never vanishes. The celebrated real Jacobian conjecture states that under these conditions Fis injective. This conjecture goes back to 1939, see Keller (1939)KELLER OH. 1939. Ganze Cremona-Transformationen. Monatsh Math Phys 47(1): 299–306. .

In 1994 Pinchuk (1994)PINCHUK S. 1994. A counterexample to the strong real Jacobian conjecture. Math Z 217(1): 1–4. found a map F=(f,g)with fand gpolynomials of degree 10 and 25 respectively, and with Jacobian strictly positive, such that Fis not injective.

Although the real Jacobian conjecture has been proved false by Pinchuk, a considerable number of papers has been devoted to this subject, mainly searching for additional conditions such that the conjecture might hold. The problem of determining ifFis injective in the case of its Jacobian to be a non–zero constant, known as the Jacobian conjecture, is still open, see Essen (2000)ESSEN AVD. 2000. Polynomial automorphisms and the Jacobian conjecture, Progress in Mathematics 190. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag. and the references therein for more information.

Main Results

In this note we present two new classes of polynomial maps that satisfies the real Jacobian conjecture. In what follows we present our main results.

Theorem 1. Letpand qbe real polynomials of one variable and consider the polynomial mapF=(f,g):22with f=f(x,y)=q(x)p(y),g=g(x,y)=q(y)+p(x)and p(x)q(x)0. Then the Jacobian of polynomial map Fnever vanish and Fis injective.

Theorem 1. is proved in the section Proofs of the Theorems.

As usual here p(x)denotes the derivative of pwith respect to the variable x, and if f=f(x,y)we denote by fxthe partial derivative of fwith respect to the variable x. Similarly is defined fy.

Theorem 2. Letfand gbe real homogeneous polynomials of the same degree in the variablesxand ysuch that

  1. the Jacobian of the polynomial mapF=(f,g):22never vanish,

  2. fand ghave no real linear factors in common,

  3. the polynomials P=ffyggyand Q=ffx+ggxhave no real common factors, and

  4. +P(1,y)Q(1,y)yP(1,y)dy=0.

Then the polynomial map Fis injective.

Theorem 2 is also proved in the section Proofs of the Theorems.

Other classes of polynomial maps satisfying the real Jacobian conjecture were given in Braun and Llibre (2015)BRAUN F AND LLIBRE J. 2015. A new qualitative proof of a result on the real jacobian conjecture. An Acad Bras Cienc 87: 1519–1524. and Braun, Giné, and Llibre (2016).BRAUN F, GINÉ J AND LLIBRE J. 2016. A sufficient condition in order that the real Jacobian conjecture in R2 holds. J Differential Equations 260(6): 5250–5258.

Preliminary results

Let Pand Qbe polynomials in the variables xand y. Consider the polynomial differential system

x ̇ = P ( x , y ) , y ̇ = Q ( x , y ) . (1)

We say that an isolated singularity pof system (1) is a center when there is a neighborhoodVpUof psuch that every solution in Vp\{p}is periodic. The biggest open connected set containingp, denoted by WpU, such that Wp\{p}is filled with periodic orbits is called the period annulus of the center. If Wp=2then pis a global center of system(1) .

Let qbe an isolated singularity of system(1) . IfX=(P,Q)then DX(q)is the Jacobian matrix of system(1) at q. If det(DX(q))0then we say that qis a non–degenerate singular point. Under these assumptions a necessary condition in order that qbe a center is that the eigenvalues of DX(q)are purely imaginary. Such a center is a non-degenerate center.

The polynomial differential system(1) is a Hamiltonian system if there is a polynomial Hsuch that P(x,y)=Hy(x,y)and Q(x,y)=Hx(x,y). Then the polynomial His called the Hamiltonian of the Hamiltonian system(1) .

The following result is due to Sabatini, see Theorem 2.3 of Sabatini (1998)SABATINI M. 1998. A connection between ishochronous Hamiltonian centres and the Jacobian Conjecture. Nonlinear Anal 34: 829–838. . This result provides a relation between the real Jacobian conjecture and the global centers of some polynomial Hamiltonian systems.

Theorem 3. Let F=(f,g):22be a polynomial map such that its Jacobian never vanishes and F(0,0)=(0,0). Then the following statements are equivalent.

  1. The polynomial Hamiltonian system with HamiltonianH=(f(x,y)2 +g(x,y)2)/2has a global center at the origin of coordinates.

  2. The map Fis a global diffeomorphism of 2onto itself.

In addition we present the following result due to Braun and Llibre, see Lemma 1 of Braun and Llibre (2017)BRAUN F AND LLIBRE J. 2017. On the connection between global centers and global injectivity. Preprint.

Lemma 4. LetF=(f,g):U2be a 𝒞2function defined in an open connected setU2and (x0,y0)Usuch that the Jacobian of Fin (x0,y0)does not vanish. Moreover consider the Hamiltonian H=(f(x,y)2+g(x,y)2)/2. Then (x0,y0)is a singular point of the polynomial Hamiltonian systemẋ=Hy, ẏ=Hxif and only if F(x0,y0)=(0,0). Under these conditions (x0,y0)is a non-degenerate center and also an isolated global minimum of H. In particular if the Jacobian of Fnever vanishes in Uall the singular points of the Hamiltonian systemẋ=Hy,ẏ=Hxin Uare non–degenerate centers and are the zeros of the mapF.

The Poincaré compactification

The set 𝕊2={y=(y1,y2,y3)3:y12+y22+y32=1}is called the Poincaré sphere. Consider Ty𝕊2the tangent space to the Poincaré sphere at the pointyand the central projection f:T(0,0,1)𝕊2𝕊2.

Let Xbe a polynomial vector field of degree nin the plane T(0,0,1)𝕊2. The map fdefines 2 copies of Xin 𝕊2, one in the northern hemisphere and the other in the southern hemisphere. Let Xbe the vector field DfXdefined on the Poincaré sphere except on its equator𝕊1={y𝕊2:y3=0}. We remark that Xis everywhere tangent to 𝕊2and 𝕊1is identified to the infinity of 2. We define p(X), the Poincaré compactified vector field associated toXas the analytic extension of y3n1Xto 𝕊2.Note that studying the behavior of p(X)around 𝕊1, we obtain the behavior of Xat infinity. Also, 𝕊1is invariant under the flow of p(X).

The Poincaré disc is the projection of the closed northern hemisphere of 𝕊2on y3=0under (y1,y2,y3)(y1,y2).

The singular points of p(X)in the interior of the Poincaré disc, or equivalently in open northern hemisphere {(y1,y2,y3)𝕊2:y3>0}, are called the finite singular points of X. While the singular points of p(X)contained in 𝕊1are called the infinite singular points of X.

For more details on the Poincaré compactification, see chapter 5 of Dumortier, Llibre, and Artés (2006)DUMORTIER F, LLIBRE J AND Artés J. 2006. Qualitative theory of planar differential systems. Berlin Heidelberg: Spring-Verlag. .

The following result is the Poincaré–Hopf Theorem for the Poincaré compactification of a polynomial vector field. For a proof see for instance Theorem 6.30 of Dumortier, Llibre, and Artés (2006).

Theorem 5. LetXbe a polynomial vector field. If p(X)defined on the Poincaré sphere 𝕊2has finitely many singular points, then the sum of their topological indices is two.

Proofs of the theorems

Proof of Theorem 1.We claim that the Jacobian of Fis q(x)q(y)+p(x)p(y)>0. Indeed, since p(x)q(y)0each one of the one-variable polynomialsp(x),q(y)is either strictly positive or strictly negative. Consider the case p(x)>0 and q(y)<0, the other cases can be done similarly. Then p(x)q(y)<0. But whatever the signals of each of these polynomials are, we have that p(x)p(y)>0and q(x)q(y)>0, consequently q(x)q(y)+p(x)p(y)>0, and the claim is proved.

From the claim we have that the polynomial map F=(f,g)with f=q(x)p(y),g=q(y)+p(x)satisfies the assumptions of Lemma 4 withU=2. Hence all the singular points of the polynomial Hamiltonian system with Hamiltonian H=(f(x,y)2+ g(x,y)2)/2are non–degenerated centers.

We study the infinite singular points of the system

x ̇ = P = H y = f f y g g y , y ̇ = Q = H x = f f x + g g x , (2)

where f=q(x)p(y),g=q(y)+p(x)with p(x)=axn+l.o.t.,q(x)=bxm+l.o.t.,nand mpositive integers, ab0, and l.o.t. means lower order terms of the polynomial.

First we assume that n=m. For studying the infinite equilibria consider the homogeneous polynomial yP2n1(x,y)xQ2n1(x,y)of degree 2n, where P2n1and Q2n1are the homogeneous parts of degree 2n1of the polynomials Pand Qrespectively.

Since yP2n1(x,y)xQ2n1(x,y)=n(a2+b2)(x2n+y2n)0for (x,y)(0,0), the Hamiltonian system (2) has no infinite singular points.

For the cases n>mand n<mwe have respectively yP2n1(x,y)xQ2n1(x,y)=na2(x2n+y2n)0and yP2m1(x,y)xQ2m1(x,y)=mb2(x2m+y2m)0for (x,y)(0,0). Therefore again the Hamiltonian system has no infinite singular points, and 𝕊1is a periodic orbit of the Poincaré compactification of system (2).

In summary we know that all the finite singular points of system(2) are centers, and that it has no infinite singular points. Moreover, since this system is polynomial it has finitely many singular points, therefore by the Poincaré–Hopf Theorem (Theorem 5) applied to the Poincaré sphere, we obtain that two times the sum of the indices of the finite singular points is equal to 2. One of the “two times” comes from the northern open hemisphere and the other from the south open hemisphere of the Poincaré sphere because we have a copy in each of these hemispheres of our system(2). Hence since the sum of the indices of all the finite singular points is1, and each center has index 1, the system has a unique center, which we denote byc.

To end the proof applying Theorem 3 we must prove that the local center cis global. But for applying Theorem 3 we need thatF(0,0)=(0,0), so we consider the map F=TF, where T(x,y)=(xa,yb)if F(0,0)=(a,b). Then the map Fsatisfies F(0,0)=(0,0)and also satisfies all the conditions of the mapFgiven in the statement of Theorem 1. So we shall prove thatFis injective, and consequently Fwill be injective. In what follows for simplifying the notation we denote Fby F.

Let Wcbe the period annulus of c. If the last periodic orbit of Wcis the infinity in the Poincaré disc we are done. Assume thatγis the last periodic orbit of Wcand that it does not coincide with the periodic orbit at𝕊1, and let pbe a point of γ. Consider the Poincaré map Π:Σ0Σassociated to γ, where Σis a local transverse section to the vector field associated to system(2) through the point p, for further information on these topics see chapter 1 of Dumortier, Llibre, and Artés (2006). Here Σ0denotes the domain of definition of the mapΠon the section Σ.

By Proposition 1.21 of Dumortier, Llibre, and Artés (2006) the mapΠis analytic because system(2) is polynomial. Clearly the map Πrestricted to the part of Σ0contained in the period annulus Wcis the identity. Therefore, since Πis an analytic map of one variable, it is analytic in the wholeΣ0. Hence γcannot be the last periodic orbit of Wc, a contradiction. Consequently the center is global and by Theorem 3 we conclude that F=(f,g) is injective.

Proposition 4.2 of Cima and Llibre (1990)CIMA A AND LLIBRE J. 1990. Algebraic and topological classification of the homogeneous cubic vector fields in the plane. J Math Anal Appl 147(2): 420–448. states:

Proposition 6. LetPand Qbe two real homogeneous polynomials of degreenin the variables xand y. Assume that Pand Qdo not have real common factors, that xQ(x,y)yP(x,y)has no real linear factors, and that

+ P ( 1 , y ) Q ( 1 , y ) y P ( 1 , y ) d y = 0 .

Then the phase portrait of the polynomial vector field(P,Q)is a global center.

Proof of Theorem 2. Under the assumptions of Theorem 2, first we shall see that the polynomial xQ(x,y)yP(x,y)has no real linear factors. By the Euler’s Theorem for homogeneous functions we have that

x Q y P = x ( f f x + g g x ) + y ( f f y + g g y ) = n ( f 2 + g 2 ) .

Therefore since the homogeneous polynomialsfand ghas no real linear factors in common, the homogeneous polynomialxQ(x,y)yP(x,y) also does not have a real linear factor. Hence, from the hypotheses of Theorem 2 all the assumptions of Proposition 6 are satisfied. Consequently the Hamiltonian system with HamiltonianH=(f2+g2)/2has a global center. So by Theorem 3 we get that the polynomial map F=(f,g)is injective. We note that as in the proof of Theorem 1, for applying Theorem 3 we need that F(0,0)=(0,0), again taking the map F=TF, where T(x,y)=(xa,yb)if F(0,0)=(a,b), we verify that F(0,0)=(0,0)and that Fsatisfies the conditions of the map Fgiven in the statement of Theorem 2. So we apply Theorem 3 to the map F, and we obtain the injectivity for the mapF, and consequently for the mapF.

ACKNOWLEGMENTS

We thank to the reviewer his/her comments which help us to improve the presentation of our results.The first author is supported by a Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) grant number 2016/23285-9. The second author is supported by a MINECO-FEDER grant MTM2016-77278-P, a MINECO grant MTM2013-40998-P, and an AGAUR grant number 2014SGR-568.

  • BRAUN F, GINÉ J AND LLIBRE J. 2016. A sufficient condition in order that the real Jacobian conjecture in R2 holds. J Differential Equations 260(6): 5250–5258.
  • BRAUN F AND LLIBRE J. 2015. A new qualitative proof of a result on the real jacobian conjecture. An Acad Bras Cienc 87: 1519–1524.
  • BRAUN F AND LLIBRE J. 2017. On the connection between global centers and global injectivity. Preprint
  • CIMA A AND LLIBRE J. 1990. Algebraic and topological classification of the homogeneous cubic vector fields in the plane. J Math Anal Appl 147(2): 420–448.
  • DUMORTIER F, LLIBRE J AND Artés J. 2006. Qualitative theory of planar differential systems. Berlin Heidelberg: Spring-Verlag.
  • ESSEN AVD. 2000. Polynomial automorphisms and the Jacobian conjecture, Progress in Mathematics 190. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.
  • KELLER OH. 1939. Ganze Cremona-Transformationen. Monatsh Math Phys 47(1): 299–306.
  • PINCHUK S. 1994. A counterexample to the strong real Jacobian conjecture. Math Z 217(1): 1–4.
  • SABATINI M. 1998. A connection between ishochronous Hamiltonian centres and the Jacobian Conjecture. Nonlinear Anal 34: 829–838.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    01 July 2019
  • Date of issue
    2019

History

  • Received
    14 Sept 2017
  • Accepted
    23 Aug 2018
Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rua Anfilófio de Carvalho, 29, 3º andar, 20030-060 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 3907-8100 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: aabc@abc.org.br