Kinetics of colour and texture changes of button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) coated with chitosan during storage at low temperature

Abstract

Abstract: Kinetics of color and texture changes in coated button mushrooms were investigated as a function of coating agent’s rate (1%, 2% and 3% w/v chitosan). The inner and outer surface colours of mushrooms in terms of CIELAB parameters L*, a*, b*, C*, ° h, ∆E, and Browning Index (BI), and their textural properties in terms of firmness were evaluated. The color values on both sides of the mushrooms except for L* values increased and their firmness decreased with the coating treatment. The color changes of the inner and outer surface of mushrooms and their texture changes followed zero-order reaction models with higher R2 (0.9987-0.9999) and lower RMSE (4.8448 x 10^-5-1.6690) and χ2 values (3.9120 x 10^-9-4.6425). The 2% chitosan solution was determined to be the most effective coating agent among the coating agents used to extend the post-harvest shelf life by optimally preserving the color parameters of the mushrooms together with their texture properties.

Key words
chitosan coating; kinetics; mushroom; colour; texture

INTRODUCTION

Mushrooms have been consumed for centuries in terms of their nutritional and medical properties, which are good sources of polysaccharides (β-glucans, chitin, hemicelluloses), dietary fibers, proteins containing essential amino acids, many biologically active and health-promoting compounds such as polyphenols and carotenoids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) despite their low fat content (Pardeshi & Pardeshi 2009, Dembitsky et al. 2010, Muszyńska et al. 2018, Rathore et al. 2017). They have nutritionally significant vitamin content (C, E, D, B₁, B₂, and B₁₂) (Heleno et al. 2010, Reis et al. 2012). They are also rich in calcium, potassium, magnesium and phosphorus (Rajarathnam & Shashirekha 1998, Rathore et al. 2017). Button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) which is the most popular mushroom variety grown and consumed is an easily perishable food with shelf life of about 24 h at ambient temperature and between 5 and 7 days under refrigerated conditions (Motevali et al. 2011, Das & Arora 2018). The short shelf life of mushrooms is a major disadvantage limiting its economic value. During harvest and postharvest storage, mushrooms are subjected to a series of quality degradation such as moisture loss, discolouration, off flavour, softening, and nutrition loss (Ding et al. 2016, Zhang et al. 2018). Among the different techniques employed to extend the shelf life and retain the nutritional value of products, the use of edible films or coatings represents one of the best alternative ways of preservation due to their ability to reduce moisture loss, solute migration and respiration and transpiration rate. They generally increase the shelf life of product (Tezotto-Uliana et al. 2014, Mannozzi et al. 2017). The colour and texture of the product are the most important parameters affecting consumer preference at first glance. Products undergo significant textural and color transformations during storage. The shelf life of products is closely associated with this fact. Edible coatings/films can be used to provide physical protection, such as protection of food products from mechanical damage and from physical, chemical and microbiological activities (Min et al. 2005, Dehghani et al. 2018). The use of edible coatings/films means that the shelf life of products can be extended by minimizing the change in their color and textural properties. Polysaccharide-based coatings such as chitosan have been frequently used for this purpose (Jiang et al. 2013). Chitosan is considered as an ideal protective coating agent for fresh fruits and vegetables due to its excellent film-forming and biochemical properties (El-Ghaouth et al. 2000, ali et al. 2011). For extending shelf life of fresh or semi-processed foods, chitosan has been attempted in plum (Kumar et al. 2017), Cavendish banana (Suseno et al. 2014), table grape (Gao et al. 2013), strawberry (Wang & Gao 2013), shiitake mushroom (Jiang et al. 2013), guava (Hong et al. 2012), Eksotika II papaya (ali et al. 2011), litchi (Dong et al. 2004), mango (Kittur et al. 2001) with successful results. The products are expected to maintain their quality properties throughout their shelf life. As the shelf life of products is extended, it is desirable that the quality characteristics do not decrease and they maintain. Both the shelf life of products and their sustainability of the quality characteristics during shelf life are affected by the rate of chitosan used in the edible coating. No published work has been found yet in the literature, which describes by kinetic modelling the effect of the ratio of edible coating agent used on the colour and textural properties of the product during storage. But, there are a limited number of studies describing the changes in both color and textural properties of products as a result of various processes with kinetic modeling (Lau et al. 2000, Chen & Ramaswamy 2002, Kahyaoglu & Kaya 2006, Kumar et al. 2006, Gonçalves et al. 2007, Jaiswal et al. 2012, Jaiswal & Abu-Ghannam 2013).

The use and determination of suitable formulations of edible coatings, which are the most important competitors of conventional packages, provides that the desired quality criteria of products are kept at the maximum level during storage. The objectives of this study are to investigate the effect of chitosan’s ratio used in edible coatings on the colour and textural characteristics of button mushrooms using kinetic modelling during storage and to determine the formulation of the edible coating that best preserves both the colour and texture of button mushrooms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample preparation

Button mushrooms were purchased from the commercial market (Migros Trade Inc., Izmir, Turkey) and selected for uniform size, shape, and color prior to coating. Firstly, the selected mushrooms were immersed in a 0.1 % NaClO solution during 1 min for surface-sterilization and air-dried at room temperature for 30 min. Hydrosoluble chitosan powder was purchased from Qingdao Reach International Inc., Qingdao, China (hydrosoluble chitosan from Alaska snow crab shells, 91.6% deacetylated). Chitosan (1.0, 2.0, 3.0 % w/v) powder was dissolved in aqueous solution of malic acid (2% w/v) at room temperature and stirred vigorously using magnetic stirrer for 8 h (Stuart Scientific, UK). The pH in all solutions was adjusted to 6.0 with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide. The adjusted solutions were also stirred for 2 h at room temperature. Then, the mushrooms dipped for 1 min into chitosan solutions at the following concentrations: 1.0, 2.0, 3.0% (w/v). The mushrooms treated with only 2% malic acid solution were used as control (Eissa 2007). After coating, the mushrooms were left to dry at ambient temperature. All coated samples were placed into macroperforated polypropylene film bag was used (40 μm thickness, 1.3x10⁴ perforations/m², 0.2mm² surface). This film preserves the atmosphere within the package at normal air composition. Then they are stored during 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 days at 4°C for evaluation of their colour characteristics. All sample preparation was done in duplicates.

Colour and texture determination

A Minolta Colourimeter (CR-400 Model Colourimeter, Konica Minolta Sensing, Inc., Osaka, Japan) was used to measure the L*, a* and b* values of mushrooms during storage. It has two standard illuminant (C and D₆₅) and standard colorimetric observer (2°) inside. The instrument was calibrated before taking measurement with a standard white plate (Y = 85.7, x = 0.3179, y = 0.3254). Ten random readings were taken from the inner and outer surfaces of each sample. The L* value shows lightness. The a* value defines greenness when negative and, redness when positive. The b* value measures blueness when negative, and yellowness when positive (Ali et al. 2014). The values of chroma (C*) (Eq. (1)) and hue (°h) (Eq. (2)) were calculated from a* and b* values. Furthermore, the total colour change (∆E) (Eq. (3)) and browning index (BI) (Eq. (4)) were estimated using L*, a*, b* values.

$$C^{\ast }=\sqrt{(a^{\ast }{)}^2+(b^{\ast }{)}^2}$$ Eq. 1

$$ºh={\tan }^{-1}\left(\frac{b^{\ast }}{a^{\ast }}\right)$$ Eq. 2

$$\mathrm{\Delta }E=\sqrt{(L_0^{\ast }-L^{\ast }{)}^2+(a_0^{\ast }-a^{\ast }{)}^2+(b_0^{\ast }-b^{\ast }{)}^2}$$ Eq. 3

$$BI=\frac{[100(x-0.31)]}{0.17}x=\frac{(a^{\ast }+1,75L^{\ast })}{5.645L^{\ast }+a^{\ast }-3.012b^{\ast })}$$ Eq. 4

where L₀*, a₀*, b₀* were the colour values of samples at the initial time, L*, a*, b* were colour values of samples at the pre-specified time.

A penetration test was performed to evaluate the textural properties of the samples using a TA.XT Plus Texture Analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK) and a 5 mm diameter cylindrical probe on the mushroom caps. Samples were penetrated to 5 mm in depth and the speed of the probe was 2.0 mm.s^-1 throught the pre-test and penetration. Using the force vs. time curves obtained, firmness was defined as the maximum force (N) (Jiang et al. 2013). All experiments were carried out in five replicates.

Data analysis

In general, it is seen in the literature that changes in color and texture of foodstuff can be explained by zero- (Eq. (5)) or first-order (Eq. (6)) kinetic models (Lau et al. 2000, Chen & Ramaswamy 2002, Kumar et al. 2006, Kahyaoglu & Kaya 2006, Gonçalves et al. 2007, Jaiswal et al. 2012, Jaiswal & Abu-Ghannam 2013). To describe the changes in colour and texture of mushrooms during storage, zero-order (Eq. (5)) and first order kinetic models (Eq. (6)) were used in this study.

$$C_t=C_0\pm K_0$$ Eq.5

$$C_t=C_0\text{exp}(\pm K_1\cdot t)$$ Eq.6

where k₀ and k₁ are the kinetic rate constants (day^-1), C₀ is the rate of change in the quality factor (L*, a*, b*, C*, °h, ∆E, BI and Firmness) at initial time, C_t is the rate of change in the quality factor at time t and t is the reaction time (day).

The values of kinetic parameters (C₀ , k₀ , k₁ ) were estimated by fitting the model to the experimental data using the nonlinear least squares procedure (Microsoft Excel 2010 and Solver Add-In package of Excel) which minimizes the sum of squares of errors between the experimental and modelled data (Brown 2001, Lambert et al. 2012). The terms used to evaluate goodness of fit were the correlation coefficient (R²), chi-square (χ2) (Eq. (7)), the residual sum of squares (RSS) (Eq. (8)) and root mean square error (RSME) (Eq. (9)). The highest R² and the lowest χ2 and RMSE values indicate the best model (Kaleta & Górnicki 2010, Horuz et al. 2017). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the kinetic parameters using SPSS software v 20.0 and significant effects (p<0.05) were determined. Significant difference amongst the values was evaluated by Duncan multiple range test.

$$X^2=\frac{\underset{i=1}{\overset{N}{\sum }}(C_{\text{exp},i}-C_{pre,i}{)}^2}{N-P}$$ Eq. 7

$$RSS=\underset{i=1}{\overset{N}{\sum }}(C_{\text{exp},i}-C_{pre,i}{)}^2$$ Eq. 8

$$RMSE=\sqrt{\frac{\underset{i=1}{\overset{N}{\sum }}(C_{\text{exp},i}-C_{pre,i}{)}^2}{N}}$$ Eq. 9

where C_exp,_i is the experimental value of the ith analysis, C_pre,_i represents the predicted value of ith analysis, N is the total number of experimental data and P is the constants’ number in a particular kinetic model.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Colour and texture changes in coated samples

Changes in color and browning are the main post-harvest issues that need to be considered for commercialization of mushrooms (Liu & Wang 2012, Khan et al. 2014, Gholami et al. 2017). The change in colour from white to brown occurs over the storage period. This is an expected situation. During storage, mushroom browning occurs as a result of spontaneous oxidation, and/or activation of tyrosinase that is an enzyme belonging to the polyphenoloxidase family. In Figure 1 the changes in the colour parameters of mushroom samples coated with coating agent (chitosan solution) at different ratios during 20 days of storage at 4ºC are illustrated. L* values on both outer and inner surfaces of the mushrooms decreased as the ratio of the coating agent used and storage time increased. However, b* and a* values on both surfaces increased with the increase of storage time and the ratio of coating agent. Coating caused a lower lightness and denser red and yellow colour in the mushroom samples than the control one, probably due to the colour attributes of coating agent. Furthermore, the high water binding capacity of chitosan may supress the dripping loss of mushrooms and this is positively affected by the increase chitosan concentration used in the coating solution. As a result of that transparency may increase and L* value may decrease (Eissa 2007, Nasiri et al. 2018). During storage, a decrease in the L* value is related with mushroom browning. The reduction in L* values on both outer and inner surfaces of the control sample is higher than the others. This reduction is related with the increase in metabolism involving various enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions and leads to browning (Adiletta et al. 2016, Castelo Branco Melo et al. 2018). The a* and b* values on both outer and inner surfaces of the control sample tended to increase more since the first days of storage compared to the coated samples. The formation of more intense yellow and red colour during storage is the result of over-ripening and is expected. These show that the use of chitosan coating in mushrooms slows down their senescence process.

Figure 1
Effects of both storage time and the ratio of the coating agent used on the L* (a), a* (b), b* (c), C* (d), °h (e), ∆E (f), and BI (g) and firmness (h) properties of button mushrooms. * Some of the standart deviation bars are smaller than some symbols.

Depending on the ratio of the coating agent used, the C* values on both the inner and outer surfaces of the mushrooms increased while the ° h values on both the inner and outer surfaces of the mushrooms decreased during storage. This decrease in ° h values means that the yellowness in the colour of mushrooms reduced and the redness increased. During storage, it was observed that the C* values in the inner surface of mushrooms were slightly decreased and closely followed the b* values. This indicates that the yellow color in the inner surface of the mushrooms is more stable than the outer surface since the C* value expresses the degree of saturation of the color. Also, the C* value of the control sample was lower and the ° h value was higher than that of the coated mushrooms. It was determined that the color of the control sample was more yellowish and dull than the other samples.

Chitosan coating inhibites the increase of oxidative enzyme activity (polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, catalase, laccase) of mushroom which is associated with discoloration (Eissa 2007). Therefore, the changes in color parameters of the control samples in this study were sharper than the coated samples. In the study of Jiang & Li (2001), it was determined that chitosan coating inhibited the growth of some fungi and delayed the increase in decay of stored longan fruit. Similarly, the chitosan coating appeared to reduce the pH of the mushrooms during storage in Eissa (2007)’s study. This is an indication that chitosan coating reduces pathogen development. Pathogen development is one of the main factors causing decay of the mushroom (Eissa 2007). In this study, coating of mushrooms with chitosan could be partially useful in delaying discoloration and browning during storage, as a result of inhibating microbial growth.

The presence of the coating caused an increase in BI values as well as in ∆E values on both the inner and outer surfaces of the mushrooms at the beginning of storage. These can be ascribed to the inherent yellowish color of chitosan (Gholami et al. 2017). In addition, BI and ∆E values on both the inner and outer surfaces of the mushrooms increased with increasing storage time. The shelf life of the mushroom is closely related to the rate of respiration in the postharvest period. Nutrients such as carbohydrates, proteins and fats in its tissue are metabolized by O₂ to simple end products such as CO₂ or organic acid. This results in both the ripening and senescence of mushroom (Cliffe-Byrnes & O’Beirne 2007, Li et al. 2017). The increase in BI and ∆E values of the product during storage is also inevitable. Since the O₂ permeability of chitosan is higher than its CO₂ permeability, chitosan coating modifies the internal atmosphere of the product. In the coated mushrooms, the CO₂ concentration is higher compared with the control sample. The high CO₂ concentrations can cause damage to the mushroom cap surface tissue, resulting in high BI and ∆E values. However, another phenomenon that causes colour change and browning is the occurrence of enzymatic browning in the presence of oxygen. Gholami et al. (2017) stated that enzymatic browning played an important role in the color changes of the control samples, but was less effective on the color change of the coated mushrooms. Findings about changes in their color parameters as a result of the mushrooms coated with chitosan and their storage are in agreement with the results of studies conducted by Eissa (2007), Ali et al. (2011), Mannozzi et al. (2017), Gholami et al. (2017), Castelo Branco Melo et al. (2018), Sneha Nair et al. (2018) and Nasiri et al. (2018).

Loss of firmness is a very important parameter that gives an idea about the quality of mushroom during marketing. The chitosan coating significantly improved firmness of the mushrooms. The firmness of all samples decreased with storage, but chitosan-coated mushrooms exhibited higher firmness compared to the control sample during storage. At the end of the storage period, the control samples had the fastest firmness loss with approximately 54.59%. This was followed by 1.0% chitosan, 3.0% chitosan and 2.0% chitosan coated mushrooms with softening rates of approximately 42.53, 38.41 and 25.61%, respectively. The reason for the higher firmness values of the coated mushrooms is probably the presence of the coating agent which provides a structural rigidity at the surface of the product (Duan et al. 2011, Mannozzi et al. 2017). During storage, the mushrooms tend to soften. Softening depends on cell structure deterioration, cell wall composition and intracellular materials (Seymour et al. 1993, Hong et al. 2012). Preservation of the firmness of chitosan-treated mushrooms may be due to the reduction of respiration and other maturation processes during storage as a result of covering the cuticle and lentils of the mushrooms with the chitosan coating (Ali et al. 2005, Martínez-Romero et al. 2006, Hong et al. 2012). The observed firmness loss is similar to that reported by Ali et al. (2011), Hong et al. (2012) and Jiang et al. (2012), in studies on the effect of chitosan coating on papaya, guava, shiitake mushroom and button mushroom, respectively.

Kinetics consideration of colour and texture parameters

Experimental data for colour and texture parameters were fitted to different kinetic models. A regression analysis was performed for the kinetic equations of zero- and first-order. The estimated kinetic parameters and statistical values are presented in Tables I-IV.

Zero-order kinetic model Eq. (5) was determined to be appropriate for modelling the changes in color and textural properties of the chitosan-coated mushrooms during storage with higher R² and lower RMSE and χ2 values. Similar findings indicating that the changes in color and textural properties of foods during various treatments were compatible with the zero-order kinetic model, were observed by Kumar et al. (2006) and Jaiswal & Abu-Ghannam (2013). The kinetic reaction rates determined on both the outer and inner surface of mushrooms for all colour and texture parameters changed by varying of the ratio of chitosan used in edible coatings (Tables I-IV).

It could be said that when the ratio of chitosan coating was increased from 1% to 2%, the luminosity of the mushrooms’ colour increased, the intensity of the reddish color decreased, and thus the rate of browning and total colour change decreased (p<0.05). Similar trends were observed in the study of Eissa (2007). When the chitosan coating ratio was increased from 2% to 3%, no significant change was observed in the lightness of the mushrooms’ colour, the intensity of the reddish color, and the rate of browning and total colour (p>0.05). It was determined that the change of firmness showed the same tendency as the color change. The highest firmness was observed in 2% chitosan coated mushrooms (p<0.05) followed by both 3% and 1% chitosan coated mushrooms (p>0.05). The very high viscosity of the 3% chitosan solution causes the prolongation of its drying time on the mushrooms’ surface after the coating of the solution and that make also coating more difficult. This reduces the efficiency of the coating and makes it difficult to maintain a desired property such as texture. During storage, it was determined that both the colour and texture of the mushrooms were best preserved in 2% chitosan coated samples. In previous studies, neither the effect of 3% chitosan coating on the color and texture changes nor the effect of coating on the inner color change of the product have been determined. In this study, it was seen that the coating treatment significantly preserved the inner color of the product. The rate of chitosan coating that best preserved the inner color of the mushrooms was both 2% and 3%. It was observed that most of the kinetic reaction rates for colour parameters (except a*, ° h and BI for 3% chitosan coated mushrooms) on the inner surface of the samples coated with 2% and 3% chitosan were higher than those of the outer surface (Tables I-IV).

These mean that the yellowness on the colour of inner surface is more dominant than the redness. In addition, the browning of the inner surface in the 3% chitosan coated samples is faster than the outer surface. Results showed that the kinetic reaction rates on the inner surface of 2% chitosan coated mushrooms were 1.22 times (-0.1484 to -0.1810 day^-1) for L*, 4.01 times (0.0333 to 0.1335 day^-1) for b*, 2.51 times (0.0564 to 0.1416 day^-1) for C*, 1.90 times (0.1646 to 0.3128 day^-1) for ∆E and 1.21 times higher (0.3468 to 0.4183 day^-1) for BI compared to those on the outer surface. The kinetic reaction rates on the inner surface of 3% chitosan coated mushrooms were also 1.67 times (-0.1986 to -0.3319 day^-1) for L*, 2.90 times (0.0617 to 0.1790 day^-1) for b*, 1.54 times (0.1232 to 0.1903 day^-1) for C* and 1.64 times (0.2450 to 0.4023 day^-1) for ∆E compared to those on the outer surface. Also, the kinetic reaction rate for firmness of 2% chitosan mushrooms was determined as -0.2214 day^-1 (Table III).

Table I
The values estimated from the fittings (k, C₀) and statistical parameters (R², RSS, RMSE, X²) of zero-order and first-order models for the values of L*, a*, b* and ∆E on the outer surface of chitosan-coated mushrooms.

Kinetic	Quality Parameters	Chitosan Concentration	Kinetic Parameters		Statistical Parameters
Model Types			k (day-1)	C0	R2	RSS	RMSE	X2
Zero Order	L*	Control	-0.5213(0.0737)b	79.8096(5.6434)a	0.9999	2.3446E-07	2.1655E-04	7.8153E-08
		1%	-0.7359(0.1145)a	65.0279(6.4374)b	0.9999	3.7221E-07	2.7284E-04	1.2407E-07
		2%	-0.1484(0.0315)c	65.5118(2.7794)b	0.9999	8.9173E-08	1.3355E-04	2.9724E-08
		3%	-0.1986(0.0169)c	62.6643(2.6586)b	0.9999	2.1520E-06	6.5606E-04	7.1735E-07
	a*	Control	0.2694(0.0419)a	2.3955(0.0678)b	0.9990	9.4377E-07	4.3446E-04	3.1459E-07
		1%	0.1933(0.0273)a	6.9017(0.5856)a	0.9999	1.1736E-08	4.8448E-05	3.9120E-09
		2%	0.0876(0.0186)b	7.3036(0.5164)a	0.9996	9.6523E-07	4.3937E-04	3.2174E-07
		3%	0.0998(0.0212)b	7.6301(0.6474)a	0.9989	3.8343E-08	8.7570E-05	1.2781E-08
	b*	Control	0.4468(0.0632)a	19.3906(2.7422)a	0.9988	1.6170E-06	5.6869E-04	5.3901E-07
		1%	0.2206(0.0406)b	19.6381(2.7772)a	0.9997	4.2760E-07	2.9244E-04	1.4253E-07
		2%	0.0333(0.0061)c	25.1598(3.2023)a	0.9999	5.0925E-07	3.1914E-04	1.6975E-07
		3%	0.0617(0.0026)c	24.6809(1.7452)a	0.9999	1.7994E-07	1.8971E-04	5.9981E-08
	∆E	Control	0.6863(0.0971)a	2.0616(0.1749)b	0.9995	8.4120E-08	1.2971E-04	2.8040E-08
		1%	0.7605(0.0538)a	16.2681(0.4601)a	0.9998	9.8862E-07	4.4466E-04	3.2954E-07
		2%	0.1646(0.0349)b	17.2429(2.4385)a	0.9991	1.2540E-07	1.5837E-04	4.1801E-08
		3%	0.2450(0.0346)b	19.6490(1.3894)a	0.9998	7.8097E-08	1.2498E-04	2.6032E-08
First Order	L*	Control	-0.0070(0.0010)b	79.8873(5.6489)a	0.9996	2.9295E-02	7.6544E-02	9.7651E-03
		1%	-0.0129(0.0020)a	65.4063(6.4749)b	0.9986	2.8422E-01	2.3842E-01	9.4739E-02
		2%	-0.0023(0.0005)c	65.5268(2.7801)b	0.9999	3.0385E-01	2.4651E-01	1.0128E-01
		3%	-0.0033(0.0003)c	62.7008(2.6602)b	0.9999	1.9889E-01	1.9945E-01	6.6297E-02
	a*	Control	0.0524(0.0082)a	2.8247(0.0799)b	0.9770	6.5402E-01	3.6167E-01	2.1801E-01
		1%	0.0203(0.0029)b	7.1840(0.6096)a	0.9964	4.1766E-02	9.1396E-02	1.3922E-02
		2%	0.0102(0.0022)b	7.3851(0.5222)a	0.9991	1.9784E-03	1.9891E-02	6.5945E-04
		3%	0.011(0.0023)b	7.7250(0.6555)a	0.9989	2.9455E-03	2.4271E-02	9.8184E-04
	b*	Control	0.0180(0.0025)a	19.7781(2.7970)a	0.9972	1.5865E-01	1.7813E-01	5.2884E-02
		1%	0.0097(0.0018)b	19.7998(2.8001)a	0.9992	1.0998E-02	4.6900E-02	3.6661E-03
		2%	0.0013(0.0002)c	25.1631(3.2027)a	0.9999	1.9559E-05	1.9778E-03	6.5196E-06
		3%	0.0024(0.0001)c	24.6889(1.7458)a	0.9999	1.2945E-03	1.6090E-02	4.3149E-04
	∆E	Control	0.0747(0.0106)a	3.7657(0.3195)b	0.9551	1.6242E+01	1.8023E+00	5.4140E+00
		1%	0.0308(0.0022)b	17.2838(0.4889)a	0.9918	1.4450E+00	5.3759E-01	4.8166E-01
		2%	0.0086(0.0012)c	17.3149(2.4487)a	0.9994	4.7436E-03	3.0801E-02	1.5812E-03
		3%	0.0108(0.0023)c	19.8028(1.4003)a	0.9990	1.6347E-02	5.7179E-02	5.4491E-03

Table II
The values estimated from the fittings (k, C₀) and statistical parameters (R², RSS, RMSE, X²) of zero-order and first-order models for the values of L*, a*, b* and ∆E on the inner surface of chitosan-coated mushrooms.

Kinetic	Quality Parameters	Chitosan Concentration	Kinetic Parameters		Statistical Parameters
Model Types			k (day-1)	C0	R2	RSS	RMSE	X2
Zero Order	L*	Control	-0.8441(0.1074)a	90.4206(8.9512)a	0.9999	8.2267E-07	4.0563E-04	2.7422E-07
		1%	-0.6814(0.0193)b	88.7522(6.2757)a	0.9999	8.5869E-07	4.1441E-04	2.8623E-07
		2%	-0.1810(0.0282)c	82.0317(3.4803)a	0.9999	2.0389E-07	2.0194E-04	6.7964E-08
		3%	-0.3319(0.0282)c	82.9425(2.3460)a	0.9999	5.7279E-07	3.3846E-04	1.9093E-07
	a*	Control	0.1914(0.0271)a	0.3743(0.0159)b	0.9991	1.6140E-07	1.7967E-04	5.3802E-08
		1%	0.0762(0.0162)b	1.3696(0.1162)a	0.9999	1.8185E-07	1.9071E-04	6.0618E-08
		2%	0.0643(0.0100)b	1.4127(0.1199)a	0.9992	3.7582E-08	8.6697E-05	1.2527E-08
		3%	0.0691(0.0098)b	1.3792(0.0975)a	0.9999	1.7128E-06	5.8528E-04	5.7092E-07
	b*	Control	0.4897(0.0346)a	10.0785(0.8552)b	0.9995	1.2414E-06	4.9828E-04	4.1380E-07
		1%	0.2769(0.0235)b	13.0635(0.7390)a	0.9999	1.7908E-06	5.9846E-04	5.9692E-07
		2%	0.1335(0.0057)c	14.3525(1.0149)a	0.9999	1.2416E-06	4.9832E-04	4.1387E-07
		3%	0.1790(0.0152)c	14.8141(1.4665)a	0.9998	4.9657E-08	9.9656E-05	1.6552E-08
	∆E	Control	0.9962(0.1127)a	-1.0869(0.0922)c	0.9995	1.0356E-06	4.5511E-04	3.4520E-07
		1%	0.6675(0.0472)b	2.6045(0.3683)b	0.9987	1.7105E-06	5.8490E-04	5.7017E-07
		2%	0.3128(0.0354)c	7.6778(0.2172)a	0.9990	7.1695E-07	3.7867E-04	2.3898E-07
		3%	0.4023(0.0284)c	7.5756(0.5357)a	0.9999	1.6050E-06	5.6657E-04	5.3500E-07
First Order	L*	Control	-0.0123(0.0017)a	93.339(6.6001)a	0.9987	6.0201E-01	3.4699E-01	2.0067E-01
		1%	-0.0083(0.0018)b	88.8988(3.7717)a	0.9994	5.4973E-01	3.3158E-01	1.8324E-01
		2%	-0.0023(0.0004)c	82.068(8.1243)a	0.9999	3.0876E-01	2.4850E-01	1.0292E-01
		3%	-0.0042(0.0004)c	83.0353(3.5229)a	0.9998	1.3386E-01	1.6362E-01	4.4620E-02
	a*	Control	0.0731(0.0114)a	1.0098(0.0714)b	0.9569	2.0258E+00	6.3652E-01	6.7526E-01
		1%	0.0318(0.0067)b	1.5329(0.1301)a	0.9913	1.9356E-02	6.2219E-02	6.4520E-03
		2%	0.0269(0.0038)b	1.5672(0.0443)a	0.9937	1.0012E-02	4.4749E-02	3.3374E-03
		3%	0.0296(0.0063)b	1.5269(0.1296)a	0.9924	1.3326E-02	5.1625E-02	4.4419E-03
	b*	Control	0.0290(0.0041)a	11.1375(1.2601)b	0.9927	6.5031E-01	3.6064E-01	2.1677E-01
		1%	0.0160(0.0007)b	13.4799(1.3344)a,b	0.9978	5.2498E-02	1.0247E-01	1.7499E-02
		2%	0.0083(0.0011)c	14.4341(1.2248)a,b	0.9994	2.9284E-03	2.4201E-02	9.7612E-04
		3%	0.0102(0.0014)b,c	14.9831(1.0595)a	0.9991	8.2258E-03	4.0561E-02	2.7419E-03
	∆E	Control	0.0952(0.0040)a	2.9799(0.1686)b	0.9306	2.3329E+01	2.1600E+00	7.7763E+00
		1%	0.0712(0.0050)b	4.1258(0.1167)b	0.9589	1.1457E+01	1.5137E+00	3.8190E+00
		2%	0.0253(0.0025)c	8.3633(0.7096)a	0.9944	2.0119E-01	2.0060E-01	6.7064E-02
		3%	0.0311(0.0026)c	8.4222(0.5955)a	0.9917	5.0173E-01	3.1677E-01	1.6724E-01

Table III
The values estimated from the fittings (k, C₀) and statistical parameters (R₂, RSS, RMSE, X²) of zero-order and first-order models for the values of C*, ° h, BI and Firmness on the outer surface of chitosan-coated mushrooms.

Kinetic	Quality Parameters	Chitosan Concentration	Kinetic Parameters		Statistical Parameters
Model Types			k (day-1)	C0	R2	RSS	RMSE	X2
Zero Order	C*	Control	0.4938(0.0489)a	19.5022(0.5516)b	0.9989	4.6667E-07	3.0551E-04	1.5556E-07
		1%	0.2399(0.0068)b	21.1080(0.8955)b	0.9999	1.3927E+01	1.6690E+00	4.6425E+00
		2%	0.0564(0.0080)c	26.2358(2.2262)a	0.9999	5.2451E-07	3.2389E-04	1.7484E-07
		3%	0.1232(0.0139)c	25.6115(1.8110)a	0.9999	5.9252E-07	3.4424E-04	1.9751E-07
	° h	Control	-0.4290(0.0182)a	82.6782(3.5077)a	0.9999	2.1278E-07	2.0629E-04	7.0925E-08
		1%	-0.2048(0.0174)b	72.3979(6.1432)a	0.9999	4.7313E-07	3.0761E-04	1.5771E-07
		2%	-0.1571(0.0244)b	73.7961(5.2182)a	0.9999	8.4291E-08	1.2984E-04	2.8097E-08
		3%	-0.1868(0.0264)b	70.4251(6.9717)a	0.9999	4.6924E-07	3.0635E-04	1.5641E-07
	BI	Control	1.3418(0.0569)b	210.1296(14.8584)a	0.9999	1.7580E-06	5.9297E-04	5.8601E-07
		1%	1.8335(0.1556)a	219.8700(21.7660)a	0.9999	1.8892E-07	1.9438E-04	6.2973E-08
		2%	0.3468(0.0245)c	235.6385(19.9946)a	0.9999	1.9410E-05	1.9703E-03	6.4701E-06
		3%	0.5469(0.0464)c	238.1944(13.4743)a	0.9999	8.7384E-05	4.1805E-03	2.9128E-05
	Firmness	Control	-0.5190(0.0587)a	19.0129(0.5378)a	0.9988	5.5021E-07	3.3172E-04	1.8340E-07
		1%	-0.4119(0.0466)a,b	19.3679(2.7390)a	0.9997	3.8416E-08	8.7654E-05	1.2805E-08
		2%	-0.2214(0.0157)c	17.2904(1.2226)a	0.9991	6.9652E-07	3.7323E-04	2.3217E-07
		3%	-0.3901(0.0276)b	20.3109(1.7234)a	0.9996	5.4191E-07	3.2922E-04	1.8064E-07
First Order	C*	Control	0.0195(0.0028)a	19.9376(1.4098)c	0.9967	2.2540E-01	2.1232E-01	7.5134E-02
		1%	0.0098(0.0003)b	21.2894(1.5054)b,c	0.9992	1.3471E-02	5.1907E-02	4.4905E-03
		2%	0.0021(0.0003)c	26.2456(1.1135)a	0.9999	3.7620E-05	2.7430E-03	1.2540E-05
		3%	0.0045(0.0004)c	25.6472(2.1762)a,b	0.9998	7.4756E-04	1.2228E-02	2.4919E-04
	° h	Control	-0.0055(0.0002)a	82.7266(3.5098)a	0.9997	9.8944E-01	4.4485E-01	3.2981E-01
		1%	-0.0048(0.0003)a	74.1412(2.0970)a	0.9998	2.9031E-02	7.6199E-02	9.6772E-03
		2%	-0.0022(0.0003)b	73.8300(7.3088)a	0.9999	1.1760E-01	1.5336E-01	3.9198E-02
		3%	-0.0027(0.0002)b	70.4447(5.9774)a	0.9999	2.5699E-01	2.2671E-01	8.5665E-02
	BI	Control	0.0060(0.0008)b	210.4270(20.8312)a	0.9997	1.4402E-01	1.6972E-01	4.8006E-02
		1%	0.0076(0.0003)a	220.6032(24.9584)a	0.9995	4.3923E-01	2.9639E-01	1.4641E-01
		2%	0.0014(0.0002)d	235.6689(19.9972)a	0.9999	1.0763E-01	1.4672E-01	3.5876E-02
		3%	0.0028(0.0002)c	236.7062(13.3901)a	0.9999	9.9709E-02	1.4122E-01	3.3236E-02
	Firmness	Control	-0.0350(0.0015)a	19.0688(1.3484)a,b	0.9895	1.6657E-04	5.7718E-03	5.5523E-05
		1%	-0.0358(0.0025)a	21.7647(0.6156)a	0.9890	6.4510E-03	3.5919E-02	2.1503E-03
		2%	-0.0149(0.0015)c	17.4196(1.2318)b	0.9981	2.6909E-03	2.3199E-02	8.9698E-04
		3%	-0.0257(0.0022)b	21.0615(1.7871)a,b	0.9943	1.3000E-02	5.0990E-02	4.3334E-03

Table IV
The values estimated from the fittings (k, C₀) and statistical parameters (R₂, RSS, RMSE, X²) of zero-order and first-order models for the values of C*, ° h and BI on the inner surface of chitosan-coated mushrooms.

Kinetic	Quality Parameters	Chitosan Concentration	Kinetic Parameters		Statistical Parameters
Model Types			k (day-1)	C0	R2	RSS	RMSE	X2
Zero Order	C*	Control	0.5140(0.0509)a	10.0480(0.2842)b	0.9998	5.2394E-09	3.2371E-05	1.7465E-09
		1%	0.2824(0.0240)b	13.153(0.5580)a	0.9997	2.5691E-08	7.1681E-05	8.5635E-09
		2%	0.1416(0.0160)c	14.4137(0.6115)a	0.9999	1.9735E-06	6.2825E-04	6.5784E-07
		3%	0.1903(0.0108)c	14.8521(1.0502)a	0.9996	2.3457E-06	6.8493E-04	7.8189E-07
	° h	Control	-0.4677(0.0331)a	86.9153(2.4583)a	0.9999	2.0937E-06	6.4709E-04	6.9789E-07
		1%	-0.1878(0.0159)b	84.4217(5.9695)a	0.9999	1.5467E-07	1.7588E-04	5.1557E-08
		2%	-0.1031(0.0087)c	83.8114(7.1116)a	0.9999	3.9577E-07	2.8134E-04	1.3192E-07
		3%	-0.1861(0.0158)b	84.5941(8.3744)a	0.9999	1.3702E-07	1.6554E-04	4.5675E-08
	BI	Control	1.1676(0.1321)a	191.0624(18.9142)a	0.9999	4.3590E-05	2.9526E-03	1.4530E-05
		1%	0.5156(0.0438)b	197.6183(19.5632)a	0.9999	2.1654E-05	2.0810E-03	7.2179E-06
		2%	0.4183(0.0473)b	199.3064(14.0931)a	0.9999	7.6273E-05	3.9057E-03	2.5424E-05
		3%	0.4714(0.0400)b	200.2262(11.3265)a	0.9999	7.9938E-05	3.9984E-03	2.6646E-05
First Order	C*	Control	0.0303(0.0034)a	11.1287(1.1017)b	0.9921	5.2394E-09	3.2371E-05	1.7465E-09
		1%	0.0161(0.0005)b	13.5814(0.9604)a,b	0.9977	1.8511E+01	1.9241E+00	6.1704E+00
		2%	0.0087(0.0012)c	14.5042(1.2307)a	0.9993	3.9257E-03	2.8020E-02	1.3086E-03
		3%	0.0108(0.0009)c	15.0367(0.6380)a	0.9990	1.0374E-02	4.5551E-02	3.4581E-03
	° h	Control	-0.0064(0.0003)a	87.8475(3.7271)a	0.9996	4.6550E-01	3.0512E-01	1.5517E-01
		1%	-0.0023(0.0002)b	84.4559(7.1663)a	0.9999	3.7840E-01	2.7510E-01	1.2613E-01
		2%	-0.0012(0.0001)c	83.8196(8.2977)a	0.9999	3.0697E-01	2.4778E-01	1.0232E-01
		3%	-0.0023(0.0002)b	84.6166(5.9833)a	0.9999	3.1229E-01	2.4992E-01	1.0410E-01
	BI	Control	0.0063(0.0006)a	189.7318(18.7825)a	0.9997	1.4325E-01	1.6927E-01	4.7752E-02
		1%	0.0025(0.0002)b	197.6830(19.5696)a	0.9999	6.2625E-02	1.1192E-01	2.0875E-02
		2%	0.0020(0.0003)b	199.4054(16.9201)a	0.9999	6.6830E-02	1.1561E-01	2.2277E-02
		3%	0.0023(0.0002)b	200.3130(14.1643)a	0.9999	2.6427E-03	2.2990E-02	8.8091E-04

CONCLUSIONS

As the food industry tends to innovative packaging practices such as edible coatings instead of traditional food packaging, chitosan coating could be considered as a potential source for senescence inhibition of cold-stored mushrooms. Chitosan coating treatment provided the maintenance of tissue firmness and colour quality of mushrooms. Colour change kinetics on the inner and outer surfaces of mushrooms and texture change kinetics were explained by zero-order kinetic models. Using 2% chitosan as the coating material, it was found that the color parameters of the mushrooms together with their texture properties were better preserved during storage compared to other coating applications. However, microbiological evaluations are required in future studies to express that this coating extends the shelf life of the mushrooms. The results revealed that the chitosan coating, especially the use of high ratio chitosan solution as the coating agent, has the potential to retard color changes and improve texture quality of the button mushrooms. This study presents valuable data to producers that can help meet the demand and expectations of consumers regarding extending shelf life by preserving the color and texture properties of mushrooms. This study can be a reference for future studies about edible coating of different foods.

REFERENCES

• ADILETTA G, RUSSO P, SENADEERA W & DI MATTEO M. 2016. Drying characteristics and quality of grape under physical pretreatment. J Food Eng 172: 9-18.
• ALI A, MUHAMMAD MTM, SIJAM K & MOHAMAD ZAKI AR. 2005. Effect of chitosan coating on the retention of colour development and firmness of papaya fruit during storage. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on papaya, 22-24th November, Genting Highlands, Malaysia.
• ALI A, MUHAMMAD MTM, SIJAM K & SIDDIQUI Y. 2011. Effect of chitosan coatings on the physicochemical characteristics of eksotika II papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit during cold storage. Food Chem 124(2): 620-626.
• ALI MA, YUSOF YA, CHIN NL, IBRAHIM MN & BASRA SMA. 2014. Drying kinetics and colour analysis of Moringa oleifera leaves. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 2: 394-400.
• BROWN AM. 2001. A step-by-step guide to non-linear regression analysis of experimental data using a microsoft excel spreadsheet. Comput Meth Prog Bıo 65: 191-200.
• CASTELO BRANCO MELO NF ET AL. 2018. Effects of fungal chitosan nanoparticles as eco-friendly edible coatings on the quality of postharvest table grapes. Postharvest Biol Tec 139: 56-66.
• CHEN CR & RAMASWAMY HS. 2002. Color and texture change kinetics in ripening bananas. LWT - Food Sci Technol 35: 415-419.
• CLIFFE-BYRNES VD & O’BEIRNE D. 2007. Effects of gas atmosphere and temperature on the respiration rates of whole and sliced mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus)-implications for film permeability in modified atmosphere packages. J Food Sci 72: 197-204.
• DAS I & ARORA A. 2018. Alternate microwave and convective hot air application for rapid mushroom drying. J Food Eng 223: 208-219.
• DEHGHANI S, HOSSEINI SV & REGENSTEIN JM. 2018. Edible films and coatings in seafood preservation: a review. Food Chem 240: 505-513.
• DEMBITSKY VM, TERENT’EV AO & LEVITSKY DO. 2010. Amino and fatty acids of wild edible mushrooms of the genus boletus. Rec Nat Prod 4: 218-223.
• DING Y, ZHU Z, ZHAO J, NIE Y, ZHANG Y, SHENG J, MENG D, MAO H & TANG X. 2016. Effects of postharvest brassinolide treatment on the metabolism of white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) in relation to development of browning during storage. Food Bioproc Tech 9(8): 1327-1334.
• DONG H, CHENG L, TAN J, ZHENG K & JIANG Y. 2004. Effects of chitosan coating on quality and shelf life of peeled litchi fruit. J Food Eng 64: 355-358.
• DUAN J, WU R, STRIK BC & ZHAO Y. 2011. Effect of edible coatings on the quality of fresh blueberries (Duke and Elliott) under commercial storage conditions. Postharvest Biol Tec 59: 71e79.
• EISSA HAA 2007. Effect of chitosan coating on shelf life and quality of fresh-cut mushroom. J Food Qual 30: 623-645.
• EL-GHAOUTH A, SMILANICK JL & WILSON CL. 2000. Enhancement of the performance of candida saitoana by the addition of glycolchitosan for the control of postharvest decay of apple and citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol Tec 19: 103-110.
• GAO P, ZHU Z & ZHANG P. 2013. Effects of chitosan-glucose complex coating on postharvest quality and shelf life of table grapes. Carbohydr Polym 95(1): 371-378.
• GHOLAMI R, AHMADI E & FARRIS S. 2017. Shelf life extension of white mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) by low temperatures conditioning, modified atmosphere, and nanocomposite packaging material. Food Packag Shelf Life 14: 88-95.
• GONÇALVES EM, PINHEIRO J, ABREU M, BRANDÃO TRS & SILVA CLM. 2007. Modelling the kinetics of peroxidase inactivation, colour and texture changes of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima L.) during blanching. J Food Eng 81 (4): 693-701.
• HELENO S A, BARROS L, SOUSA MJ, MARTINS A & FERREIRA ICFR. 2010. Tocopherols composition of portuguese wild mushrooms with antioxidant capacity. Food Chem 119: 1443-1450.
• HONG K, XIE J, ZHANG L, SUN D & GONG D. 2012. Effects of chitosan coating on postharvest life and quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruit during cold storage. Sci Hort 144: 172-178.
• HORUZ E, BOZKURT H, KARATAŞ H & MASKAN M. 2017. Effects of hybrid (microwave-convectional) and convectional drying on drying kinetics, total phenolics, antioxidant capacity, vitamin C, color and rehydration capacity of sour cherries. Food Chem 230: 295-305.
• JAISWAL AK & ABU-GHANNAM N. 2013. Degradation kinetic modelling of color, texture, polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of york cabbage after microwave processing. Food Res Int 53 (1): 125-133.
• JAISWAL AK, GUPTA S & ABU-GHANNAM N. 2012. Kinetic evaluation of colour, texture, polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of Irish york cabbage after blanching treatment. Food Chem 131(1): 63-72.
• JIANG Y & LI Y. 2001. Effects of chitosan on postharvest life and quality of longan fruit. Food Chem 73: 139-143.
• JIANG T, FENG L & LI J. 2012. Changes in microbial and postharvest quality of shiitake mushroom (Lentinus edodes) treated with chitosan-glucose complex coating under cold storage. Food Chem 131 (3): 780-786.
• JIANG T, FENG L, ZHENG X & LI J. 2013. Physicochemical responses and microbial characteristics of shiitake mushroom (Lentinus edodes) to gum arabic coating enriched with natamycin during storage. Food Chem 138(2-3): 1992-1997.
• KAHYAOGLU T & KAYA S. 2006. Modeling of moisture, color and texture changes in sesame seeds during the conventional roasting. J Food Eng 75(2): 167-177.
• KALETA A & GÓRNICKI K. 2010. Evaluation of drying models of apple (var. McIntosh) dried in a convective dryer. Int J Food Sci Tech 45(5): 891-898.
• KHAN ZU, AISIKAER G, KHAN RU, BU J, JIANG Z, NI Z & YING T. 2014. Effects of composite chemical pretreatment on maintaining quality in button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol Tec 95: 36-41.
• KITTUR FS, SAROJA N & THARANATHAN HRN. 2001. Polysaccharide-based composite coating formulations for shelf-life extension of fresh banana and mango. Eur Food Res Technol 213: 306-311.
• KUMAR AJ, SINGH RRBÃ, PATEL AA & PATIL GR. 2006. Kinetics of colour and texture changes in gulabjamun balls during deep-fat frying. LWT - Food Sci Technol 39: 827-833.
• KUMAR P, SETHI S, SHARMA RR, SRIVASTAV M & VARGHESE E. 2017. Effect of chitosan coating on postharvest life and quality of plum during storage at low temperature. Sci Hortic 226: 104-109.
• LAMBERT RJW, MYTILINAIOS I, MAITLAND L & BROWN AM. 2012. Monte carlo simulation of parameter confidence intervals for non-linear regression analysis of biological data using microsoft excel. Comput Meth Prog Bio 107(2): 155-163.
• LAU MH, TANG J & SWANSON BG. 2000. Kinetics of textural and color changes in green asparagus during thermal treatments. J Food Eng 45: 231-236.
• LI N, CHEN F, CUI F, SUN W, ZHANG J, QIAN L & YANG Y. 2017. Improved postharvest quality and respiratory activity of straw mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) with ultrasound treatment and controlled relative humidity. Sci Hortic 225: 56-64.
• LIU Z & WANG X. 2012. Changes in color, antioxidant, and free radical scavenging enzyme activity of mushrooms under high oxygen modified atmospheres. Postharvest Biol Tec 69: 1-6.
• MANNOZZI C, CECCHINI JP, TYLEWICZ U, SIROLI L, PATRIGNANI F, LANCIOTTI R, ROCCULI P, DALLA ROSA M & ROMANI S. 2017. Study on the efficacy of edible coatings on quality of blueberry fruits during shelf-life. LWT - Food Sci Technol 85: 440-444.
• MARTÍNEZ-ROMERO D, ALBURQUERQUE N, VALVERDE JM, GUILLÉN F, CASTILLO S & VALERO D. 2006. Postharvest sweet cherry quality and safety maintenance by aloe vera treatment: a new edible coating. Postharvest Biol Tec 39: 92-100.
• MIN S, HARRIS LJ & KROCHTA JM. 2005. Listeria monocytogenes inhibition by whey protein films and coatings incorporating the lactoperoxidase system. J Food Sci 70: 317-324.
• MOTEVALI A, MINAEI S, KHOSHTAGHAZA MH & AMIRNEJAT H. 2011. Comparison of energy consumption and specific energy requirements of different methods for drying mushroom slices. Energy 36: 6433e6441.
• MUSZYŃSKA B, GRZYWACZ-KISIELEWSKA A, KAŁA K & GDULA-ARGASIŃSKA J. 2018. Anti-inflammatory properties of edible mushrooms: a review. Food Chem 243: 373-381.
• NASIRI M, BARZEGAR M, SAHARI MA & NIAKOUSARI M. 2018. Application of tragacanth gum impregnated with satureja khuzistanica essential oil as a natural coating for enhancement of postharvest quality and shelf life of button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Int J Biol Macromol 106: 218-226.
• PARDESHİ BM & PARDESHİ PM. 2009. The edible medicinal mushrooms as supportive natural nutrients: study of non-volatile mineral contents of some edible medicinal mushrooms from ındia; eastern remedies for modern western Maladies. In: Proceedings of Fifth International Medicinal Mushroom Conference, 18-21st June, Mycological Society of China, Nantong, China.
• RAJARATHNAM SMN & SHASHIREKHA ZB. 1998. Biodegradative and biosynthetic capacities of mushrooms: present and future strategies. Crit Rev Biotechnol 18(2-3): 91-236.
• RATHORE H, PRASAD S & SHARMA S. 2017. Mushroom nutraceuticals for improved nutrition and better human health: a review. PharmaNutrition 5(2): 35-46.
• REIS FS, BARROS L, MARTINS A & FERREIRA ICFR. 2012. Chemical composition and nutritional value of the most widely appreciated cultivated mushrooms: an inter-species comparative study. Food Chem Toxicol 50(2): 191-197.
• SEYMOUR GB, TAYLOR JE & TUCKER GA. 1993. Biochemistry of fruit ripening, London: Chapman and Hall Publishing, 454 p.
• SNEHA NAIR M, SAXENA A & KAUR C. 2018. Effect of chitosan and alginate based coatings enriched with pomegranate peel extract to extend the postharvest quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Food Chem 240: 245-252.
• SUSENO N, SAVITRI E, SAPEI L & PADMAWIJAYA KS. 2014. Improving shelf-life of cavendish banana using chitosan edible coating. Procedia Chem 9: 113-120.
• TEZOTTO-ULIANA JV, FARGONI GP, GEERDINK GM & KLUGE RA. 2014. Chitosan applications pre- or postharvest prolong raspberry shelf-life quality. Postharvest Biol Tec 91: 72e77.
• WANG SY & GAO H. 2013. Effect of chitosan-based edible coating on antioxidants, antioxidant enzyme system, and postharvest fruit quality of strawberries (Fragaria X Aranassa Duch.). LWT - Food Sci Technol 52(2): 71-79.
• ZHANG K, PU Y & SUN D-W. 2018. Recent advances in quality preservation of postharvest mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus): a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 78: 72-82.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  12 June 2020
• Date of issue
  2020

History

• Received
  26 Dec 2018
• Accepted
  18 July 2019