INTRODUCTION
Discovered in 1909 by the Brazilian physician and researcher Carlos Chagas, Chagas disease is a systemic parasitic infection caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi. with a chronic phase following an acute phase(1). Chagas disease is recognized by the World Health Organization as one of the 13 most neglected tropical diseases in the world, and it remains a social and economic problem in several Latin American countries(2).
Few studies have evaluated the ocular repercussions of Chagas disease, although Romaña's sign was one of the first acute phase manifestations to be reported(3). Conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, iridocyclitis, and choroiditis anterior and posterior uveitis have been described in congenital Chagas disease with remission after treatment of the disease(4).
Autonomic nervous system (ANS) involvement, characteristic of the chronic phase of Chagas disease, was reported in studies showing abnormal pupillary responses to diluted pilocarpine and intraocular pressure (IOP) postural variability(5,6). In the chronic phase of the disea se, chronic heart failure (CHF) occurs in some chagasic patients and may be involved in alterations of the optic nerve (ON) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)(7).
The present study attempted to identify changes in ON and RNFL in patients with chronic Chagas disease. The systemic disturbances of the disease, whether related to inflammatory, vascular, or ASN dysfunction, are associated with ON and RNFL and may be related to lesion segmentation.
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional study at the Brazilian Institute of Ophthalmology and Blindness Prevention (IBOPC) including individuals diagnosed with Chagas disease who were treated at the Chagas outpatient clinic at São Rafael Hospital, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Noncar diopathic volunteers matched by sex and age (with a ma ximum difference of ± 2 years) were included as the control group. IBOPC employees were recruited as vo lunteers to perform periodic exams with screening for cardiopathies. When matching criteria could not be achieved, employees' relatives were recruited provided there was no consanguinity among the participants. Relatives were questioned regarding follow-up with a cardiologist in the last 6 months. The study was approved by São Rafael Hospital Research Ethics Committee and adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Signed informed consent for research was obtained from all subjects prior to enrollment.
Patients were excluded if they were systemically unstable because of the disease; had a prior history of significant ocular disease, ocular trauma, spherical equivalent greater than ±4 diopters (D), or chronic corti cos teroid use; and had dense optical media opacities, prior cardiac transplantation, any neurological disease, or me dication that could interfere with ANS functioning.
A complete questionnaire asking questions about family, medical, and ophthalmological evaluations was answered by all individuals. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure measurements were obtained during the examination and used to calculate mean arterial pressure (MAP) according to the following formula: MAP = 2/3 × DBP + 1/3 × SBP.(8) All subjects underwent a standardized examination including improved corrected visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, ultrasonic pachymetry (Ocuscan RxP, Alcon Laboratories Inc.,Irvine, California, USA), fundus biomicroscopy, standard automated perimetry (SITA 24-2, Humphrey Field Analyzer II, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA), color retinography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Cirrus Optical Coherence Tomography; Carl Zeiss Meditec).
The mean value of three consecutive IOP measurements, taken between 8:00 and 11:00 a.m., was considered for the analysis. Criteria for visual field reliability included fixation losses, false positive, and false negative <33%. Retinography evaluations were performed by an experienced examiner blinded to patients' clinical data.
OCT exams with signal quality <8 and/or misaligned or decentered images during acquisition were not included in the study.
Mean ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) was calculated according to the following formula: OPP = 2/3 × MAP - IOP(8).
Diagnosis of increased cup-to-disc ratio suggestive of glaucoma was based on one of the following criteria(9): (1) vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) 30.7, asymmetry between right and left VCDR 30.15, or neural rhythm remnant <10% of ON diameter in the upper or lower quadrants and a consistent visual field defect with glaucoma; or (2) VCDR 30.85 in both eyes or asymmetry between right and left VCDR 30.3 if a reliable field test result could not be achieved.
Visual field defect was defined as consistent with glaucoma if glaucoma hemifield test was graded “outside normal limits” with a cluster of 3 contiguous points on the pattern deviation plot at the 5% level, with at least 1 at the 1% level, using the threshold test strategy with the 24-2 test pattern of the Zeiss Humphrey field analyzer(9).
The primary outcome was designated as “ON/RNFL changes” based on the presence of 31 of the following in at least one eye: (1) increased cup-to-disc ratio suggestive of glaucoma; (2) ON peripapillary hemorrhage, notch, and/or pallor; (3) RNFL defects visible on retinography; and (4) decreased RNFL thickness in the OCT device's software analysis as present in <1% of the normal population in the same age group and sex.
Statistical analysis
The McNemar test and the paired t-test were used to compare proportions and means, respectively, between the chagasic and control groups. The values of only one randomly chosen eye of each individual were used in the statistical analysis. Two-tailed probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
The mean VCDR standard deviation identified in a previous study was used to estimate that 39 individuals in each group would be required to have a power of 80% (alpha= 5%) to detect a 0.1 difference in the VCDR between the groups. A standard deviation of 0.19 was considered in the case group and 0.15 in the control group, an intracluster correlation between both eyes of the same subject of 0.85, and a significance level of 0.05%(7).
RESULTS
Overall, 41 chagasic patients and 41 age- and sex-mat ched controls were enrolled in this study. The patients' primary characteristics are shown in table 1.
Table 1 Clinical characteristics
Chagas group | Control group | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
N | 41 | 41 | |
Age (years) | 59.4 ± 8.3 | 59.3 ± 8.5 | NA |
Female | 26 (63.4%) | 26 (63.4%) | NA |
Arterial hypertension | 32 (78.0%) | 16 (39.0%) | 0.002* |
Diabetes Mellitus | 04 (09.3%) | 01 (02.4%) | 0.380 |
Stroke report | 04 (09.3%) | 01 (02.4%) | 0.360 |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 136 ± 22.0 | 140 ± 20.7 | 0.350 |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 083 ± 13.3 | 084 ± 12.5 | 0.600 |
Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 101 ±15.5 | 103 ± 14.4 | 0.470 |
Heart rate (bpm) | 061 ± 10.6 | 075 ± 10.5 | 0.000 |
NA= not applicable;
*P value calculated with paired t-test and McNemar test.
The most commonly used medications in both groups were angiotensin II receptor antagonists, followed by b-blockers and hydrochlorothiazide in the Chagas group and hydrochlorothiazide and calcium channel blockers in the control group as listed in table 2.
Table 2 Medications used
Chagas group n (%) | Control group n (%) | |
---|---|---|
Angiotensin receptor antagonist | 21 (51.2%) | 12 (29.3%) |
β-blockers | 20 (48.8%) | 02 (04.9%) |
ACE Inhibitors | 02 (04.9%) | |
Calcium channel blockers | 3 (07.3%) | 05 (12.2%) |
Digoxin | 2 (04.9%) | 0 |
Anticoagulants | 7 (17.1%) | 01 (02.4%) |
Diuretics | ||
Hydrochlorothiazide | 18 (43.9%) | 06 (14.6%) |
Spironolactone | 6 (14.6%) | 0 |
Furosemide | 9 (21.9%) | 0 |
Others | 10 (24.4%) | 06 (14.6%) |
ACE= angiotensin-converting enzyme
In the Chagas group, 15 patients (36.6%) presented the cardiac disease form and CHF, 14 (34.1%) presented the cardiac disease form without CHF, and 12 (29.3%) presented the indeterminate form.
Evaluation of echocardiographic results in patients with Chagas disease is shown in table 3. Heart rate variability was 118 ± 41 in chagasic patients with CHF, 137 ± 21 in chagasic patients without CHF, and 125 ± 22 in chagasic patients with indeterminate form (p=0.32).
Table 3 Echocardiographic parameters of Chagas disease patients
Cardiac form with CHF | Cardiac form without CHF | Indeterminate form | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Left ventricular ejection (%) | 38 ± 17.9 | 67 ± 6.5 | 069 ± 07.4 | <0.01 |
Left ventricular dysfunction | 0.92 ± 0.28 | 00.00 | 00.00 | <0.01 |
Left ventricular end-systolic volume (ml) | 155 ± 90.1 | 041 ± 14.2 | 039 ± 11.9 | <0.01 |
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (ml) | 231 ± 79.2 | 122 ± 27.0 | 124 ± 22.7 | <0.01 |
Right ventricular ejection (%) | 049 ± 16.7 | 059 ± 10.0 | 066 ± 07.7 | <0.01 |
Right ventricular end-systolic volume (ml) | 057 ± 28.5 | 054 ± 29.3 | 035 ± 12.5 | 0.08 |
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (ml) | 113 ± 37.4 | 108 ± 33.5 | 102 ± 21.8 | 0.66 |
* P value calculated with ANOVA.
CHF= chronic heart failure.
Ophthalmologic examination results are summarized in table 4.
Table 4 Ophthalmologic examination results
Chagas group | Control group | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Corrected visual acuity | 000.89 ± 00.24 | 000.93 ± 0.19 | 0.57 |
Mean spherical equivalent (D) | 001.30 ± 01.00 | 001.18 ± 1.26 | 0.64 |
Intraocular pressure (mmHg) | 014.50 ± 03.80 | 013.90 ± 3.50 | 0.38 |
Ocular perfusion pressure, Mean (mmHg) | 052.60 ± 10.70 | 054.80 ± 10.6 | 0.31 |
Central corneal thickness, Mean (μ) | 519.90 ± 35.40 | 520.50 ± 32.7 | 0.94 |
Vertical cup-to-disc ratio, Mean | 000.59 ± 00.20 | 000.48 ± 0.16 | 0.004* |
Horizontal cup-to-disc ratio, Mean | 000.53 ± 00.19 | 000.45 ± 0.14 | 0.020* |
*P value calculated with paired t-test
Gonioscopy examinations showed no cases of angular narrowing.
The Chagas group presented 24 patients (59%) with ON/RNFL changes versus 7 (17%) in the control group (p=0.01).
An increased cup-to-disc ratio suggestive of glaucoma was seen in 13 patients (31.7%) in the Chagas group and 2 (4.9%) in the control group (p=0.003).
Retinography showed that RNFL defects were detected in five eyes of four chagasic patients and in one control eye. Peripapillary hemorrhage was observed in three eyes of three chagasic patients and in none of the controls. Neural rim notch was observed in three eyes of two chagasic patients and in none of the controls. ON pallor was observed in three eyes of two chagasic patients and in none of the controls; one patient presented localized temporal pallor in both ONs, whereas the other had diffuse ON pallor in one eye (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Chagasic patients' retinographies. A) Focal retinal nerve fiber layer defects, B) peripapillary hemorrhage, C) inferior notch of the neural rim, and D) diffuse optic nerve pallor.
Reliable visual field testing was possible in 61 eyes of the chagasic patients and 63 eyes of the controls. Mean deviation was -6.47 (5.35) dB in the chagasic patients and -3.60 (5.27) dB in the controls (p=0.01). Mean pattern deviation was 4.72 (3.5) dB in the Chagas group and 3.22 (2.57) dB in the control group (p=0.03).
Mean values of OCT measurements are summarized in table 5.
Table 5 OCT measurements of the optic nerve and retinal nerve fiber layer
Chagas group | Control group | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Rim area (mm2) | 001.23 ± 00.19 | 1.38 ± 0.23 | 0.003* |
Disc area | 001.94 ± 00.43 | 1.92 ± 0.40 | 0.85 |
Average cup-to-disc ratio | 000.56 ± 00.14 | 0.48 ± 0.17 | 0.02* |
Vertical cup-to-disc ratio | 000.54 ± 00.14 | 0.46 ± 0.16 | 0.03* |
Cup volume (mm2) | 000.21 ± 00.15 | 0.16 ± 0.18 | 0.10 |
Average RNFL thickness (μm) | 089.00 ± 09.70 | 0.94 ± 10.6 | 0.02* |
RNFL symmetry | 081.00 ± 13.40 | 0.85 ± 10.3 | 0.16 |
Average RNFL superior thickness (μm) | 109.00 ± 17.50 | 117 ± 18.1 | 0.04* |
Average RNFL nasal thickness (μm) | 071.00 ± 09.40 | 71 ± 10.8 | 0.84 |
Average RNFL inferior thickness (μm) | 113.00 ± 16.80 | 122 ± 18.4 | 0.03* |
Average RNFL temporal thickness (μm) | 060.00 ± 14.40 | 065 ± 12.3 | 0.14 |
*P value calculated with paired t-test.
RNFL= retinal nerve fiber layer.
Figure 2 shows a comparison between clinical forms in patients with a positive primary outcome in the chagasic and control groups.
DISCUSSION
This was the first study to demonstrate the occurrence of ON/RNFL changes in chronic chagasic patients. Alterations in ON/RNFL included ON pallor, ON changes suggestive of glaucoma, peripapillary hemorrhage, presence of notch, RNFL defect on retinography, and/or decrease in peripapillary RNFL thickness detected on OCT. Quantitative differences in data obtained from OCT measurements showed greater cup-to-disc ratio, lower neural rim arealower average decrease in RNFL thickness in the Chagas group. ON/RNFL changes were more significant in patients with Chagas disease and heart failure than in those with cardiac form without left ventricular dysfunction and those with the indeterminate form.
Inflammatory reaction due to T. cruzi infection was identified as a possible prompter of several ocular changes in the acute phase of the disease such as papillary edema, retinal hemorrhage, posterior uveitis, iridocyclitis, and glaucoma(4). To our knowledge, no studies in the literature have evaluated the long-term prevalence and repercussions of these manifestations in the ON/RNFL of chagasic patients.
Infectious optic neuropathies often develop with sequelae in the ON/RNFL and range from slight decreases in average RNFL thickness to ON atrophy with marked decrease in visual acuity(10). Many cases of infectious uveitis are related to transient increases in IOP that generate diffuse and localized losses in RNFL. Though these losses may not be progressive, they cause irreversible damage to the ON/RNFL.
Some studies have reported on systemic inflammation secondary to Chagas disease, demonstrating that vascular endothelial injury is associated with an increase in inflammatory markers, vasospasm, and reduction in blood flow(11). These mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction may play an important role in the physiopathology of ophthalmic complications(12). Some studies have demonstrated that increased ET-1 and cytokine synthesis favors vasculopathy in T. cruzi infection(11). In experimental models, chronic ET-1 administration was associated with glaucoma-like neuropathy regardless of IOP changes(13).
Severity of cardiac dysfunction in Chagas patients appears to have potentiated the ON/RNFL changes since they were more prominent in the heart failure group. Heart failure has been linked to ischemic optic neuropathies and, more recently, to glaucomatous optic neuropathies(14). A study evaluating color Doppler examination of the ophthalmic artery in heart failure patients and controls observed lower diastolic velocity and higher resistance index in those with CHF, probably reflecting the presence of orbital vasoconstriction in response to low cardiac output(15). The influence of these findings on ON structure and function is still under investigation.
In the present study, mean OPP did not differ between groups. Heterogeneity of the cardiovascular condition in the chagasic group may explain these results, which differ from those observed in studies evaluating only patients with CHF and controls without heart disease(7). Despite this, it is important to note that OPP, MAP, and IOP are subject to variability in 24 h, and previous studies have shown that evaluation of variability versus isolated measures may be more relevant to ON/RNFL lesions(16).
ANS dysfunction in chagasic patients may have contributed to the results of the present study. ANS dysfunction is observed in various clinical manifestations of Chagas disease, even in the indeterminate form(17). Mild autonomic dysfunction typically occurs in Chagas' indeterminate form with borderline electrocardiogram abnormalities; the most severe disturbances occur in the cardiac and digestive forms(18). Studies evaluating eye SNA dysfunction have shown that IOP level can be partially controlled by the ANS. Patients with ANS dysfunction present greater variation in IOP levels, which, combined with greater instability in blood flow regulation, probably contribute more to ON lesions than the IOP level itself(19).
The current study demonstrated a 17% prevalence of neuro-ophthalmological alterations between the controls. However, if only retinography and visual field were considered for analysis - complementary methods traditionally used in large population studies to evaluate the ON and nerve fiber layer(20,21) - only two control patients (4.9%) with alterations would have been considered. Both patients were classified as cup-to-disc ratio suggestive of glaucoma. This result is compatible with the li terature describing a 3.4% prevalence of glaucoma in southern Brazil(22).
Although previous studies have demonstrated lower IOP among patients with Chagas disease(23), no difference in mean IOP was found between the Chagas and control patients in the present study. This finding may be related to interference from the use of systemic medications, an insufficient number of participants to detect the difference between groups, or the IOP variability itself.
This study presented some limitations. As a cross-sectional study, it cannot be determined whether the changes found in NO/RNFL are sequelae of an acute neural lesion in the acute infectious period of Chagas disease or if they are signs of a progressive neuropathy.
This was the first study to identify relevant NO/RNFL changes in patients with Chagas disease. Despite conti nued efforts to eradicate it, Chagas disease affects a significant part of the world's population. In view of the results demonstrated in the present study, the need for ophthalmologic examination, including a careful evalua tion of NO/RNFL, in the follow-up routine of chagasic patients is evident.