Services on Demand
On-line version ISSN 1678-4227
Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr. vol.60 no.4 São Paulo Dec. 2002
Cristiano Mendes-da-Silva3, Sandra Lopes de Souza3,
Jairza Maria Barreto-Medeiros2, Sebastião Rogério de Freitas-Silva4,
Daniela Eugênia Costa Antunes5,Allan Delano Urbano Cunha5, Valdenilson Ribeiro Ribas6,
Maria Flávia Simões de França6, Maria Inês Nogueira7, Raul Manhães-de-Castro1
ABSTRACT - Serotonin plays a role at the pathophysiology of depression in humans and in experimental models. The present study investigated the depressive behavior and the weigh evolution in adult rats (60 days) treated from the 1st to the 21st postnatal day with fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (10 mg/kg, sc, daily). The depressive behavior was induced by the forced swim test (FST). The animals were submitted to two sessions of FST: 1st session for 15 min and the 2nd session 24h later, for 5 min. During the 2nd session the Latency of the Attempt of Escape (LAE) and Behavioral Immobility (BI) were appraised. The Fluoxetine group when compared to the Control group, showed an increase in LAE and a decrease in BI. The neonatal administration of fluoxetine reduced the depressive behavior in adult rats, possibly by increase in the brain serotonergic activity. This alteration can be associated to process of neuroadaptation.
KEY WORDS: depression, serotonin, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, neurogenesis
Tratamento neonatal com fluoxetina reduz o comportameto depressivo induzido pelo nado forçado em ratos adultos
RESUMO - Estudos em humanos e em modelos experimentais demonstram que a serotonina (5-HT) participa da fisiopatologia da depressão. O presente estudo investigou o comportamento depressivo e a evolução ponderal de ratos adultos jovens (60 dias) tratados do 1o ao 21o dia pós-natal com fluoxetina, um inibidor seletivo de recaptação da serotonina, (10 mg/kg, sc, diariamente). A depressão experimental foi induzida através do teste de nado forçado (NF). Os animais foram submetidos a duas sessões de NF, a primeira por 15 min e a segunda após 24 h, por 5 min. Durante os 5 min de NF a latência da tentativa de fuga (LTF) e o tempo de imobilidade (TI) foram avaliados. O grupo tratado com fluoxetina apresentou aumento da LTF e redução do TI comparado ao controle. A administração neonatal de fluoxetina reduziu o comportamento depressivo em ratos adultos, possivelmente em função do aumento da atividade serotoninérgica cerebral. Esta alteração poderá estar relacionada a processos neuroadaptativos.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE: depressão, serotonina, inibidor de recaptação da 5-HT, neurogênese.
Studies in animals and humans have demonstrated the role of serotonin (5-hidroxytryptamine, 5-HT) in psychiatric depressions1, through the use of pharmacological tools2. Experimental evidences of serotonin receptors involvement in the pathophysiology of depression and in the action mechanisms of antidepressant drugs, come from various biochemical, electrophysiological and behavioral approaches3. Animal models have largely contributed to the understanding of the 5HT receptors and depressive behavior relations4. Adult rats treated with antidepressants such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs) presented behavioral changes in the forced swim test (FST), a recognized experimental model for depression studies5.
The SSRIs increase the synaptic availability of 5-HT accentuating or facilitating its action6,7. According to some researches the chronic administration of SSRIs during the neonatal stage (days 1 to 21, suckling period) induces several behavioral changes in adult life8,9. Other studies demonstrated that chronic use of the SSRIs increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), one target gene of antidepressant treatment, in rat limbic structures, most notably the hippocampus10. In addition, the BDNF plays an important role in development, synapse remodeling11 and it has trophic effects on serotonergic neurons in the central nervous system12.
Furthermore, experimental works indicates that itself 5-HT can influence the embryogenesis and the growth13,14 presumably by acting as a developmental sign15 or as a neurotrophic factor16,17. Moreover, it is well known that very fast growth and development of the nervous system occur during pregnancy and suckling, and that pharmacological or nutritional manipulations at this phase, can induce drastic morphological and functional changes in these processes15,18,19. Drastic consequences have been also observed in behavior9. These alterations can become irreversible depending on the magnitude of the aggression19. Thus, there is a possibility that the use of SSRIs, in the initial phase of the life, could present long-lasting effects on behaviors related to the serotonergic function9, such as the emotional behaviors20. Therefore, since there are no data concerning this point, the investigation of the possible long-lasting effects caused by early manipulations of the serotonergic system is highly desirable. This study proposed to test the hypothesis that the administration of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor - fluoxetine - to suckling rats, promotes changes in depressive behavior induced by forced swim in adult rats.
Animals and treatments
Wistar rats were maintained at a room temperature of 23 ± 1 oC, on a light-dark cycle of 12:12 hours (light on at 7:00 a.m.), with free access to water and food. The animals were assigned randomly to two groups (6 pups per litter) 24 h after birth. One group (Fluoxetine group, 26 rats) received fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, sc, dissolved in saline solution, 1 ml/kg), and the other (Control group, 26 rats) received an equivalent volume of saline (NaCl 0.9%). The treatments were applied every day from the 1st to the 21st postnatal day (suckling period). Body weights were determined at 1st to the 21st (weaning) and 60th day.
The animals aged around 60 days, weighing 220-240g, were evaluated with regard to depressive behavior induced by forced swim (Forced Swim Test), modified method of Porsolt et al.21. This procedure consists of exposing an animal to a situation of inescapable stress, in which the rat is forced to swim. After an initial period of vigorous swimming activity in the direction to the tank border (denominated Latency of the Attempt of Escape), the animal reduces the intensity of the movements, just producing the necessary movements to maintain its head out of the water. This answer was classified as behavioral immobility, indicating a possible state of despair of the animal when it realizes that there is no escape.
The rats were placed individually in a tank (height, 42 cm; diameter, 104.5 cm), whose level of water do not allow the animal to lean on the floor, nor arise by the border. The temperature of the water was maintained in 25 oC. The animals were submitted to the forced swimming during 15 minutes (Pre-test). After the 15 min of forced swim each animal was led to dry in the Camera of Heating (CH; 32 oC /15min), an then returned to their cages. Twenty-four hours after the Pre-test, all the appraised animals were put back inside of the tank. At this time, the individual behavioral evaluation was accomplished and quantified during 5 minutes of swim (Test); soon after they were again led for CH. The behavioral parameters as Latency of the Attempt of Escape (LAE) and Behavioral Immobility (BI) were quantified in seconds (s) with aid of digital chronometers.
The corporal weight evolution (expresses mean ± SEM) was analyzed by Student's "t" test. The behavioral parameters (expressed as median and percentiles 25-75) were appraised for Mann-Whitney two-tailed test. The significance level adopted for all the used statistical tests was p<0.05 (Statgraphics Statistical Graphics System v.6.0, Manugistics, Inc. and Statistical Graphics).
Compared to the Control group, the Fluoxetine group presented a reduction in the corporal weight gain (p < 0.05) starting from the 9 th day of life and continuing to 21st day (Fig 1). At the 60th day of age none difference was observed among the corporal weights of the groups (Table 1).
The behavioral parameters were appraised during the FST. LAE of the Fluoxetine group was significantly larger (p < 0.01) while BI was smaller (p < 0.01) when compared with the Control group (Tables 2 and 3).
The present study demonstrated that chronic administration of fluoxetine, during the critical period of the nervous system development, besides harming the evolution of the corporal weight, in adult rats, also reduced the depressive behaviors induced by FST. These effects can be correlated with the reported developmental alterations of the serotonergic system, as suggested by Palén et al.13. These authors observed that the administration of drugs acting on the synthesis and serotonin liberation, or on the activation of the serotonergic receptors, during the embriogenesis, could result in disturbances of the growth and development of several tissues, including the nervous one. These data were confirmed by Lauder et al.22, that demonstrated a delay in the neuronal differentiation, through inhibition in the embryonic synthetic pathway of 5-HT, after maternal administration of p-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA). Decrease on the levels of 5-HT in the neonatal period, also induced reduction of the dendritic spines density in the developing nervous system. This constitute morphologic alterations of specific and permanent character, possibly resulting in damages on the synapses establishment15. In contrast, cultured embryonic serotonergic neurons of the mesencephalon of rats presented an increase of its density and survival19.
Other hypotesis can be relationship to the BDNF, we believe which chronic administration of SSRIs in the early life may to affect this neurotrophin, consequently leading the possible process of the neuroadaptation. Accordingly with recent study a infusion of BDNF into the of hippocampus produced antidepressant effect in the FST23. In spite of that, it is not totally been clarified that these alterations may persist until the adult life promoting functional damages, our data corroborate this possibility.
Our observations about the reduced corporal weight gain of fluoxetine treated rats can be attributed to the inhibitory action of serotonin, controlling the food ingestion24. Although, the stress provided by chronic treatment with fluoxetine can induce decreased body weight, possibly by affect the hipothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis resulting disturbances in the control of corticoid function, this fact was not considered in this study. Since, saline controls animals also were treated chronically. Besides, the chronic fluoxetine treatment normalize the corticosterone secretion in depressed pacients or experimental models25. Fluoxetine is an antidepressant drug that selectively inhibits the neuronal 5-HT uptake, consequently increasing its synaptic availability26, and so reduces the hunger and the alimentary ingestion in humans27 and produces hipofagia in rats28.
The pharmacological manipulation of the serotonergic system during the development, might have caused the post-treatment decrease of the depressant behaviors induced by the FST, that persisted until the adult age, confirming the well known relationship between depression and functional alteration of the serotonergic system29. In this context, the studies accomplished at our laboratory already demonstrated alterations of the aggressive behavior, in adult rats submitted to neonatal treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor9. The 5-HT is involved in the neurobiology of depression, as well as in the action mechanisms of antidepressant agents30. The presence of multiple types of serotonergic receptors corroborates the hypothesis that drugs with selective action in some of them, can have specific properties in emotional disorders2.
The decrease in the concentrations of brain serotonin can precipitate the recurrence of the depression in depressed patients31 while the manipulation of serotonergic receptors by pharmacological tools has evidenced antidepressant properties in some animal models32. The FST has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of several antidepressant treatments5. It was realized after evaluation of the several activity of the animals (dates not published), yet no alteration was observed. The reduction of depressant behavior in the FST, in the Fluoxetine group, seems to be related to the function of the serotonergic system5. The inhibition of the 5-HT uptake process by fluoxetine results possibly in its increased availability in the synaptic cleft, accentuating or facilitating its action6. The decreased depressant behavior evaluated in adult life after neonatal treatment, in the FST observed in the present study, seems to be associated with neuroadaptive mechanisms developed at the time of treatment, that persists until adult life.
Acknowledgements - CAPES and UFPE that supported this investigation.
1. Manhães de Castro R, Peregrino A, Sougey E, Barreto Medeiros JM, Deiró TCB J. Depression: repercussion in serotoninergic system. Neurobiologia 1998;61:45-55. [ Links ]
2. Mac Sweeney CP, Lesourd M, Gandon JM. Antidepressant-like effects of alnespirone (S 20499) in the learned helplessness test in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1998;345:133-137. [ Links ]
3. Newman ME, Lerer B, Shapira B. 5-HT1A receptors-mediated effects of antidepressants. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1993;17:1-19. [ Links ]
4. O'Neill MF, Conway MW. Role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in the mediation of behavior in the forced swim test in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001;24:391-398. [ Links ]
5. Page ME, Detke MJ, Dalvi A, Kirby LG, Lucki, I. Serotoninergic mediation of the effects of fluoxetine, but not desipramine, in the rat forced swimming test. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999;142:162-167. [ Links ]
6. Sánchez C, Hyttel J. Isolation-induced aggression in mice: effects of 5-hidroxytryptamine uptake inhibitors and involvement of post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 1994;264:241-247. [ Links ]
7. Hiemke C, Härtter S. Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther 2000;85:11-28. [ Links ]
8. Hansen HH, Sánchez C, Meier E. Neonatal administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor Lu-10-134-C increases forced swimming-induced immobility in adult rats: a putative animal model of depression? J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;283:1333-1341. [ Links ]
9. Manhäes-de-Castro R, Barreto Medeiros J.M, Mendes-da-Silva C, et al. Reduction of intraspecific aggression in adult rats by neonatal treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Braz J Med Biol Res 2001;34:121-124. [ Links ]
10. Nibuya M, Nestler EJ, Duman RS. Chronic antidepressant administration increases the expression of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 1996;16:2365-2372. [ Links ]
11. Lipska BK, Khaing ZZ, Weickert CS, Weinberger DR. BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex: effects of neonatal ventral hippocampal damage and antipsychotic drugs. Eur J Neurosci 2001;14:135-144. [ Links ]
12. Lyons WE, Mamounas LA, Ricaurte GA, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-deficient mice develop aggressiveness and hyperphagia in conjunction with brain serotonergic abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:15239-15244. [ Links ]
13. Palén K, Thörneby L, Emanuelsson H. Effects of serotonin antagonists on chick embriogenesis. Wilhelm Roux's Arch Develop Biol 1979;187:89-103. [ Links ]
14. Whitaker-Azmitia PM. Role of serotonin and other neurotransmitter receptors in brain development: basis for developmental pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 1991;43:553-561. [ Links ]
15. Yan W, Wilson CC, Haring JH. 5-HT1a receptors mediate the neurotrophic effect of serotonin on developing dentate granule cells. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1997;98:185-190. [ Links ]
16. Lauder JM, Wallace JA, Krebs H. Roles of serotonin in neuroembriogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol 1981;133:477-506. [ Links ]
17. Liu J, Lauder JM. Serotonin promotes region-specific glial influences on cultures serotonin and dopamine neurons. Glia 1992;5:306-317. [ Links ]
18. Dobbing J. Vulnerable periods in developing brain. In: Davison, AN, Dobbing J. (Eds.). Applied Neurochemistry. Oxford Blackwell 1968;287-316. [ Links ]
19. Manhães-de-Castro R, Cabral Filho JE, Costa JA, Costa FBR, Galindo MAC, Hecksher CA. Neonatal treatment with naloxone causes permanent hyperalgesia in rats. Braz J Med Biol Res 1993;26:747-751. [ Links ]
20. Chopin P, Moret C, Briley M. Neuropharmacology of 5-hydroxytryptamine1B/1D receptor ligands. Pharmacol Ther 1994;62:385-405. [ Links ]
21. Porsolt RD, Le Pichon M, Jalfre M. Depression: a new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Nature 1977;266:730-732. [ Links ]
22. Lauder JM, Towle AC, Patrick P, Henderson, P, Krebs H. Decreased serotonin content of embryonic raphe neurons following maternal administration of p-chlorophenylalanine: a quantitative imunocytochemical study. Brain Res 1985;352:107-114. [ Links ]
23. Shirayama Y, Chen AC, Nakagawa S, Russell DS, Duman RS. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor produces antidepressant effects in behavioral models of depression. J Neurosci 2002;22:3251-3261. [ Links ]
24. Simansky KJ. Serotonergic control of the organization of feeding and satiety. Behav Brain Res 1996;73:37-42. [ Links ]
25. Duncan GE, Knapp DJ, Carson S.W, Breese GR. Differential effects of chronic antidepressant treatment on swim stress- and fluoxetine-induced secretion of corticosterone and progesterone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998;285:579-587. [ Links ]
26. Olivier B, Mos J, van der Heyden JA M, Hartog J. Serotonergic modulation of social interactions in isolated male mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989;97:154-156. [ Links ]
27. Mcguirk J, Silverstone T. The effect of the 5-HT re-uptake inhibitor fluoxetine on food intake and body weight in healthy male subjects. Int J Obes 1990;14:361-372. [ Links ]
28. Wong DT, Reid LR, Threlkeld PG. Suppression of food intake in rats by fluoxetine: comparison of enantiomers and effects of serotonin antagonists. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1988;31:475-479. [ Links ]
29. Stahl S. 5-HT1A receptors and pharmacotherapy. Psychopharmacol Bull 1994; 30:39-43. [ Links ]
30. Meltzer HY. Role of serotonin in depression. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990; 600:486-499. [ Links ]
31. Robinson DS, Alms DR, Shrotriya RC, Messina ME, Wickramaratra P. Serotoninergic anxiolytics and treatment of depression. Psychopathology 1989;22(Suppl 1):27-36. [ Links ]
32. Detke MJ, Lucki I. Detection of serotoninergic and noradrenergic antidepressants in the rat forced swimming test: the effects of water depth. Behav Brain Res 1996;73:43-46. [ Links ]
Estudo realizado no Departamento de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife PE, Brasil e no Departamento de Anatomia, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo SP, Brasil: 1Doutor em Farmacologia Experimental e Clínica da Universidade de Paris VI, Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Nutrição, UFPE; 2Doutoranda em Nutrição da UFPE, Professora Auxiliar do Departamento de Ciências da Nutrição, Universidade Federal da Bahia; 3 Doutorando em Anatomia da USP; 4 Mestrando em Nutrição da UFPE; 5 Bolsista de Iniciação Científica CNPq-PIBIC; 6 Estagiário do Laboratório de Fisiologia da Nutrição Naíde Teodósio, Departamento de Nutrição, UFPE; 7Doutor em Ciências da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Professor Assistente Doutor Departamento de Anatomia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas -USP. CAPES and UFPE supported this investigation.
Received 7 February 2002, received in final form 14 June 2002. Accepted 17 June 2002.
Dr. Raul Manhães de Castro Departamento de Nutrição, UFPE - Cidade Universitária - 50670-901 Recife PE - Brasil. Fax: 81 271.8473. E-mail: email@example.com.