SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 issue3ACSF markers for diagnosis of bacterial meningitis in neurosurgical postoperative patientsPeripheral neuropathy in patients with hepatitis virus C infection in the Amazon region author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Print version ISSN 0004-282X

Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr. vol.64 no.3a São Paulo Sept. 2006

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2006000400013 

Wrist immobilization after carpal tunnel release: a prospective study

 

Avaliação prospectiva da imobilização do pulso após descompressão cirúrgica do nervo mediano no túnel do carpo

 

 

Roberto S. MartinsI,II; Mario G. SiqueiraII; Hougelli SimplícioI

IDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo SP, Brazil
IIPeripheral Nerve Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo SP, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

This prospective study evaluates the possible advantages of wrist imobilization after open carpal tunnel release comparing the results of two weeks immobilization and no immobilization. Fifty two patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were randomly selected in two groups after open carpal tunnel release. In one group (A, n=26) the patients wore a neutral-position wrist splint continuosly for two weeks. In the other group (B, n=26) no wrist immobilization was used. Clinical assessment was done pre-operatively and at 2 weeks follow-up and included the two-point discrimination test at the second finger and two questionnaires as an outcome measurement of symptoms severity and intensity. All the patients presented improvement in the postoperative evaluations in the three analyzed parameters. There was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the outcome measurements at the final follow-up. We conclude that wrist immobilization in the immediate post-operative period have no advantages when compared with no immobilization in the end result of carpal tunnel release.

Key words: carpal tunnel syndrome, surgical decompression, wrist imobilization.


RESUMO

Neste estudo prospectivo avaliamos se há vantagens na imobilização pós-operatória do pulso após a cirurgia para o tratamento da síndrome do túnel do carpo comparando este tratamento com a ausência de imobilização. Cinqüenta e dois pacientes portadores de síndrome do túnel do carpo idiopática foram randomizados em dois grupos após a cirurgia. Em um grupo (grupo A, n=26) os pacientes utilizaram uma tala em posição neutra para imobilização do pulso por duas semanas. No outro grupo (B, n=26), nenhum tipo de imobilização foi adotada. A avaliação foi realizada antes da cirurgia e repetida após duas semanas e incluiu a mensuração da sensibilidade discriminatória no segundo dedo e dois questionários que avaliaram a gravidade e intensidade dos sintomas. Em todos os pacientes houve melhora nos parâmetros avaliados. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os dois grupos considerando os parâmetros avaliados. Concluímos que a imobilização do pulso no período pós-operatório imediato não apresenta vantagens quando comparada com a ausência de imobilização após a descompressão cirúrgica do nervo mediano no punho.

Palavras-chave: síndrome do túnel do carpo, descompressão cirúrgica, imobilização, pulso.


 

 

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment mononeuropathy and is manifested by characteristic signs and symptoms resulting from median nerve compression at the wrist and/ or palm1. Diagnosis is essentially clinical and often patient history alone is indicative of CTS. The electrophysiologic studies confirm the diagnosis. The treatment can be conservative, with corticosteroid infiltration, use of symptomatic drugs and/or wrist splinting2.

The surgical treatment is indicated when nonoperative management fails, when symptoms are presented for more than one year and when there is a neurological deficit (motor or sensory).

In spite of been used by many surgeons3, wrist immobilization after open surgery has been less well studied than surgical treatment effects4-6. This study was developed with the purpose of comparing parameters results in two patients groups, submitted or not to wrist immobilization after open carpal tunnel release.

 

METHOD

The research protocol of this study was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Appropriate informed consent was obtained both verbally and in writing form from each study subject prior to surgery. The diagnosis of CTS was based on symptoms and findings on physical examination. Clinical examination included the presence of typical sensory symptoms, Tinel sign, Phalen’s and Durkan’s tests, sensory testing by two-point discrimination, muscle testing and examination of thenar atrophy. All patients had electrophysiological confirmation of CTS. Entry criteria for the study included all patients with idiopathic CTS admitted at the Peripheral Nerve Unit at Hospital Santa Marcelina. Exclusion criteria included inability to complete a self-administered questionnaire; a previous carpal tunnel release; occurrence of medical conditions associated with increased incidence of CTS like diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism; wrist trauma or surgery; musculoskeletal, metabolic or autoimmune disorders; presence of space-occupying lesions at the wrist, identified before surgery or at intra-operative period; pregnancy.

The conservative treatment was adopted for six weeks and included wrist splinting at neutral angle and use of non-steroid anti-inflamatory drugs, if pain was the symptom. The surgical treatment was adopted in patients with no response to conservative treatment and in all cases presented with impairment of sensibility and/or motor deficit.

All patients included in the study had open carpal tunnel release without upper-arm tourniquet under local anesthesia by the senior author. A standard 3-cm incision was made in the palm along a line projected proximally from the interspace between the middle and ring finger, paralleling the thenar crease without transgressing the wrist flexion crease. After the retinaculum section, the manipulation of the median nerve was limited to the inspection to discard any additional extrinsic compression. Neither epineurotomy nor internal neurolysis were performed. The wound was closed with interrupted 5.0 nylon sutures. All patients received the same immediate postoperative care. Each wrist was immobilized in a soft dressing and light compressive bandage for 48 hours and, after that, two groups with 26 patients were formed according to the treatment adopted. In one group, called group A, the wrist was splinting in a neutral position for two weeks. In another group, the group B, after the withdrawal of the soft dressing it wasn't used any kind of immobilization and patients were encouraged to move their hands and fingers freely. No other treatment, including anti-inflammatory drugs, was used. The evaluations were performed pre-operatively and repeated fourteen days after the surgery in a blind fashion. All of the subjects were examined by one author. Each patient completed the first section of a validated questionnaire described by Levine et al.7 (Severity Symptom Score - SSS). This tool, named Boston questionnaire (BQ), is a self-reported questionnaire designed to evaluate the outcome specifically in CTS and has been found to be reproducible, internally consistent and responsive to clinical change7,8. In the first section of this scale, the symptom score is determined from 11 questions regarding different attributes of pain, tingling and numbness with each answer scoring between 1 (no symptom) and 5 (very severe symptoms). A translated version of this questionnaire to portuguese was used in our study9. This version was previosly validated by Campos et al.9. The intensity of symptoms (tingling, burning pain and numbness) was evaluated by another scale (Symptom Intensity Scale - SIS). This was done by asking the subjects to rate each symptom on an interval scale from 0 to 4, with zero indicating "no sympton" and 4 indicating "intolerable sympton". For both questionnaires the results were expressed as a mean score for the answered questions.

Static two-point discrimination was measured using a two-point discriminator (North Coast Medical Inc., California, USA) applied to palmar surface of the second finger distal phalange. As well as in the evaluation through the described scales, the two-point discrimination was evaluated pre and post-operatively.

We compared preoperative and postoperative scores of each evaluation, calculating three indices through the formula (preoperative value - postoperative value/preoperative value). The indices were named symptom severity index (SSI), sympton intensity index (SII) and discrimination index (DI), according to each evaluated parameter.

Statistical analyses were performed by using Bioestat for Windows program (version 2.0; Ayres M, Belém, Brazil). Paired t tests were performed and the level of significance was set at p<0.05.

 

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients fullfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period. We had two exclusions in this study, one patient with classical symptoms who presented with a persistent median artery with large diameter at surgery and a patient who presented postoperative wound infection; this resolved with a 14-day course of oral antibiotic therapy. There were no median nerve lesion, wound dehiscence or tendon injuries.

The ages of the patients ranged from 26 to 74 years and averaged 49.8 years. There were fourty-six women (88.5 percent) and the right hand was involved in 63.5 percent of the cases. Seven patients had bilateral involvement and underwent surgical procedures on separate time for each hand. The average duration of symptoms at presentation was 29.31 months (range, 6 to 72 months).

A positive Tinel’s sign was found in 44 patients (84.5%), in 21 patients in the group A and in 23 patients in group B. A positive Phalen’s test was identified in 49 patients (94.3%), in 24 patients in group A and in 25 in group B. A positive Durkan’s test was found in 51 patients, in 25 patients in group A and in all patients in group B.

The severity and intensity of symptoms decreased following surgery in all the patients. Pre-operatively, the average of SSS was 33.38±7.33 in the group A and 31.77±7.56 in the group B. Post-operatively, the average of SSS was 11.38±4.57 in the group A and 12.33±4.77 in the group B. The SSI was 0.64±0.15 in the group A and 0.61±0.12 in the group B (Table). No significant changes in SSI were observed comparing the group A and group B (p=0.059, Figure).

 

 

 

 

The average of SIS was 8.65±2.10 in the group A and 8.23±2.23 in the group B at pre-operative period and was 0.77±1.31 in the group A and 1.54±1.96 in the group B at post-operative period. The SII was 0.91±0.15 in the group A and 0.80± 0.27 in the group B (Table). No significant difference was observed in SII between the two groups (p=0.386).

The average 2-point discrimination score improved from 5.85±2.80 mm before surgery to 3.69±1.19 mm after surgery in group A and from 7.92±3.12 mm before surgery to 5.12±2.53 mm after surgery in group B. The DI was 0.27±0.27 in group A and 0.29±0.28 in group B. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups when DI was compared (p=0.756).

 

DISCUSSION

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most commom entrapment neuropathy and often occurs after the age of 30 years, with women been affected three to six times more than men10,11. A large proportion of patients fail to respond to conservative treatment and, in this population, carpal tunnel decompression with division of the transverse carpal ligament has been a highly successful procedure12. While the patient satisfaction is usually high with the surgery, potential complications do exist and includes pain and scar disconfort, wound dehiscence, bowstringing of the flexor tendons and inclusion of the median nerve within the postoperative scar13-15.

To minimise these complications, most surgeons immobilize patients’ wrists for 1 to 4 weeks following open carpal tunnel surgery3. On the other hand, some authors recommend precocious mobilization of wrist and fingers after the surgery in order to enable the free longitudinal nerve movement in the surgical bed, what should avoid possible adherences from neighboring structures16.

Few studies in literature have investigated the effects of immobilization following the open carpal tunnel release4-6. Bury et al. compared 2-weeks of postoperative wrist splinting versus a bulky dressing after 43 open carpal tunnel releases4. In this study, there were no statiscally significant differences between the two groups. The evaluation included subjective parameters of patient satisfaction and objective parameters of grip and lateral pinch strength, complication rates, and digital and wrist range of motion4. Cook et al. compared postoperative 2-weeks splinting with early range-of-motion treatment in a serie with 50 patients5. They found that there was an earlier return in grip and key pinch strength and significantly better results, considering a subjective pain scale, in the nonsplinted group. Finally, Finsen et al. reported no signifficant differences between post-operative immobilization and non-immobilization after open carpal tunnel release in 82 wrists6. The splint was used for 4 weeks and the authors evaluated pain and scar disconfort through a visual analogue scale and the grip and keypinch strength. In general, the published studies do not show sufficient evidence to justify routine wrist immobilization following open carpal tunnel release. In the current study there was no difference also between two patients groups considering the use or not of postoperative immobilization. The use of wrist immobilization following open carpal tunnel release had not been previously studied using a validated outcome questionnaire.

It is important to remind that the related studies, including ours, evaluated only patients with idiopathic CTS. In this patient subpopulation, the adverse effects of surgery on the flexor tendon mechanics such as bowstringing of the tendons are known but they are very rare and seldom lead to serious problems17,18. It is not clear if the non-immobilization treatment can affect the recovery after surgery in patients where there is an associated rheumatologic conditions like basal joint arthritis19. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate if similar results are observed in this kind of patient.

In conclusion, if we consider the evaluated parameters, our results suggest that the wrist immobilizaton after open carpal tunnel release is not necessary in idiopathic CTS.

 

REFERENCES

1. Kouyoumdjian JA. Síndrome do túnel do carpo: aspectos clínico-epidemiológicos em 668 casos. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1999;57:202-207.        [ Links ]

2. Shapiro S. Microsurgical carpal tunnel release. Neurosurgery 1995; 37:66-70.        [ Links ]

3. Duncan KH, Lewis RC, Foreman KA, Nordyke MD. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand : results of a questionnaire. J Hand Surg (Am) 1987;12:384-391.         [ Links ]

4. Bury TF, Akelman E, Weiss AC. Prospective, randomized trial of splinting after carpal tunnel release. Ann Plast Surg 1995;35:19-22.        [ Links ]

5. Cook AC, Szabo RM, Birkholz SW, King EF. Early mobilization following carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized study. J Hand Surg (Br) 1995;20:228-230.        [ Links ]

6. Finsen V, Andersen K, Russwurm H. No advantage from splinting the wrist after open carpal tunnel release: a randomized study of 82 wrists. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:288-292.        [ Links ]

7. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptons and funcional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993;75:1585-1592.        [ Links ]

8. Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ. Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? J Hand Surg (Br) 2004; 29:159-164.        [ Links ]

9. Campos CC, Manzano GM, Andrade LB, Castelo A Filho, Nóbrega JAM. Tradução e validação do questionário de avaliação de gravidade dos sintomas e do estado funcional na síndrome do túnel do carpo. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003;61:51-55.        [ Links ]

10. Akelman E, Weiss AC. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Etiology and endoscopic treatment. Orthop Clin North Am 1995;26:769-786.        [ Links ]

11. Gomes I, Becker J, Ehlers JA, Kapczinski F, Nora DB. Seasonal distribuiton and demographical characteristics of carpal tunnel syndrome in 1039 patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2004;62:596-599.        [ Links ]

12. Dawson DM. Entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremities. N Engl J Med 1993;329:2013.        [ Links ]

13. Richman JA, Gelberman RH, Rydevik BL, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: morphological changes after release of the transverse carpal ligament. J Hand Surg (Am) 1989;14:852-857.        [ Links ]

14. Gelberman RH, Eaton RG, Urbaniak JR. Peripheral nerve compression. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993;12:1854-1878.        [ Links ]

15. Netscher D, Mosharrafa A, Lee M, et al. Transverse carpal ligament: its effect on flexor tendon excursion, morphologic changes of the carpal canal, and on pinch and grip strengths after open carpal tunnel release. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:636-642.        [ Links ]

16. Nathan PA, Meadows KD, Keniston RC. Rehabilitation of carpal tunnel surgery patients using a short surgical incision and an early program of physical therapy. J Hand Surg (Am) 1993;18:1044-1050.        [ Links ]

17. Kiritsis PG, Kline SC. Biomechanical changes after carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric model for comparing open, endoscopic, and step-cut lengthening techniques. J Hand Surg (Am) 1995;20:173-180.        [ Links ]

18. McDonald RI, Lichtman DM, Hanlon JJ, Wilson JN. Complications of surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1978;3:70-76.        [ Links ]

19. Freeland AE, Tucci MA, Barbieri RA, Angel MF, Nick TG. Biochemical evaluation of serum and flexor tenosynovium in carpal tunnel syndrome. Microsurgery 2002;22:378-385.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received 16 September 2005, received in final form 14 February 2006. Accepted 10 April 2006.

 

 

Dr. Roberto S. Martins - Rua Maestro Cardim 592 / 1101 - 01323-001 São Paulo SP - Brasil. E-mail: robar@ig.com.br