SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.70 issue4Frontal assessment battery in a Brazilian sample of healthy controls: normative dataExperimental encephalitis caused by Taenia crassiceps cysticerci in mice author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

  • pdf in English
  • ReadCube
  • Article in xml format
  • Article references
  • How to cite this article
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation
  • Send this article by e-mail

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Print version ISSN 0004-282X

Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr. vol.70 no.4 São Paulo Apr. 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2012000400012 

ARTICLE

 

Leprosy patients: neurotrophic factors and axonal markers in skin lesions 

 

Pacientes com hanseníase: fatores neurotróficos e marcadores axonais em lesões de pele

 

 

Letícia Baccaro MichellinI; Jaison Antonio BarretoII; Lúcia Helena Soares Camargo MarcianoII; Flavio Alves LaraIII; Maria Esther Salles NogueiraII; Vânia Nieto Brito de SouzaII; Maria Renata Sales Nogueira CostaII

I Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Bauru SP, Brazil
II Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde, Bauru SP, Brazil
III Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Neurotrophins are growth factors with crucial roles in neural pathophysiology. These mediators functionally modulate nociceptive fibers, and changes in neurotrophins expression have been correlated with early loss of nociception in leprosy. This study investigated the expression of NGF, BDNF, and NT3 in dermal nerves of leprosy patients. Characterization of Remak bundles was achieved by p75NTR, and axonal markers NF-L and PGP 9.5 immunostaining. Clinical parameters of neural impairment have been evaluated by Semmes-Wenstein monofilaments. Our findings demonstrated decrease of NGF in borderline leprosy, when compared to control specimens. Similar results were observed in PGP 9.5 expression (borderline: p<0.001 and lepromatous: p<0.05) and NF-L (lepromatous: p<0.05), suggesting advanced Remak bundles degeneration in multibacillary leprosy. It has also been observed positive correlation between p75NTR and PGP 9.5, indicating association between Schwann cells and axons in Remak bundles. Present data indicate that neurotrophins imbalance may participate in the establishment of peripheral nerve damage.

Key words: peripheral nerves, leprosy.


RESUMO

Neurotrofinas são fatores de crescimento com papel fundamental na fisiopatologia neural. Esses mediadores modulam funcionalmente fibras nociceptivas. Mudanças em sua expressão têm sido relacionadas à perda precoce da nocicepção na hanseníase. Este estudo investigou a expressão de NGF, BDNF e NT3 em nervos dérmicos de pacientes hansenianos. A caracterização de fibras nervosas não mielinizadas foi feita por p75NTR e marcadores axonais NF-L e PGP 9.5. Os parâmetros clínicos de dano neural foram avaliados por monofilamentos Semmes-Wenstein. Nossos achados demonstram diminuição de NGF nos pacientes dimorfos em comparação aos controles. Resultados similares foram observados para PGP 9.5 (dimorfos: p<0,001; virchowianos: p<0,05) e NF-L (virchowianos: p<0.05), sugerindo degeneração avançada das terminações nervosas na hanseníase multibacilar. Foi observada correlação positiva entre p75NTR e PGP 9.5, indicando associação entre células de Schwann e axônios em fibras nervosas não mielinizadas. Os resultados indicam que o desequilíbrio na expressão das neurotrofinas pode participar do dano neural periférico.

Palavras-Chave: nervos periféricos, hanseníase.


 

 

The main principles of leprosy control consist of early detection of new cases, proper treatment by multidrug therapy (MDT), prevention of disabilities and rehabilitation1. In spite of worldwide efforts, endemic countries still have leprosy control as an unreached goal. The prevention and recovery of peripheral neuropathy are among the hardest challenges of leprosy. In Brazil, approximately 5.9% of new cases of leprosy present grade II of disability at the moment of first diagnosis1. Unfortunately, the established neural impairment tends to persist as lifelong sequelae in these patients2.

Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) has tropism for the peripheral nervous system, where it infects Schwann cells and eventually endothelium3, generating polymorphic skin lesions with variable granulomatous infiltrate according to the clinical form of the disease4. This tropism is attributed to the binding of M. leprae-related glycolipid PGL-1 to the complex formed by the molecule dystroglycan-α from Schwann cells and the G domain of the α2 chain of laminin-2, located in the extracellular basal lamina5. The colonization of peripheral nerves may also be mediated by the binding of M. leprae to Erb2 receptor of neuregulin-16, as well as adhesins exposed on the bacillus surface7,8. The contact and invasion of M. leprae lead to antigen presentation by Schwann cells, which secrete inflammatory mediators and chemotactic factors for macrophages, thus perpetuating the immune response9.

In leprosy, nerve damage produces functional changes due to unsuccessful attempts of regeneration10. Microscopic characteristics of neural lesions include degeneration of Schwann cells, loss of the myelin sheath, axonal retraction, periaxonal fibrosis and a wide range of immunopathological responses. Paucibacillary forms of leprosy (TT and BT) demonstrate intense inflammatory infiltrate which leads to tissue destruction and Wallerian degeneration11. When regeneration is still feasible after nerve damage, the axon endings seek out a suitable microenvironment for reinstatement12. However, without neurotrophic factors, the neurites do not extend back to the perineural space13. If the axonal atrophy cannot be reversed in time due to a neural scar, Schwann cells become increasingly less responsive, and potential regeneration is progressively lost14.

Neurotrophic factors represent a group of biochemical mediators classified on the bases of their properties including regulation of neural development, neuroprotection and reduction of neural degeneration in central and peripheral nervous system (PNS and CNS). The participation of these growth factors in regeneration of CNS and PNS provide promising perspectives for therapeutics in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurotrophins correspond to a specific family of neurotrophic factors synthesized as inactive precursors and processed inside both cell bodies and extracellular environment15.

Once processed, they generate active pro-peptides and mature proteins. This group of growth factors comprises NGF, NT3, NT4/5, BDNF and GDNF. Two classes of receptors bind to neurotrophins: neurotrophic receptor p75 (p75NTR)
and tropomyosin-related kinase receptors (TrkA, TrkB, TrkC). Each neurotrophin binds specifically to a TrK receptor, whereas all of them bind equally to p75NTR. P75NTR has an intracellular type II death domain, which distinguish it as a member of tumor necrosis factor family. Additionally, P75NTR is able to modify the binding affinity of neurotrophins to TrK receptors16,17 and participates on inhibition of axonal outgrowth18. The interaction between NGF and P75NTR results in the blockage of this receptor in terms of binding with other mediators and indirectly allows the axons to extend back to the place of origin. These examples underscore the pivotal role played by P75NTR and NGF in neural plasticity19. In functional studies, P75NTR can be adopted as a marker of phenotype since this receptor is expressed in immature and non-myelinating Schwann cells19.

Previous studies have demonstrated that in leprosy the correlation of cutaneous NGF expression to functional evaluation of autonomic and sensorial fibers have been associated with decreasing of NGF in Schwann cells, which may participate of early loss of nociception and paradoxically related to neuropathic pain20-22. In the pathogenesis of leprosy, inflammation plays a crucial role in the development of neuropathy, but the non-inflammatory mechanisms that participate in axonal degeneration and demyelination should be better surveyed.

In this study, we proposed to investigate circulating and immunohistochemical expression of neurotrophins (NGF, BDNF and NT3) in dermal nerves (Remak bundles) of non-reactional leprosy patients. Remak bundles have been demonstrated by immunohistochemical staining of P75NTR - adopted here as a marker of unmyelinated nerve fibers, and axonal markers NF-L and PGP 9.5. Clinical sensory testing has been performed by evaluation with Semmes-Wenstein monofilaments in order to investigate the correlation between clinical parameters of neural impairment and expression of neurotrophic factors.

 

METHODS

Sampling

Paraffin embedded specimens have been selected from Pathology Laboratory of Lauro de Souza Lima Institute (ILSL) – Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil. The specimens were obtained from skin biopsies of leprosy patients referred to Dermatology Clinic of ILSL. The medical files of patients were accessed to survey their MDT status, data on sensitivity tests and laboratorial parameters. Samples were collected under approval of Human Research Ethics Committees and patients signed informed consent. Patients were grouped according to classification of Ridley and Jopling (1966) into: Tuberculoid Leprosy (TT) → n=10; Borderline Leprosy (BB) → n=10; Lepromatous Leprosy (LL)→ n=10. The control group was composed of skin specimens without inflammatory changes, obtained for diagnostic investigation of non-infectious dermatosis or neuropathic disorders (C)→ n=08.

Immunohistochemistry

Neurotrophins, P75NTR, S100 and axonal markers were evaluated in non-reactional leprosy lesions and skin samples from donors without leprosy. The following antibodies were used: monoclonal rabbit anti-human NGF antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); monoclonal mouse anti-human BDNF antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA); polyclonal rabbit anti-human NT3 antibody (Abcam); monoclonal mouse anti-human P75NTR antibody (R&D Systems); polyclonal rabbit anti-human S100 antibody (Dako Corporation, Carpinteria, CA, USA); polyclonal rabbit anti-human PGP 9.5 antibody (Dako Corporation, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and monoclonal mouse anti-human NF-L antibody (Dako Corporation). Five micrometer sections of paraffin-embedded biopsies were deparaffinized and hydrated by passing them through xylene and alcohol gradients. Specimens were kept in a water bath for 20 minutes at 95º C on 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer pH 6.0 for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Then, sections were incubated overnight with primary antibodies. The detection was achieved by the EnVision Dual Link System-HRP (Dako Corporation). Sections were counterstained with Harry’s hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared and mounted with Permount (Fischer Scientific, Pittsburgh, USA). 

Scoring of neurotrophic factors

Each microscopic field has been analyzed as a whole in all sections by two independent observers. The immunohistochemical presentation has been evaluated in Remak bundles of dermis (Fig 1). Positive Remak bundles were counted for each marker employed and the results obtained for different groups were compared by using non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test (GraphPad InStat Version 4.00, San Diego, CA, USA); p<0.05 was considered significant.

 

 

ELISA

The detection of NGF and BDNF in serum samples was performed by ELISA using commercial kits NGF Emax® ImmunoAssay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and ChemoKine Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Sandwich ELISA (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) according to manufacture instructions.

Light touch threshold

Skin sensory tests have been performed by using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, varying in strength in a range of 0.05, 0.2, 2.0, 4.0, 10.0 and 300 g. To each monofilament it has been attributed a score ranging from 6 to 1. For correlation purposes, the higher results for each patient have been included in body location closer to sites where biopsies were undertaken to histopathology and immunohistochemistry.

Statistical analysis

The data were expressed as mean and standard deviation values, and analyzed by non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test, using Graph Pad Prism 4.00 software for Windows. Correlations were carried out by Spearman non-parametric test. A p-value<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis

Samples and controls were analyzed by immunohistochemistry to detect neurotrophic factors and axonal markers. In this study, P75NTR was adopted as a marker of non-myelinating Schwann cells phenotype. P75NTR decreased significantly (p<0.05) in LL in comparison to controls, indicating reduction of detectable nerve branches of the skin of leprosy patients, mainly LL (Fig 2A). Similar results were observed regarding expression of axonal markers PGP 9.5 (TT: p<0.05; BB: p<0.001 and LL: p<0.001) and NF-L (LL: p<0.05) (Fig 2A). BDNF did not demonstrate any immunohistochemical positivity on samples and controls. The evaluation of Remak bundles demonstrated decreasing of NGF and NT3 expression in leprosy lesions. The ratio between NGF and P75NTR, as well as NT3 and P75NTR, was established in order to evaluate expression of neurotrophins independently of nerves branches amount in the skin (Fig 2B). Results indicated a statistically significant reduction of NGF (p<0.05) expression in borderline leprosy (BB) when compared to control specimens. For NT3, no significant difference was observed. It has also been observed positive correlation between P75NTR and PGP 9.5 (r=0.40; p=0.01), indicating the association between Schwann cells and axons in Remak bundles (Fig 2C).

 

ELISA

The serum concentration of NGF and BDNF in leprosy patients did not differ significantly from control subjects (Fig 2D).

Light touch threshold

Evaluation of skin sensitivity among TT, BB and LL leprosy patients did not show significant differences (Fig 3A), whereas BB has presented lower light touch response than other groups. Additionally, tuberculoid leprosy patients (TT) presented positive correlation between sensory results and expression of P75NTR (r=0.70; p=0.04), indicating preservation of protective sensitivity in this group (Fig 3B). Apart from TT patients, it was not possible to establish correlation between in situ expression of neither neurotrophins, nor axonal markers and the results of sensory testing.

 

DISCUSSION

Neurotrophins are key mediators in the process of myelination of peripheral nervous system and has been shown that myelin formation can be inhibited by functional changes in neurotrophic mediators. Neurotrophins are characterized as a family of growth factors with crucial roles in neural pathophysiology. These mediators may, among other activities, regulate nociceptive fibers. In leprosy patients, changes in the expression of some neurotrophins were correlated with the early loss of nociception22. Previous studies demonstrate a correlation between nerve dysfunction on clinical tests and morphological changes in skin, regardless the type of leprosy23. The present study aimed to investigate the involvement of neurotrophic mediators in the alterations of peripheral nerve branches of non-reactional leprosy skin lesions, based on a comparison between clinical tests of skin sensitivity and expression neurotrophins, phenotypic and axonal markers.

Neurotrophin family was characterized after pioneer studies on NGF, the first well established neural growth factor24, and plays key roles in the initiation of axon growth, synaptic rearrangement, neurite sprouting, besides preventing sympathetic and sensory neuronal death25. NGF deprivation participates in development of peripheral neuropathies, including leprosy and diabetes26. Accordingly, the decrease in endogenous levels of NGF and TrkA has been demonstrated in skin lesions of leprosy patients20. Our results agreed with former studies; in situ expression of NT3 and NGF decreased in leprosy lesions when compared to control skin samples, suggesting that the imbalance of neurotrophic factors might be involved in impairment of peripheral nerve regeneration after nerve damage. In spite of antibodies against NGF have also been implicated as indicators of leprosy neuritic status27, serological data in our study did not demonstrate any differences between leprosy and control serum samples concerning circulating neurotrophins, suggesting that it is not a representative method to evaluate neural damage in non-reactional leprosy. In accordance, Costa et al.28 did not find differences in BDNF serum levels in healthy control and leprosy patients before, during and after multidrug therapy. We also investigated alterations in clinical parameters, such as loss of protective sensitivity, and its possible correlation with tissue expression of neurotrophins. The perception of touch is determined by myelinated nerves, as well as Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles of the skin, which provide light touch and pressure perception respectively. The test with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments evaluates touch sensation, being therefore related to myelinated fibers. However, when there is no response to 4 to 300 g monofilaments, loss of protective pain sensation can be established. Pain perception is evoked by nociceptors and involves unmyelinated fibers of the skin (type C fibers). Therefore, Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments provide a liable alternative to prediction of early leprosy neuropathy. Accordingly, we compared results of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments evaluation in TT, BB and LL patients with the expression of NF-L and PGP 9.5, in order to estimate the axonal degeneration in skin lesions of leprosy patients. Our findings did not allow us to correlate sensory evaluation with in situ neurotrophins. However, immunohistochemistry demonstrated statistically significant reduction of NGF (p<0.05) expression in borderline leprosy (BB) when compared to control specimens. Similar results were observed regarding the expression of PGP 9.5 (BB: p<0.001 and LL: p<0.05) and NF-L (LL: p<0.05), suggesting higher Remak bundles degeneration in multibacillary leprosy. Likewise, Karanth et al.29 observed impairment in PGP 9.5 and neurofilament immunoreactivity in leprosy lesions, mainly in tuberculoid patients. Moreover, the authors reported lack of neuropeptides in most of leprosy lesions. Reduction of neurofilament and PGP 9.5 immunostaining in nerve biopsies from pure neuritic leprosy was also demonstrated by Antunes et al.30, as well as its correlation with reduced potential amplitudes in electroneuromyographic evaluation. Our results have shown positive correlation between P75NTR and PGP 9.5 (r=0.40; p=0.01), indicating the association between Schwann cells and axons in Remak bundles. Present data indicate alterations in neurotrophins, along with inflammatory process, as additional mechanisms involved in the establishment of peripheral nerve damage.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the São Paulo Foundation Against Leprosy, Brazil, and the Research Pathology Team of ILSL, Brazil.

 

References

1. WHO. Weekly epidemiological record. 2009;84:333-340. Available at http://www.who.int/wer/2009/wer8433.pdf. Accessed in Sep 29 2009.         [ Links ]

2. van Brakel WH, Nicholls PG, Wilder-Smith EP, et al. Early diagnosis of neuropathy in leprosy — comparing diagnostic tests in a large prospective study (the INFIR cohort study). PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2008;2:e212.         [ Links ]

3. Scollard DM. The biology of nerve injury in leprosy. Lepr Rev 2008;79:242-253.         [ Links ]

4. Pardillo FE, Fajardo TT, Abalos RM, Scollard D, Gelber RH. Methods for the classification of leprosy for treatment purposes. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:1096-1099.         [ Links ]

5. Rambukkana A, Yamada H, Zanazzi G, et al. Role of alpha-dystroglycan as a Schwann cell receptor for Mycobacterium leprae. Science 1998;282:2076-2079.         [ Links ]

6. Tapinos N, Ohnishi M, Rambukkana A. ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase signaling mediates early demyelination induced by leprosy bacilli. Nat Med 2006;12:961-966.         [ Links ]

7. Marques MA, Antonio VL, Sarno EN, Brennan PJ, Pessolani MC. Binding of alpha2-laminins by pathogenic and non-pathogenic mycobacteria and adherence to Schwann cells. J Med Microbiol 2001;50:23-28.         [ Links ]

8. Soares de Lima C, Zulianello L, Marques MA, et al. Mapping the laminin-binding and adhesive domain of the cell surface-associated Hlp/LBP protein from Mycobacterium leprae. Microbes Infect 2005;7:1097-1109.         [ Links ]

9. Spierings E, De Boer T, Zulianello L, Ottenhoff TH. Novel mechanisms in the immunopathogenesis of leprosy nerve damage: the role of Schwann cells, T cells and Mycobacterium leprae. Immunol Cell Biol 2000;78:349-355.         [ Links ]

10. Shetty VP, Antia NH. Light and ultrastructural study of sciatic nerve lesions induced using intraneural injection of viable Mycobacterium leprae in normal and immunosuppressed Swiss white mice. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 2002;70:25-33.         [ Links ]

11. Vallat JM, Leboutet MJ, Henry P, Millan J, Dumas M. Endoneurial proliferation of perineurial cells in leprosy. Acta Neuropathol 1991;81:336-338.         [ Links ]

12. Bixby JL, Lilien J, Reichardt LF. Identification of the major proteins that promote neuronal process outgrowth on Schwann cells in vitro. J Cell Biol 1988;107:353-361.         [ Links ]

13. Reynolds ML, Woolf CJ. Reciprocal Schwann cell-axon interaction. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1993;3:683-693.         [ Links ]

14. Gordon T. The role of neurotrophic factors in nerve regeneration. Neurosurg Focus 2009;26:E3.         [ Links ]

15. Corfas G, Velardez MO, Ko CP, Ratner N, Peles E. Mechanisms and roles of axon-Schwann cell interactions. J Neurosci 2004;24:9250-9260.         [ Links ]

16. Ceni C, Kommaddi RP, Thomas R, et al. The p75NTR intracellular domain generated by neurotrophin-induced receptor cleavage potentiates Trk signaling. J Cell Sci 2010;123:2299-2307.         [ Links ]

17. Allen SJ, Dawbarn D. Clinical relevance of the neurotrophins and their receptors. Clin Sci (Lond) 2006;110:175-191.         [ Links ]

18. Kaplan DR, Miller FD. Axon growth inhibition: signals from the p75 neurotrophin receptor. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:435-436.         [ Links ]

19. Schor NF. The p75 neurotrophin receptor in human development and disease. Prog Neurobiol 2005;77:201-214.         [ Links ]

20. Facer P, Mann D, Mathur R, et al. Do nerve growth factor-related mechanisms contribute to loss of cutaneous nociception in leprosy? Pain 2000;85:231-238.         [ Links ]

21. Antunes SL, Liang Y, Neri JA, Haak-Frendscho M, Johansson O. The expression of NGFr and PGP 9.5 in leprosy reactional cutaneous lesions: an assessment of the nerve fiber status using immunostaining. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003;61:346-352.         [ Links ]

22. Anand P. Neurotrophic factors and their receptors in human sensory neuropathies. Prog Brain Res 2004;146:477-492.         [ Links ]

23. Facer P, Mathur R, Pandya SS, Ladiwala U, Singhal BS, Anand P. Correlation of quantitative tests of nerve and target organ dysfunction with skin immunohistology in leprosy. Brain 1998;121:2239-2247.         [ Links ]

24. Levi-Montalcini R. The nerve growth factor 35 years later. Science 1987;237:1154-1162.         [ Links ]

25. Wyman T, Rohrer D, Kirigiti P, et al. Promoter-activated expression of nerve growth factor for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Gene Ther 1999;6:1648-1660.         [ Links ]

26. Anand P. Neurotrophins and peripheral neuropathy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996;35:449-454.         [ Links ]

27. Sena CB, Salgado CG, Tavares CM, Da Cruz CA, Xavier MB, Do Nascimento JL. Cyclosporine A treatment of leprosy patients with chronic neuritis is associated with pain control and reduction in antibodies against nerve growth factor. Lepr Rev 2006;77:121-129.         [ Links ]

28. Costa RD, Mendonça VA, Penido RA, et al. Study of the profile of the neurotrophin BDNF in new leprosy cases before, during and after multidrug therapy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2011;69:100-104.         [ Links ]

29. Karanth SS, Springall DR, Lucas S, et al. Changes in nerves and neuropeptides in skin from 100 leprosy patients investigated by immunocytochemistry. J Pathol 1989;157:15-26.         [ Links ]

30. Antunes SL, Chimelli LM, Rabello ET, et al. An immunohistochemical, clinical and electroneuromyographic correlative study of the neural markers in the neuritic form of leprosy. Braz J Med Biol Res 2006;39:1071-1081.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Maria Renata Sales Nogueira Costa
Departamento de Saúde de São Paulo
Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima; Rod. Comandante João Ribeiro de Barros km 225
17034-971 Bauru SP – Brasil; E-mail: rcosta@ilsl.br

Received 26 September 2011
Received in final form 24 November 2011
Accepted 01 December 2011

Support:
Fundação Paulista Contra a Hanseníase.
Conflict of interest:
There is no conflict of interest to declare.