Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Translation and validation of the Life Satisfaction Index for Adolescents scale with neuromuscular disorders: LSI-A Brazil

Tradução e validação da escala de qualidade de vida para adolescentes com doenças neuromusculares para português do Brasil: LSI-A Brasil

ABSTRACT

Objective

To validate the Life Satisfaction Index for Adolescents (LSI-A) scale, parent version and patient version, for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD).

Methods

The parent version of the instrument was divided into Groups A, B, C and D; and the patient version, divided into B, C and D. For the statistical calculation, the following tests were used: Cronbach’s α, ICC, Pearson and the ROC Curve.

Results

The parent and patient versions of the instrument are presented, with the following results in the overall score, respectively: Cronbach’s α, 0.87 and 0.89; reliability, r 0.98 and 0.97; reproducibility, ICC 0.69 and 0.80; sensitivity, 0.78 and 0.72; specificity, 0.5 and 0.69; and accuracy, 64% and 70.4%.

Conclusion

According to the validity and reproducibility values, the LSI-A Brazil parent and patient versions, are clinically useful to assess quality of life in DMD, SMA or LGMD and may also be useful for other neuromuscular disorders.

validation studies; quality of life; neuromuscular disorders

RESUMO

Objetivo

Validar a escala Life Satisfaction Index for Adolescents (LSI-A) versão pais e versão paciente para doenças neuromusculares.

Método

O instrumento versão pais foi dividido nos Grupos A,B, C e D; e paciente, em B, C e D. Para cálculo estatístico utilizou-se os testes α de Cronbach, CIC, Pearson e Curva ROC.

Resultados

Valor de Cronbach versão pais e paciente no escore geral, 0.87 e 0.89; confiabilidade,0.98 e 0.97;reprodutibilidade,entre 0.59 e 0.69 e, entre 0.58 e 0.80; sensibilidade, 0.78 e 0.72; especificidade, 0.5 e 0.69; e acurácia, 64% e 70.4% respectivamente.

Conclusão

Conforme a validade e reprodutibilidade, o LSI-A Brasil versão pais e paciente é útil clinicamente para avaliar a Qualidade de Vida da Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne, Amiotrofia Espinhal Progressiva ou Distrofia Muscular tipo Cinturas e pode ser usado para outras doenças neuromusculares.

estudos de validação; qualidade de vida; doenças neuromusculares

The importance of quantifying the quality of life of subjects with neuromuscular disorders (NMD) by use of appropriate instruments is a relevant health issue because of the lack of specific questionnaires. This study dealt with the translation and validation of a questionnaire for NMD patients. In this study, three NMDs were considered: two dystrophies and one atrophy: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), respectively. The dystrophies are characterized by irreversible degeneration of muscular fibers, which leads to muscular weakness and motor disability, originating from mutations in different genes11. Reed UC. [Neuromuscular disorders]. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2002;78(1 Suppl 1):89-103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-7557200200070001
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-7557200200...
. The atrophy is characterized by degeneration of the spinal cord motor neurons, i.e., secondary muscular atrophy11. Reed UC. [Neuromuscular disorders]. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2002;78(1 Suppl 1):89-103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-7557200200070001
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-7557200200...
.

There is scientific consensus that the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) involves subjective and multidimensional values, either negative or positive, according to individual perception and expectation, and to the cultural influence of the individual22. Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N. Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Life Res. 1993;2(6):451-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422219
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422219...
. The quality of life can be reported by the child or by a related caregiver33. Eiser C, Morse R. A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84(3):205-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.84.3.205
https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.84.3.205...
to augment the HRQOL instruments, which complement the clinical assessment of the patient and the conducting of clinical tests44. Gill T, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA. 1994;272(8):619-25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.035200...
, and to assess the magnitude of longitudinal changes and, mainly, to evaluate the impact of certain interventions with the purpose of modifying the symptoms and the functionality of the patient through time55. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(8):622-9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-...
.

For this relevant task, the Life Satisfaction Index for Adolescents (LSI-A) scale was selected as more effective in assessing the HRQOL of patients with NMDs, as it is broader than the usual emphasis on psychosocial, behavioral, psychological and educational aspects of HRQOL, and includes a few items that deal with physical aspects that contribute to the precise establishment of the HRQOL. As already mentioned, HRQOL depends on the patient’s perception of their life domains. This analysis was a longitudinal study applied to 95 children diagnosed with DMD66. Simon VA, Resende MBD, Simon MA, Zanoteli E, Reed UC. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: quality of life among 95 patients evaluated using the Life Satisfaction Index for Adolescents. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011;69(1):19-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2011000100005
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X201100...
.

According to authors Reid and Renwick77. Reid DT, Renwick RM. Preliminary validation of a new instrument to measure life satisfaction in adolescents with neuromuscular disorders. Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;17(2):184-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199406000-00009
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-1994060...
, the LSI-A aims to assess the HRQOL perception of adolescents, between the ages of 12 and 19 years old, diagnosed with DMD77. Reid DT, Renwick RM. Preliminary validation of a new instrument to measure life satisfaction in adolescents with neuromuscular disorders. Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;17(2):184-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199406000-00009
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-1994060...
. The authors77. Reid DT, Renwick RM. Preliminary validation of a new instrument to measure life satisfaction in adolescents with neuromuscular disorders. Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;17(2):184-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199406000-00009
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-1994060...
considered that further studies may expand the application of the LSI-A to the other NMDs. Parrish.88. Parrish RK 2nd. Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;94:919-1028. also verified, with psychometric properties, that the LSI-A instrument was adequate for the expansion to other NMDs. Therefore, the goal of this study was to translate to Brazilian Portuguese, and validate, the patient version of the LSI-A scale and to create and validate a parent version, for patients with DMD. As well, the LSI-A was expanded to include LGMD and SMA. The age range of the patient version (with previous authorization by the authors) was also expanded, from the previous 12 to 19 years old, to embrace the ages eight to 18 years old. The parent version created in this study is capable of embracing children and adolescents between five and 18 years old.

As the LSI-A instrument has a high level of effectiveness in the assessment of HRQOL and, due to its importance in the neuromuscular field, this scale was validated for the Brazilian Portuguese language in this study, creating the Life Satisfation Index for Adolescents (LSI-A Brazil) parent version and patient version (Appendix).

METHODS

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Analysis of Research Projects (CAPPesq) of the Hospital Clinical Board, number 0505/2010. For the validation of the LSI-A Brazil instrument parent version and patient version for patients with DMD, LGMD or SMA, the patients were recruited from the Neurology Clinic of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School. The healthy group was recruited from João Pinheiro School, São Paulo, Brazil.

Instrument

The LSI-A is self-administered and is used to assess HRQOL for patients with NMDs. It broadly covers subjective and multidimensional aspects and contains 45 questions with a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 (with 1 meaning “fully disagree”, 2 meaning “disagree”, 3 meaning “neither agree nor disagree”, 4 meaning “agree”, 5 meaning “fully agree” and 0 meaning “not applicable”). The instrument covers five domains: general well-being, interpersonal relationship, development, personal satisfaction, leisure and recreation, with nine questions for each domain, and a higher score representing a better index77. Reid DT, Renwick RM. Preliminary validation of a new instrument to measure life satisfaction in adolescents with neuromuscular disorders. Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;17(2):184-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199406000-00009
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-1994060...
. The same characteristics made up both the parent version and patient version of the LSI-A Brazil.

Participants

This protocol included 82 participants, 43 (52.4%) of whom were diagnosed with DMD, 18 (22%) with LGMD, and 21 (25.6%) with SMA. Their age means and standard deviation were: DMD 11.4 ± 3.38, LGMD 10.58 ± 3.48 and SMA 10.95 ± 2.98. The diagnoses were verified by molecular test (DMD and SMA) or by immunohistochemical analysis of dystrophin and other muscle proteins through muscle biopsy (DMD and LGMD).

The inclusion criteria for NMD patients were: individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of DMD, LGMD or SMA, between five and 18 years old; without cognitive deficit and intelligence quotient (IQ) above 80; who were reliable patients, whose parents agreed to take part in this research protocol and signed the Free and Informed Consent Form. The exclusion criteria were: patients without a confirmed diagnosis of the referred NMDs, under the age of five and above 18 years old; with a cognitive deficit and IQ below 80; who were not reliable on the scheduled days or who had interrupted clinical supervision.

The inclusion criteria of the healthy group considered healthy participants age-matched to the NMD sample (five to 18 years old), IQ above 80, whose parents agreed to take part in this research protocol and signed the Free and Informed Consent Form.

The patients and healthy participants answered the LSI-A Brazil patient version, and the parents of these participants answered the parent version of the LSI-A Brazil questionnaire. This was part of the validation of both versions.

Protocol

The translation of the LSI-A scale into Brazilian Portuguese, the validation of the LSI-A Brazil patient version and the creation and validation of the LSI-A Brazil parent version was carried out between October 2012 and July 2013. For this process, the versions were applied by intra-observer for 33% of the participants. The average duration of the applications was seven minutes each.

The validation followed the steps proposed by Guillemin et al.99. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)901...
: 1) authorization by the authors; 2) initial translation into Portuguese; 3) cultural, conceptual, experimental and idiomatic adaptation to the target population; 4) retroversion; 5) assessment by a revision committee; and 6) pretest in two stages. The creation of the parent version occurred after the retroversion of the LSI-A Brazil patient version.

Description of the validation steps

The process of validation of the LSI-A patient version translated to Brazilian Portuguese had the prior authorization (Step 1) of Ted Myerscough, from the Quality of Life Research Unit of the University of Toronto, Canada. The questionnaire was translated by an native English language professional translator and by a certified translator (Step 2). After the comparison of both translations, it was noted that the translation made by the English language native translator was non-literal and, therefore, culturally more appropriate, closer to colloquial language and more effective for the process of linguistic adaptation than the certified translation. The Probe1010. Clark P, Lavielle P, Martínez H. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(7):1584-8. technique was included in the third step. This technique is used to achieve a satisfactory comprehension level, which should be above 85%. Its application was directed to three groups of 20 patients, in three phases. During this process, there was an improvement in the linguistic quality of the instrument through cultural adaptation using the following criteria: semantic, idiomatic, conceptual and experimental equivalences.

The Portuguese language version, resulting from the Probe technique was re-translated into the English language by a native English language translator and compared to the original (Step 4). The analysis of this retranslation allowed the verification of linguistic equivalence. After this step, the version resulting from the Probe technique was submitted for assessment by the revision committee (comprising three neuropediatricians, one pedagogue and one phonoaudiologist), which suggested some technical changes in the resultant version (Step 5).

After the LSI-A Brazil patient version reached a high, and satisfactory level of comprehension, the parent version was created through pronoun changes and semantic modification of some terms to better suit the adult profile. The parent version passed through the 5th and 6th steps.

Step 6 was divided into two periods: first, the reapplication of the Probe technique in order to achieve the satisfactory comprehension level for the patient version (n = 18) and the parent version (n = 18) after the changes suggested by the revision committee; secondly, there was application of the final version of the LSI-A Brazil parent version and patient version for psychometric evaluation, obtained by statistical calculation of the quantification of the HRQOL of the patients. Note that the serial applications did not influence the result because the questionnaire is appropriate for longitudinal studies. The psychometric evaluation was distributed accordingly: internal consistency (reliability of questions), parent version n = 15 and patient version n = 21; external consistency (inter-observer correlation), parent version n = 22 and patient version n = 32; external consistency (test-retest reproducibility – twice with an interval of three months), parent version n = 05 and patient version n = 10; sensitivity and specificity, parent version n = 15 and patient version n = 32.

For the cutoff point, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve test was applied to healthy participants and to children and adolescents with DMD, LGMD or SMA, with 82 patients in total. The same was carried out with the parent version, which was applied to the healthy children’s parents (n = 82) and the patients’ parents (n = 82).

To establish the cutoff for age range, the patients with DMD, LGMD and SMA were distributed equally into four age groups: Group A, n = 19, 5–7 years old; Group B, n = 21, 8–10 years old; Group C, n = 20, 11–13 years old; Group D, n = 22, 14–18 years old. The parent version was divided into A, B, C, and D groups, while the patient version was divided into B, C, and D groups.

Statistics

For the validation of the questionnaire, the gold standard was adopted as a series of tests that expressed the accuracy value. Firstly, the statistical description – mean and standard deviation of healthy subjects and those with NMDs – was calculated. The calculation of internal consistency, item reliability, was made using the Cronbach’s alpha Coefficient test. For the calculation of external consistency – the inter-observer correlation – Pearson’s Linear Correlation (r) test was applied1111. Pearson K, Fisher R, Inman HF. Karl Pearson and R. A. Fisher on statistical tests: a 1935 exchange from nature. Am Stat. 1994;48(1):2-11. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685077
https://doi.org/10.2307/2685077...
. Reproducibility was analyzed through the scores of two applications, with an interval of three months, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient test (ICC)1212. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86(2):420-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.4...
,1313. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. New York: Wiley; 2000.. The ROC Curve test was used for the assessment of sensitivity, specificity, cutoff, and accuracy. For cutoff of the age category, the ROC Curve test compared patients with DMD, LGMD and SMA and the healthy group, both groups divided into their age ranges.

For the graphical analysis of the ROC Curve test, values above the curve were considered satisfactory1414. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555...
. The level was considered significant when p < 0.5.

The SPSS Statistics version 2.2 was used for Cronbach’s alpha and the BioStat version 5.3 package for the Pearson’s, ICC, and ROC Curve tests.

RESULTS

The level of comprehension reached via the final Probe technique was 97% for the parent version and 95% for the patient version, which is above the minimum of 85% required. The averages and standard deviations of the domains can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1
Mean and standard deviation of the scores of the LSI-A Brazil applied only to the parents of Group A, and the mean and standard deviation of the scores of the LSI-A Brazil applied to the parents and the patients of Groups B, C, and D. Group A, n = 19, 5 to 7 years old; Group B, n = 21, 8 to 10 years old; Group C, n = 20, 11 to 13 years old; Group D, n = 22, 14 to 18 years old.

Cronbach’s alpha test was used to assess the reliability of the items in the LSI-A Brazil parent version and patient version and it showed a overall score of α = 0.87 for the parent version and α = 0.89 for the patient version. These values and the values of the other domains, the values of which guarantee moderate/high psychometric reliability, are shown in Table 2.

Table 2
Cronbach alpha and Pearson’s test of the LSI-A Brazil parent version and patient version.

Pearson’s Linear Correlation Test for the LSI-A Brazil parent version was r = 0.98 and for the patient version was r = 0.97 in the overall score. The remaining domains are shown in Table 2. There were significant differences in all domains, with values of p < 0.0001. The test, which had a confidence interval of 95%, indicated a strong correlation between parent and patient participants and the inter-observer.

The reproducibility data for the LSI-A Brazil were assessed through the ICC test. The patient version showed ICC values ranging from 0.58 and 0.80; the parent version showed ICC values from 0.59 and 0.69. All domains showed a significant difference. Both versions indicated a satisfactory reproducibility (Table 3).

Table 3
Intraclass correlation test of the LSI-A Brazil parent version and patient version applied at two different times.

The ROC Curve test showed satisfactory results above the diagonal line. Due to significant differences in all domains for both versions as a result of its application for groups with DMD, LGMD and SMA, and for the healthy group, the LSI-A Brazil parent version overall score showed the following results: sensitivity = 0.78, specificity = 0.5, cutoff = 35.8 and accuracy = 70.35%; and the LSI-A Brazil patient version overall score showed sensitivity = 0.72, specificity = 0.69, cutoff = 37 and accuracy = 70.4%. The remaining results of the different domains are presented in Table 4 and Figures A and B. The cutoff value of the LSI-A Brazil parent version, and the patient version, was standardized according to age groups (Table 5). Note: as the variance was not significant between the two versions in all domains, the cutoff remains the same for both.

Table 4
Values of the ROC Curve of the LSI-A parent version and patient version.

Figure
A. The ROC Curve of the Overall Score of LSI-A Brazil parent version. B. The ROC Curve of the Overall Score of LSI-A Brazil patient version

Table 5
Cutoff of age group of the LSI-A Brazil parent version and patient version.

DISCUSSION

According to the authors, the original LSI-A is promising1515. Melo ELA, Valdés MTM, Pinto JMS. Qualidade de vida em crianças e adolescentes com distrofia muscular de Duchenne. Pediatria (São Paulo). 2005;27(1):28-37., since it obtained satisfactory psychometric data and proved sensitive to the perception of changes in the domains of HRQOL of patients with DMD1616. Solans M, Pane S, Estrada MD, Serra-Sutton V, Berra S, Herdman M et al. health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value Health. 2008;11(4):742-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00293.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007...
; that is, even a year after its application, the instrument showed reliable results due to its good replicability1717. McDougall J, Servais M, Sommerfreund J, Rosen E, Gillett J, Gray J et al. An evaluation of the paediatric acquired brain injury community outreach programme (PABICOP). Brain Inj. 2006;20(11):1189-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600975541
https://doi.org/10.1080/0269905060097554...
. Equally, in this study, the validation of the LSI-A Brazil showed significant values for all domains in the three NMDs, indicating that the patient version and the later-created parent version presented with satisfactory indexes, indicating its efficacy and trustworthiness in capturing the perception of HRQOL of patients between five and 18 years old with DMD, LGMD and SMA. Note that the age range of the NMD patients was expanded from the original version. Due to the validation process that used a cross-cultural adaptation strategy, also adopted by other studies1818. Barbosa TS, Tureli MC, Gavião MB. Validity and reability of the Child Perceptions Questionnaires applied in Brazilian children. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-13
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-13...
,1919. Bandeira M, Calzavara MGP, Costa CS, Cesari L. Avaliação de serviços de saúde mental: adaptação transcultural de uma medida da percepção dos usuários sobre os resultados do tratamento. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2009;58(2):107-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0047-20852009000200007
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0047-2085200900...
, the resultant versions had accessible language and easy comprehension and application. Therefore, the LSI-A Brazil is capable of quantifying the HRQOL with precision. Beyond this, it preserves the subjective content, psychological and social aspects, as well as physical2020. Boström K, Ahlström G. Quality of life in patients with muscular dystrophy and their next of kin. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;28(2):103-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200506000-00002
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-2005060...
,2121. Boyer F, Drame M, Morrone I, Novella JL. Factors relating to carer burden for families of persons with muscular dystrophy. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(5):309-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970600731578
https://doi.org/10.1080/1650197060073157...
features, which makes it a tool with positive differences above other scales.

The items in this questionnaire obtained high reliability of internal consistency across the application of Cronbach’s alpha in both versions; the same occurred in the original patient version77. Reid DT, Renwick RM. Preliminary validation of a new instrument to measure life satisfaction in adolescents with neuromuscular disorders. Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;17(2):184-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199406000-00009
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-1994060...
. There was proximity of values in both studies, which reinforces the quality of this validation.

The external consistency in the original patient version, measured through Pearson’s Linear Correlation Test, was considered moderate77. Reid DT, Renwick RM. Preliminary validation of a new instrument to measure life satisfaction in adolescents with neuromuscular disorders. Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;17(2):184-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199406000-00009
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-1994060...
. This study showed, in both patient version and parent version, high correlation values with a significance of p < 0.0001 in all domains. The statistical data revealed the concordance between observers during the interviews, which gave greater psychometric quality to this validation.

The external consistency was shown in the ICC. By test-retest, the LSI-A Brazil reached satisfactory values regarding replicability, indicating that it qualifies as reproducible. The values of the ICC test obtained in this study were moderate, that is, both versions of the questionnaire retained the same reference values in applications under different circumstances and places without changes of results, which made it trustworthy. However, the values resulting from the application may vary in relation to the clinical characteristics of each situation.

The gold standard originated from the application of many psychometric tests used in this validation, indicating the accuracy of the LSI-A Brazil, also shown in the ROC Curve test, which is used to assess the quality of a given clinical test2222. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 2002.,2323. Silva AC, Carvalho PCP, Gattass M. Diagnosis of solitary lung nodule using texture and geometry in computerized tomography images: preliminary results. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 2004;2(2):75-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2004.1468623
https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2004.1468623...
. This indicated, in both versions, significant sensitivity and specificity above the reference line. The accuracy, remaining above 60%, also indicated a good measurement of what the study aimed for with the instrument – guaranteeing good efficacy2424. Sabbatini RME. Um programa para o cálculo da acurácia, especificidade e sensibilidade de testes médicos. Revista Informédica. 1995;2(12):19-21..

The ROC Curve test also established the cutoff value of the instrument, which is capable of indicating changes in clinical practice and serves as a reference for routine applications2525. Heneghan C, Badenoch D. Ferramentas para medicina baseada em evidências. 2a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2007.. Through standardization of the cutoff related to age range and pathology, it is possible to assess the HRQOL with greater precision, given that values higher than the cutoff value indicate an increase in HRQOL22. Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N. Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Life Res. 1993;2(6):451-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422219
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422219...
,2626. Yamaguchi N, Poudel KC, Poudel-Tandukar K, Shakya D, Ravens-Sieberer U, Jimba M. Reliability and validity of a Nepalese version of the Kidd-KINDL in adolescents. Biosci Trends. 2010;4(4)4:178-85..

According to psychometric data for internal and external consistency (reliability and reproducibility), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, the LSI-A Brazil parent version is useful to assess the quality of life of patients between five and 18 years old and the patient version is also helpful for patients between eight and 18 years old for DMD, LGMD or SMA. The LSI-A Brazil can easily be expanded to evaluate the HRQOL of other neuromuscular disorders, but further studies are needed to confirm that.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank all patients, students, parents, teachers and all individuals who participated in this study.

References

  • 1
    Reed UC. [Neuromuscular disorders]. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2002;78(1 Suppl 1):89-103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-7557200200070001
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-7557200200070001
  • 2
    Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N. Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Life Res. 1993;2(6):451-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422219
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422219
  • 3
    Eiser C, Morse R. A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84(3):205-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.84.3.205
    » https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.84.3.205
  • 4
    Gill T, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA. 1994;272(8):619-25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045
    » https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045
  • 5
    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(8):622-9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009
    » https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009
  • 6
    Simon VA, Resende MBD, Simon MA, Zanoteli E, Reed UC. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: quality of life among 95 patients evaluated using the Life Satisfaction Index for Adolescents. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011;69(1):19-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2011000100005
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2011000100005
  • 7
    Reid DT, Renwick RM. Preliminary validation of a new instrument to measure life satisfaction in adolescents with neuromuscular disorders. Int J Rehabil Res. 1994;17(2):184-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199406000-00009
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199406000-00009
  • 8
    Parrish RK 2nd. Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;94:919-1028.
  • 9
    Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
  • 10
    Clark P, Lavielle P, Martínez H. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(7):1584-8.
  • 11
    Pearson K, Fisher R, Inman HF. Karl Pearson and R. A. Fisher on statistical tests: a 1935 exchange from nature. Am Stat. 1994;48(1):2-11. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685077
    » https://doi.org/10.2307/2685077
  • 12
    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86(2):420-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
    » https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
  • 13
    Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. New York: Wiley; 2000.
  • 14
    Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  • 15
    Melo ELA, Valdés MTM, Pinto JMS. Qualidade de vida em crianças e adolescentes com distrofia muscular de Duchenne. Pediatria (São Paulo). 2005;27(1):28-37.
  • 16
    Solans M, Pane S, Estrada MD, Serra-Sutton V, Berra S, Herdman M et al. health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value Health. 2008;11(4):742-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00293.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00293.x
  • 17
    McDougall J, Servais M, Sommerfreund J, Rosen E, Gillett J, Gray J et al. An evaluation of the paediatric acquired brain injury community outreach programme (PABICOP). Brain Inj. 2006;20(11):1189-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600975541
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600975541
  • 18
    Barbosa TS, Tureli MC, Gavião MB. Validity and reability of the Child Perceptions Questionnaires applied in Brazilian children. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-13
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-9-13
  • 19
    Bandeira M, Calzavara MGP, Costa CS, Cesari L. Avaliação de serviços de saúde mental: adaptação transcultural de uma medida da percepção dos usuários sobre os resultados do tratamento. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2009;58(2):107-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0047-20852009000200007
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0047-20852009000200007
  • 20
    Boström K, Ahlström G. Quality of life in patients with muscular dystrophy and their next of kin. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;28(2):103-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200506000-00002
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200506000-00002
  • 21
    Boyer F, Drame M, Morrone I, Novella JL. Factors relating to carer burden for families of persons with muscular dystrophy. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(5):309-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970600731578
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970600731578
  • 22
    Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 2002.
  • 23
    Silva AC, Carvalho PCP, Gattass M. Diagnosis of solitary lung nodule using texture and geometry in computerized tomography images: preliminary results. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 2004;2(2):75-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2004.1468623
    » https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2004.1468623
  • 24
    Sabbatini RME. Um programa para o cálculo da acurácia, especificidade e sensibilidade de testes médicos. Revista Informédica. 1995;2(12):19-21.
  • 25
    Heneghan C, Badenoch D. Ferramentas para medicina baseada em evidências. 2a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2007.
  • 26
    Yamaguchi N, Poudel KC, Poudel-Tandukar K, Shakya D, Ravens-Sieberer U, Jimba M. Reliability and validity of a Nepalese version of the Kidd-KINDL in adolescents. Biosci Trends. 2010;4(4)4:178-85.
  • Support: Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES). It was carried out in the Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo and in the João Pinheiro School.

APPENDIX

Qualidade de Vida para crianças e adolescentes com doenças Neuromusculares - LSI-A Neuromuscular Brasil

Distrofias Musculares de Duchenne e de Cinturas e Amiotrofia Espinhal Progressiva

Versão Pais

Idade 5 a 18 anos

Instruções

Neste questionário lhe pedem que responda a várias declarações, as quais tratam do grau de satisfação da vida se seu filho/a. Cada declaração é seguida por ícones de avaliação. Leia cada declaração cuidadosamente, então circule o número correspondente ao ícone de avaliação que melhor descreve o quanto você concorda ou discorda com a declaração à respeito de seu filho/a.

Por favor, leia o exemplo abaixo antes de você começar.

Exemplo:

Meu filho/a tem bastante energia.

Discordo Plenamente Discordo Não concordo Nem discordo Concordo Concordo Plenamente Não aplicável

Se você concordar com esta declaração, você marcará um X no número 4. Se você discordar plenamente, você assinalará um X no número 1, e assim por diante.

LEIA CADA QUESTÃO E MARQUE SOMENTE UMA RESPOSTA PARA CADA ITEM.

As informações que você der ficarão em sigilo.

LSI-A Neuromuscular Brasil versão pais

Considerando a última semana, responda Discordo Plenamente Discordo Não concordo nem discordo Concordo Concordo Plenamente Não Aplicável Meu filho (a) ... 1.Tem bastante energia 1 2 3 4 5 0 2. Muitas vezes se sente mal 1 2 3 4 5 0 3. Está feliz com sua aparência 1 2 3 4 5 0 4. Tem amigos para conversar 1 2 3 4 5 0 5. Está feliz com seus familiares 1 2 3 4 5 0 6. Não gosta de pedir ajuda às pessoas 1 2 3 4 5 0 7. Gosta da escola 1 2 3 4 5 0 8. Gosta do que faz quando não está na escola 1 2 3 4 5 0 9. Acredita que pode melhorar o mundo 1 2 3 4 5 0 10. Está feliz com sua vida 1 2 3 4 5 0 11. Gosta de si mesmo 1 2 3 4 5 0 12. Quando as coisas vão mal,acha que podem melhorar 1 2 3 4 5 0 13. Está feliz com tudo o que fez na sua vida até agora 1 2 3 4 5 0 14. Gostaria de mais tempo livre 1 2 3 4 5 0 15. Quando está entediado, sabe arrumar o que fazer 1 2 3 4 5 0 16. Tem tempo livre para fazer o que quer 1 2 3 4 5 0 17. Está feliz com os momentos de lazer que ele têm 1 2 3 4 5 0 18. Ir ao médico o atrapalha no que quer fazer 1 2 3 4 5 0 19.Fala que cadeira de rodas não o atrapalha para fazer o que quer 1 2 3 4 5 0 20. Está feliz com seus amigos 1 2 3 4 5 0 21. Acha que nós o apoiamos em suas decisões 1 2 3 4 5 0 22. Está feliz com as chances que tem para tentar fazer coisas novas 1 2 3 4 5 0 23. Se acalma quando se assusta 1 2 3 4 5 0 24. Consegue esperar pelo dia de amanhã 1 2 3 4 5 0 25. Não tem tempo para se divertir 1 2 3 4 5 0 26. Fica triste por não poder fazer o que quer em seu tempo livre 1 2 3 4 5 0 27. Fica chateado facilmente 1 2 3 4 5 0 28. Sente que sua situação física o atrapalha naquilo que faz 1 2 3 4 5 0 29. Durante as aulas, seus professores o deixam falar o que acha 1 2 3 4 5 0 30. Pensa que as pessoas que cuidam de sua saúde (médicos, enfermeiras, fisioterapeutas etc) o entendem 1 2 3 4 5 0 31. Tem chance de ajudar os outros 1 2 3 4 5 0 32. Procura informações sobre o que cada profissão faz 1 2 3 4 5 0 33. Pensa que ele nunca será quem ele gostaria de ser 1 2 3 4 5 0 34. Tem planos para o futuro 1 2 3 4 5 0 35. Pensa que a escola é importante para ele ter uma profissão 1 2 3 4 5 0 36. Está feliz com sua saúde 1 2 3 4 5 0 37. Tem dificuldade para fazer o que quer 1 2 3 4 5 0 38. Diverte se com a nossa família 1 2 3 4 5 0 39. Está feliz com as chances que tem para passear 1 2 3 4 5 0 40. Acha difícil relaxar 1 2 3 4 5 0 41. Se sente bem entre as pessoas 1 2 3 4 5 0 42. Está feliz com a amizade que tem com as meninas ou com os meninos 1 2 3 4 5 0 43. Acha que nós nos esforçamos para entender seus sentimentos 1 2 3 4 5 0 44. Faz coisas que ele se sente orgulhoso de fazer 1 2 3 4 5 0 45. Sabe o que quer ser quando crescer 1 2 3 4 5 0

Qualidade de Vida para crianças e adolescentes com doenças Neuromusculares - LSI-A Neuromuscular Brasil

Distrofias Musculares de Duchenne e de Cinturas e Amiotrofia Espinhal Progressiva

Versão Paciente

Idade 8 a 18 anos

Instruções

Neste questionário lhe pedem que responda a várias declarações, as quais tratam do grau de satisfação de vida. Cada declaração é seguida por ícones de avaliação. Leia cada declaração cuidadosamente, então circule o número correspondente ao ícone de avaliação que melhor descreve o quanto você concorda ou discorda com a declaração.

Por favor, leia o exemplo abaixo antes de você começar.

Exemplo:

Tenho bastante energia.

Discordo Plenamente Discordo Não concordo Nem discordo Concordo Concordo Plenamente Não aplicável

Se você concordar com esta declaração, você marcará um X no número 4. Se você discordar plenamente, você assinalará um X no número 1, e assim por diante.

LEIA CADA QUESTÃO E MARQUE SOMENTE UMA RESPOSTA PARA CADA ITEM.

As informações que você der ficarão em sigilo.

LSI-A Neuromuscular Brasil versão paciente

Considerando a última semana, responda Discordo Plenamente Discordo Não Concordo nem Discordo Concordo Concordo Plenamente Não Aplicável Eu... 1. Tenho bastante energia 1 2 3 4 5 0 2. Muitas vezes eu me sinto mal 1 2 3 4 5 0 3. Estou feliz com minha aparência 1 2 3 4 5 0 4. Tenho amigos para conversar 1 2 3 4 5 0 5. Estou feliz com minha família 1 2 3 4 5 0 6. Não gosto de pedir ajuda às pessoas 1 2 3 4 5 0 7. Gosto da escola 1 2 3 4 5 0 8. Gosto do que faço quando não estou na escola 1 2 3 4 5 0 9. Acredito que posso melhorar o mundo 1 2 3 4 5 0 10. Estou feliz com minha vida 1 2 3 4 5 0 11. Gosto de mim mesmo 1 2 3 4 5 0 12. Quando as coisas vão mal, acho que podem melhorar 1 2 3 4 5 0 13. Estou feliz com tudo o que fiz na minha vida até agora 1 2 3 4 5 0 14. Gostaria de mais tempo livre 1 2 3 4 5 0 15. Quando estou entediado, sei arrumar o que fazer 1 2 3 4 5 0 16. Tenho tempo livre para fazer o que quero 1 2 3 4 5 0 17. Estou feliz com os momentos de lazer que tenho 1 2 3 4 5 0 18. Ir ao médico me atrapalha para fazer o que quero 1 2 3 4 5 0 19. Usar cadeira de rodas não me atrapalha para eu fazer o que quero 1 2 3 4 5 0 20. Estou feliz com meus amigos 1 2 3 4 5 0 21. Acho que meus pais me apoiam em minhas decisões 1 2 3 4 5 0 22. Estou feliz com as chances que tenho para tentar fazer coisas novas 1 2 3 4 5 0 23. Consigo me acalmar após ter me assustado 1 2 3 4 5 0 24. Consigo esperar pelo dia de amanhã 1 2 3 4 5 0 25. Não tenho tempo para me divertir 1 2 3 4 5 0 26. Fico triste por não poder fazer o que quero em meu tempo livre 1 2 3 4 5 0 27. Fico chateado facilmente 1 2 3 4 5 0 28. Sinto que minha situação física me atrapalha naquilo que faço 1 2 3 4 5 0 29. Tenho professores que me deixam falar o que eu acho nas aulas 1 2 3 4 5 0 30. Penso que as pessoas que cuidam de minha saúde (médicos, enfermeiras, fisioterapeutas etc) me entendem 1 2 3 4 5 0 31. Tenho chance de ajudar os outros 1 2 3 4 5 0 32. Procuro informações sobre o que cada profissão faz 1 2 3 4 5 0 33. Penso que eu nunca serei quem eu gostaria de ser 1 2 3 4 5 0 34. Tenho planos para o futuro 1 2 3 4 5 0 35. Penso que a escola é importante para eu ter uma profissão 1 2 3 4 5 0 36. Estou feliz com minha saúde 1 2 3 4 5 0 37. Tenho dificuldade para fazer o que quero fazer 1 2 3 4 5 0 38. Me divirto com minha família 1 2 3 4 5 0 39. Estou feliz com as chances que tenho para passear 1 2 3 4 5 0 40. Acho difícil relaxar 1 2 3 4 5 0 41. Me sinto bem entre as pessoas 1 2 3 4 5 0 42. Estou feliz com a amizade que tenho com as meninas ou com os meninos 1 2 3 4 5 0 43. Acho que meus pais tentam entender meus sentimentos 1 2 3 4 5 0 44. Faço coisas que me deixam eu me sentir orgulhoso de fazê-las 1 2 3 4 5 0 45. Sei o que quero ser quando crescer 1 2 3 4 5 0

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Aug 2017

History

  • Received
    06 Dec 2016
  • Reviewed
    02 Apr 2017
  • Accepted
    11 May 2017
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO R. Vergueiro, 1353 sl.1404 - Ed. Top Towers Offices Torre Norte, 04101-000 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 5084-9463 | +55 11 5083-3876 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista.arquivos@abneuro.org