SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.80 issue5Evaluation of the influence of patient age and spacer device volume on aerosol lung depositionA comparison of the continuous positive airway pressures produced by two systems author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Jornal de Pediatria

Print version ISSN 0021-7557

J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) vol.80 no.5 Porto Alegre  2004

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0021-75572004000600010 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Asthma in schoolchildren from Recife, Brazil. Prevalence comparison: 1994-95 and 2002

 

 

Murilo C. A. BrittoI; Patrícia G. M. BezerraII; Rita C. C. M. BritoIII; Joakim C. RegoIII; Edjane F. BurityIII; João G. B. AlvesIV

IPh.D., Instituto Materno-Infantil de Pernambuco (IMIP), Recife, PE, Brazil
II M.Sc., Instituto Materno-Infantil de Pernambuco (IMIP), Recife, PE, Brazil
III Pediatric lung specialist, Instituto Materno-Infantil de Pernambuco (IMIP), Recife, PE, Brazil
IV Ph.D., Instituto Materno-Infantil de Pernambuco (IMIP), Recife, PE, Brazil

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of asthma and asthma variants in schoolchildren from Recife in 2002, and to compare these data with data from 1994-95; to analyze the relationship between maternal schooling and the presence of asthma or worsening asthma; and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the yearly prevalence of wheezing as an asthma indicator.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study. A probabilistic sample of 3,086 and 2,774 13- and 14-year-old students answered a written questionnaire in 1994-95 and 2002, as part of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood.
RESULTS: The following prevalence rates were observed in 1994-95 and 2002, respectively: cumulative prevalence of referred asthma: 21 vs. 18.2%; cumulative prevalence of wheezing: 39 vs. 38%; yearly prevalence of wheezing: 19.7 vs. 19.4%; yearly prevalence of night cough: 31 vs. 38%; yearly prevalence of exercise-induced wheezing: 20.6 vs. 23.8%. The yearly prevalence of asthma attacks was 16.3% vs. 15.2% for 1 to 3 attacks; 2.7% vs. 1.2% for 4 to 12 attacks; and 1% vs. 0.4% for more than 12 attacks. The yearly prevalence of attacks that disturbed sleep was 13 and 10.3%. The yearly prevalence of attacks with compromised speech was 4.8 and 4.1%. Higher levels of maternal schooling were related to higher cumulative prevalence of referred asthma and to cumulative and yearly prevalence of wheezing.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of asthma and its severe forms is high in teenager students in Recife. It is also related to higher levels of maternal schooling.

Key words: Asthma, adolescent, child, school health, prevalence.


 

 

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, predominantly eosinophilic, which results in a recurrent obstruction of the airflow, reversible spontaneously or in response to therapy. Atopic disease is the most frequently identified predisposing factor.1-4 It constitutes a public health problem, as much for its prevalence as for its morbidity.5-9

During phase one of ISAAC, (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood), 463,801 13 and 14 year-old adolescents and 257,800 children aged 6 and 7 years of age, from 56 countries were studied by questionnaire. The average cumulative prevalence of asthma reported was 11.3%, varying from 1.4 to 30.4%. Brazil was eighth in the ranking.5 This project investigated 20,544 schoolchildren aged 13-14 years and 13,604 aged 6-7 years, in Curitiba, Itabira, Recife, Salvador, São Paulo, Porto Alegre and Uberlândia. In the first group, the reported prevalence of asthma was 9.8% for males and 10.2% for females. In the 6-7 year-old group, it was 7.3 and 4.9%, respectively.6 In Recife, the ISAAC data from 1994-95 for 1,410 schoolchildren aged 6 and 7 years and 3,086 pupils aged 13 and 14 years old, demonstrated a reported asthma prevalence of 20.4 and 19.7%, respectively.7

Further Brazilian studies using methods similar to those of the ISAAC project have also been performed recently. In schoolchildren from Uberlândia aged 6 and 7 and 13 and 14, the prevalence of asthma was 15 and 16.8%, respectively.10 Camargos et al.,11 studying 13 and 14 year-old adolescents in provincial Minas Gerais, found a reported cumulative asthma prevalence of 27%. In Itabira and Santa Maria, cities in Minas Gerais state, a reported prevalence of asthma of 4.6% was observed in schoolchildren.12 Chatkin,8 found a prevalence of 25.4% in a cohort from the city of Pelotas in 1997-98.

In addition to the point-by-point assessments, the comparison of different periods allows tendencies to be detected in the variation of prevalence. In the United States between 1963 and 1980, in children from 6 to 11 years of age, the reported prevalence of asthma increased from 5.3 to 7.6%.13 In England, Burney et al.,14 studying children from 4 to 12 years of age, demonstrated an increase in prevalence of 6.9% among boys and 12.8% among girls, between 1973 and 1986. In Scotland, Upton et al.15 studying 1,447 couples in 1972 and 1,124 adults descendents in 1996, found that prevalence had doubled. In Melbourne, the prevalence of reported asthma increased for the 7 year-old subset from 19.1 to 46% between 1964 and 1990.16 Shaw et al.,17 studying adolescents in New Zealand observed an increase in the prevalence of reported asthma or wheezing from 26.2 to 34.0%, in the period from 1975 to 1989.

Asthma and socioeconomic conditions: the relationship between the two is not clear. According to Rona,18 there is not sufficient evidence to associate poverty as an etiologic factor in asthma. Nevertheless, the numbers of urgent cases, hospitalizations and deaths are linked to this variable. In Brazil relational studies have been contradictory and rare.

The objectives of this study were to: describe the current prevalence of asthma and its variants in schoolchildren from the city of Recife, to compare prevalence for the periods 1994-1995 and 2002, to analyze any relationship with the extent of maternal education and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the annual prevalence of wheezing as an indicator of asthma.

 

Method

A population-based, cross-sectional study was performed in Recife with adolescents de 13 and 14 years of age, composed of two surveys, one in 1994-95 and the other in 2002.

Recife is a coastal city in the Northeast of Brazil, with an area of 2,200 km2 and 1,296,996 inhabitants, of whom 48% are poor (per capita income less than half a minimum national wage). The average temperature is 25.3 ºC, varying from 23.2 to 26.5 ºC. Humidity is between 72 and 86%.19 The metropolitan region produces the following air pollutants monthly: 1,000 tons of airborne particles, 351 tons of sulphur dioxide, 45 tons of nitrous oxide, 33 tons of hydrocarbons and 336 tons of carbon monoxide.20 According to the IBGE 2000 census, 40.8% of the inhabitants of Recife aged more than 20 years had not completed four years' schooling.21

Both the sample of schoolchildren from 1994-95 and that from 2002 were selected in a probabilistic manner. The Recife Municipal Education Authority provided the seventh and eighth grade roll (in which grades students aged 13-14 years are to be found), according to type — public (state, municipal, federal) and private, with the number of students in these grades per school. Lots were drawn in such a manner as to preserve distribution by type. Schools with less than 10 students were excluded and those with large numbers participated with a maximum of 200 schoolchildren.

For the sample size calculation, initial asthma prevalence was assumed to be 20%, with an annual increase or decrease of 0.5%, a power of 80% and significance level of 5%, resulting in a requirement for 1967 subjects per survey, although in the event an attempt was made to obtain 3,000 schoolchildren per survey, as specified by the ISAAC project.

The instrument employed had been developed for the ISAAC project, using closed responses, designed for auto-administration by the students and previously validated in São Paulo.22 The only changes made to this instrument were: 1. Add the degree of maternal education item. 2. Where the original questionnaire referred to "wheezing", this was translated as: chiado no peito (cansaço, sibilos, piado) [roughly translated, "wheezes in chest (fatigue, whistling, crackling)"], since it is common to refer to episodes of asthma as "fatigue" in our locale.

Both surveys were entered onto their databases using double-input. Statistical analysis was performed with Epi Info 2002 and Win Episcope 2.0. Pearson's association chi-square and chi-square for tendencies were used. Significance cutoff was set at 5%. For the diagnostic accuracy evaluation, tests of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and the Youden index were used with 95% confidence intervals.

Each school principal signed a free and informed consent form before inclusion in the study. The study was approved by the IMIP Committee for Ethics in Research.

 

Results

In 1994-95, 97.6% of the questionnaires were returned and 100% in 2002. On both occasions one private school refused to take part and was excluded from the sample.

The proportion of public schools had increased between the two surveys. In 1994-95 this figure was 65% and in 2002 it was 74.6% (p < 0.001).

In 1994-95 1,656 13 year-old students and 1,431 14 year-old students were studied, making a total of 3,086 schoolchildren. Of these 1,392 (45.1%) were male and 1,694 (54.9%) female. In 2002, 1,428 of the 2,774 questionnaires were from 13 year-olds and 1,346 from 14 year-olds. Distribution by sex was similar: 1,238 (44.6%) males and 1,536 (55.4%) females.

The distribution of maternal educational level is shown in Figure 1. There was a significant reduction in the level of maternal schooling in the 2002 survey (p < 0.001). The level of illiteracy was 7.2 and 10.7% for the two occasions, respectively. Basic elementary school had not been completed by 32.3 as against 46.2%, respectively.

 

 

In Table 1 the cumulative annual prevalence of wheezing can be observed. There was no significant difference in prevalence between 1994-95 and 2002 in either variable, even when grouped or stratified by sex.

The annual prevalence of night cough and exercise triggered wheezing can also be seen in Table 1. There was a significant increase in night cough in 2002 (31 versus 38%, Pearson's chi-square, p < 0.001). In a similar manner the prevalence of wheezing triggered by exercise increased from 20.6% in 1994-95 to 23.8% in 2002.

The cumulative reported prevalence of asthma (Table 2) was 21% in 1994-95 and 18.2% in 2002. There was a significant reduction in prevalence, when the two periods were compared. The first survey revealed a male predominance (Pearson's chi-square, p < 0.001), in contrast with 2002 (Pearson's chi-square, p < 0.918). Taking the values by type of school, it is observed that the prevalence at public schools had dropped from 24.8 to 15% and at the private schools had risen from 16.1 to 28.9% (p < 0.001 in both cases). A similar pattern is seen for both sexes in this cut.

The annual frequency of episodes of wheezing is listed in Table 3. Comparing the up to three crises subset with the four or more crises group, it is observed that the percentage in the larger number of crises group was significantly greater in 1994-95, when compared with 2002 (Pearson's chi-square, p < 0.001).

Table 3 also details annual frequency of wheezing crises with lost sleep or difficulty speaking. Taking both sexes, the frequency of wheezing affecting sleep was significantly greater in 1994-95 (Pearson's chi-square, p = 0.004), in contrast with crises compromising speech which was at 4.8% on the first occasion and 4.1% in 2002 (no significant difference).

Looking at the reported cumulative asthma prevalence in terms of maternal education (Table 4), a significant tendency to greater frequency was observed in the categories with more schooling, both in 1994-95 and in 2002. The annual prevalence of wheezing by maternal education presented in a similar manner (Table 4). Taking the number of wheezing crises per year by level of maternal education (Table 4), a significant trend to exhibit four or more crises was observed the more educated the mother during the 1994-95 survey. This trend was not found in 2002.

In table 5 the number of wheezing crises per year that disturbed sleep or compromised speech is shown by maternal education. There were no observed tendencies linking the two variables in either 1994-95 or 2002.

 

 

The association between annual wheezing and reported asthma can be observed in Table 6. For both the reported cumulative asthma prevalence of 21% in 1994-95, and that of 18.2% in 2002, observed sensitivity and positive predictive values are low and specificity and negative predictive value are high for the annual wheezing prevalence. The Youden index was low for both surveys.

 

Discussion

The cumulative prevalence of reported asthma in Recife was elevated in both surveys. In phase 1 of ISAAC, Brazil was eighth in the ranking out of 56 countries studied. Five Brazilian state capitals were included in phase one, of these Recife exhibited the second greatest prevalence.23 In Latin America, variations in prevalence were related with climatic conditions. Hot and humid climates (characteristics that Recife has) are associated with greater prevalence.24

The reduction in asthma prevalence reported in Recife differs from international studies,10,11,15-17 in which the opposite has occurred. In Brazil results are divergent. Fiore et al.25 analyzing schoolchildren in Porto Alegre, found an increase in the prevalence of the symptoms of asthma and atopic disease. Wandalsen26, studying pupils in São Paulo in 1995 and 1999, found an increase in the reported asthma prevalence. Also in São Paulo, another survey found that the reported asthma prevalence among adolescents had not increased in a 3-year period.27 The reduced prevalence in Recife could be attributed to the increase in the proportion of public schools where the poorest students are concentrated. These findings are in agreement with those of Chew et al.,28 who related higher socioeconomic status with greater prevalence in Thai schoolchildren.

The increase in reported asthma prevalence found in other locations may be the result of an information bias. Doctors who are more alert to a particular problem tend to diagnose more cases.29 One possible factor to be taken into account in Recife is underdiagnosis. In a survey of one English city the lower socioeconomic strata were observed to have a tendency towards underdiagnosis.30

With respect of prevalence differences between the sexes, the first survey found that the majority of asthmatics were male adolescents and in 2002 the preponderance was female. There is no obvious justification for these findings. International and national surveys conflict.23,27,31

With reference to the prevalence of dyspnea and wheezing having been twice that of reported asthma, one could reflect that, firstly, other conditions may be causing the symptom, such as recurrent viral or parasitic infections, eosinophilic syndromes, and others. Additionally, asthma may be underreported. Siersted et al.32 observed underdiagnosis in 1/3 of cases among schoolchildren in Denmark, and in 2/3 of those who were not diagnosed, doctors were not informed of the symptoms.

Comparing annual wheezing (less subject do recall bias) and reported asthma, low sensitivity, low positive predictive value and low Youden index were observed. Specificity and negative predictive value were, however, elevated.33 In general, the accuracy of a measure is tested against a gold standard. In the absence of such, clinical history is sufficient for an epidemiological diagnosis of asthma.33 Nevertheless, this review only covered studies in the English, German, Danish and Italian languages. This being the case, their conclusions are not applicable to Portuguese-speaking countries. Using a subset of 209 schoolchildren subjected to pulmonary function tests, Camelo-Nunes et al.27 also found a low level of accuracy for diagnosis by symptoms.

The increase in the prevalence of nocturnal cough in 2002 is in contrast with the reduction in reported asthma. It is possible that in Recife, where respiratory infections (which present with coughing) are common, this question has not been precise enough as the central committee for ISAAC itself points out.23

For epidemiological purposes, exercise challenge tests are questionable for the diagnosis of exercise-induced asthma.35 Comparing the responses to the ISAAC questionnaires with bronchial hyperresponsivity from exercise, Ponsonby et al.36 found that, in Tasmanian children, sensitivity and specificity were 60 and 77%, respectively, and concluded that the questionnaire was accurate. In the current study this variable also altered differently from reported asthma.

Frequent and severe crises indicate the need for long term pharmacotherapy.1-4 Both the number of students suffering frequent wheezing episodes (four crises or more) and episodes disturbing sleep reduced in proportion with reported asthma. The prevalence of crises that interfered with speech, however, did not change over time. It is possible that the severity of the disease has altered, with severe crises (affecting speech) having grown in proportion. The study design, however, does not allow this question to be studied in depth.

In contrast to the reported asthma prevalence, maternal education was not related to asthma severity, as has been observed by several authors.10,28,37-40 There is no explanation for the finding. According to Rona,18 poverty is not a risk factor for the appearance of asthma, but an aggravating factor. With respect of what has been observed in Recife, it is possible that asthma really is more prevalent among children and adolescents from families in better socioeconomic conditions, as was observed by Chew et al.28 Another aspect to be taken into consideration is underdiagnosis being more common among individuals in worse socioeconomic conditions.30 A third factor could be the presence of other determinants other than atopic disease in poor communities. Faniran et al.41 studied children from 8 to 11 years old in Ojo (Nigeria) and in Sidney (Australia) and found that wheezing and coughing were more prevalent in Nigeria, but that there were no significant differences in terms of atopic disease. The findings obtained in Recife are in agreement with the hygiene theory.1 That is, adolescents of a lower socio-economic level would have had, at an early age, more contact with infectious agents, making them less susceptible to atopic disease. One could also, however, make the interpretation that asthmatics miss school more often, as observed in the United States in 1994-95,42 and this absenteeism would be more common among the poor, the results therefore reflecting less asthmatics than expected. The complexity of defining socioeconomic status should also be taken into account, and maternal schooling, while being associated with the nutritional status of children from the Northeast of Brazil,43,44 may not be sufficiently accurate when used as a single indicator.

Further limitations: in Brazil a significant proportion of children do not attend school. The sample is not, therefore, representative of the city's children. Furthermore, video-questionnaires were not used in the surveys in Recife, which could possibly have improved the quality of the responses.

Summing up, this study offers new and relevant insights into the high prevalence of asthma in our region, alerting health planners to prioritize resources for its control and clinicians to be more aware of the problem.

 

References

1. National Institute of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Global initiative for asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. NHLBI/WHO workshop report. Bethesda: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002.        [ Links ]

2. Warner JO, Niejens HJ, Landau LI, Jones K, Asher MI, Rachelefski GS, et al. Asthma: a follow up statement from an international paediatric asthma consensus group. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67:240-9.        [ Links ]

3. Warner JO, Naspitz CK, Cropp GJA. Third international pediatric consensus statement on the management of childhood asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998;25:1-17.        [ Links ]

4. Pereira CAC, Naspitz C, Sole D, Cruz A, Fernandes ALG, Marques FE, et al. II Consenso Brasileiro de Manejo da Asma. J Pneumol. 1998;24:171-276.        [ Links ]

5. ISAAC Steering Committee. Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjuntivitis and atopic eczema: ISAAC. Lancet. 1998;351:1225-32.        [ Links ]

6. Sole D, Yamada E, Vana AT, Werneck G, Solano de Freitas L, Sologuren MJ, et al. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): prevalence of asthma and asthma-related symptoms among Brazilian schoolchildren. J Investigat Allergol Clin Immunol. 200;111:123-8.        [ Links ]

7. Britto MCA, Bezerra PGM, Ferreira OS, Maranhão ICV, Trigueiro GA. Asthma prevalence in school children in a city of Northeast of Brazil. Ann Trop Paed. 2000;20:95-100.        [ Links ]

8. Chatkin M. Prevalência e fatores de risco para asma nas crianças da coorte de 1993, Pelotas, RS [dissertação]. Pelotas: Universidade Federal de Pelotas; 1999.        [ Links ]

9. Taylor WR, Newacheck PW. Impact of childhood asthma on health. Pediatrics. 1992;90:657-62.        [ Links ]

10. Sologuren MJJ, Silveira HL, Calil Jr JA. Associação entre asma, rinite alérgica e eczema, utilizando-se o protocolo ISAAC. R Bras Alergol Imunopatol. 2000;23:111-7.        [ Links ]

11. Camargos PAM, Castro RM, Feldman JS. Prevalence of symptoms related to asthma among schoolchildren in Campos Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Pan Salud Publ. 1999;6:8-15.        [ Links ]

12. Werneck G, Ruiz S, Hart R, White M, Romieu I. Prevalence of asthma and other childhood allergies in Brazilian schoolchildren. J Asthma. 1999;36:677-90.        [ Links ]

13. Gergen PJ, Mullally DI, Evans R. National survey of prevalence of asthma among children in the United States, 1976 to 1980. Pediatrics. 1988;81:1-7.        [ Links ]

14. Burney PGJ, Chinn S, Rona RJ. Has the prevalence of asthma increased in children? Evidence from the national study of health and growth 1973-86. BMJ. 1990;300:1306-10.        [ Links ]

15. Upton MN, McConnachie A, McSharry C, Hart CL, Smith GD, Gillis CR, et al. Intergenerational 20 year trends in the prevalence of asthma and hay fever in adults: the Midspan family study surveys of parents and offspring. BMJ. 2000;321:88-92.        [ Links ]

16. Robertson CF, Bishop J, Sennhauser FH, Mallol J. International comparison of asthma prevalence in children: Australia, Switzerland, Chile. Pediat Pulmonol. 1993;16:219-26.        [ Links ]

17. Shaw RA, Crane J, O'Donnell TV, Porteous LE, Coleman ED. Increasing asthma prevalence in a rural New Zealand adolescent population: 1975-89. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65:1319-23.        [ Links ]

18. Rona RJ. Asthma and poverty. Thorax. 2000;55:239-44.        [ Links ]

19. Prefeitura da Cidade do Recife. Secretaria de Planejameneto urbano e ambiental. Situação econômica e Social do Recife. Recife; 1993.        [ Links ]

20. CPRH - Companhia pernambucana de controle da poluição ambiental e de administração de recursos hídricos. Estimativa de emissões de poluentes atmosféricos provenientes de fontes estacionárias. Área de estudo: região metropolitana do Recife. Recife; 1994.        [ Links ]

21. IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo brasileiro, 2000. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br.        [ Links ]

22. Sole D, Vanna AT, Yamada E, Rizzo MC, Naspitz CK. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) written questionnaire: validation of the asthma component among Brazilian children. J Investigat Allergol Clin Immunol. 1998;8:376-82.        [ Links ]

23. ISAAC Steering Committee. Worldwide variations in prevalence of asthma symptoms: the International Study of Asthma, and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Eur Respir J. 1998;12:315-35.        [ Links ]

24. Mallol J, Solé D, Asher I, Clayton T, Stein R, Soto-Quiroz M, on behalf of the Latin American ISAAC Collaborators. Prevalence of asthma symptoms in Latin America: The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Pediat Pulmonol. 2000;30:349-54.        [ Links ]

25. Fiore RW, Comparsi AB, Reck CL, Oliveira JK, Pampanelli KB, Fritscher CC. Variação na prevalência de asma e atopia em um grupo de escolares de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul. J Pneumol. 2001;27:237-42.        [ Links ]

26. Wandalsen G. Prevalência e fatores de risco para asma e doenças alérgicas em escolares da região centro-sul do município de São Paulo. São Paulo [dissertação]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2003.        [ Links ]

27. Camelo-Nunes IC, Wandalsen GF, Melo KC, Naspitz CK, Sole D. Prevalência de asma e de sintomas relacionados entre escolares de São Paulo, Brasil: 1996 a 1999 — Estudo da reatividade brônquica entre adolescentes asmáticos e não asmáticos — International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Rev Bras Alerg Imunopatol. 2001;24:77-89.        [ Links ]

28. Chew FT, Goh DYT, Lee BW. Under-recognition of childhood asthma in Singapore: evidence from a questionnaire survey. Ann Trop Paed. 1999;19:83-91.        [ Links ]

29. Magnus P, Jaakkola JJK. Secular trend in the occurrence of asthma among children and young adults: critical appraisal of repeated cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 1997;314:1795-99.        [ Links ]

30. Kwong GNM, Das C, Proctor AR, Whyte MK, Primhak RA. Diagnostic and treatment behaviour in children with chronic respiratory symptoms: relationship with socioeconomic factors. Thorax. 2002;57:701-4.        [ Links ]

31. Venn A, Lewis S, Cooper M, Hill J, Britton J. Questionnaire study of effect of sex and age on the prevalence of wheeze and asthma in adolescence. BMJ. 1998;316:1945-6.        [ Links ]

32. Siersted HC, Mostgaard G, Hyldebrandt N, Hansen HS, Boldsen J, Oxhoj H. Interrelationships between diagnosed asthma, asthma-like symptoms, and abnormal airway behaviour in adolescence: the Odense Schoolchild Study. Thorax. 1996;51:503-9.        [ Links ]

33. Pekkanen J, Pearce N. Defining asthma in epidemiological studies. Eur Respir J. 1999;14:951-7.        [ Links ]

34. Powell CV, White RD, Primhak RA. Longitudinal study of free running exercise challenge: reproducibility. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74:108-14.         [ Links ]

35. Ponsonby AL, Couper D, Dwyer T, Carmichael A, Wood-Baker R. Exercise-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness and parental ISAAC questionnaire responses. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:1356-62.        [ Links ]

36. Burr ML, Verrall C, Kaur B. Social deprivation and asthma. Respir Med. 1997;91:63-8.        [ Links ]

37. Gottlieb DJ, Beiser AS, O'Connor GT. Poverty, race, and medication use are correlates of asthma hospitalization rates. A small area analysis in Boston. Chest. 1995;108:28-35.        [ Links ]

38. Mielck A, Reitmeir P, Wjst M. Severity of childhood asthma by socioeconomic status. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:388-93.        [ Links ]

39. Watson JP, Cowen P, Lewis RA. The relationship between asthma admission rates, routes of admission, and socioeconomic deprivation. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:2087-93.        [ Links ]

40. Faniran AO, Peat JK, Woolcock AJ. Prevalence of atopy, asthma symptoms and diagnosis, and the management of asthma: comparison of an afluent and a non-afluent country. Thorax. 1999;54:606-10.        [ Links ]

41. Newcheck PW, Halfon N. Prevalence, impact and trends in childhood disability due to asthma. Arch Pediat Adolesc Med. 2000;154:287-93.        [ Links ]

42. Benício MHA, Latorre MRDO, Rosa TE, Nazario CL, Monteiro CA. Modelos estatísticos de predição da prevalência da desnutrição infantil: desenvolvimento e aplicação para o conjunto dos municípios brasileiros. Relatório Técnico; 1995.        [ Links ]

43. Rissin A. Desnutrição em crianças menores de cinco anos no Estado de Pernambuco: uma análise de relações causais hierarquizadas [tese]. Recife: Departamento de Nutrição da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2003.        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to
Murilo C. A. de Britto
Instituto Materno-Infantil de Pernambuco (IMIP)
Rua dos Coelhos, 300
CEP 50070-550 - Recife, PE
Brazil
Phone: +55 (81) 9971.6424 Fax: +55 (81) 2122.4122
E-mail:murilo.britto@bol.com.br

Manuscript received Dec 02 2003, accepted for publication Jun 02 2004.