SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.84 issue6The Brazilian CARS: a standardized screening tool for autismAssessment of the behavior of children in painful situations: literature review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Jornal de Pediatria

Print version ISSN 0021-7557

J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) vol.84 no.6 Porto Alegre Nov./Dec. 2008

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0021-75572008000700002 

en_v84n6a02

EDITORIAL

 

Asthma in early life: is the hygiene hypothesis correct?

 

 

Scott T. WeissI

IMD, MS. Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Director, Center for Genomic Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Director, Program in Bioinformatics, Boston, MA, USA. Associate director, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence

 

 

Since the original studies in the late 1980's there have been literally hundreds of birth cohort studies that have purported to document the role of respiratory infection and genetic susceptibility in the development of early life asthma, including the paper in this issue looking at wheezing in southern Brazil and explain the results based on the hygiene hypothesis.1

As originally formulated by Strachan, the hygiene hypothesis suggested that younger siblings had less hay fever than their older siblings because they had more frequent infections and hence less allergy.2 Von Mutius, and others have popularized this hypothesis, as the explanation for the asthma epidemic.3 In my view, there is substantial contradictory data to suggest that both the hygiene hypothesis itself, and its ability to explain the asthma epidemic are not correct.

- Point 1: Although there is an ecologic relationship between the decline in all infections and the rise of T helper 2 (Th2) diseases, the hygiene hypothesis does not explain why T helper 1 (Th1) autoimmune diseases have increased over the same time frame as the Th2 diseases.
- Point 2: As pointed out by Platts-Mills, and others, the decline in infections diseases is a result of antibiotics, better housing, better water, and this decline antedated by many years the epidemic of both Th1 and Th2 autoimmune diseases.4
- Point 3: There is ample evidence that the lungs of children susceptible to both asthma and respiratory infection are abnormal BEFORE any infection occurs. Thus, lung damage is not simply the result of the infectious process.5,6
- Point 4: There is no evidence that there has been any real decrease in the number, incidence, or type of viral respiratory infections over the 30-year period that asthma prevalence has risen.
- Point 5: All of the phenomenon of the autoimmune disease epidemic could be explained by a factor that has been changing over the 40-year period that autoimmune disease has increased, which could be associated with infection occurrence and with both Th1 and Th2 autoimmune disease.
- Point 6: The hygiene hypothesis cannot explain the high rates of asthma among the urban poor in the USA and other industrialized countries.
- Point 7: The hygiene hypothesis cannot really explain the association of the asthma epidemic with industrialization and the urban rural gradient in disease risk.

In my view, vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women and their offspring is the likely explanation for most of what we have seen in the rise in early life asthma incidence and prevalence.7-10 It explains the association with infection because vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased occurrence and severity of infection. It explains why the lungs are abnormal before infection because in animal models of vitamin D deficiency lung development is abnormal. It explains urban-rural and black-white differences in asthma prevalence and the differences in prevalence between industrialized and rural countries because these trends mirror the epidemiologic trends in vitamin D deficiency. Trends that have been exacerbated by the elimination of cod liver oil supplementation during pregnancy and early childhood, by greater time spent indoors, and by increased use of sunscreen.

What is needed to test the hypothesis that the real cause of the asthma epidemic is vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women and their offspring, not changes in infection rates? First, observational studies with careful measurement of exposure are necessary. To do this food frequency questionnaires, sun exposure questionnaires, and vitamin D levels need to be performed in birth cohort studies and in follow-up of children. It is likely given that close to 70% of all pregnant women are vitamin D deficient, that these observational studies may have a considerable null bias. Ultimately randomized controlled trials of immune sufficient doses of vitamin D given to pregnant women compared to multivitamins will be necessary to test this hypothesis. Trials such as this are currently under design in various places worldwide and we await their results with interest.

 

References

1. Chong Neto HJ, Rosario NA, Grupo EISL Curitiba (Estudio Internacional de Sibilancias en Lactantes). Risk factors for wheezing in the first year of life. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84:495-502.         [ Links ]

2. Strachan DP. Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ. 1989;299:1259-60.         [ Links ]

3. von Mutius E. Pro: the increase in asthma can be ascribed to cleanliness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:1106-7; discussion 1108-9.         [ Links ]

4. Platts-Mills TA, Woodfolk JA, Sporik RB. Con: the increase in asthma cannot be ascribed to cleanliness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1106-7; discussion 1108-9.         [ Links ]

5. Hanrahan JP, Tager IB, Segal MR, Tosteson TD, Castile RG, Van Vunakis H, et al. The effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on early infant lung function. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145:1129-35.         [ Links ]

6. Tager IB, Hanrahan JP, Tosteson TD, Castile RG, Brown RW, Weiss ST, et al. Lung function, pre- and post-natal smoke exposure, and wheezing in the first year of life. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:811-7.         [ Links ]

7. Litonjua AA, Weiss ST. Is vitamin D deficiency to blame for the asthma epidemic? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:1031-5.         [ Links ]

8. Weiss ST, Litonjua AA. Maternal diet vs lack of exposure to sunlight as the cause of the epidemic of asthma, allergies and other autoimmune diseases. Thorax. 2007;62:746-8.         [ Links ]

9. Devereux G, Litonjua AA, Turner SW, Craig LC, McNeill G, Martindale S, et al. Maternal vitamin D intake during pregnancy and early childhood wheezing. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:853-9.         [ Links ]

10. Camargo CA Jr, Rifas-Shiman SL, Litonjua AA, Rich-Edwards JW, Weiss ST, Gold DR, et al. Maternal intake of vitamin D during pregnancy and risk of recurrent wheeze in children at 3 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:788-95.         [ Links ] en_v84n6a02

 

 

Correspondence:
Scott T. Weiss
Email: scott.weiss@channing.harvard.edu

 

 

No conflicts of interest declared concerning the publication of this editorial.
Suggested citation: Weiss ST. Asthma in early life: is the hygiene hypothesis correct? J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84(6):475-476.